TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Wednesday 22 May, 2013

UN reveals ‘credible evidence’ of Iranian nuclear weapons programme

The UN’s nuclear agency says it is “increasingly concerned” that Iran is secretly building an offensive nuclear programme.

Yukiya Amano of the IAEA only rarely uses such strong words - indicating a genuine fear about Iran's nuclear capability.
Yukiya Amano of the IAEA only rarely uses such strong words - indicating a genuine fear about Iran's nuclear capability.
Image: Ronald Zak/AP

THE UN’S NUCLEAR AGENCY says it is “increasingly concerned” about intelligence suggesting that Iran is secretly working on developing a nuclear payload for a missile, and other components of a nuclear weapons programme.

The International Atomic Energy Agency said “many member states” were providing evidence that Iran – a member state of the IAEA – was covertly continuing a weapons programme, describing the information it is receiving as credible, “extensive and comprehensive”.

The restricted 9-page report was made available to the Associated Press, shortly after being shared internally with the 35 IAEA member nations and the UN Security Council yesterday.

It also said Tehran had fulfilled a pledged made earlier this year and started installing equipment to enrich uranium at a new location — an underground bunker that is better protected from an air attack than its present enrichment facilities.

Enrichment can produce both nuclear fuel and fissile warhead material, and Tehran  - which says it is using the technology only to produce fuel – is already under four sets of UN Security Council sanctions for refusing to stop its enrichment process.

Iran denies secretly experimenting with a weapons programme and has blocked a four-year attempt by the IAEA to follow up on intelligence that it secretly designed blueprints linked to a nuclear payload on a missile, experimented with exploding a nuclear charge, and conducted work on other components of a weapons programme.

‘Increasingly concerned’

In 2007 the United States’ intelligence community said that while Iran had worked on a weapons programme, such activities appeared to have ceased in 2003. But diplomats say a later intelligence summary avoided such specifics, and recent IAEA reports on the topic have expressed growing unease that such activities may be continuing.

The phrase “increasingly concerned” has not appeared in previous reports discussing Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons work and reflects the frustration felt by IAEA chief Yukiya Amano over the lack of progress in his investigations.

His report said that choice of language is due to the “possible existence in Iran of past or current undisclosed nuclear related activities” linked to weapons work.

In particular, the leaked report said, the agency continues to receive new information about “activities related to the development of a nuclear payload for a missile.”

Acquired from “many” member states, the information possessed by the IAEA is “extensive and comprehensive [...and] broadly consistent and credible.”

The report praised Iran for its decision earlier this month allowing IAEA deputy director-general Herman Nackaerts to tour a facility where it is developing more efficient centrifuges, saying Iran “provided extensive information” on its development of such machines.

However, it was generally critical of Iran’s record of secrecy and lack of cooperation, noting that without increased openness on Tehran’s part, the IAEA is unable to “conclude that all nuclear material in Iran is in peaceful activities.”

Read: North Korea ready to resume anti-nuclear talks ‘without preconditions’ >

Read next:

Comments (18 Comments)

  • It’ll be grand, Israel will just take out the facilities same as they did to Saddam back in the day. Naturally everyone will bitch about it and there’ll be blue murder at the UNSC but it’s not like the Iranians would stand a chance and even then they’d face a two pronged assault from the American forces in Afghanistan and Iraq if they ever tried anything funny.

    Reply
  • Invade! Quickly!!!

    Reply
  • If my memory serves me right, I attended a lecture by Noam Chompsky a few years back, where he suggested that Iran needs nuclear weapons. Otherwise its next on the list to get invaded and have another bloody war in the middle east.
    That’s not saying anyone actually wants them to have them, a madman with that much destructive power at the push of a button is never a good thing, but purely as a deterrent to stop another war.

    Reply
  • Ahmadinejad has previously made unconscionable threats against Israel and indeed warned Europe that it would ‘suffer’ for supporting sanctions against Iran. Worrying to have it finally confirmed that Iran is full steam ahead building a nuclear arsenal. North Korea, Pakistan, and now Iran…

    Reply
  • No country should have nuclear weapons. Some do and getting rid of them is another issue. However allowing more countries to develop them needs to be nipped in the bud! America etc. having nuclear weapons and Iran having them are totally different scenarios given Irans track record. The one thing to be sure is Israel will not be caught sleeping on this!!!

    Reply
  • Here we go again. Iraq becomes Iran.
    “They have Weapons of Mass Destruction”. No, I mean, “We need to stop Al-Qaeda [that doesn't exist here yet]“. No, I mean, “We are liberating the Iraqi people”…. yeah that’s it “liberation” that’s why we are bombing them with weapons that wipe out an entire market – not WMDs of course.

    Is Shannon going to be used in support of this? – guess so.

    Reply
  • Anyone else getting mixed messages about nuclear power here? Message 1: Nuclear power is great for providing basic power needs for populations. 2:Nuclear power is dangerous and can cause mass radiation, destruction. 3: it can also lead to nuclear weapons. Why is it an issue if Iran has nuclear power? The US is the bully of the world, is it not worrying that they have it? Why is noone in the media addressing the real issues here?

    Reply
  • Please spear us this one sided allegation" we need hard fact".

    Reply
    • The one thing that’s being forgotten here is the impact of a war or invasion on the civilian population of Iran, many of whom do not support Ahmedinejad. Comments here like " nuke them" are the sort of things you’d hear bible belt yanks saying. Iran is not Arabic but under the control of Islamists.It has a rich Farsi culture. It has a population of about 70 million and has close cultural ties with Turkey and political ties with Syria. It may be necessary at some point to intervene militarily but it seems the most vociferous advocates of this type of action just want to sit and watch people die on Sky news while they ear popcorn and flick between channels. If they want to see change in Iran or Syria do something positive…. at least join public protests and support those who want change in anyway you can.

      Reply
  • Looks like it’s time for some freedom and democracy. I hope they have nukes already.

    Reply
  • Aidan M 03/09/11 #

    I don’t think anyone would launch.

    Logically you face total annihilation if you do. I agree that there is a small possibility some mad man would gain control of a country and do it. I think this chance is much smaller than we are led to believe.

    I image the population of the country would rise against anyone who is about to seal the deaths of themselves, their children and country men.

    Although logic seems to be absent a lot these days…

    Reply
  • Here we go again…

    Reply

Add New Comment