TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Increase in women seeking post-abortion care from IFPA

The group released its annual report from last year today.

File photo of an IFPA clinic
File photo of an IFPA clinic
Image: Photocall Ireland!

THE IRISH FAMILY Planning Association saw an 85 per cent jump in the number of women presenting for post-abortion care last year.

That accounts for 42 per cent of its client in the counselling department.

The group said improved awareness of counselling services has led to a marked increase in the numbers attending clinics and calling the helpline.

Over 1,400 women, girls and couples received one-to-one crisis pregnancy counselling across IFPA’s 11 centres during 2011.

Chief executive Niall Behan said, “The improved awareness of the availability of the IFPA’s post-abortion counselling services, the breakdown of stigma associated with the procedure and women’s increasing willingness to discuss abortion are all factors that have led to more demand for our crisis pregnancy facilities.”

On the whole, women seem to be more willing to speak about such situations, and more inclined to avail of the support services available to them.

Over the 12 months, the IFPA provided sexual and reproductive services to about 19,000 clients across its two Dublin clinics.

The clinics have seen a reduction in the number of private clients attending since the emergency contraceptive pill was made available over the counter at pharmacies.

However, there has been an increase in the number of medical card holders requesting services but due to budget restraints, some have had to be referred back to their GPs. The organisation says it continues to struggle in the face of continuing cuts.

“The 4.35 per cent cut in funding in 2011 forced the IFPA to ration the delivery of family planning services to medical card holders,” explained Behan. “Clients experienced delays of up to six weeks for contraceptive consultations and clients seeking long-term contraceptive devices (such as the coil and Implanon) faced delays of anything between one to three months for initiation of contraceptive devices.”

Contraception

An audit into the use of long-term contraception found that the use of more cost-effective and more reliable LARC (long-acting reversible contraception) methods should be promoted.

IFPA clinics regularly saw women who are using short-term contraception, such as the oral contraceptive pill, as they are unable to afford the initial outlay of more effective long term contraception, such as the implant or coil, which can cost up to €300.

The report of the review carried out over a 15-month period, however, revealed that the LARC methods are more cost-effective in the long-term despite the initial outlay.

Estimates show that a woman may spend between €150 and €260 on the pill compared to an annual cost of €94 for an implant, €65 for the LNG IUS and €25 for the copper IUCD coil.

Behan said the audit suggested that the LARC methods are “highly effective, less expensive in the long-term, and convenient for women”.

“With failure rates of one per 1,000 or less, and given they are not subject to user errors, they have been proven to be a more reliable form of contraception than oral methods, which have failure rates varying from 1 per cent for perfect use to 8 per cent for usual use.”

“The IFPA would actively promote their use over the pill,” added the CEO.

Health Checks

During the year, over 1,700 screenings for STIs were carried out at IFPA clinics. Despite the growing numbers, the IFPA believes that a lack of access to STI screenings is still a major cause of concern, particularly for young people and those on low incomes.

Such tests are not covered under the medical card scheme and the association believes that current services are “insufficient and inequitable”.

In 2011, 4,206 women were screened for cervical cancer at IFPA clinics – a 15 per cent decrease on the previous year.

The IFPA was founded in 1969 to challenge the State’s ban on contraceptive services. It now provides contraceptive advice, vasectomy services, free cervical screening, sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening and treatment, free post-abortion medical check-ups, women’s health checks, fertility and menopause advice and pregnancy testing.

Related: Fewer women travelling to the UK for abortion services>

Read next:

Comments (46 Comments)

  • At the end of the day, if Irish women weren’t travelling to England in their thousands, we wouldn’t need to be having this discussion. The fact is, they are. And our governments continued policy of leaving them with insufficient aftercare shows just how backwards we are and how little they care for those women. I think peoples heads have been buried in the sand long enough. This is not a hypothetical situation, it is very real and deserves a referendum at the very least

    Reply
  • its time we legalised abortion so women have access to the help support and aftercare they need without having to travel to the UK, it only adds to the distress of an already stressfull situation. nobody has the right to make this decision for someone else, especially not the bible waving religeous Nuts.

    Reply
    • I believe in not forcing my beliefs on other people. if a woman finds herself in a crisis situation she has the right to make the choice that’s best for her and not be forced to do anything she doesn’t want to by interfering nutters like you.

      Reply
    • Why was only my comment removed? The journal showing its true biased colours again. I think youre a nutter for wanting people to kill babies.

      Reply
    • The Journal is biased? What exactly is biased about this reporting of the IFPA’s annual report? And if you’re using words like nutter, it was probably deleted because it’s blatantly offensive to people with mental illness. Your sensitivity and compassion really shines through, Felix!

      Reply
    • Nick read the first comment. I was only responding in kind thats why I say its biased.

      Reply
    • Joy
      Do you mean legalise or introduce a system where conscientious objectors have to pay because the State pays.
      Do you mean the introduction of abortion where such a procedure may be carried out in a General Hospital at the expense of other procedures due to the under capacity in the system.
      Suddenly your demand looks just a little more complicated.

      Reply
    • Tell me, Mick, do you believe Christian Scientists should be forced to pay taxes for the HSE? Or Quakers for the defence budget? How about Orthodox Jews, who believing using technology on the Sabbath is a sin? Should their RTE licensng fee be cut by a seventh? It’s a legitimate question, but I find it hypocritical that religious freedom is only brought up in context of Catholic religious beliefs. Unless you are actively opposed to my having to fund any form of military?

      Reply
  • Uh-oh. Here we go again with the abortion debate…

    Very interesting article though.

    Reply
  • its about time abortion legalised in ireland …

    Reply
  • It’s not a mans decision. ‘it’s my baby too’ is a pretty self-righteous argument. Outmoded and outdated.

    Reply
  • Abby 17/09/12 #

    I don’t think the pro-choicers want to see this…

    Reply
    • Yes, because “pro choicers” don’t want women to receive proper medical care, right? Can’t count the number of pro choicers who are like, “let the pregnant cancer patient die”, amIright?

      This is a good thing. But there are still 2,500 women in Ireland who didn’t receive after care last year. Which is bad, especially if you care about these women’s lives.

      Reply
    • Micheal 17/09/12 #

      See what?

      Reply
    • I want to see that we’re ensuring that at the VERY least we’re providing post-abortion counseling. At least these women (and some men too) can be given the tools to cope and move on from the experience in time.
      As an ardent pro- choicer, I do take abortion very seriously and want the support to be in place for the aftermath.
      If we can take care of that end of things, hopefully in time we’ll realise that abortion is a necessary option to have in place.

      Reply
    • I agree, Lauren, it’s very worrying that over half of women who travel are not receiving post-abortion care.

      Reply
  • Let’s hope abortion is never allowed in this country. Murder is murder no matter what way you spin it.

    Reply
    • Even euthanasia? Or deciding not to resuscitate a medical patient who may or may not have a chance of survival? Or killing animals? Or stem cell research? The whole idea of whether or not we can decide whether or not to end a life, or whether or not that life is really there in the first place, is an incredibly complex one. At least give it a bit of thought before tarring abortion with the murder brush and leaving it at that.

      Reply
    • tom, I can’t see how the availability of abortion will ever effect you personally. what gives you the right to decide.

      Reply
    • Abortion isn’t murder. It’s the offence of procuring an abortion. But it’s good to see you have such an in depth knowlege of the situation…

      Reply
    • Euthanasia is murder. You have a living person and then you do something that kills them. What else is it?

      Not resuscitating someone is not murder. You are not actively doing something that kills them.

      Brendan, is it incredibly complex when it comes to the Death Penalty?

      Reply
    • Joy, an abortion affects 3 people, the mother, the father, and (as the Irish Constitution puts it) the unborn.

      Reply
    • I’m pretty sure if Joy had an abortion, Tom is none of those three.

      Reply
    • Well said Joy

      Reply
    • @Saint Ruth
      Ok then, maybe I should have phrased my comment differently. You seem to have a formal definition of murder in your mind, so instead of deciding which is and isn’t murder, ask which is and isn’t wrong.

      Is euthanasia wrong in every circumstance? Most people would say no, if the patient gave consent and of sound mind to make that decision than a lot of people would say they have every right to die/be murdered as you call it.

      Is killing animals wrong? Most people would say no, even though it is the ending of a life, a life which when fully grown has more cognitive function than a human embryo.

      The list goes on, everything from the death penalty to stem cell research and beyond. If I killed a member of an invading army force that landed on our shores and kicked down my front door is it morally wrong? It’s an incredibly paranoid hypothetical but just humour it.

      Saying abortion is murder means nothing, it just lets everyone know what side of the fence you come down on, and it just injects emotion into a topic that hasn’t seen rational argument from both sides since its conception.

      Reply
  • Up to 40% increase in chance of premature births after a woman has an Abortion.

    Hope the people who are traveling to England know this.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/women-who-have-abortions-more-likely-to-have-premature-births-in-later-pregnancies-8104824.html

    Reply
    • “The hypothesis is that a medical termination is less traumatic than a surgical termination….Bearing in mind all the caveats, it does seem to suggest that there is scope for growing medical abortion,” he said.

      From the article in question, which also mentions that miscarriages present greater risk than abortions. Women who travel to England can’t access medical abortions, only surgical ones. Yet another reason why, if you actually cared about women’s health, you would want abortion legalised in Ireland.

      Reply
    • Actually Nick Irish women travelling to England can access a medical abortion but the type of medical abortion that the article is about is the type generally performed in later abortions which are in and of themselves quite rare, and not the far more common early medical abortion which is pills taken to induce miscarriage. also wanted to point it that there are other orgs in Ireland providing post abortion care, such as the Dublin Well Woman centre, fem plus and others – and some women opt to seek post abortion care through the clinics they attended.

      Reply
  • Abortion is murder, it is consciously ending ‘life’ just because that life is not wanted does not make it ok.
    A woman who finds herself pregnant in unwelcome circumstances is indeed in turmoil- it is a very difficult situation.
    If she decides to abort, there is a risk to her future conception and births. There is also a huge risk to her emotional health; regardless of beliefs or religion, I have never met a woman who didn’t suffer tremendously afterwards, even most women who are atheists feel a guilt afterwards. from where does this guilt stem if not from the internal maternal knowledge that a life had been terminated?
    If a life is formed, it is very grave to hamper with it. Unfortunately when abortion is readily available, some women tend to use it as a form of contraception, falling back on it.
    It will bring havoc to our country, do not come at me saying this is a religious point of view or call me a nutter, abortion is a disservice to women and a complete lack of respect for women.

    Reply
    • Again, anyone who says abortion is murder has started off looking clueless. It’s procuring an abortion and you can argue it’s killing, but murder is a legal offence with a definition narrowed to born, living people.

      And stop repeating the frequently debunked nonsense about abortion being a risk to her physical health (birth is more of a risk, actually) and just because you don’t know any woman who doesn’t regret her abortion isn’t really relevant. Frankly, I doubt a woman who was happy to have access to an abortion would confide in someone like you who believes she’s a murderer. 87% of Irish women believe they made the right decision, according to a CPA report. Sorry none of those women want to share with someone so judgmental.

      And I’m not even going to ask you to justify how giving me control over when I want to have children and how many to have is a complete lack of respect for women. You might not be religious, but the doctrine that ensoulment begins at contraception is one only found in Catholic doctrine rather than science, so you are indeed influenced by religious opinion, which has no basis in legislating.

      Reply
    • And I wrote conception as contraception. Niiiice.

      Reply
    • using abortion as a form of contraception?? are you for real?? that is a ridiculous notion. its insulting to women who have gone through the trauma of an abortion that you think its a decision taken lightly or on a whim instead of using protection. oh its ok, I won’t go on the pill, ill just have an abortion. easy.

      Reply
    • The guilt could come from the stigma of being raised in catholic/conservative Ireland. Just saying.

      Reply
  • Actually Nick I would never judge any woman who has had an abortion which is probably why women speak to me. I never mentioned my own religion, I am catholic.
    Abortion should not be judged, I don’t agree with judging but I don’t agree with life being ended. Hate the sin love the sinner.
    These are my opinions and I’m just as entitled to them as the rest of you- catholic or not.
    I care not for the ‘legal’ definition of murder it’s hardly relevant in the grander scheme of things.
    Thank you for your comment, I don’t think it’s something we should be angry about, are we not all just concerned for lives in different ways?

    Reply
    • As I noted, you were clearly influenced by Catholic doctrine, as very few religions believe that people aquire human rights at conception (nor does the Irish state, for that matter.)

      People get angry when you say misleading things about women’s health. A legal abortion is physically safer for women than birth and to state otherwise, without giving any peer reviewed sources, is lying to vulnerable women, which upsets people. I believe women should always be given accurate medical information, which I guess makes me a nutter.

      And while you might not consider yourself to be judging, if you go around expressing the opinion that abortion is murder (which it’s not – but, hey, why should be use the correct definition of murder and manslaughter in the “grander scheme”), it seems unlikely that the 87% of women who were grateful for abortion access would confide in you, which is why it’s not surprising your experience doesn’t jibe with most women’s reality.

      And we are concerned for life in different ways. I just wish you would admit you prioritise foetuses over women and not feel the need to state misleading information about women’s health. The fact that you need to make up reasons why abortion harms women would really indicate that you know your arguement, if presented honestly, is unconvincing.

      Reply
  • Abortion is wrong at so many levels. And those who tells its should be allowed just think for a moment what if your mother..well you got the point.

    Reply
  • I think maybe let’s just see what happens. It is clear that most of the people here are pro choice, I should not have bothered to post.
    It seems that some anti catholic/anti conservatives are so intent on their own free speech that they knock that of those who may not agree with them (please note I said some, not all).
    However, if I hold an opinion which upsets others, that is not my motive. Ideally, no woman would have to face this choice, but she does. All conceptions are miracles, life is a miracle, that said fighting and becoming angry with one another is frivolous.
    I will continue to pray that women will see the depth of this grief before they make their decisions and that this atrocity will not arrive on Irish shores.
    I will keep my mouth shut and pray…..If you don’t believe in God then I am wasting my time and you have absolutely nothing to be upset about. It should not even merit a comment. God bless.

    Reply
    • Yeah we should all pray, that always works.

      Reply
    • “I will continue to pray that women will see the depth of this grief before they make their decisions and that this atrocity will not arrive on Irish shores.” So….you DO want women to have mental health issues? Lovely.

      Reply
    • Why oh why do these arguments always have mentions of god? If there is a moral argument to be ‘pro life’ why can’t this be made without god coming into the mix? My theory is that if you take god and the church out of it, there is very little left to base an argument on.

      Reply
    • MaryHelen K you are entitled to your opinion even if you are in the minority. A few short years ago I would have been in the minority, would you or your church have let me express my opinion so freely?

      Reply
  • MASS IMMIGRATION AND ABORTION.

    Abortion is one of those facilities that must be available for Ireland”s three quarter of a million immigrants. That’s what is behind the latest drive for abortion in Ireland. Every such facility must be put in place to facilitate mass immigration in the re-population of Ireland- that no Irish citizen was ever given the chance to vote on and won’t be!

    So whether the Irish people like it or not , and according to referenda they don’t, abortion is now going to be forced on the entire population of Ireland. This is cultural Marxism at its best , as you can see driven by the media and socialists , both small minorities, in Ireland.
    The party whip system is to be used to drive abortion home as the law of Ireland, though the Irish people never voted for it in referendum and though the Irish Constitution prevents abortion on demand – which will be the practice as abortion will be granted immediately on even false threats of suicide.
    The abortion mills are set to grind all over Ireland now.

    Reply

Add New Comment