A 15-YEAR-OLD boy has been given a five-month custodial sentence for a 16-month motor crime spree that targeted cars across Dublin.

The boy, who cannot be named because he is a juvenile, was involved in a litany of offences committed on 17 dates, generating 54 charges, spanning from late August 2024 to early January 2026.

Dublin Children’s Court heard that the offences, directly affecting 22 cars and their owners, primarily focused on vehicle interference, criminal damage to vehicles, motor thefts, smashing car windows or prising open their doors, and possession of tools or implements to commit theft, such as vice grips, a crowbar and a balaclava.

In one instance, he made off with €1,000 from a car, and on another date, he broke into seven vehicles. 

The offences, which started when he was just 14, were concentrated in Dublin 12′s Walkinstown, Drimnagh, and Crumlin areas, and in Dublin 6W’s Templeogue district, with some locations targeted repeatedly.

Other locations featured in the litany of incidents were Henry Street in Dublin 1, as well as Dublin 4, Dublin 18, Co. Meath, and Co. Kildare.

In mitigation, defence solicitor Brian Keenan asked the court to note the teenager’s exceptionally young age and that he had “struggled” to engage with the services offered to keep him out of trouble.

Since being remanded in custody seven weeks ago, the solicitor said, the boy had begun to realise the impact of his behaviour, which was attributed to a significant drug addiction and a negative peer group. He has also started to understand the importance of his family.

Keenan submitted that on leaving the structured environment of the Oberstown Children Detention Campus, it would be a big test for the boy and that it was possible for him to stay on the right track if he tackled his drug problem.

The solicitor asked for post-release supervision following the termination of his custodial sentence.

Judge Brendan Toale imposed concurrent sentences: a five-month detention order, followed by a five-month period during which he must not re-offend, and a requirement to comply with the directions of the Probation Service.

The boy, accompanied to his sentence hearing by his mother, did not address the court, but showed the judge a laminated document he had brought from the detention centre.

Facts of the offences were given over a series of hearings. The sentence was backdated to a date in January when he was remanded in custody.