We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Deirdre Morley was found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity for killing her children.

Mother who killed her three children argues coroner acted 'irrationally' over trial evidence

Conor (9), Darragh (7) and Carla (3) McGinley were suffocated at their home in Newcastle, Co Dublin in 2020.

A WOMAN WHO killed her children in 2020 has argued that a coroner’s decision to limit the evidence relating to her mental health before the tragic event was “irrational and unreasonable”.

Deirdre Morley, who was a paediatric nurse, killed her children, Conor (9), Darragh (7) and three-year-old Carla McGinley, at their home in Newcastle, Co Dublin in 2020. A postmortem showed the three young siblings had all died from suffocation.

Morley was found not guilty of murder by reason of insanity in 2021 following a trial.

Morley took judicial review over Dublin District Coroner Dr Myra Cullinane’s decision not to have medical professionals who treated the mother in the six months before the killings give evidence about her mental state at the inquest into the children’s deaths.

Morley, defended by Fiona Gallagher BL, today argued that the inquest needed this evidence, rather than relying on two forensic consultants who had also given evidence at her criminal trial.

Gallagher said that evidence relating to Morley’s admission to St Patrick’s Hospital in Dublin and treatment by mental health professionals in Clondalkin and Tallaght, as well as her GP, should have been considered.

“[The coroner] acted irrationally by unduly limiting the evidence to be heard,” the barrister said.

Mr Justice Garrett Simons suggested the decision relating to evidence was a matter “within the discretion” of the coroner.

“This court doesn’t micromanage the decisions of the coroner,” he said, adding that is what Morley’s legal team is asking him to do.

The judge reiterated that it is the coroner’s duty to decide if evidence is admissible rather than his court, however, he granted Morley’s legal team permission to notify the other party that they are applying for review.

The case is to come before the courts again on 10 February.

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
JournalTv
News in 60 seconds