Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.
You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.
If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.
An account is an optional way to support the work we do. Find out more.
Keir Starmer (l) speaking to reporters and Nigel Farage (r) celebrating after Reform's victory Alamy
Reform UK
'We get it': Starmer concedes defeat in Runcorn as Farage's Reform party makes gains
Farage said the win was a sign that Starmer had “alienated so much of his traditional base, it’s just extraordinary”.
7.18am, 2 May 2025
22.8k
98
LAST UPDATE|2 May
UK PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer conceded Labour’s loss to Reform UK in the Runcorn and Helsby by-election was “disappointing,” but insisted he was determined to delivering change faster.
Starmer told voters his party “get it” but defended what he claimed were the government’s “tough but right” decisions.
New MP Sarah Pochin took the Runcorn and Helsby seat by just six votes – a historically slim margin.
The narrow victory saw Reform taking a constituency that Labour won with a majority of almost 14,700 less than 12 months ago.
In Greater Lincolnshire, Reform elected its first mayor ever. Counting in local elections continues across England.
Farage said of the victories: “For the movement, for the party, it’s a very, very big moment indeed, absolutely, no question, and it’s happening right across England.”
He said it was a sign that Prime Minister Starmer had “alienated so much of his traditional base, it’s just extraordinary”.
Speaking to the PA news agency last night, Farage said there was “no question” that Reform is now “the main opposition party to this government”.
Nigel Farage to @joncraig - looking absolutely thrilled to win “Labour heartland” of Runcorn -
He says this ends the “media narrative” Reform is only a problem for the Tories
And he’s brutal when Jon asks his message to Kemi Badenoch: “Please stay!”
Speaking to reporters during a visit to Bedfordshire following the result today, Starmer said:
What I want to say is, my response is we get it.
“We were elected in last year to bring about change.”
Advertisement
He said that his party has “started that work”, such as bringing in measures to cut NHS waiting lists, adding: “I am determined that we will go further and faster on the change that people want to see.”
Starmer was asked by reporters whether he would reconsider unpopular policy changes, such as means-testing the winter fuel payment, amid murmurs of backbench discontent in the wake of the results.
“The reason that we took the tough but right decisions in the budget was because we inherited a broken economy,” he told Sky News.
“Maybe other prime ministers would have walked past that, pretended it wasn’t there… I took the choice to make sure our economy was stable.”
Former Conservative minister Dame Andrea Jenkyns was elected mayor in Greater Lincolnshire, where she won with a majority of almost 40,000 over her former party.
Jenkyns was accused of breaking election rules by standing despite not living in the area – a complaint that was dismissed.
She stormed out of a Sky News interview this morning after she was questioned about why, during her victory speech, she pointed out a fellow candidate’s accent.
The first-ever mayor of Greater Lincolnshire, Reform's Dame Andrea Jenkins, refuses to answer questions from Sky's @serenabarksing on her comments about a fellow mayoral candidate's South African accent.https://t.co/TC2ROCL7wW
Reform also beat the Conservatives to take control of Staffordshire County Council.
In all, Farage’s party gained more than 600 seats and took control of 10 local authorities in today’s local elections.
The full result across all 23 councils shows Reform has won a total of 677 councillors, up 648 on its tally before polling day; the Conservatives have won 319, down 635; the Lib Dems have won 370, up 146; Labour has won 98, down 198; the Greens have 79, up 41; and independent candidates have 89, down 95.
Lib Dem leader Ed Davey said the results showed the Lib Dems were now “the party of middle England”.
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
People will come on and post about Farage, and what his party represents, but much like the US, they’ll miss the point completely. People, and I’d argue a silent majority, are sick of the establishment BS right across the world. They’re being driven to vote for these parties out of sheer desperation. They aren’t being listened to. They’re on their knees financially. They’re genuinely concerned about immigration. Meanwhile the mainstream parties and media want us fussing about a ‘climate crisis’, and a tiny minority of transgender individuals and everything Trump says or does.
People aren’t going to give two proverbial fecks about ‘climate crisis’ while they’re struggling to put food on the table, or they feel unsafe walking to the shop.
@JP Fox: You’ll be arguing with yourself, most people are getting on with life and the colour of a person’s skin isn’t the cause of the issues, nor is it climate change, these are used as excuses, as they can hide the lack of polices in areas of the economy, social justice, or solving the many issues that face the world. And that’s the way it always has been to blame immigrants and poor people.
Your post is an uneducated rambling rant that makes no point, offers no solution, and is simply trying to put a veil what you and your ilk are.
@JP Fox: But you have to feel sorry for the neighbours. They at least tried to change the government but ended up with a Tory light one instaed —and it has to be said, one that is even more even as incompetent. It is cringing watching the new Home Secretary talking as lif her mouth was fukl of marbles as she endeavours to sound eposh. WE cannpt talk of course, imagine Michael Martin has won a seat in at least 5 election here!!!.
@Paul O’Mahoney: can you read and comprehend simple English Paul? Where have I mentioned anything about skin colour? You literally reiterated what I’ve just said, in part, and tried to accuse me of something, I’m not sure what, because you’ve trailed off toward the end. I agree, people don’t give a hoot about the above mentioned, but whether you want to admit it or not, or are living in your parents basement, there IS a serious cost of living problem going on, an immigration problem. Both of these issues are of major concern to people right across Europe, and my point is, desperate voters are being pushed into the hands of people like Farage because the mainstream parties are pay service to voters genuine concerns. Throw Health, housing, infrastructure and homelessness on top for Ireland.
@Paul O’Mahoney: JP Fox’s post articulately sums up the Zeigest. Your response is utter drivel.Are you some sort of pot head? Smoking ganga for breakfast?
The wealth gap is enormous in so many countries, I agree. We have the usual suspects blaming immigrants and of course this isn’t a wholly black and white issue. The elephant in the room that’s ignored as usual is the fact that capitalism simply isn’t working in any sort of a fair way. Free trade and innovation can be great things but the rewards are being funnelled in ever greater amounts to an ever smaller group of people. It’s heresy to some but there needs to be a cap on wealth. Once you have ‘won’ at capitalism and are sitting on more billions than you could spend in multiple lifetimes there needs to be more redistribution. Instead we have ludicrously wealthy people pitting people with a pittance against each other. Maybe it’s not some impoverished person trying to scrape by who is ‘stealing’ your chance at a good life but a cosy cabal of uber-elites hoarding more and more resources as they pay off more people to keep their unjustifiable stash of cash – the equivalent to some countries GDP – to themselves.
@Paul O’Mahoney: Your reply represents exactly what JP Fox is saying, no denial of his valid opinions and a personal attack with all the usual elements, colour of skin, racist, far right, homophobic, all the predictable insults out of the Woke Manual for those who disagree with you!
@Paul O’Mahoney: What an utterly hollow response that it. How ridiculous to mention skin colour. Check out who the chairman of Reform UK is: his name is Zia Yousef but of course you’d probably still try to say this is a problem in some other way. People like you have lost the argument
@JP Fox: I hear you. I’m not suggesting the abolition of capitalism. It’s a complete waste of time even having that conversation, as it’s simply not going to happen. It’s a total waste of energy trying to promote an alternative. Maybe in some Star Trek-type future, things will change, but we live in the here and now.
I don’t think it’s unrealistic to think we can overhaul it a little, though. I know the usual suspects will scream socialism, as that’s the big dirty word used to close these kinds of discussions down. Still, we have to live in a world with finite resources and ideally one in which we aren’t completely self-centred and only focused on accumulating as much as possible that we can’t take with us. If you are into the billions, you have already won. You are not only covering the basics but can afford every luxury imaginable. When people are homeless, can’t feed their kids, live in abject poverty, who honestly cares what term it comes under if a cap on wealth means life is less miserable for a lot more people. Give them a cert, a trophy, put their name on a big wall if that’s what it takes, but it’s not that radical to think that once you reach X amount of riches, you are expected to stop accumulating and start sharing the meaningless amounts you have sitting in your account. The funny thing is that things are so out of whack, the gap so extreme, you could even cap it at a ridiculously large number, and the additional money would still help enormously. The rich can still feel loaded and completely inoculated from any chance of a hard life, and those additional zeros could be shared out with people who have practically nothing. There needs to be a revolution in the ethics of wealth accumulation.
@JP Fox: the UK has been in decline for a full generation. It is hard to see prosperity declining, optimism evaporated, and your position in the world stage become very very diluted. Consider the UKs global dominance and then relative strength after the US surpassed them. That can’t be easy to make peace with. And be it labor, farage or the tories, it is a done deal and no blame or change will make the difference. The UK will break up is my prediction. England can remain relatively strong if they dump Scotland wales and NI.
@Declan Young: Exactly and there lies the problem. Finding someone or something to blame and not having any responsibility for your actions, or worse still thinking that others especially Governments to solve issues and if they don’t solve the issues, it must be immigrants and poor/vulnerable who are the reason.
Reading through the other posts just shows how entrenched people are , Capitalism is the only ” thing”in town , utter nonsense, Capitalism or any ism isn’t a solution to the world’s problems , never has been. The solutions are there but rather explore them we will simply rince and repeat the same mistakes that has us where we are and then blame others .
Think about that and history will give you a guide where we will end up if we don’t change.
@Paul O’Mahoney: And I will add this , I believe all our problems are man-made, and therefore, the solution should be man-made. But it will never happen when we blame others or science or ……………..
Humanity needs to grow up and deal with the issues collectively and not nationally.
@Paul O’Mahoney: nobody is blaming the immigrants….they see an open goal and go for it who wouldnt….the issue is with the governments and therefore esp this country take in aload of people and not upgrade the infrastructure to deal with it….closing hotels to house people big money maker that is and we all have the right to boycott them when that legal people trafficking is over if it ever will…hosptials are not being upgraded to cope with the demand…transport system useless housing is a disaster….we have money to throw at foreign wars but not enough to deal with all i listed….this place is becoming overcrowded and we dont have the infrastructure to deal with all of it
@Paul O’Mahoney: well crafted response but by looking @ the snap shot numbers of people who agree with you, your loosing 7-1.. your opinion is truly in the minority thank god..
@JP Fox: Populists like Reform, SF, MAGA etc are best in opposition – complex problems simplified, scapegoats easily found. In fairness Farage doesn’t have that superiority thing that Trump and our Mary have. He’s happier in a pub. May end up in Government by accident at this rate.
@JP Fox: If all the choices are “despicable”, then why vote at all? The only logical choice is to boycott – not to support this non-sense it ad nausea.
Not a great UK fan. But my god the country is destroyed. And between them all the country is in a very dangerous place. As I believe ireland will be very soon. Thank god at my age I may not be around to see it. Very very worrying. Trump and nige Mmmmm deadly.
@John Flanagan: Not a great UK fan, it’s a country not a band or football club, and what did the poor old UK do not to deserve your love. In fairness Farage is a choir boy compared to Trump, all mouth and no action.
More polarisation. Everything is ” hard ” now ” hard left ” , ” hard right ” hard hard hard. No doubt our own Presidential Election will be littered with this too. Weather is good so off out for a game of golf.
This is the result of the 3 main parties in the UK spending decades ignoring their electorate on issues that matter to them. They’ve the highest electricity prices in he world because of Net Zero, they are swamped with huge immigration both legal and illegal and have a Prime Minister who up to a few weeks ago couldn’t say what a woman is. The Brits have voted for a bit of common sense, well done to them
Not much in the difference between labour or tories, ordinary peeps suffer the brunt of policies that allow the wealthy to not contribute. Along comes a spoofer with magical remedies for the lower classes… Comical at this stage.
@bruce banner: except of all those local govt employees who re now threatened with the sack. Musk imitators. And amazing how many people support sacking. A real index of change. For the worse.
@honey badger: Great video of it online, he was well able too. I think it’s nice to see a politician be out at 1am having a heap of pints and getting into a scrap outside a chipper. It’s how all political disagreements should be settled.
@Paul O’Mahoney: Yeah, I went looking for it immediately. He was lucky to avoid prison. He welcomed sentences of up to 5 years for violent offenders prior to his own ‘ misunderstanding’.
@honey badger: Don’t forget that 2 MPs have been murdered in England. And apparently, the lad who got the beating was throwing insults and not pleasant ones . Still at 52 he was well able to stand up
Reform We’ll throw all the foreigners out!” Reality, not a chance as they’re a convenient scapegoat for all the cuts and thieving reform will enable . Guys like him by dint of being from the elite class can’t truly lead a working class movement
@Rian O’Callaghan: Nope. Deport those who have failed to provide adequate proof asylum is needed. Like it or not we’ve signed up to the u.n charter for human rights and asylum is a cornerstone of that. We could look at reforming the bill but as it stands we should honour our long held position.
Zero surprise, quite probably the worst Labour Party in history, and the worst Labour Prime Minister. For once I can agree with Farage, Labour have lost touch with their voting base, arguably going back to Tony Blair. Jeremy Corbyn was in touch with their voting base, but he was deemed too much of a threat to the status quo.
@Jacintha Dumbrell: corbyn may have been more in touch with the base however that base was a lot smaller, hence the tories hammered him in the election. The majority are in the centre hence labour won the last election when the party moved to the centre.
@The next small thing: Corbyn lost because the British media lied (knowingly) and accused him of being antisemitic. Corbyn has never been antisemitic he just holds israel to legal standards like every country should be. Until recently (and still in many circles) that’s considered antisemitism.
There is a lot of discontent out there. Farage is getting that support. Trump to. The same will happen here although it will take longer as we tend to be behind the UK by 10, 20 years. FF and FG are kinda like the Conservatives at their zenith. Gradually, as with all things, that will change.
@AnthonyK: I hope most people here are educated enough not to fall for right-wing nonsense. It’s certainly not working for ordinary people anywhere it’s in power. The right wing clearly love the wealthy and enriching them over ordinary working people.
Starmer and his champagne socialists are screwing the middle class and all indigenous tax payers. They favour the influx of boat folk. They will learn to regret their actions. The fuel subsidy cancellation was the last straw. The Tories are also in free fall , self inflicted.
The people appear to have spoken. You may be unhappy with your situation and you want change so you vote for a particular candidate that resonates. If you feel you made a mistake the last time you voted then there’s always the next time to try to put things right. Some people are afraid of change or don’t care so they don’t vote but for those that do, they are hopeful of a more positive outcome. Again, time will tell whether they made the right choice or not
@Andy Preneur: Exactly and voting should be the only way to change , for now….but human nature will use these results to simply drive more division and embolden the usual suspects to again blame, attack deride immigrants and poor people.
The Labour Party did the same when last in government coalition in Ireland , that is why the Labour Party is impossible to vote for because they totally betrayed their base , Labour Party in uk now doing the same
Starmer the modern day Maggie Thatcher except it’s the so called Labour Party the voice of the voiceless hasinflicted the pain on the same people it claims to represent.
Silent vigil held outside Justice Department following assault of Indian man in Tallaght
33 mins ago
1.4k
Drugs Seizure
Man charged after ecstasy tablets worth €235,000 seized in Co Monaghan
Updated
1 hr ago
3.8k
The Morning Lead
Mortgages have hit levels not seen since right before the crash
23 hrs ago
38.4k
58
Your Cookies. Your Choice.
Cookies help provide our news service while also enabling the advertising needed to fund this work.
We categorise cookies as Necessary, Performance (used to analyse the site performance) and Targeting (used to target advertising which helps us keep this service free).
We and our 210 partners store and access personal data, like browsing data or unique identifiers, on your device. Selecting Accept All enables tracking technologies to support the purposes shown under we and our partners process data to provide. If trackers are disabled, some content and ads you see may not be as relevant to you. You can resurface this menu to change your choices or withdraw consent at any time by clicking the Cookie Preferences link on the bottom of the webpage . Your choices will have effect within our Website. For more details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
We and our vendors process data for the following purposes:
Use precise geolocation data. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
Cookies Preference Centre
We process your data to deliver content or advertisements and measure the delivery of such content or advertisements to extract insights about our website. We share this information with our partners on the basis of consent. You may exercise your right to consent, based on a specific purpose below or at a partner level in the link under each purpose. Some vendors may process your data based on their legitimate interests, which does not require your consent. You cannot object to tracking technologies placed to ensure security, prevent fraud, fix errors, or deliver and present advertising and content, and precise geolocation data and active scanning of device characteristics for identification may be used to support this purpose. This exception does not apply to targeted advertising. These choices will be signaled to our vendors participating in the Transparency and Consent Framework. The choices you make regarding the purposes and vendors listed in this notice are saved and stored locally on your device for a maximum duration of 1 year.
Manage Consent Preferences
Necessary Cookies
Always Active
These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be switched off in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions made by you which amount to a request for services, such as setting your privacy preferences, logging in or filling in forms. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not then work.
Social Media Cookies
These cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.
Targeting Cookies
These cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.
Functional Cookies
These cookies enable the website to provide enhanced functionality and personalisation. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we have added to our pages. If you do not allow these cookies then these services may not function properly.
Performance Cookies
These cookies allow us to count visits and traffic sources so we can measure and improve the performance of our site. They help us to know which pages are the most and least popular and see how visitors move around the site. All information these cookies collect is aggregated and therefore anonymous. If you do not allow these cookies we will not be able to monitor our performance.
Store and/or access information on a device 148 partners can use this purpose
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 191 partners can use this purpose
Use limited data to select advertising 154 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
Create profiles for personalised advertising 117 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
Use profiles to select personalised advertising 117 partners can use this purpose
Advertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
Create profiles to personalise content 50 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
Use profiles to select personalised content 47 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
Measure advertising performance 173 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
Measure content performance 77 partners can use this purpose
Information regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 108 partners can use this purpose
Reports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
Develop and improve services 113 partners can use this purpose
Information about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
Use limited data to select content 49 partners can use this purpose
Content presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
Use precise geolocation data 64 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, your precise location (within a radius of less than 500 metres) may be used in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Actively scan device characteristics for identification 36 partners can use this special feature
With your acceptance, certain characteristics specific to your device might be requested and used to distinguish it from other devices (such as the installed fonts or plugins, the resolution of your screen) in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 119 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Deliver and present advertising and content 123 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Match and combine data from other data sources 92 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Information about your activity on this service may be matched and combined with other information relating to you and originating from various sources (for instance your activity on a separate online service, your use of a loyalty card in-store, or your answers to a survey), in support of the purposes explained in this notice.
Link different devices 65 partners can use this feature
Always Active
In support of the purposes explained in this notice, your device might be considered as likely linked to other devices that belong to you or your household (for instance because you are logged in to the same service on both your phone and your computer, or because you may use the same Internet connection on both devices).
Identify devices based on information transmitted automatically 113 partners can use this feature
Always Active
Your device might be distinguished from other devices based on information it automatically sends when accessing the Internet (for instance, the IP address of your Internet connection or the type of browser you are using) in support of the purposes exposed in this notice.
Save and communicate privacy choices 100 partners can use this special purpose
Always Active
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
have your say