We need your help now

Support from readers like you keeps The Journal open.

You are visiting us because we have something you value. Independent, unbiased news that tells the truth. Advertising revenue goes some way to support our mission, but this year it has not been enough.

If you've seen value in our reporting, please contribute what you can, so we can continue to produce accurate and meaningful journalism. For everyone who needs it.

The Space Shuttle Atlantis deploying a parachute on landing. Alamy Stock Photo

Shannon Airport was an 'emergency landing' spot for the Space Shuttle if multiple engines failed

NASA needed more landing sites as a result of a “slightly altered launch path” in 1995.

SHANNON AIRPORT WAS proposed as a potential “emergency landing” site for the NASA Space Shuttle after a change in the launch plans for the now-defunct spacecraft some thirty years ago. 

According to files released to the National Archives under the 30-year-rule, the Space Shuttle crew may have decided in a chaotic “eight to 20 seconds” that the Co. Clare airport was the safest spot to land.

NASA’s shuttle fleet was retired from service in 2001 after a 30-year programme. 

Documents show that the government was approached by the United States in early 1995 about designating the west of Ireland airport as an emergency landing site for shuttle missions.

On 14 March of that year, the US embassy in Dublin wrote to the Department of Foreign Affairs explaining that, as part of “an ongoing review of emergency planning for shuttle launches,” NASA required an “additional emergency landing site.”

The shift arose, the letter said, because the US and Russia were now collaborating on construction of the International Space Station, forcing the shuttle onto a slightly altered launch path — one that brought Ireland into view. 

The note set out an “unlikely” scenario in stark terms:

“If there were multiple main engine failures after take off, the shuttle would have to attempt an abort landing at the primary [location] in Zaragoza, Spain.

“If, while taking the action to abort to Zaragoza, the shuttle were to then experience additional engine failure, there would be an eight to 20 second period where insufficient power would exist to get the shuttle all the way to Zaragoza.

In that event, the shuttle could attempt an emergency landing at Shannon Airport.

To reassure Irish authorities, the embassy added that “United States personnel (both US government and contractor) would be dispatched” to recover the shuttle and any “foreign pay-loads” on board in the event of a crash landing.

The document also noted that the US would take any steps required to “safeguard the lives of the astronauts” and was “prepared to assume liability for damage caused.”

Nonetheless, the letter also made clear that Ireland had little room to dispute the request as the country was already part of two celestial agreements, namely:

  • The Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies

and

  • The Agreement on the Return of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched Into Outer Space

Over subsequent months, officials in the Departments of Foreign Affairs and Transport weighed how to respond. Having ratified both treaties in the 1960s, Ireland was bound to comply, they concluded.

A handwritten note dated just over a month after the US request a Department of Foreign Affairs legal official wrote to a colleague that Ireland was “obliged” to support the request.

On foot of this, the official said that they may need to prepare for the possibility of the shuttle missing its intended landing spot at Shannon. 

“We will need to establish a base which will be able to spring into action if an emergency arises, which will contact Shannon ground services to get prepared, which will notify hospital and fire services in case the landing is in a built up area, which will notify and sea rescue and naval services in case it lands in the sea, etc,” the note said. 

Despite the concerns, another DFA official subsequently noted after NASA had contacted them about an upcoming launch that the chances of all this happening was unlikely. 

“It is our understanding that the possibility of Shannon Airport actually being used as a landing site is a very remote one,” the memo said. 

[National Archives document reference number: 2025/124/266}

Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.

Close
31 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic. Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy here before taking part.
Leave a Comment
    Submit a report
    Please help us understand how this comment violates our community guidelines.
    Thank you for the feedback
    Your feedback has been sent to our team for review.

    Leave a commentcancel

     
    JournalTv
    News in 60 seconds