TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Explainer: Here’s what you need to know about Mali

As tensions surge between France and its former colony Mali, this factfile gives the facts about the country and how the current situation arose.

A Mali special forces soldier stands guard at Banako's airport on Wednesday
A Mali special forces soldier stands guard at Banako's airport on Wednesday
Image: AP Photo/Jerome Delay

TENSIONS HAVE SURGED  in Mali as France and its former colony have become locked in a vicious military struggle over a large part of the vast, landlocked country.

For more than a week, a French military operation has been ongoing against armed Islamist rebels who have controlled the north of the country since April 2012.

Here are the key facts and figures about Mali:

GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: Mali, a largely desert country which is crossed by the Niger River, is 1,240,000 square kilometres in area. It is bordered to the north by Algeria, to the east by Niger, to the south by Burkina Faso, Ivory Coast and Guinea, to the west by Senegal and to the northwest by Mauritania.

POPULATION: 15.8 million in 2011 (World Bank), 70 percent of whom live in the countryside. Divided into 20 ethnic groups, including the Bambara, Fulani, Marka, Senufo, Soninke, Tuareg, Songhai, Malinke and Dogon.

CAPITAL: Bamako.

LANGUAGES: French is the official language.

RELIGION: Muslim (90 percent), Christian (10 percent).

HISTORY: Formerly a French colony, Mali gained independence on June 20, 1960. The country was run by president Modibo Keita until a coup d’etat in 1968 led by Moussa Traore.

After more than 22 years in power, Traore’s regime was overthrown by an armed insurrection in March 1991 in which dozens were killed.

A Transitional Committee, headed by Lieutenant Colonel Amadou Toumani Toure, ran the country from 1991 until elections in 1992 when Alpha Oumar Konare became the first democratically elected president. He stepped down at the end of two five-year terms in 2002.

Toure then ran for election as an independent and won in 2002. He was reelected in 2007.

On March 22, 2012, mutinous soldiers led by Captain Amadou Sanogo announced they had overthrown the Toure government, saying it had failed to give the armed forces the means to defeat a rebellion by Tuareg rebels and Islamists in the north.

The junta and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) then announced a deal that includes democratic elections. At the same time the Tuaregs and Islamist groups allied to Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb occupied the north, declaring independence in the region. Islamists then overcame the Tuaregs and occupied the north, applying an extreme form of Islamic law.

Mali Fighting

WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN MALI THIS MONTH

January 10:

- Islamists capture the government-held central town of Konna and say they will push farther south.

- Mali’s interim president Dioncounda Traore asks France for help.

- Witnesses say foreign troops and weapons have begun arriving by transport plane at an army base in Sevare, just 70 kilometres south of Konna.

January 11:

- With French support, Malian government troops launch an offensive against Islamist rebels.

- French President Francois Hollande confirms French troops are actively supporting the offensive.

January 12:

- French Defence Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian announces the death of a French helicopter pilot.

January 13:

- French airstrikes target Islamist bases in the northern regions of Gao and Kidal.

- Four French Rafale fighter jets bomb targets near the town of Gao, which has been controlled by an Al-Qaeda offshoot, destroying rebel training camps and logistical bases, according to Le Drian. More than 60 rebels are killed in Gao and its outskirts, residents say.

- Hollande says the intervention has stopped a southward rebel advance seen as threatening the capital Bamako.

- Algeria has authorised French warplanes to use its airspace for bombing raids on Mali, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius says.

January 14:

- Rebels abandon key northern bases. Residents in the towns of Gao, Douentza and Timbuktu report all Islamists have fled, though a rebel spokesman calls it a “tactical retreat.”

- However, Islamists seize the town of Diabaly in government-held territory, 400 kilometres north of the capital. They vow to “strike at the heart of France.”

- Ethnic-Tuareg separatists say they are ready to support France by taking on Islamist rebels on the ground.

January 15

- France engages for the first time ground troops to retake Diabaly. Hundreds of soldiers from France and Mali head to the town, which witnesses say is bombarded by French fighter planes. Le Drian says the Malian army has not regained control of Konna, after the Malian army announced on January 12 that they had taken the town.

- Speaking in Dubai, Hollande says the French intervention has three objectives — “ending terrorists attacks,” as well as “securing Bamako where we have thousands of citizens and help Mali to restore its territorial integrity.”

- Some 2,500 French troops are to be deployed for Operation Serval.

January 16

- French troops battle rebels in Diabaly. Le Drian says the western zone where Diabaly lies is home to “the toughest, most fanatical and best-organised groups.”

- Islamist fighters claim to have taken 41 foreigners hostage in a retaliatory attack in neighbouring Algeria.

- West African army chiefs met in Bamako to fine tune plans to send African troops to join the offensive.

January 17

- French warplanes continue to pound Islamist militant targets in Mali around Diabaly.

- Confusion abounds over the fate of the hostages being held in the gas field compound in Algeria

January 18

- French troops seize Konna, a key city in the central region of Mali, from the rebels.

- Hundreds of hostages are freed by militants holding them at the Algerian gas facility but around 30 foreign workers were still unaccounted for as of Friday evening.

(Tank photo: AP Photo/Harouna Traore)

- © AFP, 2013

Read: United Nations backs Mali intervention as more French troops on the way >

Read: Mali conflict: Islamists vow to strike ‘at heart’ of France >

Read next:

Comments (43 Comments)

  • Very informative and well researched article. I was really curious about what was going on in Mali but just too lazy to Google it :)

    Reply
  • The armed Islamist rebels are uncivilised savages enforcing their barbaric version of the Sharia. A living nightmare if you happen to be a woman or a non Muslim.

    Reply
    • B Lowe 19/01/13 #

      I agree with you and I believe they should not be called to impose their version of Islamic law unless of course this is what the majority of the people wanted, which I presume they wouldn’t.

      What irrates me is the selective reporting. The West currently supports Islamists who are imposing Sharia law in other parts of the world yet Western countries are suddenly all of a sudden angered at Islamists trying to impose Sharia law in Mali.
      The media is also working itself up into a frenzy at the apparent outrageous yet seem ok to thread the unspoken line in other parts of world re Islamists and Islamic law.
      I wouldn’t say we’ll have any western reporters embedding themselves with the ‘rebels’ here.

      Reply
    • Its just the usual double standards .France is there as a proxy for US /Western interets . The aim is to secure Malis gold and other precious metals eg Uranium .
      Gold is going to be very important in curnce wars – and Mali has 12million ounces of it – [ price at moment is $ 1100 / ounce ] – and that price will rise and rise .

      Reply
  • Timbuktu is located in Mali. It does really exist.

    Reply
  • Too little too late by any Irish mainstream media to report on Mali’s current conflict, considering it has been ongoing for over a year! But I’ll give thejournal.ie credit that it apparently has put the research in understanding the conflict, though in the past year this site only reported the destruction of historic sites in Timbuktu and France’s ongoing recent intervention.

    The Tuareg self-proclaimed independent nation, which for some reason is not even named here, is Azawad. It is also important to know that the Tuareg struggle is part of a larger ongoing battle for Berbers to assert their own identity in northern Africa against pan-Arab, pan-African (in the case of Mali) and pan-Islamist aggression.

    Reply
    • It amazes me Stephen, We Irish love to cheer on the underdog, Sinn Fein are obsessed with seperatist movements in Spain and Scotland etc,
      Yet where is Sinn Fein et al when it comes to Azawad, Western Sahara,West Papua New Guinea,Tibet etc ? Why is their no support for those people and their attempt for self determination ?

      Reply
    • Danial you have my hymn sheet. Well said.

      Reply
    • Another reason that may explain why the Irish media, NGOs and activists have showed little interested in Mali until recently is that a lot of the information about the region circulated, especially on the net, is in French and Berber activists often talk to each in French or Arabic.

      Reply
    • You’re right, Stephen. The Tunisian Revolution was brewing for about eight months before it got a mention in the anglophone press. There was lots of interesting pieces online and in the Francophone media (mostly North African) but none at all elsewhere. It happens, it doesn’t always mean there’s an agenda or hypocrisy at play.

      Reply
  • Interesting that there is not a peep out of the Irish anti war movement or Richard boyd Barrett about this, that must mean this is a “good war” then….

    Reply
    • Why would there be?
      Mali is a democratic and somewhat stable country. Are they supposed to sit back and let a bunch of misguided religious zealots shoot up towns and villages?
      Completely justified military action from my understanding of the situation.
      If there’s an alterior motive for France’s involvement, I’d love to hear it.

      Reply
    • B Lowe 19/01/13 #

      Re Paul. Did you read the article? Mali is currently ruled by a military dictatorship. Why are you describing it as democratic. Also, Paul, the event you described about Islamists over running towns and villages is actually occurring in Syria at the moment with Western support. Without Western support the mainly foreign Islamic jihadists in Syria would have been defeated long ago.

      France actually directly supported the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group(LIFG) in their recent intervention in Libya. They trained the LIFG, armed them, supported them and put their aircraft and special forces at their disposal. France had no qualms about supporting the LIFG in their efforts to oust Gadaffi for some broader geopolitical reason I’m conjunction with other Western powers/NATO. France wanted Gaddafi ousted as he was close of implementing his gold dinar system which by the way Sarkozy described as the greatest ever seen threat to the financial stability of the West.
      So there we go. Think on that for a whole.
      Also think on the fact that French troops are now fighting the very people they trained in Libya as the LIFG is closely allied to the Al Qaeda elements in Northern Mali now. The article fails to mention this important fact.

      Reply
    • Democratic & stable? I count 3 coups in this article alone….

      Reply
    • The silence from the left is always deafening when something like this happens.

      Reply
    • Are we reading the same article? There was democratic elections from 1992 – 2012.

      Reply
    • The Irish Anti War movement is only interested as long as it is Americans,British or Israeli’s involved.
      They were silent on the civil war in Sri Lanka and Congo.They did nothing about the genocide in Darfur.

      Have never mentioned the ongoing attacks in Somalia.
      Yet lone behold a Yank or a Brit gets involved and they are out and up in arms.Sickening double standards.The Irish Anti War Movement is NOT a pascifist organisation.It is not even really anti war,
      Then again look at the Irish Palestine Solidarity Campaign. 880 Palestinians killed in Syria over 20,000 made refugees and guess what I think they made ONE press release. No protests,No demonstrations. Why is this ?

      Reply
    • Daniel — You support Israeli apartheid; you have some cheek taking the high moral ground!

      What happened to Lollapalooza Israel by the way? :))

      Reply
    • Well said Daniel,
      Of course Petr can’t acknowledge the double standards of groups like the IPSC and Irish Anti War Movement but the majority of Irish people are waking up to this double speak.

      Reply
    • A widely ignored fact is also is that any country where a non Islamic country shares its borders with an Islamic state there is a War or at least a volatile situation…..the Religion of Peace ! Is the whole world picking on poor Islam or is it the other way round ?

      Reply
  • Resources and religion. The two main causes of conflict since man first stood up on his hind legs and realised what was around him. “By god” he thought. “I’m having that bit of land”.

    Reply
    • Thing is Paul there was no such thing as fighting over religion before muhammad concieved the idea of jihad…it was all down hill after that. ( Christianity did not concieve of a holy war until it adapted the idea from its confrontation with islam…and that was after 300 years of islamic expansion by the sword. And don’t mention the jews in the old testament. that was over land/resources.)

      Reply
  • B Lowe 19/01/13 #

    Indeed the armed Islamic rebels are intent on imposing an extreme version of Islamic law. But people need to be aware that this is and has not been an issue for the West.
    The officially recognised Syrian opposition group has stated that Syria will be an Islamic state where Sharia law will be imposed. The West has not batted an eyelid at this.
    Also, people need to be aware of French hypocrisy and their anterior motives for going into France. France currently directly supports Syrian ‘rebels’ in Aleppo who are Islamists. The Islamists there banned women from driving as their very first act. No problem with the extreme version of Islamic law there by the French.
    The French could possibly be trying to secure supply of Uranium for Nuclear Energy. No article has mentioned one of the French governments stated primary national objectives which is to secure supply of Uranium.
    Media reports coming from the region are describing the fighting as being carried out by foreign Islamists. A similar situation is occurring in Syria yet the foreign fighters there are referred to as ‘rebels’. The situation in Mali is that some of the fighters are Islamic jihadists linked to Al Qaeda just like in Syria but also some fighters are locals so why is this not being referred to as a rebellion.
    Words are powerful and their use can dramatically alter the perspective.

    Reply
    • Julie 19/01/13 #

      Why are out media not telling us this ?

      Reply
    • Julie 19/01/13 #

      * our

      Reply
    • B Lowe 19/01/13 #

      Re Julie
      It is my own personal opinion, but corporate interests own many Western media outlets and they offer a perspective on the world that suits their private interests. Corporations are legally obliged to make as much profit for shareholders as they can. One must bear this in mind. Also, many media outlets tow the national line and the majority of people do not look into alternative source for information that are out there on the net.

      You will not hear it from ‘our’ media if it does not suit the narrative or agenda.

      It is a testament to the power of propaganda that people believe for example that the US opposes tyranny and oppression. Nothing could be further from the truth.
      The US supports tyranny and oppression as long as it suits its national interests(Saudi Arabia/Bahrain et al) and opposes tyranny and oppression when it suits its national interests(Libya/Iraq/Syria).

      Reply
    • Julie 19/01/13 #

      Yes I studied business it used to be that business by corporations was carried out in the interest of the people but it was one man changed that I can’t place his name and made it all about maximising profits and no mention of people. I know in America it is the big corporations who fund the politics so they have major influence over politicians and therefore policies! Thanks you made some interesting points.

      Reply
    • And b Lowe supports tyranny in Syria by backing the Assad regime. Just read his past posts.

      Reply
  • B Lowe must think that we are all stupid and that we need to be educated on what’s happening in the world.
    Note to b Lowe- enough of your self delusional grandeur!

    Reply
  • Northern Mali and Niger belong to Tuaregs and what happen in Mali also affects Niger. So France can’t allow it to affect their companies in N. Niger cause France has used their uranium to build its nuclear industry and produces 75% of her electricity, while Niger became 4th poorest country in the world. Recently France has discovered huge deposits of oil, uranium and gold in N. Mali and wants to bring her companies. The only reason why France has turned against islamists is that they messed up her plans for exploiting Mali with help of their puppets. Tuaregs and Barbers are the biggest victims here cause everyone robes their natural wealth and land, wether are French or islamists.

    Reply
  • It is very altruistic of France to go to the aid of Mali and their people – it is a wonder why they have not intervened more in Africa or why the UN did not send in troops.

    However, States rarely act in this manner and it would not surprise me if there were natural resources there like oil and France was acting out of self interest. It would be interesting to know the real reason why they intervened

    Reply
  • In reply to the above comments by ‘Daniel O’Carroll’, I wish to make clear that I was not the author of those comments (I formerly went by that surname before changing it by deed poll this summer) and do not endorse that person’s views.

    This seems to have arisen after I left an organization I formerly supported called Irish4Israel (this happened some time ago) and handed over login details to the Twitter account which seems to have been used to log in to TheJournal.ie. The individual who assumed this account obviously never bothered to change some of the details, including the name of the account-holder.

    Reply

Add New Comment