We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
FINAL CONSENT HAS been given today to allow the for the operation of the Corrib gas pipeline off the coast of Mayo.
The Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Alex White, today gave permission for the pipeline to operate between the gas subsea facilities and the terminal at Bellanaboy, Co Mayo.
The minister gave the consent subject to the fulfilling of 20 conditions relating to environmental management, operation, control and monitoring.
It is expected that the first gas could be brought onshore as early as tomorrow.
Minister White issued a statement today, saying that the the Corrib Gas Field will meet around 42% of the gas demand of the entire island of Ireland, and that it will add to GDP by substituting for imported gas.
Currently 90% of the gas for Ireland is imported from the UK.
The Minister said:
“The recent government White Paper on Energy, which I published on 16 December, has set out a trajectory to a low carbon economy by 2050.”
“However, this transition will take time, and fossil fuels will remain part of our energy mix for some years to come, as we first eliminate the most polluting fossil fuels such as coal.”
In this context, the development of indigenous gas resources will deliver significant and sustained benefits, particularly in terms of enhanced security of supply, import substitution, national and local economic development, and fiscal return.
Controversy
The Corrib gas line has been the subject of much controversy in recent years, with many locals in Co Mayo, as well as protest groups from all over Ireland, having longstanding issues and concerns with the effect the pipeline could have on the local environment.
The issue has divided the local community in Mayo and has been the focus of many protests over the past number of years.
A spokesperson for Shell said today that following the go-ahead from the minister they would begin their final preparations for the introduction of gas from the offshore field.
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Should have been operational many years ago but was delayed with huge cost overruns to the tune of €2.4 billion thanks to crusties on social welfare protesting. Hopefully international companies aren’t fearful about investing in similar projects on this island in future.
Agree 100%
Comexicity read this and learn something
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/conned-a-german-view-of-ireland-1.1454115
And your point?
You just keep agreeing 100% with yourself
Agree
I agree with comexity, not you.
Locals would have made more from tourism. beautiful area (well it was).
JimmyMC: Oil and coal should be left in the ground – it is too polluting to burn. Gas is cleaner. Nuclear is cleanest.
@Andrew
Care to back that up with some figures?
Go educate yourself. Read some science. Here’s a start. http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Current-and-Future-Generation/world-Energy-Needs-and-nuclear-power/
@comexicity stereoptyping in such a dismissive manner is one of the lowest forms of inteligence!!!!
Andrew you are talking absolute nonsense. There are no figures to back this claim up because it’s not true. The community in the area is not split either – 90% of the locals were behind this project. The vocal minority, together with a heap of blow-in crusties, held this up for years and cost the Irish taxpayer millions in unnecessary overtime payments to gardai. The employment generated over the last decade in one of Ireland’s most economically neglected areas has been a lifeline that kept the local community afloat during the recession.
Fukashima-Nuclear? Is one disaster not enough? It seems not so. Chernobyl and now fukashima. Read the facts about nuclear energy before you make a ridiculous statement this. Yes it maybe be clean but at what cost? The Pacific ocean has only dead fish in it
Unless you’re a shareholder in shell, statoil or vermilion (or indeed a Norwegian citizen) you should not be cheering this outcome. I suppose you can add complicit, corrupt government stools to this to. Every cent it took to build this is tax deductible. Every bribe paid to local idiots is tax deductible. All grants to clubs and societies locally and nationally are tax deductible. Which means the people paid to build this and make it operational. No tax will be paid and people will pay full market price to get gas that should belong to Irish people were it not given away for free. What’s to cheer? Nothing other than victory for a foreign multi national corporation against a local community in Ireland. Red thumb if you so wish – makes it easier to count the idiots on here.
What are you suggesting, some kind of state owned oil company?
you want the state to fund this and then provide free gas for all ??? Not even the middle east do this with Oil. The state dont have the resources,technology etc to build a giant refinery and all the add ons like this. Plus now, we will finally be protected from currency and supply changes for gas.
Capital development costs can be written off against tax on profit which is levied at 25%. The State will lose €600 million in tax revenues from the €2.4 billion cost overrun.
A victory by a multinational against a local community is nonsense rhetoric. The local community has benefited hugely with massive employment created during the construction phase, huge investment in infrastructure and now 200 permanent jobs for the lifetime of the terminal.
The father of Willie Corduff, one of the chief protesters against this pipeline, opposed electricity being brought to the area in the 1950′s. I suppose the introduction of electricity to the area was a dark day for the local community also?
You think tax deductions for capital expenditure means the Irish taxpayer payed for it? You need to read back up on Junior Cert accounting if that’s you’re understanding
Agreed
You got there just as I was typing!
Well Sean you get what you vote for! You might be able to choose some one different but at the end of the day the majority will keep the the status quo!
A gas line pipe that transfers raw gas where the pressure cannot be controlled from off shore to an onshore facilitiy first of its kind in the world, the term used is “Experimental” i feel for all the residents i know i would be praying that things don’t go wrong.
its not experimental, it is just a change on what is already available. stop trying to scare people and go back to pointing at jet trails in the sky
High pressure gas pipes are not experimental. Ireland needs baseload energy to balance useless wind power. Gas generation is better than burning turf or importing gas or electricty from the uk. If you dont like gas, then we should be lobbying for nuclear
The pipe will explode, we’re all gonna die…
@Buster
Will the Irish economy be big enough for a decent size nuclear plant? And that is before you deal with the NIMBYs.
I think we will have massive interconnectors exporting green energy and importing nuclear when necessary.
It’s a bit like the abortion debate, we will be able to get up on our environmental high horse and say we have no nuclear but be completely dependent on it.
The irish govt took a huge leap of faith in 1926, to provide cheap, green, electricity to the population. We had balls then. Sadly, PJ, i think you will be correct. Exported surplus intermittent wind power is very often dumped out at a loss, becase when the wind blows here, it is blowing in the uk too
It is called geoengineering, I have attended many lectures around the world on the subject held by leading scientist’s, I also have discussed this “Experimental” pipeline with engineer’s qualified to give me their expert views of this controversial project. Your statement also makes no sense Darren, thanks for your time.
The real controversy here is that we’ve sold ourselves out so cheap for such a valuable resource. Sure, the local economy in Enda’s constituency will benefit but in the long run we’ll see little or nothing of the enormous revenue this project will generate; that’s reserved for Shell and it’s shareholders!
It would have been better to have negotiated a joint semi state involvement along with Shell instead of selling our natural resources to the highest bidder.
Semi state?
We have had such impressive experience with that haven’t we…….
I am guessing all you red thumbers think climate change is a conspiracy. Take look out of your windows.
Well yes PJ we do as a matter of fact. A much better than record of managing our national resources than selling them off to the ‘quick buck’ merchants, I’d think?
Have ever worked in a semi state.
I have
Shhh! Don’t mention irish water!
Ha ha it wasn’t Irish water
About bloody time.
Bullshit
That it’s taken this long!!!
You’re right Obi. Should have happened years ago.
This is fantastic news and as has been pointed out its long overdue
Unfortunately Alex won’t be cutting any ribbons as he can’t find the terminal. In common with many other infrastructure sites it unbelievably does have an Eircode. Then again Eircode is for billing householders… nothing else.
*doesn’t have an Eircode
I might agree with you………
If this thread had anything to do with eircode.
Alex White gave the go ahead for Eircodes
I wonder how many of our politicians are shareholders of this project.another asset sold for nothing in return.
The big winners in this story were the cops who raked in millions in overtime and the security thugs from east Europe ditto. And Ray Burke and others In Fianna Fáil who gave the stuff to the Dutch for bales of loot
Paddy…don’t forget the free beer that never was. The only reason the Garda got overtime was down to the ‘peaceful’ tactics of the protestors.
Return to the dark ages and go live in a cave by candle light.
With the low price of oil combined with the high cost associated with working in the Atlantic and increased tax on the finds, the chances of substantial exploration off Ireland in the next 10 years must be pretty near zero
Fingers crossed that the next project does not get delayed by 10 years due to protesters etc. Then maybe investors will be more likely to explore more. Then maybe after that the tax rules can be more favourable to the state…
The main protesters were locals who had legitimate concerns.I recommend watching a documentary called “The Pipe” which examined some of the issues and shows what was going on in Rossport at the time. It was the most heavily policed town in Ireland for awhile!
The same film maker is making a second documentary called “Atlantic” which should be very interesting also.
Shane, the word you are looking for is NIMBY.
Shell divided and conquered the locals at an early stage while the government provided them with private Garda security. They actually used the same tactics they used in Nigeria. But as a Dutch project manager who worked out there told me personally, they couldn’t get away as cheaply in Nigeria.
90%, no actually 95% of the protestors were Eco warriors from outside the area. They also were involved in the making of The Pipe, which was an extremely biased documentary. You make it sound like it was an impartial piece of work. The proof of the pudding came in the 2007 election, when the independent TD jerry cowley ran for reelection on an anti gas platform. Michael ring of FG was the area’s local representative, and effectively represented the pro gas side, alongside dara calleary of FF. Cowley lost his seat by a wide margin, and in Rossport, the epicentre of the perceived local opposition, Ring alone outpolled him almost 4:1. That said it all about how strong local opposition really was.
Not before time
Is it the case that the gas is just sold to us at market rates, what benefit is it to us? That’s like the Saudis giving all the oil away, the Saudis raised the price of patrol today to I think 16 cent a litre for themselves.
It’s called security of supply
Would you rather we depended on Putin?
Martin G. Your reference to the project being in Enda Kenny’s constituency means exactly what. Like Mr. Kenny prayed to some God who mysteriously placed Corrib in his constituency? Come on. Now as for who gains and who looses. Yes the government could drive high taxes to multinationals who pull Irelands natural resources from the sea or ground. But if done, these multinationals would not invest their shareholder dollars. Economics 101 in university.
We need more of this. Every last drop of oil and gas needs to be extracted from Irish territory. It is black gold under our feet.
Little ireland is not going to make a difference to your global warming, considering that China is opening 28 NEW coal power plants every year.
Buster what you are failing to see is its another asset belonging to the people sold for nothing I suppose buster your type would love to sell our water as well.ff fg Labour would sell their mothers for a few cents shame we dont have a government for the people only money grabbing parasites
How much did Shell pay the Irish govt for this? It’s an absolute disgrace kicked from ff to fg. Shocking if the truth ever comes out
Ireland secures Clean-ish energy, but the nimbies would prefer we either live in caves or buy oil from the Saudis
Rat Kelly would sanction it at X mas the end is near for him politically but I am sure he was well rewarded by shell
Boo!!!!!! :(
Hooray! The gas is flowing. Our houses are warm and the lights are on. A victory for common sense.
This announcement is not something to celebrate as it just soldifies the shameful giveaway of our natural resources by successive governments.
A report in 2006 for the Department of Energy and Natural Resources said there was oil and gas at current day values worth about €540bn off the west coast — but with companies able to write off 100% of costs against tax backdated up to 25 years, and a tax of just 25% on net profits, very little would go to the State.
“There is something very wrong with the way we have valued our resources over the decades — perhaps it’s a cultural thing. When we joined the EU we ended up with less than 18% of the fish caught in Irish waters. People value property but when it comes to the offshore, it is not valued, and yet nine-tenths of the Irish territory is under the sea.”
Justin Keating in 1975 brought in a Norwegian-style policy but it was dismantled by Ray Burke and Bertie Ahern to such an extent that a US government report found that Ireland had the second lowest tax take from their hydrocarbons of 142 countries studied.
https://youtu.be/v0ij_l5szHY
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
Non-TCF/GVL Vendors
have your say