TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 10 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

EPA fracking study reveals potential impact on groundwater and earthquakes

The study, commissioned by the Environmental Protection Agency, states that groundwater contamination is the most serious local environmental concern.

Rows of pumps where the hydraulic fracturing process in the Marcellus Shale layer to release natural gas was underway at a Range Resources site in Pennsylvania, USA
Rows of pumps where the hydraulic fracturing process in the Marcellus Shale layer to release natural gas was underway at a Range Resources site in Pennsylvania, USA
Image: (AP Photo/Keith Srakocic)

Updated 3.30pm

A STUDY INTO the possible environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing – or ‘fracking’ – has identified potential risks to groundwater purity and tremors or earthquakes.

The importance of well integrity and knowledge of local geology are highlighted in the study, which was commissioned last October was conducted by the University of Aberdeen and is part of a wider study being undertaken on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Last month the Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources Pat Rabbitte said that no licences will be awarded for fracking before the EPA finishes its research into the area.

The research was commissioned following concerns raised by residents in the northwest and southwest of the country, as well as politicians and environmental activists.

In terms of potential environmental impacts the study identifies that the risk of contamination of groundwater is dependent on the integrity of the well. It also states that fracking fluid can contain chemical additives, methane, metals and naturally occurring radioactive material.

It’s also identified that detailed knowledge of local geology – particularly in Europe where it is more complex than the geology in the US –  is necessary in order to assess the potential impact of fracking on the quality of groundwater and tremors or earthquakes.

The research also concludes that the risk to groundwater – which it says is “probably the most contentious” local environmental concern – is “low and probably manageable” and that the potential impacts on the atmosphere from associated methane emissions and the risks of increased seismic activity are less well known.

Further investigation is recommended and the report identifies that much of the coverage of fracking so far has not been peer reviewed and is often “misinformed”.

Fracking is a method of pumping water and a chemical mixture underground at extremely high pressure, to break up – ‘fracture’ – rock formations and allow pockets of naturally occurring shale gas to escape

Earlier this year councils in Clare, Leitrim, Roscommon, Donegal and Sligo all banned fracking in their counties, while councillors in Clare called on the Government to implement a national ban.

A spokesperson for the EPA has told TheJournal.ie that this “very preliminary” research is part of a much wider study in order to evaluate the information which is already available. The agency has been waiting for the results of this study in order to determine where to go from here, and a project with a much wider scope is in the pipeline.

The spokesperson also said that the University of Aberdeen was the only institution which responded to the EPA’s calls for submissions, but that it’s expected that there will be a much larger response to the next invitation to carry out research.

Tamboran Resources, the energy company which has secured exploration drilling licences in the northwest region, has welcomed the EPA study, placing emphasis on the report’s conclusions that the “mechanical fracking process itself does not pose a significant environmental risk” and that there is a “low and probably manageable risk to groundwater from fracking”.

Chief executive of Tamboran, Richard Moorman said that the company will be undertaking comprehensive seismic data analysis, and that it is “committed to chemical-free fracking”.

Read the EPA study>

Rabbitte: No licences for fracking before EPA finished research>

Polish report: shale gas extraction ‘not harmful’>

Read more: Everything you ever needed to know about fracking>

Read next:

Comments (35 Comments)

  • Bloody hell! One report recommending another report! The country’s full of wasters! Nothing ever gets done properly.

    Reply
  • So it’s better to suck the ground dry than invest in renewable tech now so it will become cheaper in the long term. Ireland has so much wave and wind resources we could become the power house of Europe with a little bit of foresight and future thinking instead we will go for the easy option of raping the land and when all that gas is gone then what? What the feck is it just me or is this decade turning into ‘the forget about the future let them suffer as long as we are alright society’.

    Reply
  • Fracking is the latest in a long line of government backed schemes to privatise and give away the natural resources of Ireland.

    Each time they do, jobs and cash are promised, the reality is only the elite classes benefit from what is essentially state sponsored theft from the Irish exchequer.

    This current phase of bending over backwards to line the pockets of multinationals is particularly odious due to the fact that the fracking process has the potential to seriously and permanently damage Ireland’s fresh water supply.

    If this does happen, joe soap and the taxpayer will be left bearing the brunt of the consequences while the resource companies walk away with their pockets stuffed full of cash.

    Reply
  • Ah lads did ye read the study of just see the Euros..
    1. European Shales more complex than US shales . If they can make a f*ck up on the simple stuff.. whats going to happen when they’ve got a few real engineering maths problems to solve
    2. The nice slides on Marcellus and Barnett frac jobs.. there’s fractures extending over 600M. They want to frack at 500-1500M so theres high probablilty of contaminating the aquifers in Leitrim and Fermanagh at the depths they want to frack.
    3. Quite happy for large towns and cities to take the gas (as we won’t) so long as they take the billions of gallons of waste too. Personally don’t think there’s gas there, but know there will be waste created.
    4. Shale Gas relies on Diesel to drive the trucks/generators/compressors/drilling rigs… phenomenal amounts of it. Given that a significant cost factor will be forever increasing, do you seriously think the gas is going to be cheap ? And how can it be cheaper than conventional gas coming from Norway Holland, and Russia ?
    5. The flow rates of the wells would not be enough to keep Ireland going on a day to day basis.. Therefore Gas security can only truly be achieved by storage facilities – think Video Download and Buffering.
    6. So far this is only a PR exercise. It should be noted that Tamboran wish to take more cuttings. They say the previous samples (with low carbon content of <1%) aren't true reflections and are hoping the new cuttings will have the 3% or higher values needed to make this feasible. So all those facts and figures are just pick a number, Previous companies have evaluated the Carbon content and walked away.

    Reply
  • I have seen fracking in OZ…wells are drilled every 50 meters square and there are surface pipes connecting them all together to a pumping station…the big problem is that there is a risk of contaminating the water table…there is also a risk of the methane gas being released at the well heads…this technology can release 150 – 200 years worth of natural gas and is a cheaper why to harvest gas than existing gas technologies …this is why governments are keen on the idea.

    Reply
  • And SHAME on ‘Manorhamilton Business Forum’ – a self appointed group of ‘business men’ with NO mandate, for accepting a 20k bribe from Tamboran on behalf of the people of Manorhamilton.

    Reply
  • Frack off!

    Reply
  • Aidan 11/05/12 #

    No to fracking no to fracking!!!

    Reply
  • Pat Rabbitte will soon be in favour of fracking – as soon as Merkek/IMF/EU tells him to. This coalition will do a “ray burke” and back the Multinationals

    Reply
  • Why Mark, would it upset you to much to have to watch people actually protest?

    Reply
  • As stated by John Perkins in 2004 once involved in a bailout pact with the IMF any oil or gas resources are subject to be exploited by multinational corporations regardless of social or enviromental carnage that it might bring. Expect Fracking to begin in Ireland in the next few years.

    Reply
  • Fracking is the perfect example of how desperate our feudal neoliberal overlords are in their attempt to keep this bullshit system going. Their motto is maximize profit at all costs regardless of humanity and this planet. The only way u can have growth in this world is to have the energy reserves to back it up and with a recent study saying that in 25 years we will have only 50% of the fossil fuels that we have now, they know the game is coming to an end. The war on terror is nothing other than a smokescreen to mask their attempts to grab the few remaining resources in the world. They don’t like green energy, cause they know they can’t control it. Further proof of their desperation is the crazy plan to launch a rocket to a meteor to mine it next year.Everything that is going on at the moment is in relation to this fact.

    Reply
  • “low and proberely manageable ” that’s what this report says

    Reply
  • Dont let them read this in the west, we will have another Shell to sea.

    Reply
    • You may be right and Rossport is one small area, they are talking about a 1/4 of Ireland licensed here between north and south, north clare/kerry/ limerick, clare, north mayo/sligo/roscomman, all of leitrim, south donegal, south fermanagh, antrim,derry,. People here looking down on people protesting, i presume none of this is happening in their ‘back yards’. In Rossport, they wanted to put pipes with gas (not processed, so if it leaks, no smell) outside peoples doors at high pressure). so you wouldnt protest if they did that at your front door step. And what about living with your kids downwind of 4 pads with 28 wells with a km of you, people really only associated water pollution, but a huge problem is air pollution and also the noise pollution going on 24/7. there are so many aspects to this.

      Reply
  • G. Ring 18/04/13 #

    The industry loves to tell us that hydraulic fracturing has been around since the 40s, this is not quite true. The development we are talking about today is known as high volume slickwater horizontal hydraulic fracturing and is not that old.

    So HVHF is not a technique that was developed in the 40s. Some techniques of well stimulation were developed at that time but what is currently used to extract shale gas requires technical processes which have only been discovered very recently:

    First horizontal shale gas well: 1991
    First slick water fracture: 1996
    First use of cluster drilling from one pad: 2007
    When well stimulation requires on average a 206 bar water pressure, hydraulic fracturing requires to inject fracking fluids at pressures up to 4 times higher (725 bar on average)

    The technologies have made it possible to extract shale gas economically. There’s a reason why it hasn’t been done earlier: First because gas price was too low to make these activities economically viable (it only really started in the US in 2008 when the gas price cost 13$ per unit) and secondly because the technologies necessary to extract this specific kind of gas didn’t exist.

    Reply
  • come on people, we need the cash, we need the jobs

    Reply
    • How many jobs is fracking going to create in reality ?? How much is the country really going to gain?? can anyone tell me pls….

      Reply
    • While fracking itself will not create many jobs in Ireland, access to a reliable domestic energy source, which is relatively inexpensive would stimulate economic growth and lead to more employment opportunities.

      Reply
    • There is no guarentee of supply or price, we will have to buy on the world market so no reliable domestic supply…as for jobs, the majority of their crew will be brought in, there will be some local short term work but is that worth losing all the employment from the tourism sector and food sector if there is any air pollution/ground water/aquifer contamination??? As much would be lost as gained in revenue and that is worth tearing up the north west and puttings people health in danger?????????? 120 pads 7acres each with 28 wells per pad in a 13km radius, how would you like living downwind of that?? Children are more susceptible to the health problems associated with fracking and in the north west we have a lot of red list rare species that would be devasttated. the area they are talking about fracking had 52km of cave system, underground rivers etc that flow into lakes that have species that live anywhere else, aquifers that are the water supply for people. All for the promise of revenue and jobs that would be cancelled out by destroying the sectors we already have. Yep we need more jobs and revenue but not like this

      Reply
    • At what cost ? I am not talking about money either … Environmental cost . It seems too dangerous to proceed with.

      Reply
    • @ On The Dole. It will probably lead to a net jobs loss. The primary economic activities in the northwest are tourism and agriculture. Our tourist industry would collapse if fracking is given the go ahead. (The majority of tourists to this part of the country do so because of the unspoilt nature of the countryside. Stick in hundreds of gaswells, pipelines and crowded transport infrastructure and bye bye tourists). And considering there aren’t that many fracking experts living up here to be employed I doubt those former hotel workers would find a job too quickly in the fracking industry. And as for those arguing that it will provide cheaper more reliable gas-dream on. More reliable, yes, but the price will be the exact same as gas from Russia. The high price if gas is the only reason that fracking in Ireland is seen as being economically viable.

      Reply
    • Come on? Have some vision. It’s not going to create jobs. Regardless of the possible toxicity it might cause- let’s put that aside for a moment- It will ruin the landscape. The unspoilt landscape is 80% of why people visit here. The gas will run out, and we will be left with the debris.
      Invest in tourism, make this an even nicer place to visit. That will create jobs and income to the country.
      THIS IS SIMPLY STUPID

      Reply
    • What about the continuous destruction of Boglands across the west Mary. The bogs are unique, and one of the most fragile and overworked natural habitats in the world. Irish turf cutters are still carving up the land even though the E.U. said enough damage is done to the area. Fines will be on the way to Ireland from the E.U.

      Reply
    • Am I right in thinking that any wells would be subject to the planning process and that any unsightly wells could be appealed?

      Reply
    • SMcB 11/05/12 #

      Jobs… And pollute the water supply in the process? What utter nonsence.

      Reply
  • test

    Reply
  • http://www.causes.com/causes/799563-artists-against-fracking/actions/1726944

    The destructive elements of fracking are becoming well documented, most recently by Sean Lennon & Yoko Ono and the Artists Against Fracking link above – how does any government official balance the destruction of environment , tourism potential and population comfort against short term gas extraction when the long term alternatives as proposed by Spirit of Ireland, et al are available without the damage, with the infrastructural jobs and the unlimited FREE resources of wind, wave , sun waiting to be harnessed?

    Reply

Add New Comment