TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 18 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

UN ‘concerned and disappointed’ over Israel’s settlement plans

Any construction would be an “almost-fatal” blow to the two-state solution, according to Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

A view of the Jewish West Bank settlement of Maaleh Adumim, with E1, background.
A view of the Jewish West Bank settlement of Maaleh Adumim, with E1, background.
Image: Ariel Schalit/AP/Press Association Images

UNITED NATIONS SECRETARY-General Ban Ki-moon says he is gravely concerned and disappointed that Israel is to go ahead with 3,000 new settlement units in east Jerusalem and other parts of the West Bank.

In a statement, he said plans to build units in the so-called E-1 envelope “risks completely cutting off east Jerusalem from the rest of the West Bank”.

The area runs between the easternmost edge of annexed east Jerusalem and the Maaleh Adumim settlement and is highly-contentious. Any settlement would cut the West Bank in two and make the creation of a Palestine state even more difficult.

“Settlements are illegal under international law and, should the E-1 settlement be constructed, it would represent an almost-fatal blow to remaining chances of securing a two-state solution,” continued Ban.

The Secretary-General repeated his call for all parties to resume negotiations and intensify their efforts to provide a “comprehensive, just and lasting peace”.

“In the interests of peace, any plans for E-1 must be rescinded,” he concluded.

Israel announced the proposal to build 3,000 settler homes on Friday, a day after a landmark UN vote which saw Palestine recognised as a non-member observer state. An Israeli official confirmed it was part of a “comprehensive settlement plan”.

Finance Minister Yuval Steinitz also revealed yesterday that the Jewish state would not transfer about $100 million in tax and tariff funds it collects for the Palestinians this month. The move has been described as a retaliation against Palestine winning the UN vote for statehood.

The Palestinians want east Jerusalem as capital of their state and vigorously resist expansion plans for Maaleh Adumim, which lies five kilometres from the city’s eastern edge.

Arab east Jerusalem was captured by Israel with the rest of the West Bank in the 1967 Six-Day War and later annexed in a move not recognised by the international community.

Israel considers all of Jerusalem as its “eternal, indivisible” capital, and does not view construction in the eastern sector to be settlement activity.

-Additional reporting by AFP

Israel announces plan for 3,000 new settler homes after UN vote

UN vote on Palestine should see ‘substantive peace negotiations’ – Tánaiste

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (84 Comments)

  • So a dispossessed people seek small recognition of their existence by the UN and bully boy Israel retaliate by building illegal settlements and withhold taxes. I hope this finally exposes the hatred at the heart of Israel to the wider world. The underbelly has been exposed.

    Reply
  • Criticism of Israel over its stance on the Palestinian issue always evokes shouts of ‘anti Semitic’ and ‘holocaust’. The people of Palestine were in no way involved in this abhorrent behaviour visited on a people by predominantly European nations. Similarly, I can in no way be blamed for the holocaust so I reserve the right to condemn all attempts at ethnic cleansing be it in the Balkans or Palestine.

    Reply
    • Your knowledge of history is as abysmal as your logic. The Arab people of Palestine (who refused to consider themselves Palestinian reserving that term for the Jews) were intimately involved in the Holocaust. Do your homework.

      Their leader, war criminal, Haj Mohammed Effendi Amin el-Husseini encouraged Hitler and actually raised an Arab army on his behalf. He was instrumental in torpedoing efforts to buy the safety of Jews early in the conflict.

      Through the efforts of local Arabs, Palestinians if you will, the British Mandate of palestine closed its doors to those fleeing the Nazis, condemning hundreds of thousands to their doom.

      Reply
    • Ethnic cleansing in Palestine? Are you confusing the ethnic cleansing of almost all Jews from the Middle East? Perhaps you are thinking of the current Arab efforts to remove the remaining Christian communities?

      Palestinians have probably the highest rate of population increase of any people in the world. In Israel their percentage of the population has risen to match the Jewish population despite waves of Jewish emmigration. In Gaza their population is rising at twice the world average while in the West Bank the population rise is a percentage point less but still above the world average. In Jerusalem, the site of new Jewish building the Arab population grew from 68,600 people in 1967 to 244,800 people (a rise of 257 percent), twice that of the Jewish population.

      THIS HAS TO BE THE LEAST EFFECTIVE ETHNIC CLEANSING THE WORLD HAS EVERY KNOWN. Do your homework.

      Reply
    • David — Your distortions are downright wacky.

      Your education starts here:

      The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, by Ilan Pappé.

      How did end up on this website and thread by the way? ;)

      Reply
    • @David
      ‘The Arab people of Palestine were intimately involved in the Holocaust.’

      No doubt they shot JFK as well and organised 9/11.

      Ta for that update on ‘history’. In fact I remember them distinctly invading Ireland with the Danes and treacherously slaying Brian Boru. Its scribbled on page 911 of my bible.

      Reply
    • You clearly don’t now much about history do you Marist ’59 ??? You should be aware of the deportation of Jews to Palestine/Israel by Nazi Germany (before the gas chambers were being used), and many Muslims in the area were collaboraters with the Nazis. Some were even in the SS etc. You should research the facts before coming out with incorrect statements such as that.

      Reply
    • Petr Tarasov.
      Is that the same Ilan Pappe of whom Benny Morris wrote, “Pappe … is mortally ignorant of the basic facts … awash with error of a quantity and quality that are not found in serious historiography. … It can almost be called a deliberate system of error.” ?

      Is this the same Pappe who said, “There is no historian in the world who is objective. I am not as interested in what happened as in how people see what’s happened. ”

      I’ll raise you serious analysts and historians Benny Morris, Efraim Karsh, Herbert London, Steven Plaut,as well as Professors Daniel Gutwein and Yossi Ben-Artzi from his previous employers Haifa University who all consider Pappe is not only incorrect in his conclusions but deliberately mistranslates and even falsifies his so called evidence.

      Reply
    • I’m aware Pappé has many enemies; dissidents always do. Let’s cut to the chase though. If you can cite a list of errors Pappé has made then we can talk. So over to you, produce your list and we can evaluate it.

      On a side note, Morris’s work on 1947/1948 largely supports Pappé’s, despite it being framed differently.

      Reply
    • falsifies his so called evidence

      Boy, you better be able to substantiate that!

      Reply
    • Damian from the IPSC thinks that everyone who disagrees with him is a propagandist.

      Reply
    • Right. No propaganda here whatsoever.

      So we have David from Rehovot, Israel, throwing in a whole bunch of comments. David’s “looking for a position in public diplomacy. We also have Irish4Israel doing coordinated comment spamming and email campaign to email the “author” directly: https://www.facebook.com/irish4israel/posts/174618716013475

      2 + 2 = ?

      Reply
    • Yup.. the usual bully-boy tactics…

      Reply
    • My inner criminologist just woke up for a second … Sykes and Matza’s neutralisation theory attempts to understand how people justify unconscionable acts – I think it’s quite telling, pretty much any given apologist post falls into one of these general categories:

      Denial of responsibility. The offender will propose that they were victims of circumstance or were forced into situations beyond their control.

      Denial of injury. The offender insists that their actions did not cause any harm or damage.

      Denial of the victim. The offender believes that the victim deserved whatever action the offender committed.

      Condemnation of the condemners. The offenders maintain that those who condemn their offense are doing so purely out of spite, or are shifting the blame off of themselves unfairly.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Techniques_of_neutralization

      Reply
    • @Paddy

      IPSC?
      Not everyone who disagrees with Israel’s recidivist criminality is affilliated with your chosen straw-men decoys.

      Try dealing with the issues, instead of hasbara smear-techniques.

      Reply
  • ‘concerned and disappointed’, but not surprised. How predictable have Israel become?

    Reply
  • Just goes to show that the Israeli government are blood thirsty war mongers and have no interest in peace. Their aim appears to be to wipe out the Palestinians, and to keep the “war” going so that they can continue to get money from the US for their nuclear program. Supporters of Israels approach should be ashamed of themselves. I hope that the Palestinians can use their new position in the international community to bring real pressure on Israel – perhaps through the ICC or other similar actions via the UN where the security council does not have to get involved.

    Reply
  • This could end up being a positive move for Palestine, Israel has now lost any remaining country sympathisers, this settlement can never happen it is time for the world to do something about this bullying of the palestinian people!! Free Palestine.

    Reply
  • Why do they (UN) tip toe around criticising Israel? It doesn’t matter what state is doing an illegal land grab, its not right.

    Israel know well that they can call anyone who critises them anti-semitic.

    Reply
    • The US would just vote down anything going negatively towards Israel as they need the ally in the Middle East. China would vote it down because they don’t want anyone interfering with China or her interests. UK and France wouldn’t support anything because they are trying to tip-toe around past mistakes. The only one on the permanent security council who would stand any chance of supporting anything against Israel is Russia, and only because it would be looking to get some lucrative defense contracts out of Palestine and other nations in the region within the next few years.

      That is why nothing more than weak words come out towards Israel.

      Reply
  • The Zionist “settlements” are an act of war. It’s an invasion in slow motion.

    Reply
  • I do not condone the Israeli actions. However, it would be preferable if people based their comments on fact and not prejudice.
    Fact: it is an election year for Netanyahu. Therefore, to show his resolve and convince the conservative vote he feels the need to bomb Gaza, murder Hamas leaders and make settlement announcements.

    It is crazy, but it has become a part of the political election cycle in Israel to mobilise the military every four years and find excuses to drop bombs on houses.

    Reply
    • What nonsense you speak. Opininion polls show that 90% of the Israeli population supported his actions and that includes all the Jewish opposition parties who surely would have been the first to complain if this was an election gimmick. His party’s likely share of the Knesset (parliament) has actually dropped because of his failure to complete the job.

      You should ask, why so close to an election, the Gazans thought it an opportune time to make war against Israel? Didn’t they realise that more than a thousand rocket and mortar attacks would guarantee that no Jewish politician could pretend that opposing Israel’s self defence would be a peace move?

      Reply
    • David — I strongly suspect you are a paid propagandist.

      Reply
    • Petr Tarasov. I wish someone would pay me. If they did it would make difference to the argument. The war in Gaza had nothing to do with elections, neither Israeli or Palestinian. Remind me when they are scheduled.

      Reply
    • Petr, you accuse every person who disagrees with your opinion of being an Israel spy! Get over yourself.

      Reply
  • Israel are trying to provoke a war, then the US has to intervene and Israel can grab even more land and knock a few more houses while their at it……..

    Reply
  • Yes Reg, you’re preaching peace again I see?!!

    Reply
  • The Israeli general at the time of the 6 day war the late Matti Peled completely disagrees with you. The Arabs did not attack not were they going to. But what would he know. Israeli historian Ilan Pappe had also written extensively on the subject.

    Reply
  • Whats the story with a lot of posts being removed?

    Reply
  • ‘..to wipe out Israel..’, captured through the Balfour forked-tongue Brutish empire stroke, and the vicious terror war of Irgun and the Stern Gang and the 1948 Nakba holocaust against Palestinians…still running on its slow-burn final solution of mission-creep settlements and stealth starvation of the native Palestinians from their own stolen lands.

    Sorry, Reg, your tower of babble totters.

    Reply
  • This is nothing but pure politics. Netanyahu needs the support of the smaller religious parties after the debacle in Gaza. If asked I am sure the majority of secular Israelis wouldn’t care about the corridor or East Jerusalem. But the way the way the Isreali election system is set up it gives the smaller parties a much bigger say than they should have. And the American Isreali lobby are too powerful for either the Democrats or Republicans to ignore so the American government have to play along or loose a very large chunk of money come election time.

    Reply
  • Israel will be destroyed by its own Zionist regime in their quest to fulfill their prophecy they will ruin what the Jewish people actually want which is to live in peace and prosper along with their neighbours .Jewish people lived in peace in Syria Iraq Lybia even Iran but like in most cases of invasion the population of the country have no will to steal off whilst murdering other civilians just like themselves.The ruling elite in most countries have bypassed the peoples wishes to implement their own agenda it is the soul reason that the world is in a constant cycle of war and thievery.Is their any world leader out their that isn’t a monster in a suit.They have to be ruthless to get into power is that what we really want going into 21st century with all this technology and weaponary we are playing a very dangerous game and our so called leaders are holding all the guns.

    Reply
  • If it’s their land then why don’t they just stop the pretense and claim it properly? Why string the Palestinians along?

    Reply
  • @ Kieran, it is not fact, the UN does not agree that it “is Israel’s land now.”
    Why should the average person be critised and compared to nazi’s for slagging off despicable Israeli behaviour.
    During the cold war people who critised Russians weren’t compared to nazi’s and over 13 million russian civilans were killed by nazi’s. There is way to much pussy footing around Israeli aggresion by western countries because of the strong Jewish lobby in the USA. As usual it is different rules for different nations, but trying to shame people and calling them nazi’s because they insult Jews over their behaviour is getting really burned out.

    Reply
  • Don’t forget that the terrorism that the Israelis accuse everyone else of was pioneered in the Middle East by they themselves to gain Independence.
    In 1937, the British commander Orde Wingate, who had leanings to the Jewish cause, formed brigades of Jewish self defence groups. They went out at night into the Muslim villages to seek retaliation for what the felt was subjugation in the land that they felt was theirs. Orde Wingate is still a revered figure in Israel today for that fact.
    And the first major act of terrorism was the blowing up of the Ramat David hotel where the British and their families were housed. It was to try to encourage the British to leave the Mandate of Palestine quicker and to show a strong hand to gain Independence.
    So terrorism and duplicity are nothing to the Israelis if it is a means to an end on their part. If anyone else uses the same tactic, it’s Terrorism…

    Reply
  • Kieran the problem with Reg,s facts is they are mostly not true. Israel attacked first in the six day war in what they later called a preemptive strike, as Moshe Dayan said later, in 1967 we were ready for war and willing to go to any lengths to start it.

    Reply
  • The journal has become a censor machine. Come on you have a comments feature so we can contribute our opinion. No point in having it if you don’t agree with it.

    Reply
  • Their book tells them they own everything as far south as Babylon……

    Reply
    • Reginald, Israel has made their intentions clear and the world has had enough. Its not going to be long before they cross the final line…….then it WILL be tough

      Reply
    • Their book also says that the Canaanites and Pelishtim (Palestinians?) were the people there before the Israelites.

      Reply
    • No Mary not the Palestinians. Palestine was a term invented by the Romans.

      Reply
    • Mary, you’re right about the Canaanites but do you mean Phoenician rather than Pelishtim? The Phoenicians as well as the Canaanites and [Ancient] Israelis are Semitic tribes that were situated in the Levant thousands of years ago. Semitic covers a lot more people than just Jews. One fact many people, especially the ones that like throw ‘anti-Semitic’ around a lot, don’t realise is that Arabs are Semitic too!

      Reply
    • Paddy, ‘Palaistine’ was used by the Greeks around 500BCE to refer to the Levant area. The Latin name ‘Palaestina’ was adapted from the Greek. The Greek name is thought to possibly come from the Ancient Egyptian name for the region.

      Reply
    • Any evidence for that Barry?

      Reply
    • Plenty of history books out there Paddy. All you gotta do is pick them up and read them. Or you could even just google it… http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_name_Palestine

      Reply
    • So absolutely no connection to the Arabs in Judea and Samaria/Palestine today.

      Reply
    • Actually Paddy, the majority of Jews in modern Israel are Ashkenazi Jews of European origin. The Sephardic Jews are native to the Levant and are genetically far more similar to Arab Palestinians than the Ashkenazi. Most of the Sephardic Jews are against the wars and occupation of modern Israel – they lived in peace with their neighbours before the mass immigration of Ashkenazi Jews. This time google it yourself.

      Reply
    • Actually Barry Ashkenazi Jews have their origins in the Middle East, dna studies tell us that. Google it yourself :)

      Reply
    • If Eastern Europe and Central Asia were in the Middle East then you would be correct but it’s not. The Askenazi are of Scythian origin – near the Ural mountains. The Ashkenazi migrated westward through Slavic territories and into Central and Western Europe. Many settled near the Rhine in Medieval times and became quite wealthy through trade. This accumulated wealth, along with religious suspicion, is one of the main reasons for their persecution and subsequent migration throughout the world including migration to the Levant. Most Ashkenazi will deny this historical truth because they think it will invalidate their ‘god given’ right to the disputed land.

      I don’t deny that the Ashkenazi Jews were persecuted beyond what words can describe throughout history, but I don’t agree that this gives them the right to persecute people of other ethnic origins i.e. Palestinian Arabs.

      Reply
  • The ipsc are out in force on the Journal today,

    Reply
  • Amazing, I just saw that my comment from earlier was deleted – it was quite fact based – and the reason is probably because in the first line I stated that that their recent actions since the recognition of Palestine in the UN show that Israel is ruled by “blood thirsty war mongers” … can someone disprove that ? maybe provide a comparison of the number of Palestinians they have killed versus the number of Israelis killed ? perhaps it could be broken down in to categories of men, women and children … bottom line, Israel does not want peace or they lose the donations from the US for their security (nuclear) programs.

    Reply
  • Why is sinead o carroll deleting pro israel comments ?

    Reply
  • Interesting that people on here see no problem with the Palestinians breaking the Oslo accords.

    Reply
  • LOL Pro-Israel people have a worse persecution complex than Unionists, and that is saying something.

    They are now organising an ‘email Sinead’ effort. Jesus wept!

    Reply
  • Everyone criticises Reginald for stating a fact that is not actually opinion based, and allow Padraig free reign to describe the Jewish nation in the most objectionable way (“they’re like maggot infestation”). Padraig’s comment is one that could have come straight from the mind of Heinrich Himmler, who dehumanised Jews by describing them as “untermencsh” – “subhuman”. It’s easier to kill 6,000,000 “pigs” or ” maggots” than “men”. The Nazis evolutionary and atheistic mindset excused their behaviour – in their own minds at least.
    It seems some here believe they have the freedom to state exactly what they like, no matter how perverted or objectionable, and think there will be no consequence.

    Reply
  • @John the six days war was caused by an attempted Arab land grab and the attempted Arab destruction of the nation of Israel. Irregardless of the UN view of Israel’s retention of land. That’s a fact. Or do you want to re-write history?
    I am not calling anyone a Nazi. I am comparing the tactic of dehumanising human beings to that practiced by the Nazis. The comparison is stark and real. Love em or hate em, the Jewish nation does not threaten to destroy their neighbours because they consider them pigs or subhuman. The same cannot be said of the neighbours. Arab Muslim children tend to be raised to believe that the Jew is less than human. By the by, unlike the Nazis, your average Muslim is neither an evolutionist nor an atheist, they have religious reasons for hating Jews. Or a Palestinian may also have land reasons to hate Israel.
    I am opining that, like the Nazis, to be either an atheist or an evolutionist (or both) negates the need to feel accountable for describing people as less than human. If you do not consider someone to be human and you describe them as vermin, it’s easier to call for their destruction. It’s ugly and nazi-like to call people maggots. I’m calling someone out over it.
    I can agree to disagree over the Palestinian nation/land question, thats politics and war. The other thing is insidious.

    Reply
  • End of world war 2 the newly formed United nations with France,uk and USA established the state of Israel do don’t be shocked by their flippant supine attitude to Israel by the UN. USA needs its bully boy Israel in the region to further USA And iseali foreign policy is a mutual arrangement at the minute but china and Russia can’t be ruled out of the mix.

    Reply
  • @Carlin there is hardly a serious – or even a secondary school level – historian on earth would agree with you. Arab nations conspired and
    ativated their armed forces to annihilate Israel. That is historical fact.

    Reply
  • Captured in the 1967 6 days war. A war started by the Arab countries to wipe out Israel, which they lost. It’s Isreals land now. Tough.

    Reply
  • Kieran historian Ilan Pape seen the Israeli archives. He is also from Israel. Even the opinion changing Benny Morris once agreed. But the most important is Matti Pelled, Israeli general during the 6 day war stated to the Israeli gov at the time that attacking such nations (Egypt, Syria) was the best tactical move as they were practically incapable of defense never mind attack. His son Miko travels around America and sometimes Europe speaking about it. He has written a good book on the subject called the Generals Son. John Pilger, Noam Chomsky and Norman Finkelstein have also written on the subject.

    Reply
  • Gavin 03/12/12 #

    Israels re-establishment was predicted with more predictions to come.
    Hatred toward them is not new, they had to claim the land in the beginning and the surrounding nations suffered because of it and hatred burned in them too I bet. It is part of who they are to reclaim it again and again! It is their promised land.
    You can like it or not but at least make an informed decision on the matter.
    Prophecy is the stamp and a true God, only the bible has that monopoly…
    http://youtu.be/NvYzmp1gFRc

    Reply
    • @Gavin, What a load of crap

      Reply
    • Nice one Gavin, did you get to the end of your magic book yet, I’ve a good one Thor and another on Ganesh when you are finished.

      Reply
    • Gavin 03/12/12 #

      @John: the prophecies and their fulfillment are true. I’m just saying that there are more that are supposed to follow, do we just disregard that FACT and play caution to the wind?
      Your lambasting doesn’t help!!!

      Reply
    • I find it funny how Gavin uses the phrases “make an informed decision” and “only the bible has that monopoly” almost in the same sentence. I needed that laugh to lighten up the day.

      Reply
    • Gavin 03/12/12 #

      @ Jason: I mean ‘informed’ regarding what the bible prophecies are, its why I attached the link.
      The bible is made up of about 1/3 prophetic themes, its what separates it from any other so called ‘holy book’. Its stands alone in that regard, prophecies that have occurred beyond even a reasonable doubt, and are the hallmark of omnipotence. That is why I say monopoly, so laugh away!
      Proverbs 18:2 ESV: A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.

      Reply
    • @ Gavin

      Genesis 16:8

      And he said “Hagar, Sarai’s slave girl, where have you come from and where are you going?” She answered, “I’m running away from Sarai, my mistress.” The angel of the Lord said to her, “Go back to your mistress and submit to ill treatment at her hands.

      Reply
    • Hahaha Gavin… yer too funny!

      So God is now an estate agent?! hahaha

      Reply
    • Hey Gavin, your talking a load of hogwash! “bible prophecies” FFS get a grip man, there’s no more truth or facts in that piece of fiction than any other! The Israelis are flouting international law, just like they always do safe in the knowledge that as long as the US backs them up they can do as they please, they are like the annoying obnoxious little brat who bullies other kids in the playground with the big bully standing over them. This should make people wake up to the fact that Israel and Nethanyahu in particular have no interest in peace and are certainly not going to allow a 2 state solution. I don’t condone terrorism in any form but like a lot of people I am sick of the Israelis and i’m sick of hearing the holocaust card being played again and again by those who support them. The Israelis have had 70 years to come to a solution with the Palestinians, they have milked the holocaust for all it’s worth and tragic as that was for the Jews and don’t forget not all Jews are Israelis. I think the time is coming when Israel is either going to have to get serious about peace or face the prospect of an all out war with it’s Arab neighbours especially Egypt, Egypt is slipping more and more down the road to becoming an Islamic republic, another Iran in the making and with Syria tearing itself apart and the very real prospect of it too becoming another Iran then Israel is going to face an onslaught, throw Iraq into the mix and you have another enemy in waiting. Even Turkey has fallen out with the Israelis so they are becoming more and more isolated. Only the US and it’s puppy the UK are standing firm and even the puppy has been yapping at Israel this morning over these ‘settlements’. If Israel continues to build these illegal settlements then they deserve to be treated like a pariah, they can’t have it both ways. As for the threats to Israel from Hamas and other terrorists by all means they have the right to defend themselves but their own behaviour is just playing into the hands of the extremists.

      Reply
    • Wee caveat, Gavin.

      Think of the bible as the Hollywood of its day. Lotsa people think John Wayne tamed the West. Its not gospel.

      Reply

Add New Comment