EUROPEAN LAWMAKERS HAVE voted to back the weakening of landmark EU environmental and human rights rules, as part of a business-friendly drive to slash red tape pushed through with far-right support.

The EU parliament’s biggest centre-right bloc joined forces with the hard right to back amending the legislation on corporate sustainability – a law approved only last year that was hailed by green and civil society groups but loathed by firms.

The text is one of the first to fall under the axe of Brussels’ new drive to make life easier for Europe’s ailing industry, which is struggling in the face of competition from the US and China.

The Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) requires large companies to fix the “adverse human rights and environmental impacts” of their supply chains worldwide.

This means tracking deforestation and pollution that they, as well as their suppliers and subcontractors cause, plus other issues like forced labour – and taking steps to curtail them.

Today, EU lawmakers backed limiting its application to large companies, upping the threshold to qualify from 1,000 to 5,000 employees and more than €1.5 billion in turnover – in line with changes endorsed by member states.

They also moved to do away with the European civil liability regime, which served to harmonise firms’ obligations in the event of breaches, referring to national legislation instead.

The changes, which aim at significantly reducing the law’s scope of application, secured support from 382 lawmakers, with 249 voting against.

The outcome triggered an outcry among the traditional partners of the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP) on the left and centre, who denounced what they saw as an unholy new alliance on the right of the EU assembly.

Rene Repasi of the Socialists & Democrats (S&D) accused the EPP of having “torpedoed any middle-ground compromise”.

“The conservatives marched ahead with a red pen – striking away the firewall and redrawing their self-made majority together with the anti-democratic forces on the fringes,” he said.

‘Turned its back’ on climate

The far-right Patriots group hailed the result as a “significant success” and a “victory for workers, farmers and industry”.

“Today, Patriots for Europe broke the old coalition’s deadlock and opened the path to replace the Green Deal straitjacket with a competitiveness-driven agenda,” the group wrote on X, referring to the EU’s ambitious climate policies.

In a statement, the World Wildlife Fund said the EU parliament “turned its back” on climate and nature, people and businesses by “effectively dismantling the EU’s flagship corporate sustainability laws, all in the name of ‘simplification’”.

“These laws that provided hope, security, and promise for a fairer and more sustainable future have been reduced to performative exercises that have little effect on the real needs of people, nature, and businesses,” the wildlife conservation organisation said.

“This is not a time to slow down on our path to a more sustainable economy, but the EU is moving in reverse.”

ActionAid Ireland accused the parliament of “turning its back on the mandate citizens gave it to defend EU values and long-term interests”. 

Programme and policy manager Cillian Quinn said: “By supporting a mandate shaped by an alliance of conservative and far-right forces together with corporate interests, the Parliament is not only hollowing out corporate accountability – it is betraying the very values and long-term interests it was elected to defend.

“An alliance between far-right parties and corporate interests to dismantle due diligence rules is a direct attack on the EU’s promise to stand for human rights, gender equality and sustainable development.”

Greater ‘predictability’

An ultimate round of negotiations is now to kick off with member states and the European Commission aimed at finalising the changes by the end of the year.

Jorgen Warborn, an EPP lawmaker who sponsored the text, said ahead of the vote that the changes would bring greater “predictability” and boost competitiveness for companies while keeping “Europe’s green transition on track”.

But while most groups agreed on the need for tweaks, their extent has proven contentious.

Dutch Social Democrat Lara Wolters, who had championed the original law, walked out of talks.

Swann Bommier of environmental group Bloom said the amendments would empty the law of its substance.

But Stephane Sejourne, the EU Commissioner for industry, said the text came on the back of extensive consultations and in “response to the firm and repeated demands of member states and the new parliamentary majority”.

Right and far-right parties, which made significant gains in the 2024 European elections, have been clamouring for Brussels to take a more pro-business slant and ditch some of its green policies.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron had called for the CSDDD, which has come under fire also from trade partners, to be scrapped altogether.

The text was proposed by the commission in 2022 after a parliamentary push inspired by the 2013 collapse of the Rana Plaza garment factory building in Bangladesh, which left at least 1,134 people dead.

Its approval in 2024 was hailed as historic and celebrated as a landmark in the fight to preserve the planet and better working conditions across the globe.

© AFP 2025