We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Firefighters watering the smouldering rubble last Sunday AP Photo/THE CANADIAN PRESS,Ryan Remiorz

20 dead, 30 still unaccounted for in Canada rail tragedy

The railway owner says a lone engineer failed to set brakes properly on the train.

A CANADIAN RAIL disaster that “probably” killed as many as 50 people was likely the result of an engineer’s failure to set the brakes on an unmanned train owned by a US railway company, officials have claimed.

Twenty people have been confirmed dead and 30 remain unaccounted for with little hope of being found alive following the explosive train crash, Quebec provincial police inspector Michel Forget said.

All 30 people, he said, were “missing and most probably dead in this tragedy” adding that authorities had met with their families.

“It is with great sadness that I give you this news,” he said.

The confirmed death toll was raised from 15, while 10 people previously reported missing were located. Only one victim has been identified.

The freight train carrying oil crashed on Saturday after rolling down a hill from a nearby town and flying off a curve in the track, sparking a massive inferno that tore through part of Lac-Megantic, a town of 6,000 located east of Montreal near the US border.

The massive blaze forced about 2,000 residents to flee their homes, though many of them started returning on Tuesday.

Workers combing through the debris at the crash scene (Image: Paul Chiasson/The Canadian Press/Press Association)

Earlier the railway owner said a lone engineer had failed to set brakes properly on the train.

“Adequate hand brakes were not set on this train and it was the engineer’s responsibility to set them,” Edward Burkhardt, chairman of the Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, said while visiting the scene.

Had the hand brakes been properly applied, he told reporters, “we wouldn’t have had this incident.”

The freight train had been stopped for a crew change in the nearby town of Nantes when it began to roll downhill without a conductor towards Lac-Megantic, several kilometers away.

It derailed at a curve in the tracks and several cars exploded.

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper meets residents while visiting the emergency centre on Sunday (Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press/Press Association)

Burkhardt had previously blamed firefighters in Nantes for the disaster, saying they unwittingly unlocked the train’s air brakes when they shut down the main locomotive’s engines to douse a small unrelated fire hours before the disaster.

He said Wednesday that the shutdown of the air brakes “was an important causal factor in this whole thing.”

But he added, “The fact that when the air brakes released on the locomotive the train ran away would indicate that the hand brakes were not properly applied.”

Burkhardt also said that he feels the Nantes firefighters had done “what they thought was correct” in turning off the locomotive’s engine.

The train’s engineer has been suspended without pay while he is under investigation. “I don’t think he’ll be back working for us. That is my personal opinion,” Burkhardt said.

Part of the disaster zone remains off-limits as police and federal transportation officials comb through the smoldering debris for evidence, while Quebec announced Can$60 million (€45.35 million) for emergency aid and reconstruction.

Canadian flags have been ordered to fly at half mast at federal offices across Quebec and atop the parliament in Ottawa for one week.

Read: Canada: 40 people still missing in runaway train blast, five bodies found

Your Voice
Readers Comments
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.