We need your help now
Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
By continuing, you are indicating that you accept our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Updated 22.45pm
DUBLIN FIRE BRIGADE is investigating a case in which a paramedic had to kick his way out of a broken down ambulance.
Today’s Irish Daily Mail reports that a child suffering an anaphylactic allergic reaction was being rushed to Temple Street Children’s Hospital after a 999 call when the ambulance broke down.
The power failure caused all of the doors on board to lock, leaving the paramedic to kick out the windows from the inside.
The child had been stabilised and was treated at the hospital before returning home.
Today, Dublin Fire Brigade said that they were taking the incident ‘very seriously’, but a spokesperson said it was an isolated incident.
“Dublin Fire Brigade takes this incident very seriously and has launched an investigation into the incident. This includes making an enquiry with the manufacturer of the ambulance to identify what might have caused the ambulance to break down, and to safeguard against the potential for a similar incident taking place again in another ambulance of that make.
Our primary concern is patient welfare and we can confirm that the patient was later transferred to hospital safely. It is of course regrettable that an incident like this occurred, but again, I wish to stress that this was an isolated incident which will be investigated thoroughly with the objective of preventing a recurrence.
“We are not in a position to make any additional comment at this juncture, pending the outcome of the investigation.”
The HSE declined to comment, saying that it was a matter for Dublin Fire Brigade.
First published 10.09am
He’s full of shįte, that’s a five cent coin.
U should go to Speechsavers.
Most people imagine that evolution began with Darwin but all Darwin did was introduce a speculative cause for evolution and the calamitous survival of the fittest as a ‘law of nature’ which includes the curtailing of savage populations through famine (it came about 15 years after the Great Famine so we get included as a less favorable race ).
Evolutionary biology began with evolutionary geology by an Catholic Archbishop Nicolas Steno who actually drew the conclusion from shark’s teeth found in rock strata far removed from the sea -
http://academic.emporia.edu/aberjame/histgeol/steno/steno.htm
It progressed through William Smith who showed older rock contained more simpler lifeforms and newer rock more complex forms -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Smith_(geologist)
The old ideas of a global flood came from observing that marine fossils were found on mountaintops and the ancient authors wove narratives around these observations such as Gilgamesh or Noah’s flood .
Mention evolution and Darwin’s picture comes up but this is an accident of empirical propaganda normally directed against the Biblical texts however a more expansive view generally puts it all right.
@Gerald Kelleher: Darwin spelt it out to the world scientifically very well. That is why he would be more famous than earlier understandings. Anyway at this point what does it matter?
@Gerald Kelleher: And it was Darwins cousin, Galton, who turned ‘survival of the fittest’ to mean a treatise on eugenics.
@Séamus Longshanks: The Southern rednecks in the States could live with the idea that negroes were yard apes, what they couldn’t live with was that their white skins were linked to monkeys with negroes forming a level closer to monkeys then they were.
“At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.” Darwin 1871
You will never,ever understand the rationale behind the mass extermination in WWII without the awful attempt to insert a cause into evolutionary biology which was cause neutral up to then .
” A lopsided education has helped to encourage that illusion. Man must realize that a fundamental law of necessity reigns throughout the whole realm of Nature and that his existence is subject to the law of eternal struggle and strife. He will then feel that there cannot be a separate law for mankind in a world in which planets and suns follow their orbits, where moons and planets trace their destined paths, where the strong are always the masters of the weak and where those subject to such laws must obey them or be destroyed.” Hitler
I am full sure that more than a few can see the academic whitewash on evolutionary biology and no ’cause’ is required to explain evolution as a ‘law’ or anything else.
@Gerald Kelleher: if you really want to be thorough, then you should mention the first musings on evolution which was in 600BC by the Greeks, also medieval Islamic scholars posited the idea of survival of the fittest. However as per the previous poster, it is all irrelevant. Lamarck was the first to actually create the evolution hypothesis with his transmutation theory but Darwin did expand on all that went before and consolidated the idea of a tree of life which is truly the modern theory we accept today.
@John B: I trust the reader to spot that they replaced negroes in Darwin’s original proposal with Neanderthals to make it fit for contemporary consumption. What a bunch of academic thugs who take no responsibility for how that ‘law of nature’ played out in the gas chambers !.
The full title is not ‘On the origin of the species’ it is the “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life”.
I am delighted that a few readers have enough sense to make the distinction be they ever so silent.
Nicely said. Also this Weltenschauung allowed both the Afircan people enslaved in America and German people who were Jewish to be renders “socially dead” I.e nasally alienated, violently dominated, and generally dishonoured.
From that point, the “I-It” relationship was established between one group of humanity and another, with PRediCtable outcomes for the latter.
@Gerald Kelleher: if I posted this comment my wife would say it was too long.
@Sean: Here you go Sean, let me show you your Irish place in the academic world using images in case your small brain can’t handle two sentences -
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fa/Scientific_racism_irish.jpg
For those who can go beyond two sentences, this is unfinished business. At least a few here are aware that when they hear those pseudo-
authoritative upper class English accents of Farage or Dawkins that sometimes there is trouble.
Ireland was close to the equator? That must have been nice. Though probably not so good for the spuds.
With a coat hanger beside it
And to think our Galaxy has made only one revolution/spin in that time.
The second last paragraph doesn’t make sense (“The main fossils we find in these rocks, there’s not a huge diversity of them so it’s always been interpreted as a very difficult environment so finding a shark tooth, especially one that size, that’s quite a large shark. It tells us that there was a lot going on that there was a wider diversity than we previously thought.”)
The church is cool about this discovery.
An apex predator of 70cm ???
@Catherine O’Connor: Was wondering about that myself.
Mini-Megalodons. leprechaun sharks. Figures. We’d never get the big ones.
It is commonly misquoted as being ‘the survival of the fittest’ whereas in fact it is the ‘survival of the species that are most adaptable to change’
Also known as those most able to pass on their genes successfully yea unto the nth generation (but on behalf of all parents today here’s hoping that’s at least as far as FTL travel after that it’s a lottery). We’ve come a long way in 200,000 years only, even 8,000,000 since separating from common chimp ancestors, and in 14 billion years of the Universe existing you’d imagine a Very Large Number of civilisations like ours arose – purely on the mathematical odds – but hit the Big Filter and extinguished themselves thru uncontrolled technology. If as a species we could survive from now to development of some space folding version of the Enterprise warp speed would be where we hit infinity and beyond. Like to think some posterity might be there then. Must ease up on the popular science bukes.
Don’t think that shark would have stood a chance if “Dusty the dolphin” was around back then.
@Al coholic:
Or Davy Fitz doing a wobbly.
Lol…. call the media quick. Are you serious.
have your say