We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

File photo of Sliabh Liag cliffs in Donegal Alamy Stock Photo

Sliabh Liag murder trial: Jury deliberations to go into third day

Robert ‘Robin’ Wilkin’s body was found in the sea near Sliabh Liag over a week after his alleged murder in the summer of 2023

A JURY HAS asked for an explanation of the legal definition of joint enterprise as they consider the evidence in the trial of two former lovers accused of murdering a 66-year-old, whose body was put over Ireland’s tallest cliffs.

The jury of seven women and five men began their deliberations on Tuesday in the trial of Alan Vial (39) from Drumanoo Head and Nikita Burns (23) of Carrick, Co Donegal who both deny murdering Robert ‘Robin’ Wilkin in Donegal on June 25, 2023.

Each accused has claimed that the other used a rock to beat Wilkin’s head before he was put over the cliffs at Sliabh Liag. The prosecution, however, alleges that they were part of a joint enterprise to cause serious injury to Wilkin and are therefore both guilty of murder.

Justice Paul McDermott today told the jury that a person’s mere presence at the scene of a crime is not, on its own, participation in the crime. To become part of the joint enterprise, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that each accused assisted in the killing and had the intention to kill or cause serious harm.

The agreement may be explicit or tacit, he said, and can be formed in a very short time. He told the jury to look at all the circumstances leading up to Wilkin’s death and the actions of each accused afterwards.

If one of the accused went beyond what was contemplated, he said, the other is not liable for that to which he or she did not agree.

The jury also today viewed a pair of leggings worn by Burns at the time of the killing. The trial heard that the leggings had bloodstains on them with DNA matching that of Wilkin. Burns’s defence counsel, Eoin Lawlor SC, suggested that the blood could have gotten on her leggings when she helped to clean blood from the car in which Wilkin died.

The jury will return to the Central Criminal Court tomorrow to continue their deliberations.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds