Agreed!!!!

Ryan
Maybe your right, but I never ever hear anything about other european royals, maybe I live on another planet, or don’t buy the right ‘magazines’! Any things possible.

The reason you hear so much about the British royals is we get British TV, newspapers and magazines. Its not rocket science…

It would probably be more wise for her if she kept her Baps in.

She was on holiday in a private residence. She should be able to get her baps out in privacy whenever she damn well feels like.

Totally agree with you Stephanie she should have some privacy in her life, but in the real world its just not going to happen. She will more than likely be our future Queen.

our future queen?????

Yes im in London, She will more than likely be our future Queen.

So! That doesn’t mean she isn’t entitled to privacy. What if she was trying on a dress in Harrod’s? What if she was using the bathroom at an event? She shouldn’t have to think “Better not get partially naked, someone is bound to invade my privacy since I’ll probably be queen one day.” She did nothing wrong. If she’d been on a nude beach maybe I’d see your point but she was poolside in a home
belonging to her husband’s relative. Surely the fact that a ridulously long range lens had to be used to get some fairly poor quality shots (given resolution of digital cameras these days) shows the extent to which her privacy was invaded? Sue them to smithereens I say!

Stephanie im not disagreeing with you, the woman should have her privacy. But because of who she is she will get followed around wherever she goes. And paps will try and get the perfect shot to sell on. That’s the the world we live in. Unfortunately.

Unfortunately there is a whole sector of society of whose only intake of ‘news’ is celebrity gossip. The fact that this muck makes actual news headlines only validates it further as actual news.

British papers refused the pictures because they knew they could run on the story for a week or two anyway without the.

Google it. You probably googled the journal to get here.

Two fried eggs not much to see, still a gorgeous girl though not as stuck up as she could be. Feel sorry for her to be honest she better get used to this type of invasion of privacy horrible papparazzi hyenas.

….and who cares about them anyway ????

I’ll take the pair:) :)

Ah bless Richard, so now you think you have a girlfriend too?

Can you show us pictures to prove your claim? :)

The lads in the pub must love that.

Dont be envious lads ,Get your own girlfriends.

have all the lads in the pub seen them?

Or boyfriend :)

Sluazcanal, should get comment of the week!

Lol Gerard. U crack me up !

she married royalty to become a celebrity. secluded maybe, private no, did she make the bodyguards look the other way?

You might be but it doesn’t mean every woman would be, especially one on a private holiday.

She was in a private home. What don’t you understand about privacy? She’s not a normal celebrity, she gains nothing from this type of notoriety. She’s not peddling a book or a film or trying to get a spot on I’m a Celebrity. She’s married someone she loves, that is all.

The Netherlands could give the UK a good run for their money. Oh and Sweden too.

It’s not “only boobs”, it’s a massiveLy illegal invasion of privacy. These people are selling her body for profit. It’s reprehensible.

Completely ignoring the fact that she was killed by a drunk driver.

and she really should be left alone to enjoy a holiday in peace. royality yea but also human!!

She was only doing it for the lads

Except she was not in public, but rather in a private residence with a high wall

She wasn’t in public? Thought she was in a private villa?

well she couldn’t have Harry stealing all the limelight.

@Katrina Carroll i couldnt disagree more, she chose to live her life in the public forum so she deserves every bit of it she gets, if she doesnt want to be harrassed by the media she should step down, the ‘media’ plus all those who want to be famous, deserve each other

revolting peasant.. she was not in public though was she, if she was laying on a public beach i’d prob agree with you but her and her husband were in a private villa , with a very high wall.. and some dirty photographer hiding in the bushes invaded there privacy! yes she did she her the life she leads now but there has to be a line, in this instance the french mag went too far!

* choose the life..

very unfair she is human same as us all and if people didnt buy these papers or mags it would not be a problem

She didn’t take them out on public !!

you entirely missed my point Katrina, these people choose to be members of an aristocracy( by staying part of it when they grow up), the fact is the papparazzi do this kind of thing all the time, i dont agree they should do it but they do, if these people dont want it then they should step out of the limelight full stop. She deserves privacy as much as any celebrity i.e. none, they choose to be in the public eye

First thing i thought when i heard, was what a shocking intrusion into her privacy. Second thing i did was google “kate Middletons diddies” .