Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic/PA
New Plan

'Banking union' plan to shift cost of bank losses from taxpayers

European Commission says new framework will be primarily based on preventing and preparing for banking problems.

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION has released details of its new proposals for protecting taxpayers against future bank losses through greater economic integration and a ‘banking union’.

The Commission is proposing a new four-pillar ‘banking union’ and says a new framework for tackling future banking problems will be based foremost on prevention and preparation, followed by early intervention.

The proposed banking union incorporates a single EU deposit guarantee scheme for all EU banks, one uniform ‘rule book’ for bank supervision, a single EU supervisor with ultimate decision-making powers for systemic and cross-border banks, and a common resolution authority and fund for the resolution of systemic and cross-border banks.

The proposals favour resolution over insolvency proceedings, because the Commission says that the former protects certain stakeholders – such as depositors – and keeps the banks operational. The latter can take years in order to ensure maximising the value of the assets involved in the interest of the creditors.

The cost of any such resolution “should be borne by the banking sector rather than taxpayers” and a single European resolution fund should be set up in time but that for now, “setting up a single pan-EU fund would be difficult”.

The Commission says in a memo today that although using public funding to bail out troubled banks may have been necessary to prevent widespread market disruption, “it is clearly undesirable for public funds to be used in this way at the expense of other public objectives”.

It also says that high-profile banking failures such as Anglo Irish Bank and Lehman Brothers have revealed “serious shortcomings” in the current framework for coping with such crises while demonstrating that “supporting banks which are too big to fail with squeezed public finances is becoming increasingly unsustainable”.

ECB leaves main interest rate unchanged at 1pc >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
9
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.