Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Dublin circuit criminal courts.
Indecent Assault

Man who was indecently assaulted by a Donegal teacher in his teens tells court of his suffering

The man, now in his fifties, said that Ms McSherry O’Connor has been “like a spectre hanging over me”.

A FORMER SECONDARY school teacher found guilty of indecently assaulting a 13-year-old pupil nearly 40 years ago does not accept the verdicts of the jury, a court has heard.

Jacintha McSherry O’Connor (63), of the Mullins, Donegal Town, Co. Donegal, was found guilty of two counts of indecently assaulting a male student in 1985 following a Dublin Circuit Criminal Court trial in October.

The court heard the abuse occurred while McSherry O’Connor worked as a student teacher at a Dublin secondary school. The court heard she indecently assaulted the boy on two occasions in his home on dates between June 1 and September 1, 1985, while giving him grinds. She was aged 24 at the time and the boy was 13.

In a victim impact statement handed in to the court today, the complainant, now in his fifties, said McSherry O’Connor “has been like a spectre hanging over me my whole life”.

He said she “took my innocence away” and that what happened was “deeply and morally wrong”.

He said he “tore up every photo of her or anything that reminded me of her” and “perhaps now she may have an idea of how I suffered”.

“The truth was close to never coming out, just left festering there in the back of my mind,” he said, adding that he was glad he spoke out.

The four-day trial also heard allegations of inappropriate sexual relations between McSherry O’Connor and the boy on a holiday she attended with his family in Spain in the run-up to the alleged offences.

No charges were before the jury in relation to these alleged incidents as they pertained to a different jurisdiction.

The complainant in the case told the court that seeing his own children reach the age he was at the time of the incidents spurred him to go to gardaí, along with other unrelated high-profile cases. He said he was also concerned to see McSherry O’Connor was still teaching in Donegal.

The trial heard that while giving the boy grinds at his home, McSherry O’Connor started having inappropriate conversations with the boy about music that made her “horny” and discussing things of a sexual nature. He also visited her regularly in the home she lived in with her parents.

The prosecution alleged that this was a form of “grooming” on the part of McSherry O’Connor and that the complainant was “drawn in” as a result, and “infatuated” with his teacher.

The court heard McSherry O’Connor and a friend of hers accompanied the boy and his family on a holiday to Spain the summer he finished first year after getting a cheap deal. The two young women stayed in a separate apartment in the complex.

The complainant told the trial that it was on this holiday that the first sexual encounters occurred.

He said McSherry O’Connor rubbed her breasts against him at the pool, fondled him and later performed oral sex on him in her apartment. He said she also gave him alcohol, which was the first time he got drunk.

After the holiday, the court heard of two further indecent assault incidents that occurred in the boy’s home – in the sitting room and in the attic. The complainant said that although he initially felt like a “big man”, he became uncomfortable about his interactions with the teacher and told her he didn’t want to see her anymore.

She had finished her work experience at the school by then and neither of them have had contact with each other since 1985, the court heard.

Marc Thompson BL, defending, described the case as “highly unusual” and said his client does not accept the verdict. He said the result of the trial had a “significant impact” on her.

He said there were “levels of depravity” and that McSherry O’Connor had used no violence, not recorded the indecent assaults and had not publicised them.

He handed in a booklet containing almost 40 references for McSherry O’Connor. He said it included testimonials from teacher who knew his client personally or professionally and “find it hard to reconcile the verdict with the person they know.”

Mr Thompson told the court McSherry O’Connor’s husband “finds it hard to reconcile that the person he knew at the time could have committed these offences.” Her husband also does not accept the jury’s verdict.

He said McSherry O’Connor’s imprisonment will have a significant impact on her mother, who is elderly. He asked the court to be as lenient as possible.

The maximum sentence for indecent assault is two years imprisonment.

Judge Elma Sheahan adjourned the case for finalisation on January 11, 2024.

Additional evidence

McSherry O’Connor took the stand during the trial and denied ever having sexual relations of any kind with the boy. She told the court that at the time of the alleged offences, she was in a relationship with the man who is now her husband.

When asked by prosecution counsel why the man might make up such an allegation, McSherry O’Connor said she didn’t know.

“He did say he fantasised about me, he was in love with me,” she said, later adding: “I don’t know why he brought the criminal case. If he told so many people, maybe they pushed him into it.”

Author
David O'Sullivan and Isabel Hayes