Sign in. It’s quick, free and it’s up to you.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
FILMMAKERS SHOULD MAKE their movies shorter if they want them shown in cinemas, according to Picturehouse Cinemas creative director Clare Binns.
Binns made the remarks after she was named the recipient of this year’s Bafta award for Outstanding British Contribution to Cinema. She argued that directors should prioritise making films “for the audience, not the directors”.
While none of this year’s Golden Globe Best Picture nominees exceeded the three-hour mark (the longest was One Battle After Another, which runs for two hours and 41 minutes), several recent blockbusters have gone beyond that length. These include Avatar: Fire and Ash (three hours and 17 minutes) and Killers of the Flower Moon (three hours and 26 minutes).
“There are always exceptions, but I look at a lot of films and think, ‘You could take 20 minutes out of that,’” Binns said. “There’s no need for films to be that long.”
With that, we wanted to ask: Does a film’s runtime influence your decision to watch it?
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
have your say