TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 12 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

HSE to examine make up of panel, says it takes husband’s concerns ‘extremely seriously’

A face-to-face meeting with Savita Halappanavar’s husband Praveen has been sought after he said he would not cooperate with the investigation.

Image: PA Wire/Press Association Images

THE HEALTH SERVICE Executive has told TheJournal.ie that it is taking the concerns of widowed Galway resident Praveen Halappanavar “extremely seriously”.

Mr Halappanavar told The Irish Times yesterday that he is not satisfied with the presence of three Galway University Hospital staff on the team investigating his wife Savita’s death. He has made it clear that he wants nothing less than an independent examination of the events from after she presented herself with back pain on 21 October to her death on 28 October.

The HSE said it is now re-examining the make up of the seven-person inquiry panel.

Meanwhile, the chairman of the team Professor Sir Sabaratnam Arulkumaran – the independent expert in obstetrics and gynaecology from the UK – has sought a face-to-face meeting with Mr Halappanavar in order to discuss his concerns in relation to the investigation.

The statement from the HSE came after a lawyer for the Halappanavar family told RTÉ’s Today with Pat Kenny that Praveen had no faith in the process and would not cooperate with it.

Gerard O’Donnell told the presenter that his client would not consent to having Savita’s records looked at by the team. His appearance as a witness would also be in doubt.

“Any inquiry conducted by the HSE does not meet with his approval. He has no faith in the HSE. It’s important to remember that he lost his wife while under the care of the HSE,” continued O’Donnell.

The solicitor added that simply removing the three Galway hospital staff would not be sufficient. The bereaved wants public hearings and witnesses called under oath.

Mr Halappanavar told The Irish Times that he did not believe there would have been an inquiry into his wife’s death had it not been for the outrage seen since he made the tragedy public.

More calls

Ireland’s human rights watchdog has added its voice to the calls for an independent inquiry into the tragedy.

The Irish Council for Civil Liberties backed Mr Halappanavar’s request for a “fully independent” investigation.

Director Mark Kelly said the husband raised an “arguable claim that his wife had been seriously ill-treated”. Under human rights law, this places a procedural obligation on the State to conduct an official investigation, he added.

“The proposed inclusion in the inquiry team of three medical consultants from the hospital in which Mr Halappanavar’s wife died manifestly fails to meet this requirement.”

“Professor Sir Sabaratnam Arulkumaran, the proposed head of the inquiry team has reportedly suggested that the main reason to have ‘internal people involved’ is to ‘find out about their standard practice’. The appropriate manner to achieve this is to call the persons concerned as witnesses before the inquiry, not to include them as members of it,” concluded Kelly.

RELATED: HSE announces details of Savita Halappanavar investigation>

READ: TDs won’t get to vote on Sinn Féin’s abortion motion. Here’s why>

MORE: In aftermath of Savita death, Richard Branson recalls arrest for selling condoms in Ireland>

Read next:

Comments (28 Comments)

  • It would make more sense to have the three members who work at the hospital called to give evidence about the practices etc there rather them to be on the enquiry team itself…can’t see how they would have a meaningful enquiry if there is no cooperation from family such as disclosure if records or husband refusing to appear, there will have to be some changes to enquiry team taken on board here me thinks ….

    Reply
  • Way to go. Let the Chairman talk to , and listen to , the Husband.

    Reply
  • I thought the HSE was meant to be talking to the family about the make up of the panel and it’s remit, did this not happen?

    Reply
  • The part where he says that if iy was for the media, there wouldn’t be an enquiry….i believe that 100%. It would have been swept under the carpet quicker than yesterdays breadcrumbs.

    Reply
  • I agree. No chance of cover ups

    Reply
  • mister 20/11/12 #

    Am I the only one who thinks this was another hapless HSE stroke? Who on earth are these people running an organisation that single-handedly manages to pee off almost an entire nation with almost everything they do, which is generally done badly??? We are a quiet people. (PS.I do know there are lots of good people working in the HSE – I’m referring of course to the apparently endless number of ‘higher-ups’).
    Also, and forgive me if my facts are not quite correct on this but wasn’t this unfortunate event made public about a week ago now? And didn’t it occur about two weeks earlier? So why no mad scramble by the HSE for an inquiry between those two times??

    Reply
  • The very consultants who ‘treated’ this lady investigating themselves…ya…the findings in their report would be totally non bias. Wouldn’t blame him for refusing to co-operate.

    Reply
  • The only reason this case came to light at all was because Savita was involved in the Divali committee and Divali in Galway was cancelled due to her death.
    I can’t believe that three people from Galway Hospital would be on the investigation team. Can’t see how that wouldn’t be conflict of interest.
    I would be inclined to suggest that when this enquiry is finished there should be a complete independent review of how complications of pregnancy and miscarriage are treated in all maternity units in this country. Particurlay in light of the inquest findings in regard to the recent case of Anna Byrne. There seems to be a little too much complacency about our record regarding pregnancy and childbirth which is quite worrying.

    Reply
  • well would you trust the hse?

    Reply
  • has this murder not been perpetrated against a foreigner this would have all been swiftly declared a”human error” by an HSE review group, presided by the very people who perpetrated the crime. Big sighs and what can you do. Thankfully the international media and the family of the victim are actively involved and are pressing for something closer to the standards we expect in the modern western world rather than the shambolic collusion of state and church that is passed off as governance in this country.

    Reply
    • Leopoldo, if you know of any person that intentionally took the life of another in this state you are bound to inform the Gardai. While the use of the word murder may have been an act by yourself to attract attention to your comment it is ill advised and unfair, especially pre enquiry!

      Reply
  • allan 20/11/12 #

    I see a lot of gratuitous and obtuse comments regarding this article, even after such a serious tragedy that resulted in death, that shows the ignorant opinions of the relentlessly hard-wired racial mind-sets.

    Reply
  • Surly some Indian doctors and consultants are needed to balance the investigation.

    Reply
  • I would also question the integrity of the investigation seeing that the British doctor who will lead Savita
    inquiry has previously written that countries who restrict abortion should be challenged .

    He favours “liberal abortion laws” which make
    “choice of a termination of pregnancy a right for
    women”.

    See the paper here: http://www.sciencedirec t.com/science/article/pii/S002072920900143X

    I want an impartial
    and independent inquiry.

    Reply
    • An impartial expert? Someone will always have an opinion either way.

      Reply
    • Colin, there are two possibilities:

      * Someone is anti-choice
      * Someone is pro-choice

      So, no matter who is appointed as head of the committee, someone is going to cry bias.

      P.

      Reply
    • It is practically the definition of integrity in this sort of scenario that you are able to leave aside your personal opinions and judge a matter on its merits. That is what we require of all judges etc – we don’t ask that they have no opinions, since that’s an impossibility, just that they leave those opinions aside and make their judgements based on the evidence before them. That they act with integrity.

      So you are questioning the integrity of this man?

      Difficult argument to make. He is certainly well respected by his peers, having been elected to lead some of the most highly regarded medical bodies in the world.

      Reply
  • Dont mean to sound like a bitch…but this is the only think we are hearing about…many an irish woman died in irish hospital..many kids have had the wrong treatments and there is nothing about it…the cut backs in the irish health system is a joke…but they will cut it on old people waiting on treatments…kids having to have to go out of this country to get treated..but because this womans family and country are pushing things the government will go to any lenght to sort it out…once again look after the outsiders and to hell with our own…

    Reply
    • Surely instead of begrudging them justice we should instead lead by their example and not let “the hell with our own” mentality prevail anymore? You should be happy that this inquiry is taking place, regardless of why you think this is happening, as it gives precedent for other inquiries should such a this travesty happen to someone else!

      Also, kids and adults have to leave this country to get treated for some conditions because as a small country it would be extremely expensive and unsustainable for us to have certain expert treatment available here.

      Reply
    • One of the reason things are getting done is because the family didn’t just quietly accept what happened, the “ah well, sure you can’t do anything to change it now” attitude that resides in Irish society and government is why tragedies have happened again and again without much of a whimper.

      Reply
    • Can you clarify what you mean by ‘once again look after the outsiders and to hell with our own’?

      I’m not sure we have any reason at all to clap ourselves on the back about how well we look after ‘outsiders’ (how ever you define that).

      Reply
    • censored 20/11/12 #

      Sad comment. This should never happened to anyone, whether it’s one of our own or not. I wonder how many times this happened to Irish women and been covered up?

      Reply

Add New Comment