Advertisement

We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

Independent TD Joan Collins speaks to the media as she leaves the High Court. Laura Hutton/Photocall Ireland
pro note

High Court dismisses TD's challenge to Anglo promissory note deal

Joan Collins TD had claimed that the deal was unconstitutional because it gave the Minister for Finance open ended power to approve the payments without Dáil approval.

THE HIGH COURT has dismissed the case taken by United Left Alliance TD Joan Collins who had challenged the constitutionality of the €31 billion promissory note deal supporting Anglo Irish Bank and Educational Building Society.

Collins had claimed that the legislation behind the deal was unconstitutional because it gave the Minister for Finance open ended power to approve the payments without Dáil approval.

The court found however that the the Credit Institutions (Financial Support) Act 2008, “does not invest the Minister with an uncontrolled discretion”.

The three judge court ruled that it did not breach Article 15.2.1 of the constitution which provides that the “sole and exclusive power of making laws for the State is hereby vested in the Oireachtas.”

The 68-page  judgement delivered this morning acknowledged the intense political argument over the promissory note deal but said that this is not something for them to consider:

The Court is fully aware that the decisions made at that time were (and still are) hugely controversial. We would emphasise, however, that neither the enormity of these decisions or their consequences nor their controversial character have any direct bearing on the legal and constitutional issues which we are now called upon to consider.

“It is not part of this Court’s function to express any view on and still less to review the political or economic wisdom of the decisions which culminated in the 2008 Act,” they said.

In  addressing the right of the Minister for Finance to use funds to in support of the banks, the judges accepted that “while, of course, the Oireachtas did not know precisely the sums which were at stake”, the minister “could only provide such support as was necessary to safeguard the viability of the financial sector and, by extension, the wider economy.”

These restrictions satisfied constitutional requirements they said.

The full judgement can be viewed here >

Read: Challenge to promissory notes dismissed, court says TD could bring case >

Read: ‘It’s odious debt’: Dáil to debate ‘burning the bondholders’ tonight and tomorrow >

Read: 30 Days in September: An Oral History of the Bank Guarantee >

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Your Voice
Readers Comments
39
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.