This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
OK
Dublin: 8 °C Sunday 24 June, 2018
Advertisement

Blow for Theresa May as Tory minister resigns suddenly over 'irresponsible' Brexit strategy

Justice Minister Phillip Lee has resigned in order to voice his criticism of his party’s approach to Brexit.

lee Phillip Lee Source: PA Images

A MEMBER OF Theresa May’s government has resigned suddenly ahead of today’s key parliamentary debate on legislation regarding Britain’s departure from the European Union.

Conservative minister Phillip Lee, a prominent Remainer, resigned as justice minister so he could speak out against his party’s policy on Brexit.

He said that while he was sad to leave the government, he believed many big changes were needed to make the UK’s exit a success.

“If Brexit is worth doing, then it is certainly worth doing well; regardless of how long that takes,” he said.

It is, however, irresponsible to proceed as we are.

May’s fragile government will be trying to defeat a rebellion by pro-EU lawmakers and reverse changes to its key piece of Brexit legislation as the matter comes before the House of Commons for two days of debate.

May is resisting changes approved by the House of Lords that would soften Britain’s exit from the EU, because she says they will weaken the government’s negotiating position.

Brexit Secretary David Davis has warned Tory rebels that proposals to give parliament the power to direct negotiations with the EU are simply a tactic to overturn the results of the 2016 referendum that mandated Britain’s departure from the bloc.

Davis earlier told the BBC “that was the decision of the British people… and whatever we do, we’re not going to reverse that”.

Lee said that nonetheless, the present course raised questions of legitimacy because the end game was unclear.

“When the government is able to set out an achievable, clearly defined path – one that has been properly considered, whose implications have been foreseen, and that is rooted in reality and evidence, not dreams and dogma – it should go to the people, once again, to seek their confirmation,” he wrote.

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

About the author:

Associated Press

Read next:

COMMENTS (19)

This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
write a comment

Leave a commentcancel