TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

‘Fantasy budget’ survey shows Irish adults want child benefit means tested

Most Irish adults would introduce means testing for child benefit as well as a value-based property tax if they had control of this year’s Budget.

Image: 401(K) 2012 via Creative Commons/Flickr

IF IRISH ADULTS had control of this year’s Budget, most would introduce means testing for child benefit as well as a value based property tax, according to a newly released survey.

Coyne Research interviewed 1,000 Irish adults during the month of August, asking them a number of attitude questions aimed at examining what decisions they would make in this year’s Budget.

The survey found that more than half of respondents (52 per cent) questioned about the changes they would make to the 2013 Budget would choose to means test child benefit allowance. Meanwhile 15 per cent said they would cut unemployment benefit, and 14 per cent said they would slash rent allowance.

A further 9 per cent said they would cut lone parent allowance, while 9 per cent preferred to means test the old age pension or cut disability allowance.

The survey found that older age groups are more likely to choose to means test child benefit whilst younger age groups are more likely to cut unemployment benefit – as did more affluent socio-economic classes and those who do not have children.

Given a choice of options aimed at increasing the country’s income, 48 per cent of respondents said they would impose a property tax based on the value of a property.  Some 37 per cent said they would increase income tax by 1 per cent on each tax band for everyone, and 15 per cent favoured imposing a 1 per cent tax on all financial transactions.

Meanwhile, just under half of all Irish adults said they plan to decrease their spending in 2013, with 25 per cent of those planning to cut down on spending intending to decrease “a little” and 20 per cent “a lot”.

Only 1 in 8 Irish said they planned to increase expenditure, with those residing in Dublin showing a higher incidence of doing so.

Read: Government undecided on child benefit tax for wealthy>

Read next:

Comments (67 Comments)

  • Did they “survey” these “adults” as they walked into the dail?!

    Reply
    • 1000 people surveyed? They must’ve forgot to ring ” the ordinary people” that day. That survey sounds like government generated waffle to me.

      Reply
    • Ryan'O 05/09/12 #

      A really good sample of people 1000!

      Reply
    • Well said Darragh,never heard of Coyne if it were Red C or Landsdowne i might pay attention.Watch out for the usual government supportors, but a 1000 polled the majority agree with us said so we’re right.They agree with survey results when it suits,other times they agrue that polls are only a snapshot in time and meaningless.

      Reply
    • Hi Darragh, Ryan and Norman, thanks for your all comments. I’m delighted to see the survey is getting interest! Just to let you know the survey was not paid for by the government or anybody else. We are an independent Market Research company and ran the questions to generate some publicitiy as we are a new company just set up this year. This is why you haven’t heard of us yet! We did not give respondents a choice to choose none of the above or no cuts as it was designed to be a question focussing on the imagined situation of the Irish people having control of the budget and what they would choose to cut if they had to make a difficult decision. We use the same panel as all other research companies in Ireland (including RedC and Lansdowne) and the survey is of 1,000 people so it is statistically reliable and genuine. If you have any questions on the survey, just reply and we will get back to you asap!

      Reply
    • Hi Coyne research, I’d be interested in hearing how you chose your questions. Did you ask people whether they thought the budget for Dail expences should be cut? Or then senate abolished to make savings? Just generally give us an idea of why you chose the questions you did.

      Reply
    • @coyne . So the survey basically asked the doomsday question . To use an analogy , would you rather die by the chair or lethal injection and no option to say ” id rather live thank you ” .

      You are a new company looking for publicity :-) All i can say is that releasing from what i can see is a skewed poll to such an important question is not a good start. I’m sure Enda will hire you guys , he loves giving people no choice !!

      Reply
    • Hi Niall,
      As Cloyne Research has responded by saying, the survey asked respondents to choose from a limited number of options so they could try to draw meaningful conclusions from the research. I think the purpose of the survey was to find out how much support exists for each option that is likely to be considered in the real Budget in 2013.
      If respondents were given open-ended questions then there would be no way of gauging how popular/unpopular potential measures are – which wouldn’t be of as much interest, I think.
      Obviously we’d all like it if there were no cuts at all but, given that there will be, it’s a good idea to sound out how people feel – wouldn’t you agree?

      Reply
    • Hi Paul, thanks for your question. The list of options used was compiled after reading through a mix of media reports and online chatter on potential budget cuts that would impact the Irish population. Abolition of the senate or cutting TD’s expenses did not fall under this remit – i.e. they would not impact on the general public. The objective was to see which option was the best of a bad lot.

      @Niall, I understand your analogy but we did want to keep the research realistic. Unfortunate as it is, it seems that there will be cuts like those researched which will be implemented in the next budget. The objective was to get an idea of the ordinary person’s choices if they had control.

      Reply
    • Coyne research I think it irresponsible to cause controversy in order to gain publicity for yourselves. The reporting of the story is misleading and that may be due to the author and not yourselves. The survey is described above as the Irish adult’s ‘fantasy budget’ and ‘the imagined situation of the Irish people having control of the budget and what they would choose to cut’. It was based though on decisions the government is making and merely a survey on the respondents attitudes towards those decisions.

      Reply
  • I know I’m gonna get crucified for this but…… The amount of non Irish nationals claiming SW is unreal! Why don’t they introduce a system/law where if a non national has not worked for more than a year, they are sent home!? I know this seems harsh, but, didn’t they all come over here on the promise of work. When they did work, they were sending the money home. The money earned was not being spent in this country, surely this attributed to our situation in some way… However small.
    I work with a polish chap who quite happily told me that if they intended to come here or the uk for work, they are offered classes over in Poland to show them how to get the most of of the benefit system here.
    I’m not nationalist, racist or any other ist, I just feel that if they were sent home it would ease the burden on the taxpayer and the system a great deal.
    One last rant…. If the child benefit is means tested a lot of honest people will lose out, I work, my partner doesn’t, we have a 7yr old and one on the way in march, I am on basic wage, pulling in approx 360 a week, Because I work we get risible if not no payment from the SW, rent allowance is a joke. Our monthly child benefit is a great help as it enables us to get uniforms for the boy and clothing as he is ever growing, that’s what it was intended for and if it’s cut then it will only make it harder for families like us who take the honest route as far as the social is concerned.

    Now let the crucifixion about my first rant commence.

    Reply
    • Couple of things wrong with your comment,but i’ll only enlighten you on one.As a member of the EU we signed up to free movement of all citizens of the EU.You have the right like any other citizen in the EU to seek work and a life in any other EU country.BTW under rules brought in the last couple of years,you must have paid into the SW system for a minimum of 2 years before you can claim,this applies to all except Irish nationals and aslyum seekers.

      Reply
    • Just in regard to the child allowance I don’t think there would be any question of you not recieving it. The figure Joan Burton had in mind was 100,000 euro cut off.

      Reply
    • Damocles 05/09/12 #

      Sounds great, aside from the EU issue would that mean that non-nationals wouldn’t have to pay PRSI? Would that mean that I’d get back all the PRSI I have paid? Would it also mean that Irish nationals in other countries would have to abide by the same rules?

      Reply
    • Bruce 05/09/12 #

      Will be careful what you wish for. how many Irish will get sent home from other coentries?

      Reply
    • What if every other country then sent Irish people home for the same reason….have you any idea of the amount of Irish that are overseas , you might think it a simple solution to simply send ” non nationals” off the island but if the US Canada Uk Australia sent Irish back home …be careful what ya with for I’d say

      Reply
  • why is it people keep blaming the poor and running them down bcos they on welfare dont forget most were working and paid their tax this goverment shud start cutting at the top of the food chain for a change theres more to be saved there than anywhwere else

    Reply
  • OU812 05/09/12 #

    Easy way to cut children’s allowance is to go back to the old weekly book at the post office.

    See a lot of them not being picked up, two weeks in a row & it’s cut off.

    Reply
  • Ohhhhhh this will be a busy thread today! #FunAndGames

    Reply
  • As if the crowd running the show would listen to ordinary people! This governments agenda is one that consists of looking after their crooked wealthy accomplices, and to hell with the consequences. The least well off are the most unorganised, therefore they become the easiest source of revenue.

    Reply
    • Exactly… Who’s looking out for joe the plumber

      Reply
    • OU812 05/09/12 #

      Well someone looked out for Paddy the plasterer..

      Reply
    • So 48% would introduce avalue based property tax.1 in 8 will increase their spend next year witha higher incidence in Dublin.Well if a property based tax is levied i’m afraid 8 in 8 in Dublin will be spending alot more than their country cousins.Why, houses in Dublin are worth alot more simples.

      Reply
    • I wonder what the demographic for the survey was ? Of course if you are in large percentage of unemployed you would answer yes ! Of course of you are in the low payed sector you answer yes !

      There is a certain amount of Irish begrudgery in the choice for some people . Why should a working mother and father earning 100k a year lose the benefit and a family on welfare for the last ten years get it. It comes back to one basic principle and that is the harder you work the less you get and the more your punished .

      What they should do is restrict it to two children and after that you are on your own .

      Reply
  • The well off support the government. They won’t hit their suppliers.

    Reply
    • A sample of 1000 gives statistically meaningful results and the respondents sure chosen at random. When it come to Elections these guys are remarkably accurate. You cannot reject and debase its finding because you dislike them.

      Reply
    • Niall 05/09/12 #

      So 850 out of 1000 people think social welfare should not be cut?? I don’t believe that for a second. I have never come across a single friend/colleague/family member etc who thinks it should be left as is. It’s a ridiculously generous allowance and compared to the UK it’s a gift!

      Reply
    • @Niall – the cost of living in the UK is also a lot less over there. The Government should be tackling the real issues in reducing the cost of living, then they could benchmark the dole against the cost of living, then people would have more disposable income as the cost of living comes down. Then more money is spent in the local economies.

      Reply
    • People forget that most of England is a lot cheaper to live than here, that the Social welfare over there, adds up to a good amount when all the differing strands are added up.

      The most important thing they forget is that much of urban England is a decrepit, run down sink estate that would not be out of place in 1980’s Poland, but with very high levels of crime.

      All the countries that are bailing us out have a common feature, they are all strong social democracies, they look after the welfare of their country and people.

      They aren’t like FG and FF here who are out at every turn to make a quick buck for themselves or their buddies/donors and don’t care how much it damages the country.

      Reply
  • Bruce 05/09/12 #

    In reality most people are clued in and would make hard decisions in order to get us out of this mess.

    Too bad the government has no balls. a national emergency budget which would:
    1. cease all pay increases including increments;

    2. change social welfare to a single max payment model

    3. limit all state pension to a ceiling of max ?50k irrespective of roles or salary. And it applies to all current and future recipients

    4. means test all state payments.

    5. every home receiving water from public mains pays ?200 per annum. collected directly from your tax or social welfare payment.

    6. enforce ?3b reduction in health budget by reduced administration layer.

    7. abandon croke park agreement and slim public sector wage bill by 5% across the board.

    8. limit expenses to ?12k per annum for all tds; senators and councillors.

    Reply
  • Rodigeo,,, wake up man have you see them people outside Kildare at protesting over cuts. We have ppl in this country on the dole for years even during the boom cop on to your self

    Reply
  • Damocles 05/09/12 #

    I’ve been told, in all seriousness, that you have to be careful about cutting Social Welfare because otherwise people will turn to crime.

    So effectively, in some cases, Social Welfare acts as protection money to stop poor scrotes from entering villainy.

    Reply
  • BULLSHIT!

    That’s what the government would like us to believe.

    Child benefit started out at around €300 and has now been cut down to €140.

    That’s €160 that’s is taken off of each and every child every month, now we,re do you think that money is going???

    I think it’s the governments EXPENSES that should be means tested by us the people. I mean it’s alrite for ENDA to hike up our petrol prices, to introduce whatever new taxes he feels like, and spend €25,000 of the taxpayers money in one day in a pub/hotel. Now we,re do you think his priorities lie??

    http://www.change.org/petitions/supporting-the-irish-nation-step-down-from-government#share?utm_source=guides&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=weekly_summary

    Reply
  • Amazing how none of that 1000 surveyed suggested cutting the pay of the highest paid in society both public and private,go figure?

    Reply
  • Bruce ,,,, were can I vote for you !!!! Dole payment cut off after two years

    Reply
  • finbar m 05/09/12 #

    Norman yes you are right about free movement in the EU no problems there but most country’s only pay you the dole for a set time .So why do we not do the same if we are members of the EU can you tell me please???,

    Reply
    • If like you say dole was cut after two years, with no available work what would 450,000 people do for basic needs ??

      Reply
    • Not true Finabar.

      Take for example Holland, where you get the dole for 2 years at 80% of you salary. So here for the average wage that would equate to a 538 a week before tax.

      After the 2 years, you can go in to work fare, where you get a wage and where you spend the whole time, digging up pavements and laying them down again.

      It is not that hard to get out of though by all accounts and many do, living on welfare their for years.

      So if you want us to step up to the European welfare system, then unemployment benefit will rise substantially here.

      The long term dole sponger in Ireland, for all the hand wringing and moaning for the last 15 years was among the lowest in Europe, that might not be a popular fact in the pub on a Friday night when someone is preaching from the pulpit but a fact nonetheless.

      and this is a country that is bailing us out, has a much higher standard of living, public health care where even the right wing political parties would be further left economically than Sinn Féin or labour.

      Reply
  • louise 05/09/12 #

    Any1 got a one way ticket out of here!!

    Reply
  • Free Love now, no means testing!

    Reply
  • Won’t be too many red thumbs down for SW cuts ,,,,, poor ppl don’t get out of bed till midday

    Reply
    • Cutting social welfare, whatever the pro’s, if any has one big problem. It takes money directly out of circulation, the dole money doesn’t exactly go to buying German cars. It goes in to the local economy, virtually all of it. The tax man gets it back, the local business man gets it back.

      Will we ever see you comment on the rates that accounts charge in this country, the extortion on small business, all businesses that the legal profession engage in. The fees of doctors etc.

      The guy at the top in Ireland, just loves pulling up the ladder and screwing the rest of the country for all they can.

      Reply
    • Dunbar. It’s your type that have the country bolloxed.

      Reply
    • Bruce 05/09/12 #

      @arjun why circulate money that has to be borrowed at crazy rates?

      Reply
    • Guess your were wrong,alot of early risers huh?

      Reply
  • Heres a great idea , how about we just cut all social welfare payments to those living at home , people who never worked, non irish people, and anyone who doesnt apply for atleast 2 jobs a week. Turn social welfare into food/clothes stamps only and claim back any savings people on social welfare have

    Reply
    • it be so much easier and less expensive just to shoot them in the queue and have Ireland changed to the Stephen Church Elite Club

      Reply
    • Ohh i wish sherbet, where theres no dole , all the borders are closed to anyone without a company sponsoring them , and tax rates are below 10% because theres no spongers to waste our money , the words minimum wage and trade union are unknown , where my tax money isnt spent letting some little brat go studying anthropology and greek philosophy only to whinge afterwards that theres no jobs in that field ahh paradise

      Reply
    • ahh stephen think about one of your points on what your saying ..No spongers …that’s not all the people on the dole…….. it’s all the politicians, and their advisory teams and ( remember they get a pension too ) and they not claiming the dole.
      and the brat you refer to is probably one of the above kids whom are studying
      trade unions have always been know as a necessary evil and have saved no jobs but their own in this country purely because they have never been challenged by the people whom pay their wages ( a lot of those on the minimum wages cause they told they not allowed to)

      so i still don’t want the isle of SCEC but do agree you should pay into a country before claiming out of it. and that’s not all the involving the boarders there are people claiming hall their lives off the state and have never worked a day in their lived and they born and bred IRISH.

      Reply
  • were these people living in Monaco?????

    Reply
  • a survey on politicians expenses salaries, company profits taken out of this country , advisers salaries ? would be very interesting, better still stand out side the dole office when the queue is a mile money and sure there would be at least some of the 450k answer honestly

    Reply
  • i’d love to see the actual survey questions cause i’ve seen surveys manipulated before. great to see a new company set up,
    but the survey states 1000 persons asked what was the criteria of the survey ?
    what 1, age group was targeted.
    2, were they employed or unemployed?
    3 how many male or female
    4. how many had kids were asked
    5 how many were presently receiving the different allowance etc
    6. what salary groups were asked ## need i go on

    as a say great to see a new company set up
    this survey is too vague and is very once sided and has cuts cuts cuts and nothing but cuts nothing , so you wouldn’t be far off thinking this is government survey or kite flying

    am sure if the real people in Ireland were asked they would like to add to budget and give the Irish people something back they have enough cuts and taxed …they may even possibly want reform the most

    Reply
  • Means Testing… What a laugh. There is no way this country could complete an unbiased means test and act unilaterally on the results. From what I have gathered… This nation isn’t suited for planning, preparation and forward thinking.

    Reply
    • This nation is suited for planning, preparation and forward thinking. Its the Government that are incapable of this. I for one. I for one am planning and preparing for new Taxes and Cuts by saving as much money as possible and spending as little as possible. As for forward thinking, the Government is thinking about Christmas Holidays already I would imagine :-) but that as forward as they go.

      Reply

Add New Comment