TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 15 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

ECJ rules Spain’s eviction laws breach EU directive

The Spanish government has promised its law will now be “corrected” to comply with the ruling.

Protesters hold banners against evictions as they march along a street during a demonstration in Barcelona, Spain.
Protesters hold banners against evictions as they march along a street during a demonstration in Barcelona, Spain.
Image: Emilio Morenatti/AP

HOMEOWNERS AFFECTED BY Spain’s economic crisis and their defenders hailed a big step forward today after Europe’s top court ruled that the country’s eviction laws breached EU rules.

“There is no justice in Spain, but luckily there is in Europe,” said Delia Esther Molina, 57, an unemployed Cuban who is facing eviction, demonstrating outside the Spanish parliament.

The European Court of Justice (EDJ) ruled that Spanish legislation breached a EU consumer rights directive by preventing courts from halting evictions based on “unfair” mortgage agreements.

The Spanish government promised its law would be “corrected” to comply with the ruling.

The decision by the EU court in Luxembourg gave a fresh boost for a popular protest movement which last month persuaded the Spanish parliament to consider reforms to the eviction laws.

“We are very satisfied,” said Ada Colau, a spokeswoman for the Platform for Mortgage Victims (PAH), the organisation that brought that motion backed by 1.4 million signatures.

“This is a big step forward for what we have been campaigning for, over four very hard years,” since the worst of Spain’s financial crisis broke out, she said.

At the discretion of judges

The Barcelona judge who took the case to the European court, Jose Maria Fernandez Seijo, said that “from now on, any judge who detects abusive clauses can decide as a precaution not to evict the consumer” until he has decided whether the terms of the mortgage are fair.

Campaigners have accused banks of predatory lending during the Spanish construction boom that collapsed in 2008 and of misleading unwitting borrowers.

“I bought my house in 2005. I’m not highly literate, so they really fooled me,” said Jorge Teran, an Ecuadoran plumber who lost his job in 2008.

“If they had explained to me the interest rates and everything, I would never have signed.”

In a deep recession which has pushed unemployment to record highs of 26 percent, hundreds of thousands of people have defaulted on their loans and been evicted as the banks scramble to get their loans back.

Large number of evictions carried out

Spain’s top legal authority, the General Council of Judicial Power, says 415,000 eviction orders have been issued since 2008, including for second homes, land and commercial property. Some 60 percent of those evictions have been carried out.

In response to popular protests and a string of reported suicides of people facing eviction, Spain’s government in November passed a two-year moratorium on evictions – but campaigners insist it go further.

The activist’s bill calls for an end to evictions and for insolvent homeowners to be allowed to write off their debts by surrendering their home.

Under current Spanish law, a bank can pursue a mortgage holder to pay off the rest of a loan if the value of the seized property falls short.

“I want to be able to hand them my home and have them write off the debt,” said Molina. “I have nothing.”

The group also demands that empty properties held by Spanish banks be transformed into social housing.

Colau said Spain was an “anomaly” in Europe for the harshness of its eviction laws.

“The Spanish exception is over,” thanks to today’s ruling, she said.

Gonzalo Moliner, chairman of the judicial council, said the change required by the European ruling was “immediately applicable” in Spain.

The head of the Spanish consumers’ association Facua, Ruben Sanchez, called it “a turning point in relations between mortgage-holders and the banks”.

Beyond the EU court’s ruling, PAH activists now demand Spain enshrine the group’s demands in new legislation.

“They have to change the law, for all the people like me who were fooled,” said Teran.

- © AFP 2013.

Read next:

Comments (34 Comments)

  • I just downloaded the Judgment. The reasoning in the Judgment applies with equal legal force in Ireland. Traditionally in Ireland, property and mortgages fall outside the area of consumer protection and Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts.

    This will not apply to buy to let or commercial loans.

    Ireland transposed the EU Directive into domestic Irish law more restrictively than in some other EU countries but this Judgment offers legal potential in Ireland. It’s good news. It offers a potential line of challenge.

    Reply
  • Here we change all the rules to please banks why is that.

    Reply
    • Well we can’t change this court decision as EU Law supersedes Irish law.

      Reply
    • Ucanthandlethetruth

      Correction we don’t change the law. Politicians we elect change the law.

      I would suggest that come the next election people look back at the laws introduced by this Government and if they do not like them then they should vote for them out of office. Just like we voted the last Government out of office.

      Reply
  • Unfair, people may not have been able to understand the legal jargon or it was not explained properly to them.Wonder the same happen here?

    Reply
  • This could be good news for people in mortgage distress in Ireland. Banks must feel hamstung on what to do.Hope ecj doesnt just Note what our government did this week?

    Reply
  • Does the new legislation about house repossessions and mortgage reform now illegal after this ruling.

    Reply
    • @ Al S MacThomais, sadly no, but it gives an extra potential line of defence. I heard of this pending case about two months ago, that There would be a judgment but I had no expectation as to the outcome. I will study this Judgment tonight. It’s promising.

      Reply
  • Congratulations, you clearly read all the small print put in front of you.

    The problem with unfair terms is that the only become manifest when things go wrong.

    Reply
  • bigmac 15/03/13 #

    Its a great victory over the banks, the abusive practices refers to things like minimum interest rates hidden in the small print, using the justice system like a debt collection agency, evicting people selling the house at auction for a fraction of the debt and the person is stuck with the mortgage debt and they have to pay the vat on the auction sale

    Reply
  • As the Irish look on…

    Reply
  • The moratorium is been closed here, were going in the other direction, so expect loads of evictions and suicides how clever…

    Reply
    • @ De Badger, it’s a pity but the people can unify and gain collective strength through solidarity against the stupidity of repossessions as a supposed “solution”. The EU Judgment has the potential to equalise the conflict between the people and the banks.

      The idea that repossessions will save the Banks is laughable.

      Reply
  • Yes the ruling in the spanish case changes the game a lot, applies to all eu countries, Shatter will have to do a lot of thinking before he “plugs the hole” in the 2009 Act.

    Reply
  • phil 14/03/13 #

    What I don’t get about “unfair mortgage agreements” is why people signed them in the first place.

    Reply
    • Maybe they were never offered any fair ones. I don’t know too much about Spanish mortgages, but these sound a lot like the US “sub-prime” mortgages, themselves a bit if a disaster to all concerned.

      Reply
    • Yeah cause the contracts aren’t complicated legal baloney.

      Reply
    • Phil I think the point to remember here is the word ‘predatory’. Banks knew well in advance that the crash was comming but continued to lend and resell the debt into the bond markets as they got their profits through that process. The borrower was the pawn…always is. If you are largely unaffected by the downturn you wouldnt notice. If you were renting and on a low income and told you could buy a home by the banks ..right now you would.

      Reply
    • It is time for the bankers, judges, politicians, regulators, law makers, that are paid by the people to serve the people to recognise the simple fact that,
      if someone wants to buy a home as shelter for their family,
      and if they need a mortgage to assist them in buying it,
      all that they really need from their lending institution is a plain and simple,
      sustainable,
      stress tested,
      mortgage product to purchase it with.

      If banks cannot provide that one simple thing responsibly, sustainably and un-corruptly to the homebuyer
      then these banks should be immediately expelled from the mortgage market, prosecuted and have their mortgages nullified.
      In fact if all banks were expelled from the mortgage market permanently, maybe we would all have more affordable houses that we all respected a hell of a lot more.

      Just because an idiot greedy corrupt/criminal banker/vested interest corrupt/criminal valuer/vested interest corrupt/criminal stockbroker reckon a house/mortgage is
      worth 5 times its real value
      shouldn’t make a decent unknowing homeowners accountable for these conmen’s heinous acts.

      If these filthy institutions cannot serve their customers (the customers who pay their wages) then they should be put out of business permanently and prosecuted, fined and imprisoned as a deterrent.

      Reply
    • Its called a ponzi scheme, most of Europes banks were running it, they’ve pulled the rug out from under those who were “greedy” enough to want to put a roof over their familys head and now find themselves jobless and paying for the mess on two fronts. Capitolism for the poor and socialism for the rich.

      Reply
    • That’s strange.
      You get Noonan spouting rubbish like
      “tens of thousands of people/taxpayers must be vilified and have their homes repossessed as a deterrent against mortgage arrears”
      I say
      Throw the handfull of bankers (that broke the country) in jail for corrupt/criminal banking practices, instead Noonan.
      It will have a better effect.

      Don’t engage in another “Punish The Victim” hepatitis travesty Noonan!

      Reply
    • @ Ronan Stokes, exactly, the Great Mortgage Scam promoted by politicians, facilitated by the Central Bank of Ireland and feed by the greed for bonuses. It is an obscenity that repossession, evictions, are spoken about at all. The best penalty of the banks would be permanently to strip the Banks of the right to apply to Court for repossession.

      Reply

Add New Comment