Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Shutterstock/thieury
out of date

Drivers warned airbags could have an expiry date

Gradual deterioration, rather than a manufacturing fault, is being blamed for motor recalls.

JAPANESE CAR MAKERS are mulling the idea of introducing expiration dates for airbags.

The head of the country’s auto industrial body said he thinks the debate may as well occur eventually on whether airbags should be replaced after several years.

Fumihiko Ike, chairman of Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association and chairman of Honda Motor said:

We have already started the talks unofficially.

Millions of vehicles produced by some of the world’s biggest automakers, including Honda, Toyota and General Motors, have already been recalled due to the risk their airbags could deploy with excessive explosive power, spraying potentially-fatal shrapnel.

Amid worries that maker Takata still does not know the root cause of the problem, the finger of suspicion is pointing at a gradual deterioration, rather than a manufacturing fault.

At least five driver deaths in the US and Malaysia have been reportedly linked to the faulty airbags, with at least one victim’s death initially investigated as a murder due to the grisly injuries.

Honda is Takata’s biggest customer and also a shareholder. It held 1.2 percent of Takata’s outstanding stock as of September 30.

© – AFP 2014

Read: ‘Our nativity donkey was literally squashed by an overweight man’>

Read: Motorcyclist in his 70s dies in Templemore crash>

Your Voice
Readers Comments
14
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.