Apple claims Samsung's Galaxy Tab devices infringe patents from its own iPad. Lee Jin-man/AP
Patent Wars

Court to hear Apple’s €2 BILLION patent claim against Samsung

The smartphone giants will lock horns in a federal court in the US today, with Apple seeking $2.5 billion for patent infringement.

APPLE AND SAMSUNG will lock horns in a federal court in the United States today, in an attempt by Apple to wrangle over $2.5 billion (€2 billion) in damages from its Korean rival over alleged patent infringements.

Apple claims that Samsung’s tablets and phones infringe patents behind the operating systems used on its own iPad and iPhone – and is seeking an award that would dwarf any previous award made in a US court for similar offences.

Samsung counters by claiming Apple is doing the stealing – and that some of the technology at issue, such as the rounded rectangular designs of smartphones and tablets, has been industry standards for years.

The US trial is just the latest skirmish between the two over product designs. A similar trial began last week, and the two companies have been fighting in courts in the United Kingdom and Germany.

The case is one of some 50 lawsuits among myriad telecommunications companies jockeying for position in the burgeoning $219 billion (€178 billion) market for smartphones and computer tablets.

In the United States, US district judge Lucy Koh in San Jose last month ordered Samsung to pull its Galaxy 10.1 computer tablet from the US market pending the outcome of the trial, though the judge barred Apple attorneys from telling the jurors about the ban.

“That’s a pretty strong statement from the judge and shows you what she thinks about some of Apple’s claims,” said Bryan Love, a Santa Clara University law professor and patent expert. Love said that even though the case will be decided by 10 jurors, the judge has the authority to overrule their decision if she thinks they got it wrong.

More than money at stake

“In some sense the big part of the case is not Apple’s demands for damages but whether Samsung gets to sell its products,” said Mark A. Lemley, a Stanford Law School professor and director of the Stanford Program in Law, Science, and Technology.

Lemley also said a verdict in Apple’s favour could send a message to consumers that Android-based products such as Samsung’s are in legal jeopardy. A verdict in Samsung’s favour, especially if it prevails on its demands that Apple pay its asking price to certain transmission technology it controls, could lead to higher-priced Apple products.

Lemley and other legal observers say it’s rare that a patent battle with so much at stake doesn’t settle short of a trial. Court-ordered mediation sessions attended by Apple’s chief executive Tim Cook and high-ranking Samsung officials failed to resolve the legal squabble, leading to a highly technical trial of mostly expert witnesses opining on patent laws and technology. Cook is not on the witness list and is not expected to testify during what is expected to be a four week-trial.

Lemley, Love and others say it also appears that Apple was motivated to file the lawsuit, at least in part, by its late founder’s public avowals that companies using Google’s Android operating system on phones and other products – as Samsung does – were brazenly stealing from Apple.

To that end, Samsung’s attorneys made an unsuccessful pitch to have the jury hear excerpts from Steve Jobs’ authorized biography.

“I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple’s $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong, I’m going to destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product,” Jobs is quoted as saying in Walter Isaacson’s book ‘Steve Jobs’ published in November.

“I’m willing to go thermonuclear war on this.”

But the judge barred those statements in a ruling earlier this month. ”I really don’t think this is a trial about Steve Jobs,” Koh said.

Read: Samsung extends lead over Apple in smartphone market

Associated Foreign Press
Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.