TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Sunday 26 May, 2013

Teenage girls spend 19 hours a day sitting or lying down – study

Girls between 15 and 18 are moving little for the vast majority of their time, a University of Limerick study has shown.

Image: islandjoe via Flickr

TEENAGE GIRLS SPEND almost 19 hours a day either sitting or lying down, according to a new study from the University of Limerick.

During the research, 111 girls aged between 15 and 18 wore an accelerometer device for just over a week. The device was able to tell when they were sitting down, lying down or engaging in other physical activity, and logged their position every 15 seconds.

There was little difference in the amount of time spent sedentary on weekdays and weekends. During the week the average was 18.8 hours, while on Saturdays and Sundays it was 18.9 hours.

The researchers found that participants spent longer periods sitting still during school hours. On the weekends the same amount of time was spent sedentary in total, but the patterns of activity were more varied, according to results published in the International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity.

A number of studies have drawn links between the amount of time spent sitting or lying down and risks from conditions such as heart disease, even if the people concerned are physically active at other times.

The research was carried out at the University of Limerick by Deirdre Harrington, Kieran Dowd, Alan Bourke and Alan Donnelly.

Column: Reforming our relationship with food can start in schools>

Read next:

Comments (53 Comments)

  • Oh please, sleep 8hrs, school 6hrs,secondary school homework 2/3 hrs…meals/toilet etc…
    Anything makes news these days!

    Reply
  • random 06/03/12 #

    I don’t understand why they would limit the study to girls. The results would only seem to be of interest if there is a disparity between the genders, given that everybody’s got to sleep, and this age group has no choice about whether to sit or stand at school…

    Reply
  • Back in my day;
    Well, of course, we had it tough. We used to ‘ave to get up out of shoebox at twelve o’clock at night and lick road clean wit’ tongue. We had two bits of cold gravel, worked twenty-four hours a day at mill for sixpence every four years, and when we got home our Dad would slice us in two wit’ bread knife.

    Reply
    • Right. I had to get up in the morning at ten o’clock at night half an hour before I went to bed, drink a cup of sulphuric acid, work twenty-nine hours a day down mill, and pay mill owner for permission to come to work, and when we got home, our Dad and our mother would kill us and dance about on our graves singing Hallelujah.
      And you try and tell the young people of today that ….. they won’t believe you.

      Reply
    • Lint sucking, coal mining, stubs?

      Reply
    • You kids today have it so easy. We were stumps when I was a boy – lint sucking, coal mining stumps, that melted because it was so hot. It was 4000 degrees in the winter when I was a boy. You’d be standing there talking to your sister, turn around and there’d be a pile of goo with a hat on it where your sister used to be, and you couldn’t even clean it up. Why? you ask. Because we had no cleaning products. No “Mr. Muscle”. We had a similar product called “Not Bad” which didn’t really clean anything, but would just make a streak so people knew you made the effort. It was the best we could do.. It was one damp dark miserable day after another.. but… We were thankful for what we had

      Reply
    • Eoin, your sister sounds like she’s hot stuff! Smokin’!

      Reply
  • A school day: 8 hours sleep. About 6 hours in class. An hour for meals, three hours on computer/watching TV/homework. That’s 18 hours of sitting. So they are active for 5 out of the 6 remaining hours? Seems fine to me.

    The weekend: Sleep 9 hours (including weekend lie-in). The active for a third of the time they are out of bed. Still not bad.

    Reply
  • Since I have worked in Higher Education for the past 30 years I think it would be reasonable to say that I am familiar with this age group, I have certainly noticed a worrying increase in the level of obesity amongst young women. It is commonplace now to see young women bulging out of quite capacious jeans. There are many young women now who have the beginnings of paunches which would have been more likely observed in male beer monsters in the past . It would be true to say that young males too may be carrying more weight on average than back in the 1980’s, but I would say that they seem less obviously obese than many of their female counterparts. It is not an objective scientific analysis, I know, but merely an impression derived from having dealt with the 18-22 age group for a long time.

    Reply
  • I think that is a good idea. In our house we fed calves before school, hauled in fuel for the fire, cooker etc, often walked to school/college and then same when we got home and then did homework etc. I remember thinking when I was 20-22, that I was already sick of work and daily grind…so I think between 15-18 we should be allowed lots of chill time to build up reserves for the demands of later life. I also could be talking complete crap and a tough early work ethic sets u up for life…

    Reply
  • How much did this study cost? Any dad could tell you this

    Reply
  • Bloody luxury lad! We used to dream of living in a shoe box! I had to work 27 hours a day, [according to the Mayan calendar], drink rancid sewer water and gnaw on a bag of old bones, sleep standing up, wear clothes made out of recycled toilet paper, go down the mine at weekends, dig out our own coal with our bare hands, lick the coal dust off it with our tongues, bring it to the surface in carts whilst carrying a small horse or donkey, bag the coal ourselves, seal the bags with snot then bring it all home after a twenty mile walk thru the bog, that was infested with deadly animals, insects and man eating plants……THEN we had to start the fire by rubbing a rose twig between our arse cheeks, to cook the one piece of mouldy crust we were allowed to eat washed down with bile water drained from an old tramp. Hardship? Deprivation? Yes, but we were happy!

    Reply
  • The ‘teenage girls’ part of this research is pretty pointless if you don’t have something to compare it to.

    What is the norm?

    Reply
  • As a buddy once said to me “women are like cats, if they could curl up in front of the fire and TV all day every day they would”

    Must be something genetic to do with staying safe in the cave while man is out hunting

    Reply
  • It’s probably that little thing called the Leaving Cert, and the fact that sport is culturally a male activity (see the amount of coverage female sports players).

    Reply
    • Facebook? Online shopping? Texting? Getting carried in the Mammies car to every place they go? Treating yourself “cos we’re worth it”, treating yourself cos you’ve had a tough time, widespread aversion to sporting activity, household chores? “get real”‘ it’s all bound to mount up. Not helped by hugely indulgent subservient parents who rarely wish to challenge their offsprings choices…we have a little princess and a princeling generation and they despite all our touchy freely best intentions, many are ill equipped for the future both mentally, spiritually, and physically…

      Reply
    • Don’t mean to be pedantic, but mentally, physically and spiritually is three things, so can’t be both. There’s no need to thank me, honestly ha

      Reply
  • Think about how long a child spends sitting in a classroom for five days of the week. That idleness is ingrained in children from an early age from when they’re told to “saoigh sios agus na bi ag caint” so it’s not that surprising that they spend so long sitting or lying down.

    Reply
  • Girls generally drop out of sport and physical activity generally when they reach their teens. That’s prob why they’ve fixed on that group. Not surprised by the results of the study. But save us from more academic studies about the state of our kids diet and lifestyle. What happened to the obesity task force ? That was going to turn us into a nation of stream lined high fliers. Probably disappeared under a load of academic waffle. I’m not bitter – check out what I do for a living http://parentsforhealth.org/ With all these reports we still can’t get funding. Now I’m going for a run.

    Reply
    • I used to row in my early twenties. One thing that I notced was that at junior level there were as many girls as boys rowing almost an even 50/50 split. However once it came to senior rowing the split changed to 90/10 in favour of male participants.

      Reply
  • R cawley 06/03/12 #

    8hrs in bed, 7 in school and 2 for homework, 1 for eating- breakfast and dinner and travel to and from school= 18hrs. Sounds about right on a weekday

    Reply
  • Top predators of all species have this kind of lifestyle,,,,,, !Don’t worry , Be happy .

    Reply
  • How much time was actually sleeping, sitting in school, etc?

    Reply
  • Over 6 hours a day on the move? Not bad. Bet our teens are fitter than the cousin teens access the Atlantic – the fat nation

    Reply
  • a new study how is this new……

    Reply
  • Young girls in ‘studies’ are either too fat or too skinny. Where’s the results that show the normal, balanced ones that definitely exist? Give the girls a break please! And advertising should be more regulated to portray a balance – on the one hand we’re being bombarded with fast-food / processed food as feel-good items and on the other we’re being bombarded with ads for weightloss products / systems. I’m nearly 40 so can make up my own mind but it’s not fair on young girls / young women. They’re getting mixed messages.

    Reply
  • Good point Donal. But when they come to working age they are the harder workers,as I’ve seen nurses vast majority female work more than 12 hours a day for buttons.I’d finish at 6pm as maintenance and they’d be still on duty at 8 next morn,cleaners, as for housewives 25/7…..

    Reply
  • Let me think now…mmmmm, no its not coming, mmmmm oh yeah.. A kick in the bloody arse… These are of future for the love of Jehovah .

    Reply
  • journal spends 19 hours a day down on maintenance. getting an error in chrome alot. seems to be fine in ie..

    Reply
  • ray darcy covered this on his shoe this morning. he started ok but finished up sounding like the Nanny state. dome himself mo credit of course unless it was controversy he was after!

    Reply
  • Sarah Hearnis says “Give the girls a break please”…..er why? It’s not criticism it’s a scientific fact….this is an example of the sort of attitude that prevails so often these days, many people are unable to face into facts, since it may sound a bit “politically incorrect” to say it. As I understand it the research was prompted by widespread observations that young females were living unusually sedentary lifestyles compared with as recently as 20 years ago. The report did not set out to “get at” girls, it investigate a conjecture and published its findings. Would it be better to NOT investigate anything we may not like the results of? Perhaps we should just not upset people at all by engaging in any research which produces uncomfortable results. By that logic, we should not have bothered to research smoking and cancer, since it made quite a number of smokers rather uncomfortable. Someone mentioned the. ” nanny state”, this is an ideologically driven term popularised by right wingers, who favour a free market ion everything. The logic of the “nanny statue” concept is that we should all be entirely responsible for own health care, since it’s a “nanny state” that provides things as oppressive as “hospitals” and trains “doctors”….. Ah that bad oul nanny state….terrible isn’t it?

    Reply

Add New Comment