TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Election on the cards after Dutch budget talks collapse

The prime minister is expected to tender his resignation today but remain on as caretaker until elections later this year after discussions over an austerity budget collapsed over the weekend.

Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte could be on his bike (File photo)
Dutch prime minister Mark Rutte could be on his bike (File photo)
Image: ROB KEERIS/AP/Press Association Images

AN ELECTION IS likely to take place in the Netherlands later this year after discussions over an austerity budget collapsed over the weekend.

Leaders of the coalition parties in the Netherlands have been in negotiations for the last two months in an attempt to cut €16 billion from the national budget in order to meet deficit targets laid down by the EU.

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte admitted the talks had collapsed after his centre-right coalition, which has been in power since October 2010, failed to agree on budget adjustments with ally Geert Wilders who refused to do a deal.

The New York Times is reporting that Rutte will tender his resignation to the Queen today amid a clamour for elections which would most likely be held in September or October.

The Dutch finance minister has flown home from the International Monetary Fund meeting in Washington to discuss the issue saying he still plans to submit the 2013 budget to the EYU by the end of this month.

Jan Kees De Jager told De Telegraaf that the AAA-rated country has a reputation for fiscal prudence and discipline and he wants to keep it that way.

Reuters reports that the government must now seek support from opposition parties for budget cuts before calling a new election.

But the failure to agree austerity measures has already spooked the markets with borrowing costs rising and fears that one of the strongest eurozone economies could now be drawn into the debt crisis.

The talks broke down after the far-right Freedom Party walked out of the three party talks.

Its leader Wilders said, according to BBC News, that the austerity package will “will damage economic growth and… severely effect the spending power of many people, especially pensioners”.

His party has been renowned for its anti-Islamic stance although in recent months had focused on populist issues such as the eurozone crisis.

- additional reporting from AP

Read next:

Comments (21 Comments)

  • Wondering how long it will be for Standard & Poor to downgrade them.

    Reply
  • Dave 23/04/12 #

    Hate to say it, but the Dutch government have acted a bit like the French – Austerity for everyone except themselves. Perhaps they will now learn some modesty.

    Reply
  • The EU/ECB policy of installing firewalls to protect core European nations may yet prove to be another ill-advised policy.
    Mark Spitznagel, in a recent article, carries on the fire prevention analogy. He points out how US forestry services have learned the hard way that wildfires provide an essential element of the sustainable growth cycle and allowing the accumulation of deadwood ultimately results in more devastating fires.
    http://www.americanfuture.net/category/central-banks/

    Reply
  • About time. This coalition was doomed to fall sometime. I don’t see much change in the possible upcoming elections, however, still I’d most likely vote far left or Pirate.

    Anyone up for a laugh should check out the dutch “Party for the Animals” or “Partij voor de Dieren”.

    Reply
  • Roubini Global Economics RGE Economic Research Mar 27, 2012
    http://www.roubini.com/email/newsletter/analysis/172157.htm

    The Netherlands:
    “To compound the political uncertainty, the coalition parties are engaged in negotiations on how to allocate around €10 billion of new fiscal savings, following an €18 billion austerity budget agreed in September 2011, which parliament must ratify to meet the Netherlands’ budget deficit target of 3% of GDP in 2013. Pressure from the opposition to ease the pace of fiscal consolidation and alter budget deficit targets is, in many ways, legitimate, given the Dutch economy returned to recession in H2 2011, with a further contraction of 0.9% forecast for 2012 by the European Commission. However, with the Netherlands having been the most vocal European Council member in rejecting peripheral country requests for leniency in the pace of fiscal adjustment, it is now poorly placed to seek improved terms for itself. “

    Reply
  • This crisis was caused by demands from Brussels to reduce the budget deficit. It’s ~4.7%, I think which is pretty low by the standards of many European countries and it wouldn’t have been a disaster if the Dutch had been allowed to reduce it more gradually over a few years. Indeed, it would be good for Europe as a whole if those countries whose budget deficits aren’t so high didn’t engage in policies of austerity. They would keep on growing and this would help countries who are struggling with higher deficits.

    But….no. The doctrinaire hardliners in Brussels had to have their way and now this has happened. Lose-lose all round.

    Reply
  • PVV is not far right. Actually this party walked out after cuts that were prommised not to be taken during the election appeared on the agenda. OAPs being cut… but more contribution to Brussels?

    Reply
    • The PVV is a far-Right, islamaphobic and racist party that is routinely condemnded for its race-bating.

      Reply
    • Pvv is not racist. It is however antiislamic. Islam is not a race!

      Reply
    • Dave 23/04/12 #

      Yes they are a racist party. They do not merely confine their ire to Islam, but also have an issue with eastern Europeans and indeed most non Dutch groups in the Netherlands.

      Reply
    • They are racist. Their hate is not directed solely at Muslims, but everyone of Maroccan, Turkish, Egyptian, and other Middle Eastern cultures’ descent. Not to mention Eastern Europe and Asia.
      They are wholly comparable to the BNP.

      Reply
    • Dear Lord Conor! There is huge evidence on-line for the racist nature of the PVV .. just Google it! As Joost said they’re the NL equivalent (and allies of) the far-Right BNP in Britain.

      Reply
    • Being anti Islamic is not racist. They have legimate points about Islam. Sharia law is brutal and like something out of the dark ages.

      Reply
    • Conor, do you even bother to read what people post? The PVV is islamophobic, gedddit, i.e. anti-Islam. It is also profoundly racist, especially towards people of colour and people from Eastern Europe. They are the Dutch equivalent of the thugs in the BNP. Now do you understand?

      Reply
    • Desmond people from eastern Europe are Caucasian . Ie same race as the Dutch. There hardly racist against their own race! There focus is anti Islam ! Do u know what racist means?

      Reply
    • *sigh* Yes Conor, I do know what racism is, having fought it for most of my adult life. Alas, however, it seems you do not.

      Reply
    • To reiterate, Conor, there is no scientific definition for race; racism is as ambiguous a statement as anything, and could be applied to any number of ethnic and national backgrounds. Where Caucasian and African could be races, within the Caucasian races one could claim Slavs, Mediterraneans and Aryans are races, while Caribbean, North African and Subsaharan could be races within the African subset.

      In any case, you forgot to address the fact that the PVV is against all Arabian people. Not just Muslims. Let’s tick off the Surinamese, Arubans, Javans, Phillipinos, Indonesians, Indians, Chinese.
      The PVV doesn’t want any of them in the Netherlands. I hardly think you can ignore the fact that they’re complete racists.

      If you don’t like that word, let’s use xenophobes, discriminatory, prejudiced, bigots… take your pick, Conor.

      Reply

Add New Comment