Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Budget 2012

Readers' Panel: Single and working full time

Budget 2012 has seen an increase of 2 percentage points in VAT and an increase in tax on fuel.

Don Roche is a 25-year-old worker in the private sector. Before the Budget, he was primarily concerned about increases in direct taxes – but also said that increasing indirect taxes such as VAT would hurt the economy by taking money out of people’s pockets.

“Overall it’s a ridiculous budget. They’re taking money away which could be spent on things, which creates jobs. Whereas most things the Government spends money on are completely pointless – like libraries, museums, agriculture, ministers’ pensions and so on. They would be the things that I would prefer to cut. I have no personal use for the President or any politicians – they don’t serve me – so I don’t see why I should pay their wages and pensions.

With the petrol tax, even though I don’t have a car, if people are having money taking out of their pockets for basically no reason, that’s a threat to the place where I work. Because people have less money to spend. But I’m in favour of the removal of the USC for people earning less than €10,000, because it means they have more money to spend, and that will create jobs.

Because of the VAT increase, I bought several things today. They’re things that I was planning to buy after Christmas, but I bought them today because they will be slightly cheaper.

The way that they cut things is really bizarre. The Government don’t cut things that we could get rid of completely – but they do cut things that make people angry. They also don’t cut things enough to make a big difference. So it’s not really a proper austerity package. It’s just deferring all these problems until next year’s Budget.”

Your Voice
Readers Comments
16
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.