TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Monday 20 May, 2013

Column: With so many empty houses, why are people still homeless?

Almost 4,000 people are homeless in Ireland. Joyce Loughnan of Focus Ireland outlines what we need to do.

Joyce Loughnan

A SPECIAL CENSUS report titled Homeless Persons in Ireland recently found that 3,808 people were homeless on census night of April 10th 2011.

It is a positive move that the resources were put in place for the Census to examine the issue of homelessness. This report can be used – in addition to prior research – to inform future services and policy development. However, it’s important to note the Census figure provides a snapshot in time, not the full picture.

It does not capture the number of hidden homeless which includes people “sofa surfing” ie people who are homeless and are staying with friends or relatives. It is hard to estimate the number in this situation but we are finding through our work at Focus Ireland that sadly this is happening to more people. There are also many more at risk who are struggling to keep a roof over their head.

What is clear from the report is that one in seven people who are homeless is a child under 18 years of age. These stark figures show that more urgent Government action is required to tackle – and prevent – homelessness.

To most people it must seem crazy there are still people who are homeless while at the same time there is a massive surplus of housing. Why? Successive Governments failed to deliver access to housing for those most in need in society.

Focus Ireland would argue that housing became viewed by the State as an economic commodity. During the so called ‘boom years’, Government policy was directed towards driving output to produce “units” of accommodation rather than building homes – the foundation on which to build and sustain local communities. As we know this approach failed spectacularly and our country will pay the price for years to come.

Terrible damage

Long-term homelessness can be solved if access to housing is improved. Our work proves it’s possible to support people to move on from homelessness and settle back into local communities – once the housing and supports required are in place. We also see the terrible damage being homeless does to people if they remain stuck in that situation.

A review of the 2008-2013 National Homeless Strategy is to be published shortly and it’s vital that every action is taken by the Government to deliver improved access to housing for people who are homeless. The housing can be provided through a number of ways:

  • NAMA to fast-track suitable housing to deliver a social dividend.
  • More effective Government leasing schemes so local authorities can strike deals with landlords to provide secure housing for people in need.
  • Reverse the cuts to the Rent Supplement payments (especially for single people) to ensure access to accommodation for those at risk

The strategy must also support measures to prevent homelessness. Focus Ireland has realigned our own services in recent years to place a greater emphasis on targeted prevention services along with provision of advice and information. We are already seeing the impact as we are helping to prevent more people from becoming homeless.

To solve any social problem like homelessness we must understand why people become homeless. As a society we must also support action to drive solutions and not simply blame people who are marginalised as the architects of their own misfortune.

There are many reasons people become homeless including poverty, family breakdown, a childhood in State care, addiction to drugs/alcohol and/or mental health problems. These are the recurring issues that crop up in personal histories. To effectively combat homelessness these problems must be tackled through targeted services, including aftercare, access to education, community mental health services and drug-treatment facilities.

In addition to securing appropriate housing , some families and single people require ongoing support to enable them to live as independently possible in their own home and prevent them from becoming – or returning to – homelessness.

Saving money

This approach makes both moral and financial sense. It’s the right thing to do to support people who need our help – and it also saves the State money, as the more people are supported to live in their own homes, the need to spend on expensive emergency accommodation is reduced.

We have also found that the more secure families’ living circumstances are, the more chances there are for their children as they are growing up in a more stable environment.

Our Government must realise that failing to address issues such as homelessness not only makes the existing problem worse it also leads to many other problems for society in the future; for example people falling into addiction, deteriorating mental health, some people being exploited and others getting involved in low level criminal behaviour.

Demand for services from charities such as ours is increasing as more people feel the full impact of the economic downturn. We work hard to support people who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless but all the support in the world can’t replace the loss of your home. In such a climate it would be disastrous if the government were to cut existing levels of funding in the forthcoming Budget. They must first provide access to sufficient housing and support services in the community.

It’s important to remember much good work is being done in these tough times. We must remember it is still possible to overcome the greatest challenges if the right priority and focus is given by the State.

The correct approach to tackle a social problem is often only taken if it is demanded by society. We all have a responsibility to demand action to tackle issues like homelessness.
Ireland must plan for the future now. It’s time for Ireland to consider the long term when tackling societal issues and build a more sustainable society , both for now and for the future. Let’s leave the short-termism thinking and failed policies in the past – where they belong.

Joyce Loughnan is the CEO of Focus Ireland. To find out more about Focus Ireland’s work go to focusireland.ie. People can support the charity through volunteering, taking part in events, donations and/or supporting its campaigns.

Read next:

Comments (72 Comments)

  • with so many trades people on the dole if they were given an extra few quid every week to finish these ghost estates and train apprentices on the job the houses could then be sold to long term council tenants that cant get mortgages but were given council loans the council houses would be freed up for homeless people etc, everyones a winner but theres nobody in government able or willing to join the dots on this

    Reply
    • I agree with you. but there’s no creative thinking in this country when you have a crowd of cossetted idiots running it.

      Reply
    • Yeah but that would require government legislation, an act of parliament, and a possible referendum. Then a quango of 10 civil servents on over 100k to administer, a few junkets to the US and China to see how their similar programs are going. All the while the 2 brickies, and one carpenter employed by this scheme never see a penny, one of them dies of old age waiting, and there’s a tribunal lasting five years after the initial scheme was rolled out to see where 2 million euros vanished to during the scheme and also to find out who drank two bottles of Perrier-Jouet Champagne while staying in a seven star hotel in the US on a visit to an apprentice workshop. The 10 civil servents then retire with 80k pensions and the ghost estates are knocked down.

      Reply
    • @ michael, pretty much sums the whole shitstem up there, great comment.

      Reply
    • they have simular schemes in england where u train and build ur own house in a group effort and u end up getn the house at a much lower cost and it works effectively

      Reply
    • The government shouldn’t undercut employed tradesmen with cheap labour from people on the dole.

      Reply
  • Many homeless are in that situation due to severe substance abuse or mental health issues. How extreme do your problems have to be before even your own family and friends refuse to provide you with a place to live?

    Throwing them houses and saying “oh look, they have homes now” doesn’t solve the core issue of homelessness. Many of them need to receive support for their problems, not thrown a roof and told the problem is over.

    And also, a small minority of homeless chose to maintain a homeless lifestyle. So should they be forced into housing to cure the statistics?

    Reply
    • If they’re getting free housing let them sort themselves out. Are we our brother’s keeper? It’s that kind of thinking that has the country in a mess. Let people fail and let people succeed. What a nanny state this place has become.

      Reply
    • If you read the article again you will see that the issues you refer to are mentioned and it says that follow up care is needed to help people with those issues.

      Reply
    • Let them sort themselves out? They’re homeless because they can’t sort themselves out. Seriously how bad of a drug and/or alcohol problem do you think you need before you can’t even sleep in your own parents home for the night? How is a person with such severe issues going to “sort themselves out”?

      And your assertion that providing help for those that need it is becoming too much of a nanny state is beyond ridiculous. It’s called being a decent society that shares wealth and knowledge and helps those in need.

      Reply
    • If this state was a nanny state she’d be the nasty type who’d steal your communion money, and pinch you when your mother’s back was turned.

      Reply
    • ‘sort themselves out’? You clearly don’t give a damn about the issue, you just want all those awful poors out of sight.

      Reply
    • Maria 21/09/12 #

      I agree with you Jason

      Reply
    • Good points Jason, but not all homelessness is down to severe substance abuse issues or mental health problems. Providing permanent housing for all homeless people should be a priority, but not the only priority in tackling the issues these people have. Certainly don’t throw homes at them and leave them be, give them all the other help they need, counselling, medical care, etc,. No one should ever have to willingly sleep rough.

      And if there are a small number of people who want to be homeless, of course, let them be, provide them with whatever they need to live on the streets in relative comfort.

      Reply
    • You are right. Some like the Simon community should be allocated the houses.

      Reply
  • I normally don’t agree with this thinking but the country is in such a dire situation people, who through no fault of their own, should be housed. However, those of us who work (or have worked and are now unemployed) and continue to pay for everything should also be given a break.

    Reply
  • At the end of the day it is greed! Houses are empty but they will not be allowed be used until the developer gets paid, after the damage those people did to the state they should be housed in 6 * 6′s.
    Using surplus housing has many benefits for the state as over time it will help reduce health costs.

    Sad fact: The political elite on all sides of the Daily bar 4 / 5 members don’t care if there were 2 or 3 million homeless as long as they can get the pat on the head from the EU overlords and told what good little boys and girls they are.

    Reply
  • Tommy C 21/09/12 #

    Mike, hows aboyut you do your research before spouting rubbish. As a long term volunteer with various homeless organisations, I can assure you that Joyce is not earning a fortune however, people who work a 40 hour week or more for these organisations also have mortgages to pay and kids to raise so they are entitled to a decent pay cheque.
    Focus Ireland spend at least 91c out of every € on providing direct care for their clients and they also run a coffee shop which has been a source of light for many homeless or those at risk of losing their homes.
    Focus have also housed 42 families since March of this year. thats 42! These are families who didnt have substance abuse issues. The parents lost their jobs and the rent allowance went down so these people couldnt pay their mortgages and were made homeless. Focus acted as a go-between for these people who are now living in proper accommodation as opposed to the B&Bs that the government were putting people in. adults and 4 kids in 1 room without cooking facilities is not ideal.
    maybe you need to get off your bum and start helping these organisations instead of patronising those who do their best to try and help?

    Reply
  • Nobody is suggesting people who are homeless are moved in to ghost estates.

    NAMA is already meant to be delivering 2000 suitable homes for social housing but is dragging its feet as recently reported in the journal http://www.thejournal.ie/nama-social-housing-ghost-estates-512791-Jul2012/

    I woudl also highligh to some previous posters that it actually costs less money to provde a home with support as required – to help someone move on from being homeless as opposed to paying for expensive long-term emergency accommodaiton on a long-term basis.

    Even if you dont agree with the moral argument that a society should support people in need the financial one should make sense to anyone.

    Reply
  • The sad part is of all posts on here, few seem to say the simple truth: its the right thing to do. Getting people off the street is the moral thing to do. They might not thank anyone, hell, some will probably wreck the houses they are given, but we shouldn’t do it because they’ll thank us, we should do it because its the right thing to do.

    Reply
    • If you living in unsellable semi in a ghost estate, paying 1,200 a month and in negative equity, scrimping to feed your kids and then some junky got the other semi beside yours for free, I don’t think you’d be happy.

      I was talking to a Russia a while ago who was incredulous about this (as he saw it) “Communist” country.
      Get a job and work your hole off and you’re no better (and in some cases worse off) than some junky layabout. At least the junky who move in next door isn’t literally chained (by debt) to the house…

      Reply
  • It was about 7 or 8 years ago but I was told that if you do not have an address you cannot claim any benefits, by someone who worked in our local dole office.
    I was told by someone else that organisations like focus Ireland offer to put their address down for you so that you can at least claim some money to be able to save to get a place to live – but the source for that information was not reliable, so perhaps the author can clear this up for me?

    I hope that the social welfare system has changed since that conversation. To think that someone who ends up homeless would then be completely left out in the cold by our welfare system is quite sickening and would explain some part of why it becomes such a terrible trap. Not having a home you might not have access to information services – if you had mental health issues you may not be in a position to think clearly about obtaining help with the added stress of finding yourself homeless.

    I don’t think simply throwing homes at those who have been sleeping rough for some time is an adequate solution, they need more help to rehabilitate. But in terms of housing stock to prevent more people falling into this trap then it can only be a good thing to provide more social housing rather than allow these buildings go idle or just be destroyed.

    Reply
    • 59m was allocated for homeless services in Dublin in 2011 (DRHE http://tinyurl.com/8rjsvos). This provided a range of services to 2,375 individuals (Census 2011 http://tinyurl.com/9rpnrz4). That is 24,842 euros for each homeless person. The 59m funded 70 different services provided by over 31 voluntary and statutory service provider organisations. I wish all the statutory and non statutory bodies the very best in the transition to a housing first approach (providing long term accommodation with supports for homeless people as quickly as possible after entering homelessness). This will over time reduce the high level of extremely costly emergency accommodation and duplication of services provided.

      Reply
  • You ask why don’t they treat the underlying issues, I think the simple answer that this country (and most other countries) are run by rich people who have never struggled for anything. They can’t empathise and make rational decisions that will affect marginalised people as they are incapable of doing so. The closest they get to a homeless person is when they are being driven by in their Merc’s, plus there is no quick win with housing homeless people. No one wins with a campaign slogan of “I re-housed 1000 homeless people and with a bit of luck they will get menial jobs that will contribute a tiny amount of tax, but they will probably stay unemployed”.

    Reply
  • They’re either going to go derelict or be bulldozed. Why not put them to some practical use? It’s this mé féin attitude and loss of community along with slashing social supports or building social housing that has created and exacerbated this problem. It’s an indictment of an any society how it treat its most vulnerable members.

    Reply
  • Andrew P 22/09/12 #

    Irish people in general dont care about homeless men. Its the plain truth. As witnessed by many of the comments above. People only care about themselves.

    Reply
  • In fairness, you cant put homeless people into these ghost estates, because like it or not they will become ghettos.

    Reply
  • so why should myself and my wife bust our nuts working to pay ?1200 mortgage and ?1050 creche fees and pay taxes through the roof for someone just to get handed a new home free of charge.. and then we get taxed more to pay for these homes..

    Reply
    • So a homeless person, or anyone that’s fallen on hard times should be cut off completely if it affects your taxes? Seems pretty harsh. There is enough money (well there WAS enough money) in this country that there shouldn’t have been any homelessness at all and if it meant me paying a couple of euro per week more in tax to sort it out, I’d happily pay it, I can do without one pint a week or without buying a magazine if it means putting a roof over someone’s head.

      Reply
    • M 21/09/12 #

      I think people get confused between beggers and homeless, most of the beggars on the streets HAVE homes and places to stay and work a racket preying on people, the people who are genuinely homeless rarely beg because they are off elsewhere or they can’t face begging, I agree that they should be helped but a lot suffer drug and mental problems and shouldn’t be put up in a new house

      Reply
    • Maria 21/09/12 #

      Dominic – if money could sort it there would be no issue as it would have been dealt with by now.

      Reply
  • M 21/09/12 #

    Houses, apartments were built at a cost to someone, either builders or the general public who bailed out the builders, ye cant give just them away to homeless junkys.

    Reply
  • So who wants to live in a ghost estate outside Drumshanbo?

    Reply
    • I’m sure plenty of homeless people would

      I heard last week they are thinking of knocking down some of the ghost estates what a dreadful waste

      Reply
    • Social housing near commercial areas should be reserved for jobseekers solving two needs at the same time

      Reply
    • if the houses were completed and then let to those on waiting lists etc, they wouldn’t be ‘ghost estates’. as for ‘negotiating with the developers’, most of these properties are now in the hands of n.a.m.a. or the banks, the same banks that have had billions of tax payers money handed over to them by the government to compensate for the un-paid loans that the banks gave to developers to build these houses, so effectively, the state has already paid the banks for these houses, just tell the banks to hand them over ! but that won’t happen here, no the banks will be allowed to grab another big wedge of taxpayers cash, by ‘selling ‘the government houses that have already been paid for ,double bubble for the w88ker bankers at the cost to me and you.

      Reply
    • The worry of ”Unintended consequences” has to be considered. Sincerely intended provisions to care for a 4% incidence of a need can result in up to a 40% incidence.

      Reply
    • Tommy C 21/09/12 #

      Anyone remember the guy who jumped into the liffey after his pet rabbit?
      Well he was offered a house and a job in Portlaoise and turned it down as hes from Dublin city and wanted to stay in Dublin city so yeah, not every homeless person wants to live away from their own town or area they grew up in.

      Reply
    • Nomadic Dumshambo ghosts?

      Reply
    • I agree everyone needs a home and deserves a home. But there are 2 sides to this argument, i know 2 cases of People coming from homelessness into local authority accommodation, one went really well with the guy using the support to work on his issues and get on with his life, and of being of good standing amongst his neighbours, yet on the other hand another guy Has turned his flat into a using den, becoming a nuisance and making life a nightmare for other residents. So it’s not as simple of putting homeless people Into a home when there is other issues that needs to be considered

      Reply
  • Greed?

    Reply
  • there are lots of abandoned houses in limerick that are not in ghost estates. they were abandoned due to high crime rates and fear of local crime gangs. these houses could be used again if the local people would take control back with the assistance of the Garda. I don’t think this will happen any time soon

    Reply
  • Mike El 21/09/12 #

    Hi Tommy. I applaud the fact that you volunteer and I don’t doubt there are hard working people with families and kids employed by such organisations. I’ve been involved in the third sector also and I would be interested to know of that 91c out of each €,if that related to a € of money’s fundraised or their total budget . The large majority of charities only raise about 5-10% of their budgets through fundraising and the remainder comes from government funding and large corporate donations. I have no doubt that they have done good work, and I don’t dispute it, but I feel the governments remit should be only to offer social housing through traditional channels or offer services for long term homeless to deal with underlying issues, and as such not fund bridging accommodation indirectly through such charities. This is just my opinion of course. I feel that funding charities to do what falls in their remit is not efficient. That said, by all means the work they do is great and by all means keep it up, it’s needed, but rather than doing such marketing ploys as saying they can’t provide services for a week, or something along those lines, why not take a pay cut, like the rest off us. Perhaps they have, and I don’t really know the finer detail, but with prominent CEOs of charities on salaries of over €100k, maybe the charity should start at home. Of course, that’s just my opinion, and I’d gladly be educated if I have made some mistakes or assumptions. I don’t want to start a debate online though, so you’ll forgive me of I don’t respond.

    Reply
  • Maria 21/09/12 #

    Mike – well said. Pointless treating the symptom without treating the root causes.

    Reply
  • no I think this massive sense of entitlement is part of the problem in this country. Why should people who can’t sort their lives out because they won’t be treated differently? Give them house, sort themselves out. A line has to be drawn somewhere.

    Reply
  • Cpm 21/09/12 #

    Oh dear, my comment was deleted. And I thought it was a great solution.

    Reply
  • People already receiving free accommodation from the state should be obliged to take in homeless people.

    Reply
  • get a job, and get somewhere to live. no room for freeloaders.

    Reply
  • @Ciaran Morgan, dreadfully insensitive comment.

    Reply
  • Be careful what you say about the homeless , I’m sure you are all good well intentioned people, but unless you have been involved in dealing with the psychological issues of homeless people, then please think a little deeper about what is happenening in their lives before casting judgement about their lifestyle.
    there is a lot more to it than is appearent to “outsiders” looking in.

    Reply

Add New Comment