This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
OK
Dublin: 17 °C Sunday 18 August, 2019
Advertisement

'Where does it end?': Selfie-taking monkey at centre of copyright lawsuit

Pictures taken by the monkey ended up in a wildlife book.

Monkey Selfie Copyright Case The selfie of the monkey which appeared in the wildlife book. Source: DPA/PA Images

A MONKEY CAPABLE of taking selfies is in the spotlight as a federal appeals court questioned lawyers fighting about an animal’s ability to hold a copyright to selfie photos.

Naruto is a Macaque monkey who snapped the pictures with an unattended camera in Sulawesi, Indonesia, in 2011. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) said Naruto was accustomed to cameras and took the selfies when he saw himself in the reflection of the lens.

PETA sued British nature photographer David Slater, whose camera the monkey used, and a San Francisco-based self-publishing company Blurb, which put out a book called “Wildlife Personalities” that includes the photos.

The animal rights organisation wants to administer all proceeds from the photos to benefit the monkey. Slater’s company holds the British copyright for the photos, and he says it should be honoured worldwide.

A three-judge panel of the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco appeared puzzled by PETA’s role in the case, asking the group’s attorney why it should be allowed to represent the monkey’s interests.

Attorney David Schwarz said the question had not been raised in court previously, and he urged the panel to define authorship for copyright purposes.

The judges did not issue a ruling.

Angela Dunning, attorney for Blurb, said the self-publishing company was confident it would prevail but wondered at the possibility if it did not.

“Where does it end? If a monkey can sue for copyright infringement, what else can a monkey do?” she said.

Dunning said Naruto can’t hold copyright in part because he cannot grant permission to others to use his photos and can’t benefit financially from the pictures. The monkey, she said, is “blissfully unaware” of what’s happening in court.

A federal judge ruled against the monkey last year, saying there was no indication that Congress intended to extend copyright protection to animals.

PETA’s general counsel Jeff Kerr said after the hearing that the group has plans to use money from the photos to protect monkey habitats and help people study the species.

“PETA is clearly representing Naruto’s best interests,” he said.

Read: Trump says Donald Jr is a ‘high quality person’ and applauds his ‘transparency’ on Russian meeting >

Read: ‘The joke is actually on us’: Dáil to decide on bill to abolish blasphemy as a crime >

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

About the author:

Associated Press

Read next:

COMMENTS (48)