TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 17 °C Thursday 20 June, 2013

WikiLeaks suspect tells court of his despair in ‘cage’

Bradley Manning is charged with aiding the enemy by causing hundreds of thousands of classified documents to be published on the secret-sharing website WikiLeaks.

Bradley Manning steps out of a security vehicle as he is escorted into the courthouse.
Bradley Manning steps out of a security vehicle as he is escorted into the courthouse.
Image: (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

WIKILEAKS SUSPECT BRADLEY Manning admitted to falling apart during his detention and contemplating suicide, as he took the stand for the first time at a pre-trial hearing yesterday.

The 24-year-old US Army private, facing possible life imprisonment over allegedly leaking documents to the secret-spilling WikiLeaks website, acknowledged he had suicidal thoughts initially when he was held in a “cage” in Kuwait in 2010.

He told the court he “started to fall apart” not long after being detained in Iraq in May 2010. After being held for a short time in Kuwait, he was transferred to a brig in Quantico, Virginia, where he was held for nine months.

Aiding the enemy

Later yesterday military judge Denise Lind said Manning could potentially plead guilty to lesser charges and avoid conviction for “aiding the enemy,” which carries a possible life sentence.

However, the ruling focused solely on the wording of a proposal from Manning and did not represent formal acceptance of a plea, which could come at later proceedings.

Manning is demanding his case be dismissed because of alleged mistreatment during his detention at the Quantico brig, where he was kept isolated and under suicide watch despite objections from psychiatrists.

The boyish-looking soldier recounted how he was forced to stand at attention naked in his cell and encountered angry responses when he questioned his detention regime.

Toilet paper

“If I needed toilet paper, I would stand to attention and shout: ‘Detainee Manning requests toilet paper!’” he said.

Manning, accused of the worst security breach in American history, faces a slew of charges over his alleged disclosures to WikiLeaks, which embarrassed the US government and rankled Washington’s allies.

Before his transfer to Quantico in July 2010, Manning said guards at a US brig in Kuwait repeatedly searched his cell and scattered his possessions.

At Quantico, Manning said he maintained a tough mental outlook and never returned to the despair he felt in Kuwait.

Suicide

But he said he grew frustrated after his requests to lift suicide watch measures were rebuffed, leading him to conclude his appeals were “pointless.”

Manning, who has poor vision, said he had his glasses taken away, had to request toilet paper and was forced to remove his underwear at night and then sleep on an uncomfortable mattress designed for inmates deemed a suicide risk.

Two US military psychiatrists told the court earlier that the strict conditions imposed at the brig were unnecessary, unprecedented in duration and against their medical advice.

International outcry

Manning’s treatment at Quantico sparked an international outcry and a United Nations rapporteur on torture concluded he was subjected to cruel and inhumane treatment.

But the US military defends its handling of Manning, saying he had voiced suicidal thoughts in Kuwait and that brig commanders were determined to ensure his safety.

During his testimony, Manning appeared to grow more at ease, apparently relishing his first chance to speak publicly after two years behind bars.

After his detention from July 2010 to April 2011 at Quantico, Manning was transferred to a prison at Fort Leavenworth in Kansas, where authorities concluded he was not a suicide risk and granted him regular privileges.

- © AFP, 2012

Read: Unlikely Celebrity Meeting of the Day: Lady Gaga and Julian Assange >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (32 Comments)

  • land of the free………

    Reply
  • Alan, George W also took an oath when he became President and yet he rode roughshod Texas style over the Constitution the moment he took office. With the Patriot Act, the wars in AfPak and Iraq, the illegal assassination of suspects in Yemen, Saudi, Sudan etc, kidnapping, internment without trial, torture and wholesale slaughter of civilians it is George W Bush and his cohorts who should be on trial and not Manning.

    Reply
  • Like Assange and Vanunu, his treatment is to send a message to the rest of us.

    Do not challenge the PentagoniaNato express.

    Reply
    • Damien ! Get a real job and stop scrounging of the taxpayer and biting the hand that feeds you.
      The policemen and interpreters of Afghanistan are being murdered in their beds because of that pseudo, egotistical messiah .8

      Reply
    • God man John, shoot the messenger when you don’t like the message.

      Who’s me$$age are you delivering yourself this foggy morning?

      Make me an offer. Or am I on your blacklist too?

      Reply
  • Derek 30/11/12 #

    Suicide watch conditions making one feel possibly more suicidal and uncomfortable, seems legit.

    Reply
    • I’m interested in how an uncomfortable mattress designed for those on suicide watch is supposed to work..

      Would having a decent mattress and sleep make him more likely to commit suicide? That’s a new one on me..

      Reply
  • If America hadn’t done anything they shouldn’t have then there would have been nothing embarrassing to be leaked. apart from the national security concerns I seem to remember that most of what was published was embarrassing because it publicly showed the distain that washington had for other world leaders and their countries.

    Reply
  • So the Bush admins lies about WMD and millions die in Iraq and Afghanistan while billions of public money is spent on private contracts for donors to the Bush campaign. This guy is the enemy of America? I think not.

    Reply
  • I wonder what exactly he was expecting would happen when he leaked all those documents. Surely he must have known that the retribution would be swift and severe.

    I disagree strongly with what he did. I have no objection to stuff being leaked that highlights breaches of human rights or international law. But he did not just do that. He leaked everything. Private correspondence, military communications, you name it he leaked it. That kind of indiscriminate action should not be applauded.

    Reply
  • Manning knew when he sent wiki leaks the info that there would be a price to pay. Yet he still did it. So now he has to pay. No one forced him to do it. Its not as if he is the patsy for some conspiracy.

    Reply
  • An oath of what

    Reply
  • Take a look at all the promises made by Labor & Fine Gael to get into power in the last election & them breaking them now…
    They are not representing the people that elected them

    Reply
  • Clue about what Ed? Less of the personal attacks. Just because I don’t agree with your logic that private Bradley is some sort of hero? If there was human rights abuses all well and good but releasing other sensitive information which possibly put his fellow soldiers in harms way. The man obviously had too much time on his hands .

    Reply
    • well Alan K, give us some examples of the dangerous info relaaesed, most of what i seen was footage of of Iraq Citizens being cut down inthe street from above, but it all wellin good when it happens far far away. If whistle blowers are too afraid to come forward, make no mistake this is why the US is pursuing this case and wikileaks because they fear info being made availble to the public.

      “Disobedience is the true foundation of liberty. The obedient must be slaves.

      Reply
  • Traitor. The man took an oath so deserves all he gets.

    Reply
  • Private Bradley wasn’t entitled to reveal that information simples. Hero my ass. So many people here blinded here by their hatred of the us that it clouds their judgement. Private Bradley contravened military law and put state security at risk. Stop making him out to be some sort martyr.

    Reply
    • Evil prospers when good men do nothing.

      Reply
    • If no one stands up & speaks about war crimes being committed no matter by who then its not such a “civilized” world… at least he has a conscious !

      Reply
    • Allan, you haven’t got a clue. You are supposed to be loyal to your country and its people. Not your government. You need to think about the difference before you make a bigger ass of yourself.

      Reply
    • In a democracy the government represents the country and the people. One can’t be loyal to the country and the people without being loyal to it’s democratically elected government.

      Reply
    • As a soldier respect of International Law is also your duty.

      Reply
    • Just because the public elected a representative, that doesn’t mean that the representative is doing what their constituents want (look at our lot)..

      Hence – they may not really be representing the people.. I doubt any American citizens were too pleased about the government lumping an act which permitted the patriot act being extended to include American citizens (the patriot act didn’t permit indefinite detention for US citizens) onto another act which was about the men and women of the military being paid their dues..

      It’s like that episode of the Simpsons – wanna get something passed, tack it on at the end of a bill that’s sure to pass.

      America is quickly becoming a police state – does that sound like their government really represents them?

      Reply

Add New Comment