TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Thursday 23 May, 2013

Dublin in top 10 most congested cities in Europe

Traffic congestion in the Irish capital was rated as worse than Leeds-Bradford, London, Stockholm and Hamburg.

Stock photo: traffic congestion in Bristol, UK
Stock photo: traffic congestion in Bristol, UK
Image: Tim Ireland/PA Archive/Press Association Images

DUBLIN IS AMONG the top 10 cities in Europe rated worst for traffic congestion, according to an index which monitors and analyses traffic in major urban centres.

The TomTom Congestion Index compares travel times during non-congested periods (free flow) with travel times in peak hours. During the period January – March 2012, the Irish capital was rated as more congested than Leeds-Bradford, London, Stockholm and Hamburg.

Warsaw was rated as the most congested city in Europe, with a 42 per cent congestion level.

1. Warsaw – 42 per cent congestion level

2. Marseille – 41 per cent

3. Rome – 34 per cent

4. Brussels – 34 per cent

5. Paris – 32 per cent

6. Dublin – 30 per cent

7. Leeds-Bradford – 28 per cent

8. London – 27 per cent

9. Stockholm – 27 per cent

10. Hamburg – 27 per cent

At the beginning of 2012, draft proposals for the development of Dublin city centre indicated that the capital was to become a more “pedestrian-friendly” area, with cars only a secondary priority.

The proposal to Dublin City Council stated that increasing congestion in the city centre made it essential to prioritise pedestrians and public transport over cars in the near future.

Read: Pedestrians to have priority over cars in new Dublin plan>

Read next:

Comments (55 Comments)

  • This is not a surprise to anyone :) Dublin’s answer to traffic congestion is 24hrs NO RIGHT TURN

    Reply
  • Until public transportation infrastructure is up to spec then we will continue to favour the car.

    Dublin is the only capital city in Europe whose airport isn’t serviced by a railway. Now I’m no trafficologist but I reckon a railway might in fact help taking cars, buses and taxis off the road and helping the thousands of people who pass through Dublin Airport everyday, some of which are biting their own hand when they realise that a taxi will cost them 60 euro to the city centre.

    Reply
    • How would an expensive rail link relieve congestion? It would have almost no effect on day to day traffic flows. Unfortunately, the problem is that bad planning and corruption have led to a city that is sprawling and makes building rail links unviable. Bus services are the solution but aren’t attractive to commuters because busses end up in the traffic snarl ups.

      BTW why would you pat 60e in a taxi when you get an AIrcoach or Dublin Bus service to the city centre (and beyond) for €7?

      Reply
    • I never paid €60 from the airport to central Dublin, €25-€30..

      Reply
    • Taxi from the rank on Dame St / O’Connell St to airport is €20 for up to 4 passengers. The caveat is that the drivers on the Gresham rank are most unpleasant.

      Metro to airport should go ahead.

      Reply
    • @Brian Daly

      Bus services can hardly be the solution if they end up being in traffic snarl ups now can they? You answered your own question.

      Time and time again railways are proven to be the most efficient way of travel. Relatively few delays and right of way at crossroads.

      So it really comes down to which you prefer. Plodding along in a coach or taxi that could take anywhere from 30 mins to 2 hours (depending on traffic) or 20 mins on a train everytime.

      Reply
    • Dublin does need an underground badly, They should have built it 20 years ago, 15,000 could be created during construction of metro north and Dart underground. The government should apply to the EU investment bank for funds to develop these projects.

      Reply
  • mmm….the shelving of the Dart expansion, including the city center underground, extension to Drogheda & Celbridge, the Metro North and West, New Luas lines…. and we one of the worst for traffic congestion …really…. any real surprise there.

    Over 25 years after the DART line was opened, we STILL have only one DART line, even though, the original plan (first proposed in 1974) was to have a city wide DART network. But no. Roads, roads and more roads. People must have a proper alternative to commuting than using the car and until you provide that, you will never, ever solve the problem of traffic congestion. Building more roads doesn’t solve it and as it doesn’t provide an alternative to the car.

    Rail, has been proven time, time again to be a superior form of transportation when it comes to moving people in, out and around urban areas. We must implement the Dublin Rail Plan, asap. It will create desperately needed jobs for the next several years and at the end of it, we will have a city wide high capacity, high quality rail network. If other cities all around the world can have it, why can’t we. What make us so different, that we can’t have one.

    Reply
    • It’s also an absolute disgrace that the airport of such a major city has no rail link, what must tourists make of spending an hour plus on a bus for such a short distance

      Reply
    • I would agree that not expanding the DART in 1984 to the other rail lines around Dublin e.g. Maynooth was a real mistake. It would have made a big difference. However, extending the DART to Drogheda/Dundalk is a red herring and a disservice to people in Dublin and those towns. The DART should be limited to the city “proper”. The folks in Drogheda, Mullingar etc would be better serviced by regional express trains.

      Metro North is a white elephant and the longer it stays on the drawing board the better. DART underground should be prioritised as it will be ultimately more beneficial to the city.

      Reply
    • I always thought metro west was a mad white elephant but I can’t agree with you on metro north, the north side and in particular the airport need a high speed mass transit system that is unaffected by traffic, building it and extending the DART to the airport should have happened years ago!

      Reply
  • That is impressive Ashlee, I think you managed the trifecta of racism, bigotry and xenophobia in one short post on a topic that was not even related to immigration.
    Our congestion stems from our Viking road layout, the lack of an underground and city planners attempts to force private road users on to public transport by reducing arteries into the city. Stockholm virtually has no rush hour. The underground there is faster than driving….

    Reply
    • Stockholm virtually has no rush hour??

      I live here and I can tell you that from my office window looking directly out onto the E4 just north of Karolinska sjukhuset, there’s very much a rush hour every morning and afternoon.
      It’s not too bad at the moment as pretty much the whole city is off to their country houses for the month of July.
      But yes, the T-Bana is faster than driving during morning and evening rush hours. Pendaltåg better still.

      Vi hörs.

      Reply
  • I’m guessing they never went to Galway??

    Reply
  • There is an upside to this: there are more people cycling around the city than I’ve ever seen before. Presumably traffic congestion is one of the factors pushing this. It’s great to be able to whizz past everyone on the bike and never get stuck in a traffic jam!

    Reply
  • oh and Ashlee, our country is not over populated. Aside from the fact we once had a population of 8 million and now only 4.8, we have massive outward migration that is not going to change anytime soon…

    Reply
    • Fagan's 10/07/12 #

      This history of Ireland in the last 100 years has been severe under-population, we have an exceptionally low population density.

      10 million people would fit on to this Island in even smaller urban space than now, with proper planning and good management.

      Reply
  • Actually I think it’s down to poor urban planning. Endless housing estates, low density sprawl. It makes it impossible to provide proper public transport because the densities are so low. We need to SERIOUSLY cut down on low density sprawl and start building up where the transport can be provided – e.g. along the proposed metro north line and the proposed 2nd DART line (Dart underground plan).

    Reply
    • Karswell 10/07/12 #

      I personally think the suburban sprawl that makes up the majority of Dublin is caused in part by our obsession with owning our homes. Many European cities have far larger urban areas, less suburban areas and populations where just over 50% rent rather than buy. Buyers are more likely to want the most for their money, so they will have a bias towards houses. Apartments provide convenience but are not “stand-alone”, so they are more attractive to tenants. Reform tenant’s rights and we could see a shift from suburban to urban, and so a reduction of road congestion.

      Reply
    • Suburban Dublin is urban, you mean more densely populated high rise buildings? Something Dublin councils seem to be afraid of.

      Reply
    • Karswell 10/07/12 #

      It works well enough on the continent. There shouldn’t be a need for people to sit in traffic for 90+ minutes to go from a residential suburb to their workplace in the city centre or in an office/industrial park. Higher buildings means shorter distances to travel so less need to travel by car and so less congestion. Suburb cities have huge drawbacks.

      Reply
    • I agree with you karswell, Dublin has to expand upwards to grow, it can no longer grow outwards, I lived in LA for 3 years and traffic is hell, im from London and live in central london, i could not sit in traffic for an hour +, Dublin councils need to realise this and start building high rise and an underground for the city, airport and suburbs.

      Reply
  • Dave 10/07/12 #

    Yet we have people like “Carrolls Paddywhackery” souvenir shops trying to dictate public transport policy for the city by telling lies about the cost of Metro North. Time to get with it folks…we need these things!

    Reply
  • Because the M50 is tolled just to cross the Liffey, people use the city centre to avoid paying. Lift the toll on the M50 and put a congestion charge in the city. Problem solved.

    Reply
  • Mjhint 10/07/12 #

    Single accupancy cars. Thats a huge problem in Ireland. Also no car pool facilities.

    Reply
  • corgarve 10/07/12 #

    @Simon. 8 million people included N. Ireland. If you take the current population of the island as a whole its currently approx 6.6 million. Still not over populated but you must compare like with like.

    Reply
    • Fagan's 10/07/12 #

      The Dutch have a country with a qtr of the land that we have, but a population of 17 million. They still a massive agricultural producer. Not that I think that we should aim to have 68mn people that a beermat calculation implies.

      Bangladesh is 2 times the size of Ireland, it has 150mn people living there. It must be hell tho.

      Belgium is a 1/3 of our size yet has 11 million people there. When you drive through it, it has less one off housing and building blight than we do.

      We could readily double the population here, and have a better organized society at same time.

      Reply
  • Sure it’s no surprise.
    Dublin seem to take years to build roads.

    Reply
  • Rob 10/07/12 #

    People voted yes to more cuts to investment in transport infrastructure. They will get what they deserve…

    Reply
    • Karswell 10/07/12 #

      Did they? When exactly did they vote for reduced infrastructure? If you mean the referendum, people voted for or against an amendment to the constitution. Nothing about reduced spending on infrastructure..

      Reply
    • Dave 10/07/12 #

      No they didnt Rob. FG promised delivery of both Metro North and DART underground to Dublin voters, then slapped them in the face as soon as they got in power.

      Reply
    • Rob 10/07/12 #

      Karswell,

      The referendum brings spending cuts of €5 billion – where do you think this money will come from? Hint: no new investment in infrastructure as a starting point.

      Reply
    • Karswell 10/07/12 #

      @ Rob : an old, tired argument. The yes result in the referendum did not force €5 billion in cuts. We have a public spending deficit. Anyone with a trace amount of common sense were aware that there would be cutbacks. The referendum result would not have changed that. The money trees were only fantasy, alas.

      Reply
  • Karswell 10/07/12 #

    Oh dear. Intentionally or unintentionally trolling? Want to blame out weather on “them immigrants” also?

    Reply
  • Why English cars in pic :(

    Reply
  • How can we be congested? Who has the money to run a car? All the taxi drivers are penniless and the buses do not run on time.

    Reply
  • 7. Lees-Bradford – 28 per cent, should that be Leeds Bradford, which are two separate cities

    Reply
    • But one economic area, they group themselves together whilst attempting to attract people and investment to the area as both are very close to one another and pretty small cities in comparison to others in the UK.

      Reply

Add New Comment