We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

A rendering of the proposed site in Dublin 6.

Locals mount opposition over plans for €356m apartment development in south Dublin

Developers are seeking permission for 562 apartments across seven blocks, marking a third attempt to build on the site following earlier legal challenges.

RESIDENTS IN DUBLIN 6 have lodged objections to plans for a €356 million apartment development in Milltown, warning that the scale and height of the proposed scheme would “dwarf” existing homes in the area.

The planned apartments would be contructed on the corner of Sandford Road and Milltown Road in Dublin 6.

In January, Ardstone subsidiary, Sandford Living Ltd launched a renewed bid to secure planning permission for 562 apartments for the site comprising 267 two bed units, 176 one bed units, 43 three bed unit and 70 studios across seven apartment blocks.

As part of its social housing requirements, Sandford Living is proposing to sell 56 of the planned 562 apartments to Dublin City Council for social housing, and has put a price tag of €1.03m on the largest three-bed apartment.

It is Sandford Living Ltd’s third application for the site and planning consultants, Thornton O’Connor (TOC) state that the previous two applications have been subject to High Court judicial reviews.

Advancing the case for the new scheme, TOC state the Large Scale Residential Development (LRD) has been reduced from 636 to 562 and a 10-storey apartment block has been reduced to eight storeys.

Screenshot (352) A rendering of the proposed site in Dublin 6.

In an objection, the Norwood Residents Association has told the council that the excessive scale, height and proximity of the proposed Blocks A and C to Norwood Park “will have an overbearing impact on all residents”.

The submission states: “Put simply there is no justification for building structures of the heights proposed so close to existing residences.”

The closing date for submissions was Tuesday, and Dublin City Council has processed 31 third-party submissions to date including one from the Cherryfield Avenue Residents Association.

Julie Ennis of Cherryfield Avenue Upper, Ranelagh has told the council “that the scheme dwarfs our property”.

“I have observed the pictures which are very depressing, dark, and imposing,” Ennis said.

Ennis states that “there is a housing crisis and an urgent need for housing in this and other areas of Dublin.”

“However, the density proposed, represents a gross overdevelopment of the site. 562 new units taken together with other new developments in the area will put unbearable pressure on the amenities of the area.”

In their submission, Brenna and Ray Clarke of Cherryfield Avenue Lower, Ranelagh have told the council that “Ranelagh is in danger of losing its cultural life and combination of young and old residents, swamped by apartments and inappropriate housing”.

“The development does nothing to conserve our homes, community or Green environment nor does it help the real housing shortage in Dublin,” the Clarkes added.

Another submission from Cherryfield Avenue resident Liam Kilcullen said that he was concerned that the introduction of walkways “may encourage anti-social behaviour and above all open the back of our property and our neighbour’s property to intrusion.”

A decision is due on the application next month.

View 9 comments
Close
9 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds