TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
: °C Sunday 26 May, 2013

Santorum campaign reborn as he beats Romney to take caucuses

“Conservatism is alive and well in Missouri and Minnesota.”

Image: Jeff Roberson/AP/Press Association Images

THIS TIME LAST week it looked all but wrapped up for Mitt Romney, while Rick Santorum’s campaign was dismissed as a failure.

Two caucuses and a non-binding primary later and cracks have appeared in Romney’s presidential bid and Santorum has fared surprisingly well.

CNN reports this morning that Santorum has won presidential contests in Missouri, Minnesota and Colorado.

Questions have now been raised about whether Romney can actually bring together the wide-ranging assortment of Republican supporters seal the GOP nomination.

In Minnesota, Santorum got 45 per cent compared with Romney’s 17 per cent. Texas Rep. Ron Paul stood between them with 27 per cent of the vote. Romney’s defeat there is more notable as he won the state during his unsuccessful 2008 presidential bid.

Colorado was more competitive with Santorum taking 40 per cent and Romney 35 per cent.

Bragging rights – but no national convention delegates – were up for grabs in non-binding Missouri which Santorum also bagged.

“Conservatism is alive and well in Missouri and Minnesota,” the former Pennsylvania senator told supporters in his victory speech.

Meanwhile, Romney was gracious and hopeful.

“This was a good night for Rick Santorum. I want to congratulate Sen. Santorum, but I expect to become the nominee with your help,” he told his own supporters in Denver.

The race is still a four-person one with Romney, Paul, Santorum and Newt Gingrich vying for the chance to fight the Democratic incumbent in November’s presidential election.

There was comparatively little campaigning in either Colorado or Minnesota and no debate was held in the caucuses ahead of Tuesday’s vote – a huge difference from last month’s primary contests.

The race will be fuelled again as the 10-State Super Tuesday draws closer. There will be 416 convention delegates at stake on 6 March but first the primaries of Michigan and Arizona must choose a candidate on 28 February.

-Additional reporting by AP

More: Romney win in Nevada leaves opponents out of options>

More on the Republican nomination race>

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • Santorum’s victories in these primaries is all froth.

    Reply
    • To an extent, that’s certainly true. These *particular* states run non-binding polls which, effectively, means that the delegates from those states will simply change to vote for whoever the winner is whenever the winner becomes clear. So, as far as that goes, it’s a useless contest and result.

      However, it’s certainly going to change the nature of the race. Representatives of the Romney and Gingrich camps have been putting themselves out there (such as McCain and Thompson on Meet the Press last week) desperately trying to get over the message that, respectively, Romney’s obviously going to win so it’s time for everyone to shut up and fall in line and it’s obviously now a two-horse race and it’s time for the other Not-Romney candidates to drop out and give Gingrich room to fight. More importantly, the media seemed to be generally agreeing Santorum and Paul had no chance at all.

      Both of those stances have been blown away now and it’s going to be a long time now before any of the candidates again has an opportunity to push for an early end to the competition.

      To give a truer idea of where the race is at, here’s the current delegate count (remembering, it’s delegates, not states, that matter)
      Mitt Romney 114
      Newt Gingrich 46
      Rick Santorum 40
      Ron Paul 28

      Although when you take out the ‘non-binding’ delegates who can change their minds later, it looks like:

      Mitt Romney 73
      Newt Gingrich 29
      Ron Paul 8
      Rick Santorum 3

      So, yeah, Santorum’s series of wins don’t *in reality* mean as much for him as they might appear. But as a media narrative he can play on, he’d be stupid to bow out now and his chances of serious progress has just improved drastically.

      Reply
    • The following is a friend from Arizona’s status update from a few months back..
      Quote:
      “Crunching the numbers:

      No matter what the media wants you to believe, The republican nomination is already a two-man race.

      FACT: Of the 2,286 total Republican delegates, 1,144 are needed to win nomination.

      FACT: In five (5) States: Virginia, Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee and Illinois, Gingrich and Santorum are not even on the ballot. That’s 564 delegates that they cannot get.

      FACT: After South Carolina, only 59 delegates have been allocated to the 4 candidates. Mitt Romney has 39 of those. This means Santorum or Gingrich has to pick up 1,144 delegates from the remaining 1,683.

      Let’s say that Ron Paul only picks up 20% of the total number of delegates. That’s 457 delegates for Paul. Add that to the 564 that Newt and Santorum won’t have a shot at and now there are 1,021 delegates that Santorum and Gingrich have no chance of getting. Subtract that 1,021 from the total 2,286 and you’re left with 1,265 delegates. That means that Gingrich and Santorum, one or the other, have to pick up over 90% of the available delegates to get the nomination. So, essentially, we’re down to Paul and Romney.

      A vote for Paul is not a wasted vote and may well mean that the next President of the United States will be a man that, for the last 30 years, has not broken a promise, compromised his principles or waffled his position on an issue. Preserving individual liberties and property rights are the primary reason for the Federal government, and with a President Paul there is a real chance we may turn back to these principles!…”
      End quote.

      Add to this the fact that mainstream media outlets have consistently misrepresented facts about Ron Paul’s campaign or his levels of support begs the question – why?

      Ron Paul’s campaign is viral. A large chunk of the campaign isn’t even coming from him or his campaign coordinators it’s coming from his supporters making their own videos.. An aggregate site was recently founded to bring them all together. He has the support of the so called “Patriot Movement”, the troops, and a huge percentage of the Internet generation. The main evening news simply doesn’t want to admit it, but this video puts it quite nicely, please do watch it, as it shows incidences of severe truth economy from the mainstream media.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ocJn_V6qyU&feature=youtube_gdata_player

      It’s a pity many people vote for the person they think might win. It makes a mockery of democracy which is supposed to be about representation and not perceived popularity..

      Reply
  • This is all very good for the Democrats if we look at it in an all very cynical and tactical way

    But, on the other hand, Santorum is such a complete and utter loony (he wants Intelligent Design taught in schools, wants to ban free weather reports – seriously, he thinks weather forecasting rights should be sold off and weather reports provided to citizens for a charge; is pro-torture, says a President has a moral obligation to enforce his religious beliefs on the nation (and passionately attacked Kennedy’s definitive statement on the balance of public duty and religious conviction), equates homosexuality with paedophilia, and is against contraception as “a license to do things in a sexual realm that is counter to how things are supposed to be”) that anything that takes him one step closer to the White House can’t help but be somewhat alarming.

    Reply
    • He also says there’s a US Government programme to assassinate Nuclear scientists who work in Iran – and says he thinks it’s wonderful!
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8uNcIEvGdo&feature=youtube_gdata_player

      Nice the way they can bypass justice and just assassinate based on assumption there isn’t it? There’s no evidence of Iranian weapons, same way there was no evidence of WMDs in Iraq.. Anyone with sense would at least wait until after the UN inspections have been completed – that’s the kind of talk that could indeed start a war..

      Reply
  • Bad news for the man with the magic underpants.

    Reply
    • Good news for Obama. Head to head polling shows that, if an Obama/Santorum election was held today Obama would win by 10% (better than he’d do against Romney (who he’d beat by 5%), though not as well as he’d do against Gingrich (who he’d beat by 12%). And the Obama campaign hasn’t even properly started yet.

      But anything that prolongs the Republican competition and forestalls the eventual candidate (still probably Romney let’s face it) beginning their national election campaign in earnest is good for Obama. Especially since the Republicans seem so determined to tear lumps out of each other in the meantime.

      Reply
  • The crazy train just continues. This guy is a freak.

    Reply
  • Republicans at war with each other? Love it.

    All these guys have in common is their ‘not a Democrat’ position.

    Reply
  • Obama has proved that Democrats and Republicans are just two wings of the same Party.

    Reply
  • “Bully” for Santorum. Score some wins both for fans of the right to bear arms in sweater vests and all who can titter like school children seeing words like poppycock and santorum side by side in news stories. Such are the appeals of Rick Santorum, our highest contrast candidate — the “noycest guy” in America who would still quietly freak you out if your daughter chose to date him. For more political mash-up humor, enjoy this funny YouTube video that imagines what Barrack Obama’s Chicago home would say if the walls could talk. http://tinyurl.com/6sevqsj

    Reply
  • Why bother the Republicans are going to be crushed by their own doing, Intelligent Design HAAAAAA

    Reply

Add New Comment