TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 16 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

High points: Science could be next to offer a bonus to Leaving Cert students

The education minister has said that offering extra Leaving Cert points to students who sit Science subjects is a possibility.

THE EDUCATION MINISTER Ruairí Quinn has said that introducing bonus points for Leaving Cert Science students could be on the way.

Next year marks the first that universities will offer bonus points for higher grades in Leaving Cert Maths, and the minister has said that following suit with science subjects could be one way to ensure more students take up Biology, Chemistry and Physics, reports the Irish Times.

Newstalk reports that Quinn will see how the Maths scheme goes before considering it for science subjects. Students who sit higher level Maths will get an extra 25 points.

This year saw new lows in the numbers of students taking Honours Maths.

The education minister has said that employers and industry experts have called for incentives for students to study Maths and Science at Leaving Cert level.

According to the Irish Examiner, he said that there needs to be balance in how easy some subjects are to study and the points that are awarded.

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • Very good idea. Maths needs to be the priority but we also need to encourage the sciences too. They’re just as important in getting people into the high-tech sector, where many vacancies are just waiting to be filled!

    In this case it seems Quinn is focusing on just getting people to do the subject as opposed to Maths where the focus is on people doing HL. I assume the bonus here would apply at both ordinary and higher level.

    My only criticism is that there’s plenty of people who do biology anyway. In my school there were 3 biology classes. That’s about 70/120 students. Physics was 2 classes with about 40/120 and Chemistry was only one class with about 20/120. More people doing biology than doing Physics and Chemistry combined! One girl did all three of them :D

    Maybe the focus should just be on Physics and Chemistry. Those are the subjects that are most sought after in the high tech sector. Or at least have a different bonus point for each subject.

    It’s also important to realise that if the subject is not taught well, then adding more pupils doesn’t really help the situation. Sure, more people may do the subject at leaving cert, but it doesn’t help the economy if none of them take it on to third level. More focus needs to be placed on teacher training and curriculum change to encourage people into third level in these subject areas. Many people are completely turned off Maths in college because of the huge jump from LC maths to college maths. At least the sciences are different because they can often start from scratch again or at least the jump up isn’t as big.

    Reply
  • Meg 28/07/11 #

    Students should only get bonus points for courses that actually require science subjects. It’d be nonsensical to get rewarded for taking sciences if you want to study philosophy or history or languages.

    This is going to lead to people neglecting English and Irish because their Maths and Sciences will boost their overall points. Whatever about Irish, English is a necessity in every field at university, even Science…

    Reply
    • Good point. The bonus points should only be relevant if say maths or a science is relevant to the course. It would be totally unfair for students who want to pursue arts/social science courses to be given bonus points for maths and science, putting those who are naturally poor at those subjects at an immediate disadvantage for courses that don’t even need them.

      Like you I also share concerns about the devaluing of English an indeed other non scientific subjects. History for example provides excellent training in communications and forming a coherent argument, yet we deride it as a subject because it doesn’t necessarily provide qualifications for specific jobs. I do however agree that science, as a growth area is important to focus on – yet we must ask ourselves are physics and chemistry much more relevant to say computer science than German and economics. Tread carefully minister Quinn.

      Reply
    • What about dealing with incompetent teachers first and a dumbed down curriculum first…..

      Reply
  • They should also examine if each of the science courses taught in secondary school are taylored enough to properly feed into the college courses, I found a huge step up in level, they need to merge more seamlessly

    Reply
    • Agreed. One of the reasons I hated physics at leaving cert so much was that it was boring and monotonous. I mean seriously, they took calculus off the course because they wanted people doing pass maths to try doing higher level physics.

      What kind of university allows people doing pass maths to do physics? The logic escapes me. It seems that it escapes a lot of people too, given how the numbers of people doing physics have dropped since the dumbed down course was introduced nine years ago.

      I understand that definitions are important, but they’re given too much priority on the current course. And what kind of person likes learning off reams and reams of definitions every single day? Cut out some of the more arbitrary definitions and bring in more maths.

      I’m sure biology and chemistry (which I didn’t do) are suffering from similar problems.

      Reply
  • Bad idea. If it happens a lot of students will choose a science, not because their interested but because they can get more points in the points race. Trying to force people into maths/sciences with incentives like extra points and easier exams (project maths) is not the right idea.

    Reply
  • Meg and Keith are spot on, it is the points system that is the problem. Maths and science have not got any harder over the years it is just easier to get points elsewhere, life cherry pick the easier subjects

    Reply
    • Meg 28/07/11 #

      I don’t understand why they aren’t focusing on changing the points system. It’s farcical at this stage. With the new bonus points for Honours Maths, a D3 in HL is worth more points than an A1 in OL. That’s going to lead to people barely passing HL risking a fail in Maths instead of doing the smart thing and dropping to OL, for the sake of points. Offering a better incentive won’t make better mathematicians of us, especially when we’re facing a new course (doing the LC in 2013). It’s rather frustrating.

      I wrote about why the points system needs to go here – http://lavieenross.wordpress.com/2011/06/19/trying-to-do-two-things-at-once/ – and that’s probably more coherent than anything I post here :D

      Reply
  • where are all the science jobs I know someone just finished there course and can’t find work. so no point giving extra points for jobs that aren’t there .

    Reply
  • science should come before maths. then students can see the application of the math theory. Rate of chemical reaction = differential eqns; direction of forces = vectors; why recessive genes don’t die out = stats.
    Not to mention the logical thought process

    Reply
  • To be fair I’m not the best at spelling myself!

    Reply
  • SMcB 29/07/11 #

    Sound like it’s a dumbing down exercise.

    Reply
  • The really important thing of course is that we acknowledge the right of corporate CEOs to tell us how to run our education system.

    Reply
  • @Kevin, they cannot both be dealt with first

    Reply
  • “…follpwing suit with science subjects could be one way to ensure more students take up Biology, Bhemistry and Bhysics…” Really?

    Reply

Add New Comment