Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
IT’S A TABOO in Irish society to talk about money or wages, but I guess when you have neither, it’s easy enough to break taboos. So here goes.
As the election looms, the Fine Gael line is that work should always pay more than welfare. Which is fair enough; of course work should always pay more than welfare, but it seems pretty clear to me that the blueshirts intend to ensure work always pays more than welfare by cutting welfare so much that no matter how rubbish your wages are, you’ll still be worse off on the dole.
I work a zero-hour contract.
I’m angry, depressed and very, very broke. I’m also someone who – financially at least –would be literally better off on the dole.
Not knowing if I have work today or not
A zero-hour contract works like this: I wake every morning and phone my employers’ number. The recorded message tells me if I have work today. Sometimes they don’t record the message till the last minute, so I lie in bed, drifting in and out of sleep, calling back until I know whether or not my day is work or a grey, shapeless depression.
Days I don’t work, I sign on.
I get the dole for the days I don’t work. (About €30 a day.) I’ve always paid my taxes and I’ve always worked. I certainly never wanted to be a burden on society, but I lost my job when the recession hit and – rather than sign on – I was grateful to take this as a stop-gap, despite its obvious drawbacks.
But here’s the thing. Despite Joan Burton braying at every opportunity that Labour “preserved core welfare rates”, I don’t qualify for rent allowance anymore. That’s because – though I’m very lucky in a good winter week to earn €100 and often I earn nothing at all – in the summer I sometimes earn perhaps €350 per week after tax and the welfare officer looks at my bank statements over the course of the year. (Under this Government, welfare thresholds have, if not lowered, then at least tightened.)
Normally, I wouldn’t care. I’m not about money and I never have been. As long as my rent is paid and I can afford my dinner and a few books and the odd (or even) pint, I’ve never cared that I don’t dress so well or take holidays or that my car is – frankly – a joke.
Advertisement
Things are bad at the moment
But when things get bad, as they have of late, then they get really bad.
The dole is – if you’re lucky enough to be over 26 – €188 per week. (Actually, as my hair gets ever-greyer, I’d dearly love to be under 26 again. Maybe I could lose weight by eating grass.)
Because I do a bit of extra work, my dole is means-tested. Long story short, and to be honest I’m very uncomfortable telling you this, but when I’m out of work for a week, I don’t get €188. I get €100. Because I don’t get rent allowance, I’m often left, once my rent is paid, with literally nothing on which to live.
Employers will do what they have to do, and what they can get away with. I don’t mean to whine and I’m very aware of how extraordinarily lucky I am.
The Cork Penny Dinners is a wonderful institution. In essence a soup kitchen dating back to Victorian times. In 2011, they supplied perhaps 100 meals per week.
Nowadays, that’s closer to 1,800 meals a week and they have –these past five years – seen a remarkable shift in the socio-economic profile of the people they look after.
Once upon a time, the people calling to Cork Penny Dinners were – almost exclusively - homeless. Now more and more of those calling in have homes and work. These are people who earn a weekly wage but who – once they’ve paid their rent or mortgage – simply cannot afford to put food on the table.
Not just for the homeless
I used to make small donations to the Cork Penny Dinners. I’ve never been well-off, so it’s always been a fiver or a tenner. I’d like to think I was just being a decent human being, but maybe sub-consciously I was making a deposit for the “There but for” days.
As someone starting to feel the strain, I know why people are falling between the cracks. It’s because we don’t have in this country, a living wage. It’s because we don’t have in this country, the idea of work certainty. It’s because we don’t have in this country, a desire to ensure that there is a safety net – a proper safety net – for all of our citizens.
It’s election-time and all I have to my name is my vote. I’ll be asking my local candidates where they stand on a living wage, on zero-hour contracts and on the idea that every citizen should be treated fairly when they fall on hard times.
The “There but for” days are closing in on me now and I’m feeling pretty lonely. Still, though, so long as we allow employers to get away with zero-hour contracts, I guess I’ll never really be alone.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Duplicitous,vain,a venal man Charles J Haughey,all the requirements needed for Taoiseach and Supreme Leader of the Fianna Fáil
Parliamentary Party ,Bertie was just a corner boy and Cowen all bluster ,the damage they inflicted on the citizens of this country has not been fully realised yet.
………3 Irish citizens domiciled in a British colony murdered by British terrorists in another British colony, such was the way of British rule worldwide! Ironically when the community in Belfast responded in like on British undercover terrorists the following week their Government used hyperbole and hypocrisy to demonise a whole community, crying to the heavens about the terrible deed done to their armed undercover agents while it was ok for SAS to murder unarmed Irish citizens, you can’t have it both ways??!
@Patrick Mc Menamin: off duty security personnel where consider legitimate targets . So was German wife’s and kids of soldiers in Germany . Stop winging they got what they deserved .
I’m aware that one of the perpetrators of the crimes you’re referring to – Dessie Grew – had been subject to a German arrest warrant but the SAS killed him (and rightly so) before the RUC could get around to having the warrant translated into English.
@Diaspora’d: You can’t justify it but you can understand it, the funeral was of a person murdered by Stone at a cemetary and then at his funeral two armed plain clothes yokes drive at speed into a funeral cortege and the surprise and horror is they get killed!!! – no can’t condone it but fully understand it.
@David Conroy: incorrect EOD321 bomb disposal unit has being deploy on to the ground over 22000 times to protect life and property . Over 300000 soldiers risk their life s on the streets of NI to suppress terrorism and deny the terrorist the freedom to kill and murder .
@David Conroy: that’s correct, the real injustice was the lack of Civil Rights and the inequality suffered by the minority Catholic population in Northern Ireland.
The struggle for a United Ireland latched onto that civil rights movement and channeled the sense of injustice. But the truth is there was no guarantee that a United Ireland was going to solve inequality, ask any Northern Protestant that saw how the Republic of Ireland was ‘de facto’ run by the Catholic Church. One can only ask if the present devolved power-sharing arrangement would have come about sooner if there hadn’t been an armed struggle that polarized the two communities there.
@Tommy Whelan: The british army knew they were unarmed and they attempted to surrender themselves and they “got what they deserved”? This coming from you who only two days ago posted that there “was no such thing as shoot to kill”? F**k but you really are one absolute bollocks tommy.
@Patrick Mc Menamin: mmm bit over the top, they were on active duty, and terrorists….
Really til you have seen the carnage of terrorism first hand, and cleared the body part’s of innocents I suppose you could still have sympathy for them.
For me No!! live by the sword as they say.!
@Powerabbey: Aren’t you the fella who asked me where I got the evodemce to back up claims made about collusion,and then when told my spurce was the PSNI Historical Enquiries Unit, claimed the the source lacked substance?
@Tír Eoghain Gael:
You’re neglecting to mention that the three had just prepared and placed a huge car bomb in a busy street – if your job was to protect innocent civilians would you take a chance that any one of the three could have just detonated the bomb with a simple button-push??
@Avina Laaf: 1. The car they parked in a small carpark (not a busy street) had no explosives in it.It was inspected beforehand by the brits who stated that it should be treated as a car bomb but an ex-British Army bomb disposal expert stated at the inquest that it would have been obvious there was no bomb as there was no weight on the springs. 2. How could they have used a button to detonate anything? Several experts at the inquest noted that the car was far out of range of any remote detonator & that the car did not have the necessary outdoor arial needed for remote detonations. 3. The SAS opened fire without shouting any warning. They were unarmed and could have each been arrested at walking pace. Instead, they were executed with shots to the head as they lay incapacitated on the ground.
@Tír Eoghain Gael: it’s irrelevant if they where arm or not . If the soldier BELIEVES they pose a threat to his life or anyone else’s life they he has the power to eliminate that threat . It’s what we call A ACT OF SELF DEFENCE .
@Tír Eoghain Gael: the bomb was in a car in Marbella, which they were traveling too.
This was viable and ready to be detonated…
They were not innocent, they were on active service.
I get your pro Ira, that’s your call,
But they were not innocent.
@Barry morcom: I know the actual car was in Marbella. That has nothing to do with the discussion. The British knew they were unarmed and posed no threat as whatsoever whatsoever as they walked down the street, but instead of simply walking up to them and slapping handcuffs on them, they shot them to incapacitate them and then executed them with shots to the face as they lay on the ground. They then moved in to remove their shells to disguise their shooting positions so it wouldn’t look like a pre-planned ambush. If Britain claims they were not at war then by their own standards, this pre-empted was murder.
@Tír Eoghain Gael: they may not have been armed, but the bomb could have been in the car….
Lot of what ifs..
But as they were on active service, had had a bomb ready they were a threat…
They were going to set a bomb off eventually… So innocent women and children may be dead now because of it…
Had to clean up after one such attack, bits of an 18 year old girl innocent…
No sympathy they were at war…
@Austin Rock: thats not true. The soldiers didn’t drive at speed anywhere, for that mater they could have shot some of the mob
that attacked them, but didnt.
@MaryLoonyMcDonald: unarmed but on active service. Bit silly to be on active service in a war and not be armed. Silly soldiers..i see the other side brought their weapons…professionals b amateurs.
@MaryLoonyMcDonald: ……Irish citizens from one British colony murdered by British terrorists in another British colony, such has always been the way of British rule worldwide??!
@MaryLoonyMcDonald: clown,obviously know fcuk all reference Gibraltar,do a little research honey,instead of your silly knee jerk,comment,little Brit lover
@billy Dorney: Brit lover – aren’t we all? Millions of us get/got employment there; we holiday there (more than anywhere else), watch/play their games, follow their TV – and eat their food.
@MaryLoonyMcDonald: they were on what they called “active service” with the intention of detonating a bomb in a small
square that would be full of people, tourists and locals. They were not innocent characters, their intention was to kill as
many people as possible.
That was a bad time. Enniskillen bombing a few weeks previous. Michael Stone shooting and bombing at Milltown cemetery a few weeks later. The Gibraltar 3 got a dose of their own medicine. I doubt they’d have given any warning or chance to avoid the bomb.
Haughey had some neck, you could never deny him that. He was worried about “the notion that someone somewhere in the British government machine had been orchestrating this scenario”, and this was after he had to leave government charged with gun running.
Yet they still arrived home via Dublin where thousand people met the coffins. The journey was made as difficult as possible by British/Gibraltarian authorities.
@Charles Murr: Watch out. Karma always, always, always, finds a way, whether through the grief of a single fallen soldier or something as grandiose as Brexit. Either way and from time memorial, there’s no stopping it, Ireland’s Martyrs will be fully avenged.
@Charles Murr:yeah you see this is why ISIS don’t target the Republic of Ireland.We have never starved tortured/terrorised locals on their own land, the British have been colonising anywhere they can over the years,hence 22 people killed in Manchester,and so it goes on.The British will never learn.things won’t change, will only get worse, people fight their enemies on their own soil.Old isn’t it? But sometimes it’s all colonised people have to fight with.FF Charlie H? They don’t surprise me, they haven’t changed abit, cut from the same cloth as FG blueshirts,in fact I reckon that the Black and Tans bred/raped some of our people.it’s the only reason I can come up with the shitty generation coming up next that would sell their souls to the devil for political/financial gain, sad really
@Lucille Ball: what history are you talking about . Did you miss the 400 hundred years of Ireland s service in the British army . Why don’t you drop the republican fairytale and look at the real history of your country . You might be surprise at what you find .
@Tommy Whelan: Tommy youre not one to try to lecture on “real history”. Remember back in June when you claimed “support for SF has been in decline since the end of the troubles”, even though their vote has shot up by 63,000 votes in the past 16 years? And then you claimed in the same post that support for nationalist parties is decreasing”, even though support for nationalist parties grew at for the past two elections. Then to cap it all you said SFs vote in 2017 was half what it was in 2001. Even though it was actually up by 62,082 votes! Comedy gold from Tommy, the journal.ie s resident ex-British Soldier
The British justice system again (or as I call it the anti Irish system shoot on sight ) Haughey had some neck not letting republicans through Southern Ireland no brown envelope for him and Margret thatcher was nothing but a low life vermin of this world may she rot in hell . 3 republicans shot at point blank range murdered in cold blood BRITISH JUSTICE IS A JOKE like its leaders and royal family tyranny is how they rule
@Diaspora’d: you mean like the six month old baby girl put into the back of a car by her father . By the time the IRA had finish filling the car full of lead half her skull was missing . Good republicans that we are all meant to feel sorry for .
@Tommy Whelan: and here we go the magic round about, remember this and remember that and only remember the bits you want to remember and recycle it enough recycle it enough times with enough outrage and conviction and eventually you will believe – a one sided story.
@Tommy Whelan: Does that same logic apply to your fellow ex british army colleagues who died in Afghanistan/Iraq where yis slaughtered countless civilians?
@Michael: little history lesson. The SAS were named as the special air service to lead the Germans to believe there was a new airborne large unit operating in North Africa in 1941.
@Paul Murphy: You’d believe anything they told you So the Germans believed they were airborne when they saw them driving around the desert in jeeps. A little bit of history for you. The only time they tried an airborne operation it was a disaster.
@Tommy Whelan: I’m confused when did I say paratroopers were the only airborne troops?!!! But can I point out to you? If soldiers are transported to their destination by sea it doesn’t make them sailors. So if there transported by air they’re not an air service. When the SAS got their name the only way soldiers could attack by air was parachute One last question for you. In this incident in Gibraltar did the SAS attack by air or were they in civilian clothes and did they walk up to three unarmed people and shoot them down in cold blood LIKE ASSASSINS DO?
Charles J Haughty, forerunner of the gangesterism in the so called Republican party. While this country was going through a recession this paracite was living the life of a Lord. As for the bodies of the three murdered republicans passing through Dublin , Haughty, s stance was typical of the free state washing their hands of the conflict in the six counties. Reading a report of this sorry saga on R.T.E. website… It states the three were shot dead by British security forces, Yet in a later paragraph it stated that two members of British security were murdered after driving their can into a funeral of a man murdered by Michel Stone. In a later verdict by the European court Britan was found guilty of unlawful killing of the three republicans.
Gardaí appeal for information after four men injured during ‘public order incident’ in Co Clare
28 mins ago
1.4k
diplomatic flurry
Zelenskyy warns against 'rewarding' Russia for war ahead of White House meeting with Trump
Updated
4 hrs ago
29.5k
118
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 222 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage . Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework. The choices you make regarding the purposes and vendors listed in this notice are saved and stored locally on your device for a maximum duration of 1 year.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Social Media Cookies
These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 155 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 202 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 162 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 125 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 126 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 54 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 51 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 181 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 80 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 114 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 120 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 53 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 67 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 38 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 126 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 129 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 98 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 70 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 122 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 109 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say