TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

New rules on advertising of ‘unhealthy’ food and drink to children

Foods high in fat, salt, or sugar will fall under the new regulations – but cheese products won’t.

Image: Moyan_Brenn_BE_BACK_on_10th_OCT via Creative Commons/Flickr

NEW RULES ARE to be introduced concerning the advertising of food and drink with high fat, salt, and sugar content to children.

Following a recent public consultation, the Broadcasting Authority of Ireland (BAI) has agreed adopt the ‘nutrient profiling model’ which will be used to determine whether a food or drink being advertised is one that is high in fat, salt or sugar (HFSS) and thereby subject to additional regulation by the BAI.

Under the new rules, the advertising of HFSS food and drink will not be permitted in children’s programmes, as defined by the Draft Children’s Commercial Communications Code.

Rules regarding content will also be introduced for HFSS food and drink adverts broadcast outside of children’s programmes but which are directed at children. Such communications shall not:

  • Include celebrities or sports stars
  • Include programme characters eg Peppa Pig
  • Include licensed characters eg characters and personalities from cinema releases
  • Contain health or nutrition claims
  • Include promotional offers

In addition to this, no more than 25 per cent of advertising sold by a broadcaster can be for HFSS food and drink and no more than one in four adverts included in any advertising break can be for such products.

Notably, upon the recommendation of the Department of Health, advertisements and other commercial communications for cheese will be exempted from the new rules. While advertising for cheese products aimed at children will still be allowed, they will include an on-screen message indicating the recommended maximum daily consumption limit for cheese.

Speaking about the new rules, BAI Chief Executive, Michael O’Keeffe said the revised codes has been completed following “one of the most extensive consultations undertaken by the BAI”.

He added that cheese products were not to be removed from the nutrient profiling model due to the “health benefits and the economic and cultural significance” of cheese:

The key area of the draft code which has now been amended is the removal of cheese from the nutrient profiling model. This was done on the basis that the pre-eminent health body in the State, the Department of Health, recommended this approach given the health benefits and the economic and cultural significance of cheese in an Irish context.

Concerns expressed

The Irish Heart Foundation has expressed concerns that the new regulations do not go far enough – saying it was disappointed that the BAI’s proposed Children’s Commercial Communications Code does not ban the advertising of foods such as “French fries, crisps, confectionery, biscuits and sugary sweetened drinks from 6.00am to 9.00pm in order to protect children and young people”.

“I am extremely concerned that a ban on adverts for foods high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS), excludes prime time viewing when on average the most popular time for children (4 to 17 year olds) to watch television is between the hours of 6pm and 9pm and over half of Irish children watch adult programmes without parental supervision. It is clear that the interests of industry have been put before the health of Irish children,” said Maureen Mulvihill, Head of Health Promotion at the Irish Heart Foundation.

The Foundation said commercial interests had ‘taken priority over the health of children’ and that a ban on advertising such foodstuffs up to 9pm, to include primetime family viewing, was the only proportionate response to ensure adequate protection of children’s health.

It said that a pre-watershed ban was also “strongly supported” by 75 per cent of Irish parents.

The rules will come into effect on July 1st 2013 and will apply to all radio and television broadcasters regulated in the Republic of Ireland.

Read: Dairy Council says cheese ban is based on ‘inappropriate’ UK model>
Read: Committee criticisms proposed changes to cheese ads aimed at children>

Read next:

Comments (30 Comments)

  • Can they tackle the onslaught of adverts for toys during kids shows too.

    Reply
    • Z? 12/10/12 #

      Just import kids’ TV into a generic video editing application and chop out the adverts. A bit of work, but it’s the best way to ensure you know what you’re kids are watching. The responsibility does ultimately lie with the parents.

      Reply
    • Z? 12/10/12 #

      The red thumbs are interesting. Does that mean that people think that the advertising authority have a greater responsibility than the parents and that television is an acceptable replacement for parental supervision? Or just that editing out adverts is too much work to fit into our busy schedules. Kids are work. Kids cost time and energy. It’s an extremely small price for the result.

      Reply
    • Z unfortunately not all parents are that tech savy, how does one get the tv show to their pc remove the adverts and then show it on the tv again without hacking the settop box or illegally downloading the shows.

      Reply
    • Z? 12/10/12 #

      Maybe not, but it’s not rocket science and most people with young children will be in the age group who are comfortable with using computers. I’m not dissing this BAI, but editing out the adverts does solve the problem, and it is the parents who should take responsibility to what children are exposed to. Producers produce products and hire advertising agencies to help promote those products. That’s what they do. We shouldn’t expect them to stop doing this to absolute limit.

      Reply
  • Maybe a good place to clamp down on would be in restaurants.
    Don’t think I have ever seen a “kids menu” that doesn’t consist of chips, burger or chicken nuggets.
    Encourage healthy eating habits and itt willcarry on into later life.

    Reply
    • The problem with kids menus is a complete lack of imagination by fast food restaurants especially! They think oh all kids eat chicken nuggets, burgers,fish fingers, etc but i know from my nieces they have a much a wider pallete than just chips &. A little more thought is needed as to what kids what to eat

      Reply
  • mike 12/10/12 #

    We series link the kids programs, record them and then fast forward over the adverts.

    Reply
  • I think this should be a very welcomed change. Children are very easily manipulated. Usually the products that are well advertised cost a fortune and a very unhealthy for them. Now the won’t know the difference between the products. Think this will make life a little easier for parents.

    Reply
  • On top of this, people who want to be calorie conscious should have ability to be so when eating out. Displaying calorie content on menus, at least approximately, should be a requirement. I understand some people won’t want to see it but those people can look away. People who wish to make slimmer choices or who need to should be empowered.

    Reply
    • or occasionally use a bit of self control ?

      Reply
    • Graham, that’s fine for processed food or chains with the same menu, but how would those calories be calculated exactly in one off restaurants?

      A) The scientific way, of sending the food off to a lab to be turned to ash and getting your results several weeks later. The only accurate way of doing it, mighty expensive and not much use for the daily special you want to run tonight.

      B) The makey-up way, of guessing and using the internet, which is wildly inaccurate and of zero value to anyone.

      Lemme guess…. B.
      As it’s totally useless, why bother wasting everyones time?

      Reply
    • I am won over to displaying calories, even if it’s an approximation, since I read that one pack of Prawn Crackers had an unbelievable 600 calories.

      Reply
    • As I said, at least an approximate value. Calories are displayed on food packaging and chefs know what ingredients they use! Not that hard tbh.

      Reply
  • Thank crunchy that cheese has escaped and rightly so. Ohhhh cheeeessse!!! Nomnomnommmm!

    Reply
  • Nice work BAI

    Reply
  • Enda Kenny is horrified at allegations of child abuse.He only abuses the old,sick and unemployed.

    Reply
  • More nanny state BS.

    Reply
  • Pity they wouldn’t ban aspartame. One of the most dangerous things added to food and drinks. Major cancer cause too.

    Reply
    • …in the knowledge that sugar is a leading contributor to consumers succumbing to heart disease diabetes and the like …is it not time to ban the refined substance completely..it is said to be an addiction…!?

      Reply
  • Regulate, regulate, regulate. The proles cannot be trusted to live their own lives in the way we, their omniscient overlords, know to be best for them. Do as I say, little people, for I am an unelected, ungoverned, quango-master and I KNOW BEST mwahahahaha.

    Reply
  • When I was growing up my mother never bought fizzy drinks, chocolate bars or crisps…surprise surprise I was never obese. These new regulations sure are an improvement but ultimately is up to the parents to educate their children.

    Reply

Add New Comment