TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

HSE report recommends ‘closer State monitoring’ of dioceses

The HSE’s Diocesan Audit Report of the safeguarding arrangements in the Catholic Diocese in Ireland was published this afternoon.

Image: Lewis Stickley/Press Association Images

AN AUDIT BY the Health Service Executive into safeguarding arrangements in the Catholic Church in Ireland has recommended that the State should monitor dioceses closely and apply its resources to intervene and work with all dioceses to address various shortcomings outlined in the report.

It advocates a “hands on” approach by the State until such a time that there has been a “substantial and demonstrable improvement in child protection practices across all dioceses”.

The publication of the Diocesan Audit Report, which was ordered by the late Brian Lenihan in 2006, has been broadly welcomed today.

The HSE examined 24 dioceses across Ireland, taking account of 579 allegations of child abuse in relation to 189 priests. Of the 189 priests, 39 were in Ministry at the time of the claims. In total, there were 31 criminal convictions.

Similar to other reports, the audit identified a number of historical poor practices, including failure to take precaution in relation to known offenders, lack of recognition of abuse as a serious criminal offence, a desire to protect reputation without recognising the paramount need to protect children and the removal of priests from parishes but not from direct contact with children.

It also noted the Church’s failure to understand the psychological damage resulting from abuse and its failure to educate priests about its impact.

“For too long consideration of reputation, livelihood and institutional damage were put before the rights of children,” said Gordon Jeyes, the National Director of Children & Family Services in the HSE. ”No institution, organisation or profession can ever again be allowed to put the protection of its own interests ahead of the protection of children. The reports like this Church Audit are important milestones in the journey towards a society that always puts children first.”

As a final part of the audit, in November 2011, the HSE reviewed the practices in place in each diocese against the seven standards for safeguarding children as set out in the Safeguarding Children: Standards and Guidance Document for the Catholic Church in Ireland.

The improvements made by the 24 dioceses in the recent past were recognised by Jeyes. However, he added that a number of dioceses still have “considerable improvements” to make, particularly in relation to data collection and record keeping.

Children’s Minister Frances Fitzgerald said she is “very pleased” that the audit is now in the public domain but is aware of it serving as a “very painful reminder to many victims of the abuse they suffered”.

In a statement, Fitzgerald said she believes that this audit, together with reports published in recent years in relation to the Diocese of Ferns, the Dublin Archdiocese, the Diocese of Cloyne, and the recent Church Safeguarding Board reviews, have contributed to a significant body of knowledge on the subject of clerical sexual abuse in Ireland and the ongoing initiatives and efforts to improve child protection practice in the Church. However, she added that she remains concerned by some aspects of the findings.

The focus must remain on addressing the need for ongoing improvements, she said. In some instances, dioceses had stated in their audit returns that they had reported all allegations promptly but the HSE then found that this was not the case.

“There is no room for complacency,” she continued. “While progress is welcome, ensuring implementation of best practice must remain an ongoing and continuing priority.”

Support group One in Four noted the good child protection polices and procedures in some dioceses but said the audit confirmed implementation continues to be “inconsistent and patchy”.

“While some dioceses have clearly absorbed the lessons of the sex abuse sandals, others continue to delay in making sure that children are safe,” commented executive director Maeve Lewis.

The HSE has acknowledged that the audit is limited because the information was submitted voluntarily and diocesan files were not examined. A number of discrepancies in figures and other details were apparent when compared with other reviews into safeguarding.

One in Four singled out one clarification. Lewis explained, “It is difficult to equate singling out the Diocese of Clonfert for particular praise in the HSE audit when Ian Elliot’s recent review concluded that the diocese did not even have a child protection policy in place as late as 2011.”

Other dioceses that were found to be performing well were Armagh, Waterford & Lismore, Elphin and Dublin. Kildare & Leighlin also proved examples of good practice, it said.

The HSE is currently working on part two of the report which involves a separate review of about 150 Religious Order/Congregations.

Connect provides free telephone based counselling and support at 1800 477 477. One in Four can be contacted at 01 662 4070.

Download the full report here>

Read next:

Comments (26 Comments)

  • A majority religious denomination that preaches and campaigns in relation to the morality of respectable people has to be monitored by the State regarding it’s responsibility for the protection of children from being raped, buggered and abused by it’s clerical members. Says it all really!

    Reply
  • “Various Shortcomings”? . I would call it something else, how about “Serious Shortcomings”

    Reply
  • Keep them away from Children full stop. Sex offenders and their enablers should not be left anywhere near vulnerable people.

    Reply
  • The state should have seized all Records from the Diocese in every jurisdiction and every school . Rather than allowing them the opportunity to mysteriously lose a lot of records. Not once did the courts in this country issue a seizure order for any religious records . This beggars belief and shows the justice department to be completely negligent. Every minister has a duty of care (A Tort) to the citizens of this state . The fact that the government did not act in the interests of the citizen and the victims with the full force of the law but instead through wilful inaction protected the hierarchy of the RCC and allowed many perpetrators of the most heinous crimes to escape justice means they failed in their duty of care. That is a crime. Probably the most hardest pill to swallow is that the government abdicated their responsibilities and permitted and still permits those institutions of the RCC to police themselves . The redress board set up under Bertie Aherns (awarded a papal knighthood)regime was supposed to compensate the victims of child abuse . The compensation was paltry and the whole process was a sham , the victims were bamboozled into signing a gagging order in order to protect the church and the perpetrators of child abuse . This in reality granted child rapists immunity from prosecution and permitted them to continue to be a threat to children and once again denied justice to the victims .

    Reply
  • Surely anyone who has children and is associated with the Catholic Church knows to mitigate against any risks at this point.

    Reply
  • Yes Liam I can tell by your twitter account that I was on the mark with your loyalties. Wonder would your religious brethren agree with you following of “girls in yoga thought yoga pants” . You should be more careful with your twitter account.

    Reply
    • Tight yoga pants

      Reply
    • ha ha ha! u spotted another Jesus freak

      Reply
    • Are you stalking me? I’m flattered that you would do a bit of cyber stalking but that says a lot about your weirdness. I’m not really sure what point you’re trying to make except you seem to have a lot of time on your hands, you’re obsessive and trollish and you seem to hate people of faith.
      I suppose that undermines everything you’ve said so far. Well done.

      Reply
    • Liam Fooley I’m not surprised you think child rape isn’t a crime . Thank you for admitting it so publicly. Your cards are well and truly marked . This has nothing to do with religion this has to do with justice. Justice for the thousands of victims of an evil and corrupt powerful organisation which also happens to be a state which facilitated and covered up the rape, torture and abuse of children internationally.
      I believe in the principles of the universal charter declaration of human rights . Rights which the Roman Catholic Church had violated .

      http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml

      Your reaction only strengthens my resolve to seek justice for the victims of child rape , torture, enslavement and other multiple abuses of human rights.

      You may think that child rape isn’t a crime but many of your catholic brethren in the USA have taken action to expose those perpetrators of those crimes in their church . Are they anti catholic because they seek justice?see

      http://www.bishopaccountability.org

      If you don’t want the public to see your twitter account then you should change
      Your security settings .

      Reply
  • Rhubarb Rhubarb

    Reply
  • Actually I get an email every time someone responds to my post. I wouldn’t insult the victims of clerical sex abuse by trying to impress you with
    Wit. You ran your flag up the post , everyone can see what you posted. Maybe I’ll come and visit your little library in Galway someday soon so we can discuss this like adults. I’ll promise not to violate your rights unlike the rights that the Vatican violated of many thousands of innocent victims. The simple fact is you are a conservative Roman Catholic who ardently supports a corrupt organisation that facilitated and covered up the rape , torture and abuse of children internationally. I on the other hand am an ex Roman Catholic who has been enlightened to their crimes. If I had my way I would have those who committed those crimes treated as Jesus suggested.

    Reply
    • ” and whoever may cause to stumble one of the little ones believing in me , better is it for him to have a millstone hanged around his neck and he hath been cast into the sea” mark 9:42

      Reply
  • The campaign for justice will continue for the victims and there will be a day in
    Court . Your opinions are invalid your arrogance is your weakness. You read all those books yet by your posts you don’t appear to comprehend the basic principles of Christianity and truth. You appear so wrapped up in your own ego and self righteousness that you have shown absolutely no compassion anywhere . You continue to defend the church and I’ll continue to defend its victims. I’ll not engage you through this post any longer for I have more important issues to deal with . However I do so hope I can meet you in person if your willing to accept of course . i don’t want to be labeled a stalker and I feel I maybe missing something , i suspect your not as nasty in person as you seem in your posts .
    . You can only judge what’s in a mans heart by holding his hand and looking him in the eyes. Until we meet I bid you adieu.

    Reply
  • Liam there’s no point arguing with a fool it only brings me down to your level. You are what you are. You made very public statements here and tried to defend the indefensible . You can try and wrangle out of it all you like by trying to transfer your guilt on to me. This is a typical tactic employed by abusers. The public will ultimately judge you by your posts and me by mine. I have nothing to be ashamed of unlike you . Justice for the victims of child abuse is all that’s important certainly not you and the corrupt organisation which you so ardently support.

    Reply
    • I stand by everything I said and I can say it in public. I don’t know what you mean by “trying to defend the indefensible” you can continue to say what you like about me here, it says a lot about how your mind works. You would never say in public what you said about me because you are a coward. You show no care for those who were abused, instead you troll this page. You should take some time out and work on your trolling skills though, you are getting very boring and predictable. Any chance you could come up with something more original or wittier? I wonder how long it will take you to check back here, you are probably clicking back every few minutes. It must be tough work trolling all day, from one page to another, from one site to another. To each his own I suppose.

      Reply
  • You clearly don’t understand the definition of troll nor do you have any sympathy for the victims of child abuse. You said it wasn’t a crime. You tried to defend the indefensible . I know
    Many victims personally and I understand fully the traits and Modis
    Operandi of clerical pedophiles and their protectors and your attitude is typical. I’m really concerned for the children in your community in Galway.

    Reply
  • Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? The HSE, considering their record in the last years is not in a position to judge anyone. More children have suffered and died under their custody in the last 10 years than in the last 100 in the care of the Church.

    Reply
    • Liam the state had the right to seize those records because criminal actions were facilitated and carried out by agents of a foreign state in this country. We as a citizens of a democratic society are entitled to be protected by the state and the law would have legally permitted seizing of those records. The only violation has been the rights of the victims ? The RCC in this country is a criminal organization which carried out the most heinous crimes against the most vulnerable.I would wager many more children died under the church’s “care” than you think.
      I can clearly see your loyalties lie with the the Vatican state and its agents and not with the thousands of victims which have suffered at their hands internationally.I don’t find it funny how you try to deflect attention away from that fact. If you love the vatican state so much go live there , for your loyalty is not to your fellow Irish citizen or to the victims of clerical abuse.

      Reply
    • No, you’re wrong. There was no crime. Funny how everyone becomes a solicitor when it comes to prejudice. Your guff about foreign states is typical of the hate that’s spewed out. Catholics are foreign. That is soooo 17th century. Tell you waht, if you really consider it a criminal organization start a campaign, see how far you get. Once you get into a courthouse you’ll see that light as you won’t be able to wear your tinfoil hat.

      Reply
  • Is that really the best you can do? You have no argument against what I said so you try ad hominem. It’s not even real ad hominem because it isn’t even true.
    Odd how you would use such a sensitive issue as child protection to troll. It shows that you have no interest in the issue, you use it as a cynical tool to get your jollies.
    I have nothing to hide so I don’t need to change security settings. I do find it interesting that you continue to stalk me and try and paint me as someone who either denies the reality of sex abuse or try to imply that I would be involved myself. It is truly the mark of someone who is unhinged. Have a nice day trolling. Some of us have greater contributions to society.

    Reply
  • You fit the perfect profile of a troll. An online “hard man,” being inflammatory and trying to shock. The profile of a troll as being someone with a disappointing life and needs some excitement fits you. You’re not one of the worst for sure, I doubt you have the originality. Trolls have a lot of time on their hands because they are too socially inept to have a life offline. Sound familiar?
    There you go again, implying that I am an abuser. That in itself shows that your interest in the subject is not for the victims but as a weapon against people you don’t like.

    Reply
  • Enda Kenny is horrified at allegations of child abuse.He only abuses the old,sick and unemployed.

    Reply

Add New Comment