We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Foreign Affairs minister Helen McEntee speaking to the media at Parliament Buildings, Stormont in Belfast on Wednesday. PA via Alamy

DUP leader criticises Helen McEntee's 'clear challenge' to UK on NI Legacy Bill

Gavin Robinson was speaking after Helen McEntee said any significant changes to the Bill should have the agreement of both governments.

DUP LEADER GAVIN Robinson has criticised Foreign Affairs Minister Helen McEntee’s “clear challenge” to the UK over legislation to tackle the Northern Ireland Troubles.

Robinson urged UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer against “spinelessly surrendering” to the Irish Republic as work continues on the Bill.

He was speaking after McEntee said during a visit to Parliament Buildings in Belfast that any significant changes to the legislation must have the full agreement of both governments.

Starmer had indicated that new protections for military veterans will be added to the Northern Ireland Troubles Bill his Government is taking through Parliament.

The joint framework on legacy announced by London and Dublin last September outlined a range of measures and mechanisms for dealing with historical cases from the Northern Ireland conflict.

The framework included commitments to fundamentally reform the structures established by the last Conservative government’s contentious Legacy Act, including the removal of a controversial provision that offered a form of conditional immunity to perpetrators of Troubles crimes.

At the same time it published the framework, the Labour Government also announced a separate set of proposals it described as “new protections, rights and safeguards for Northern Ireland veterans”.

The measures included allowing witnesses who participate in new legacy processes the option to give evidence remotely without travelling to Northern Ireland.

McEntee said what was agreed in September “is a very fine balance” resulting from a “huge amount of work”.

“We are very clear as a government that in transposing that agreement and putting it into legislation, there cannot be any significant changes that shift that balance,” she added.

In a communication to DUP party members, Robinson said he had challenged Starmer to ensure that the legislation “must properly protect our veterans”.

He paid tribute to military veterans for “putting their lives on the line to protect others and uphold the rule of law”.

“They deserve gratitude and respect, not the prospect of legal jeopardy decades later,” he said.

“It is vital that any legal framework clearly distinguishes between those who upheld the law and those who sought to undermine it through terrorism and violence. To blur that line is morally wrong and unjust.

“The Prime Minister indicated that the Government would bring forward amendments to address these concerns.

“Of course, within minutes, the foreign minister of the Irish Republic responded to say any change required their support.

“That’s a clear challenge to the Prime Minister – will he side with sovereignty and protect our armed forces or spinelessly surrender to the Republic who have delivered nothing for victims?”

Robinson was also critical of Stormont Finance Minister John O’Dowd’s draft budget.

He said the document was published without Executive agreement, and “cannot be treated as settled”.

“While we recognise the real financial pressures facing Northern Ireland, the priorities John O’Dowd has chosen raise serious concerns,” he said.

“Public services, particularly education, are under severe strain, and significant changes will be required before this budget could ever secure DUP support.

“Northern Ireland must also show it can deliver major infrastructure projects if we are serious about investment, jobs, and economic growth.”

Close
48 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds