TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Sunday 19 May, 2013

Reilly: Savita inquiry must be expedited to ensure no risk remains at GUH

The Minister for Health has dismissed suggestions of a public inquiry into the 31-year-old woman’s death, saying it would take “an awful lot longer” to conduct such an investigation.

THE MINISTER FOR Health James Reilly has recognised the need for a transparent, independent inquiry into the death of Savita Halappanavar at Galway University Hospital – but added that the process needed to be expedited in order to ensure no further risk is posed to women being treated at the facility.

Responding to questions put to him at the Joint Committee on Health and Children this evening, Reilly said that ‘justice not only needed to be done, but needed to be seen to be done’.

“This is a very difficult and traumatic time for the family of Savita Halappanavar and I know that it’s going to be very difficult for them in relation to whole procedure,” he said.  However, he added that he had a “duty of care” to women across the country to expedite the process so that if any further risks at the hospital remain they can be addressed.

Earlier today, the HSE confirmed that three people from Galway University Hospital had been removed from the team investigating the death of Savita, who died of septicaemia several days after she presented at the hospital experiencing a miscarriage and was subsequently denied a medical abortion. The statement came after a lawyer for the Halappanavar family told RTÉ’s Today with Pat Kenny that Praveen had no faith in the process and would not cooperate with it.

Savita’s husband, Praveen, told The Irish Times yesterday that he was not satisfied with the presence of three Galway University Hospital (GUH) staff on the team investigating his wife’s death, and made it clear he wanted nothing less than an independent examination of the events surrounding her death at the facility.

Seamus Healy TD said the composition of the inquiry, and the manner in which it had been arranged, had compromised the investigation from the very beginning – adding that whoever had thought it appropriate to place three consultants from GUH on the inquiry panel “was not in touch with reality”.

Although Healy called for an independent public inquiry, the Health Minister indicated that this option would take “an awful lot longer” to complete. Reilly said it was “at the fore” of his conscience to ensure that other patients were not at risk.

Reilly said the inquiry needed to be carried out in a transparent fashion that could stand up to the scrutiny of Savita’s family, the Irish people, and the world.

Read: Galway University Hospital staff removed from Investigation Team

Read: HSE to examine make up of panel, says it takes husband’s concerns ‘extremely seriously’

Read next:

Comments (14 Comments)

  • How in Gods name could anyone have faith in the H.S.E. A fiasco before the inquiry started.
    We are shamed in front of the world once again.

    Reply
    • alan 20/11/12 #

      Reilly should have intervened and acted immediately rather than waiting for the HSE to cobble together such an unsatisfactory response.

      Once again, a shambles. And you have to wonder whether Kenny is somewhere in the background worrying about possible outcomes and consequences.

      Reply
  • James Reilly.
    I would trust you and your comrades no more than I could throw you.
    If I was the husband of Savita I would muster the expertise of the most reputable and competent expert witnesses abroad that one could afford.
    But even if financial circumstances were to allow this, I would not trust the Irish to conduct a fair, professional and impartial investigation into this Medical blunder.
    Aforementioned post is based on extensive transactions with the medical council in a previous case.

    Reply
    • Dr_Palo 20/11/12 #

      Medical Blunder? Seems to me the doctors could very easily have been in a damned if you do damned if you don’t scenario but who knows yet? Await facts before trial by twitter

      Reply
  • Reasons for public inquiry: give the public some degree of confidence in the system, make sure all the facts get a public airing.

    Reasons for private inquiry: efficiency (ignore all the facts, rubber stamp etc)

    Reply
    • Alan
      why would the Minister be worried about the results or consequences of such an enquiry. You make it sound as if Dr Reilly is orchestrating an outcome at variance with the facts. Let’s not start playing the conspiracy game as this issue has enough emotion in it for those directly concerned including the Medical and Nursing Team in University College Hospital Galway.

      Reply
    • > why would the Minister be worried about the results or consequences of such an enquiry.

      I’d say you know the answer to that one yourself, Garry! ;)

      Reply
  • He recognises the need for transparency, but won’t have a public enquiry??? Seriously!!! God only knows the shambles they are trying to hide!!

    Reply
  • Perhaps it would be prudent to wait until all the facts of the case have been released before lynching the medical staff Philip, or perhaps your are privy to these confidential details and qualified to draw conclusions on obstetric practice?

    Reply
    • Agreed. Just hard not be emotional at this. I do respect the medical profession, but want is being presented as fact in the media is hard to fathom Due process is required, absolutely. Do we not have some independent body that could run this inquiry to make sure that process wont be corrupted?

      Reply
  • The worse scenario in this case has happened . The Media are whipping this up to sell a few rags ,the politicians trying to score points and now the legal vultures are in to demand a full public inquiry in which case all get represented with full legal teams and full costs paid for by suckers on here .

    Mr Halappanavar getting lots of advice from his new found friends very few who give a damm about him !

    Reply
  • Lets hope Savita’s husband does not read any of the material that has negatively pre judged the outcome in an effort to kick the establishment. Is he safe from being used by pressure groups?

    Reply
    • alan 20/11/12 #

      Well he has shown that he is well able so far.

      Also, I dont think anybody is prejudging the medical team. this thread is about the process of investigation. and both reilly and kenny stand to lose. reilly for his (already) inept handling of the affair and kenny for the way in which it might force him into actually doing something about the issues surrounding abortion

      Reply
    • Amen to that Alan, in times like this where is the leadership? Kenny is supposed to be Taoiseach, isn’t a Taoiseach supposed to show leadership?

      Reply

Add New Comment