TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 9 °C Saturday 18 May, 2013

5 things you should know about the Republicans running for US president

Our quick-and-easy guide to the six men and one woman hoping to be the candidate to face Barack Obama in the autumn…

Six of the seven candidates in the running for the Republican nomination for the US presidency. (Not pictured: Jon Huntsman)
Six of the seven candidates in the running for the Republican nomination for the US presidency. (Not pictured: Jon Huntsman)
Image: Charlie Neibergall/AP/Press Association Images

US PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULS from the Republican party face the fist test of strength in tonight’s Iowa caucus but who are the candidates in the running? TheJournal.ie takes a look…

It has been widely-acknowledged as one of the most fluid races for the Republican nomination since they began. Indeed over the weekend, the polling organisation Gallup said it had been “the most volatile Republican nomination contest” since such races were tracked by polling companies.

While for large parts, Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, has led the way, Republican voters appear unconvinced by a man who failed to win the nomination four years ago and have at times switched their preference to others in the race.

At some point over the last few months, Texas governor Rick Perry, former pizza magnate Herman Cain, and former House Speaker New Gingrich have led the national polls but debate performances, sexual harassment allegations and ties to lobbyists respectively have undermined their chances. Cain has already stepped out of the race.

In the end it might be last man (or woman) standing. But what do we know about the six men and one woman who want to face Barack Obama in the main presidential election later this year?

In no particular order here are some of they cringe-worthy ads and a few things you should probably know about the candidates:

Mitt Romney


  1. Before entering politics, Romney ran the management consulting company Bain Capital, the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City and then became Governor of Massachusetts. He failed to win the Republican nomination in 2008, pouring millions into his campaign but coming off second best to John McCain.
  2. Romney has championed his business credentials saying that they are what is needed to fix America’s economy. Figures show that over $1 million dollars has been given to his campaign from banks and other financial institutions.
  3. His Mormon religion is a cause for concern among some Republican voters, many of whom are evangelical Christians. Romney has shied away from talking about it on the campaign trail but his history is steeped in it having served a ward bishop for his church in Massachusetts.
  4. He has a reputation as a “flip-flopper” who has changed policy positions for political expediency. On abortion, he was pro-choice, he now opposes it. There have also been questions about his past views on gun-rights, a key issue for conservatives.
  5. Healthcare may prove troublesome for Romney. He opposes the federal health care law introduced by Obama yet it was modelled partly on Romney’s own universal healthcare achievements while Governor of Massachusetts. He argues that states and not central government should determine what healthcare model works best.

Newt Gingrich


  1. A former congressman for Georgia and Speaker of the House of Representatives – the most powerful position a US politician can hold outside of the presidency and vice presidency – Gingrich was the chief opponent of Bill Clinton during his presidency in the 90s.
  2. Gingrich’s ‘Contract with America’ was key to his success in the mid-nineties as the Republicans gained control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 46 years. The budget impasses, similar to what we saw last year, led to the US government actually shutting down twice but it would eventually lead to a compromised, balanced-budget being pushed through.
  3. His marital infidelities have not sat well with some voters. He has been married three times and cheated on his second wife with his third whom he was seeing during a time when he was castigating President Clinton for his own infidelities with Monica Lewinsky.
  4. On the issues, Gingrich is a solid conservative wanting, amongst other policies, to shrink the Department of Education, cut corporation tax to our own rate of 12.5 per cent and continue to keep Guantanamo Bay open.
  5. He surged in the polls towards the end of last year having originally been written off in the summer but his credibility has been badly damaged by a series of scathing ads released by a political action committee with links to the Romney campaign. This has been widely seen as the key reason for his drop in the polls, particularly in Iowa.

Michele Bachmann


  1. Bachmann has been a Congresswoman for Minnesota for the past five years and her presidential run has surprised many. A former tax attorney, she is a supporter of the Tea Party movement.
  2. She has a strong evangelical faith and has fostered 23 children. Her husband runs a Christian counselling service which reportedly claims to “cure” homosexuals.
  3. As a Tea Party favourite, she is in favour of cutting government spending and has outlined one way of creating jobs as taking the 100,000 employment opportunities American companies have created in Ireland and bringing them back to the US.
  4. She created considerable buzz when she won the Iowa straw poll in August, indicating she had a strong operation on the ground. However more recent reports have indicated that her operation is threadbare and lacks funds, an indication that she is unlikely to do well in Iowa or anywhere else.
  5. Her poll numbers have steadily declined since the summer as a series of stories have seemingly discredited her candidacy including an old lecture from 2004 in which she reportedly said homosexuality is a “sexual dysfunction”.

Rick Santorum


  1. A former lawyer and US Senator from Pennsylvania, Santorum has also worked as a contributor to Fox News  and is widely viewed as a rock solid social and religious conservative.
  2. A Catholic and father-of seven, he is staunchly conservative on social issues such as abortion, contraception and stem-cell research – he is against all of them.
  3. His views on homosexuality have caused controversy and have drawn the ire of liberals who conducted an internet campaign to come up with a new definition for the word ‘Santorum’ – a graphic, sexually-related definition which still appears at the top of Google searches for that word.
  4. Santorum had drawn little attention through most of the campaign but in recent weeks he has surged in polls. The latest Des Moines Register newspaper poll in Iowa saw him leapfrog other candidates into third place with the numbers showing a surge to second place in the final two days of polling.
  5. He is proposing a zero corporate tax rate and would seek to starve Obama’s health care law of the funding it would need. A foreign policy hawk, he believes that troops should have stayed in Iraq and that the draw down from Afghanistan should happen a little slower than being proposed by the current administration.

Jon Huntsman


  1. Huntsman is a former Governor of Utah and has served in four different White House administrations. His candidacy is most interesting perhaps for the fact that up until April of last year, he was the Obama-appointed US ambassador to China.
  2. He has close ties to the family business, the Huntsman Corporation, a global chemical company with multi-billion dollar revenues and his deep-pockets could be advantageous to him sustaining a lengthy campaign.
  3. However, his poll numbers have never risen into double figures, primarily because of his ties to Obama. He is also a believer in evolution and “trusts scientists on global warming” – not something that has gone down well with many Republican voters.
  4. He is anti-abortion and pro-business (cutting regulation, lowering taxes) but proposals to cut the defence budget and support for same-sex marriage will not endear him to some in the conservative movement.
  5. His daughters are conducting an active and hard-fought campaign on behalf of their dad on the Twitter machine with @Jon2012girls making a spoof video of one-time candidate Herman Cain’s infamous campaign ad and releasing their own version of a Justin Timberlake song where they vowed to bring “Huntsman Back.”

Ron Paul


  1. A former air corp pilot and gynaecologist, the 76-year-old has been a long-serving Congressman for Texas. His libertarian views have seen him relegated to the fringes of the Republican party, though his anti-war policies have drawn considerable support from younger voters in recent months.
  2. He ran for president as the Libertarian Party candidate in 1988, getting on the ballot in 46 states and winning 0.5 per cent of the popular vote nationally. He also ran for the Republican nomination in 2008 but failed to get out of single figures.
  3. He is most notable for his foreign policy views which are a sharp departure from other candidates. He favours cutting the Pentagon’s budget, closing many of the US armed forces’ foreign bases, bringing troops home from Afghanistan and cutting aid for Israel.
  4. His Tea Party credentials have helped his standing in the polls and this is without question his most successful presidential campaign. He favours smaller government by cutting half its spending, and shutting five cabinet level agencies. He would also abolish the federal income tax and the Inland Revenue Service.
  5. Like others, he has shot to the top of polls only for past controversies to affect his numbers. In this case, there have been questions about leaflets distributed under his name in the 90s which contain racist and homophobic views. Paul has disassociated himself with the leaflets, saying he didn’t write them.

Rick Perry


  1. A former Air Force pilot and farmer, Perry has been in politics since the early 80s. He was George W Bush’s Lieutenant Governor in Texas before the junior Bush went off to the White House and Perry assumed the governorship which he retained in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
  2. He once supported former US Vice President and Democrat Al Gore when he was running for president in 1988, but he later defended this support and subsequent switch to the Republicans, pointing out it was a switch former President Ronald Reagan made at one point in his political life.
  3. In Texas he has overseen a remarkable level of job creation going against the national grain of rising unemployment but closer scrutiny of the numbers make the rise less impressive. Nonetheless there was considerable clamour for him to enter the race last year.
  4. Once he did, he topped early polls but then the debates came and his performances were widely panned. This was primarily thanks to the most humiliating moment ever seen in a debate when Perry couldn’t remember one of the three government departments he wanted to abolish.
  5. Perry supports a constitutional ban on abortion having been previously been in favour of allowing states to decide. He has called the imposition of a US-Mexico border fence “idiocy” and says there needs to be more border agents to curb illegal immigration. He also wants Congress to become a part-time institution in order to reduce costs and put a stop to the political gridlock currently engulfing Washington.

For more on the candidates positions on the main issues, check out this handy guide from the Associated Press.

What is a caucus? Your guide to the first step in the race for the White House

Read next:

Comments (44 Comments)

  • Ron Paul or John huntsman- polar opposites in a lot of ways, but the rest of them are religious nuts!

    Reply
  • You left out a couple of important things that leave Ron Paul a cut above the rest..

    1. He has the most consistent voting record in the house (unlike some of his opponents)
    2. He hands back a chunk of his wage at the end of his year.

    He’s certainly the most honest of the candidates, something America (and everywhere else) desperately needs.
    Here’s hoping he gets the votes and the electoral college don’t overturn them..

    Reply
  • Would love to see Ron Paul getting the nomination, but knowing the Republicans they’ll go for Perry or Romney. And Obama will wipe the floor with them.

    Reply
  • It speaks volumes about the sorry state American politics when one of its “mainstream” parties produces such a bunch of far right extremists as Presidential candidates. The kind of obnoxious and offensive views expressed during the GOP primary would make these people pariahs in most other western democracies – from cheering at the prospect of leaving an uninsured patient die to booing a gay soldier serving in Iraq, the Republicans are seeking to appeal to lowest common denominator in a contest to see who can be more bigoted and nasty than the others. I expect Obama to prevail over whatever candidate emerges from this freakshow. The margain will be interesting however.

    Reply
  • Colm 03/01/12 #

    Ron Paul is the best candidate by far but the U.S media(especially FOX) are ignoring him.

    Reply
    • RDX862 03/01/12 #

      Ron Paul ran in the last election and has been around for a long time. People are well aware of his positions and most people are able to find at least one issue (most likely dozens) that would stop them from voting for the guy.

      I would love for somebody to tell me how a Ron Paul Presidency would work? How would he even be able to form an administration? How would his appointments get through the Senate?

      You see how much trouble Obama has with the Republicans in control of only the House. Ron Paul would either have to seriously compromise on all his political positions or nothing would get done.

      President Paul wants to cut funding to Israel? The Democrats and Republicans pass a veto proof bill increasing funding to Israel.

      Obama had far less radical ideas than Ron Paul and how did that work out for him? If you think a president alone can radically change America you are deluded.

      Ron Paul has no chance of winning the Republican nomination never mind the presidency.

      If he did win all those lovely ideas that liberals love about Paul like his foreign policy, drug war, gay marriage, etc, would be exactly the ones that would have no chance of ever getting done with a Republican controlled congress.

      So if you support America going further to the right then Ron Paul is your candidate

      Reply
    • Ron Paul is a great candidate if you are a Democrat. Obama would wipe the floor with him in debates on issues of drug legalisation, prostitution and foreign policy. There is only two parties, the right will vote Republican and the left will vote Obama, it’s the centre that should be the biggest issue for all parties concerned. Romney is the Republicans best bet and the fact that he has $250 million in his back pocket helps. I like Obama but as a betting man I would say that Joseph Smith loving millionaire will win it.

      Reply
  • Ron Paul seems the most interesting of the lot. He is different from Bush and Obama both of whom have been huge failures .Maybe it is time for smaller government with less red tape annoying the hell out of ppl who want to get on with their lives.

    Reply
    • One could point out that it was small government that caused the current financial mess that the world is in. Over the last twenty years most governments adopted a hands-off approach to financial regulations and letting the markets dictate the course of events. And when the US government stayed out of the way and let Lehman Brothers collapse it was the trigger for the last couple of years of recession. And where did people turn to to get the mess sorted out at that point? Why, their governments of course. Seems small government is only helpful when everybody is doing well.

      Also interesting to see that the countries where banking regulation was enforced by governments are the ones who seem to have done best out of this crisis. Government isn’t always the problem.

      Reply
    • James this is where we will just have to disagree. I am sick of government interference in people’s basic lives . From red tape when a loved one dies to even keeping a dog. It’s gone mental. Libertarians have a great belief in small gov. Small taxes but also small welfare payments. The USA is full of red tape. And in fact it was government interference that kept the banks alive. They should have been allowed to fail .if they can’t survive in the market they should be allowed to collapse like any other business .

      Reply
    • The effectiveness of financial regulation is too often overstated. Much of the problem with banking has been cronyism and the “too big to fail” policy.
      http://www.roost.com/app/index.php/public/roostbar?bid=98509&k=99e438b6133b005ce1802eec6f9da5ea&roostBDI=98509

      Ron Paul is also of Geman/Irish extraction.

      Reply
  • Can’t imagine the powerful Jewish vote going with Ron Paul.

    Reply
    • Indeed, that’s why the Republican Jewish Coalition Barred him from their Presidential Debate. While the rest of these warmongers were there kissing asses for Jewish funding and votes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nBYZJ6hEag

      Reply
    • It’s not the Jewish vote, that accounts for a very small percentage. It’s the Zionist Christians he needs to worry about..

      Reply
    • Yawn , we now see the age old anti Semitic comments. Your a great one for bashing Jews and Israel dude. While your off blaming Jews for all the worlds evils realise one thing the largest pro Israel group in the USA is cufi and it’s a Christian group. Christian evangelicals make up most of israeli support in America . And btw Ron Paul has said its time America kept its nose out of israels business and he has said if Israel needs to attack Iran for its own protection washington should not stand in its way.

      Reply
    • No wonder your such a bigot when you fill your brain with such nwo crap.
      Amazed the journal.ie allows for such racist language. You harped on about Jews and their money , the issue is not Israel. Despite the fact Ron Paul has said if Israel needs to it should attack Iran . You totally ignore the fact most Zionists in the USA are Christian not Jewish. But never fail for you to start attacking Jews .

      Reply
    • If I had a tenner for every time you try to divert a topic with “You totally ignore the fact…”, I’d be laughin. No I didn’t ignore the fact that you don’t have to be Jewish to be a Zionist and you don’t have to be a Zionist to be Jewish. I was talking specifically about the ‘Republican Jewish Coalition’ because they’re the ones who held a closed shop ‘presidential debate’ and barred Ron Paul because he wants to cut funding to Israel. Of course there’s plenty of other Zionist groups, but the topic here is Ron Paul and the Republican candidacy.

      If I had a problem with Jews I wouldn’t have donated to JVP, a group I’ve the utmost respect for and I can’t be ‘anti-Semitic because I’m pro Palestinian and they’re Semites too. I am however anti Zionist…

      Reply
    • And Larry if you want to discuss Jewish money. And not discuss Irish american. Chinese American and Latin American then here lies an issue. Why are Jews singled out. And if you look at the last election most Jews voted and donated to Obama not to the republicans and Obama is considered the least friendly president to Israel in years

      Reply
    • Barry, while I can appreciate that you are trying to avoid anti semitism you are in fact incorrect.
      Semetic refers to a group of languages, including Phoenican, Hebrew and ARABIC. Therefore, Arabs are just as Semitic as any Jewish person. For you to deny that is Anti Semitic in itself.

      Reply
    • The term anti semitism is used to describe discrimination against Jews. The only people I ever meet who consistently bark on about anti semitism not really being anti semitism are those who use and abuse the word for their on Jew bashing . No generalisation needed they are generally nwo conspiracy theorists and or anti Israel activists – anti semitism is widely recognised as a term for Jew hatred and discrimination towards Jews. To single out Jews like the above two posters have done is anti semitism. And in fact shanti you can read above I actually said Palestinians were the very closely related to Ashkenazi Jews . So I denied nothing . I simply defended the term anti semitism from those obsessed with revisionism

      Reply
    • That’s true Barry, but the topic here by Phil Mc Donald was about the Jewish vote. There’s plenty of more powerful big corp. lobby groups and while I do have a problem with any lobby group’s money dictating America’s foreign policies, I’m merely pointing out how these squirmy Republicans (except RP) were kissing ass for their funding.

      Reply
    • Wow, thanks for your assumption.. But the fact that someone hijacked the term means nothing really.. The ADL were the first ones to insinuate that the term was specific to the Jews. Being a predominantly Jewish organisation, their will to have this new meaning applied was slightly biased. As is their listing every single Muslim organisation as terrorists (which would cause them to be labelled anti Semitic if they had not hijacked the term).

      Reply
    • Larry. How much money does Saudi Arab or other oil lobbies invest in presidential campaigns . How much do gun lobby groups. Pro or anti abortion groups
      Why are Jews singled out . I personally think as someone who is pro Israel . Ron Paul is a better candidate and I don’t believe the USA should give aid to Israel. Though time and time again it has been proven this aid benefits America more than Israel . America is borrowing money to give as aid . Pathetic situation really.

      Reply
    • Ps, Barry, while I disagree with Israeli government policy, I do agree with your last statement, borrowing money to give to a country as aid when there are far more deserving countries of that aid too!

      Reply
    • Not disagreeing with you on that. In what way has this aid to Israel benefited America more? Just a question as I didn’t know that…

      Reply
    • No I believe America should cut all aid. How can u give away money you don’t even own. Ireland should do the same . Number of very interesting videos on YouTube by an african lady who speaks out against foreign aid. She said it fuels corruption. Discourages enterprise in the country and has led to African nations becoming over reliant on aid. When the soviet union collapses Cuba looked screwed but in a year they were producing food in allotments and waste land in urban areas. They became more self reliant and took better care of the soil through organic farming . In my opinion Africa will not feed itself until we force it too. Of course there is complex issues of large companies growing crops for export but the best thing Africa needs is to be free of aid . It’s is simply a tool to dictate foreign policy. That goes for Europe too.

      Reply
    • Like most us aid. It is called tied aid. Used to buy American weapons and goods . So technically it’s really credit to buy American goods. America has threatened Israel a number of times when Israel attempted to do weapons deals with India . If the aid was cut Israel would be free of this sort of American interference.
      Aid is a joke. The billions given by governments and individuals and all we see is more people facing food poverty. Both home and abroad . The governments of Saudi and UAE are tight arses . They give minimal amounts of aid .the bits they do give is generally to find mosques .like the one in Dublin and being built in cork. western nations borrow money from china and wealthy middle eastern countries to give aid to countries in Africa

      Reply
  • Although i like Ron Paul, he will never get the nomination. Huntsman is interesting and would be my 2nd choice but again wont get the nomination. So we are now left with Conservative nutters and even if Paul or Huntsman got the nomination the appointment of Republican Secretary of State and Secretary of Defence would be extremely worrying from an international perspective. Herman Cain is trying to get the Secretary of Defence yet he didnt even have a clue about Obamas involvement in Libya- Scary. Obamas been a major disappointment but hes still the best of a bad bunch

    Reply
  • Ron Paul wants to cut ALL foreign aid.

    Reply
  • So all of a sudden the Tea Party guy is cool! Who would’ve believed it? BTW, the profile of Ron Paul might have mentioned that his son Rand Paul is a Senator ( Republican- Kentucky) and a big Tea Party favourite.

    Reply
  • 03/01/12 #

    they are all barking

    Reply
  • None of the parties have acceptable candidates. We don’t love any of them, which leaves us asking “Who’s the less evil?” and since evil is so subjective…

    Reply
  • Worst bunch of Republican candidates ever. And that’s not long after Bush. Ron is the best of a bad bunch. Personally see Romney and Obama going down the stretch. Anyone can call it from there.

    Reply
  • To correct something above on Jon Huntsman, he doesn’t support equal marriage, only civil unions, which still places him as the most liberal of the GOP candidates on the issue. To correct a comment above, Paul does not support gay marriage.

    Reply
  • Anyone else notice a lack of black people in those videos?

    Reply
  • Ron Paul’s main appeal is to youngish, privileged, well off, straight, white men. That is a voting block that is certainly wealthy and powerful, but doesn’t add up to anything like overwhelming numbers.

    Romney, is an interesting case. The madness that has come to define Republican political culture now demands that he be apologetic about some of his best instincts. His Massachusetts health care reforms were very successful, and in any other country, would be trumpeted on every street corner to demonstrate his abilities and experience. His original position on abortion was finely nuanced. He was always against abortion as a personal choice for himself, but, having witnessed the death of a first cousin of a botched illegal abortion in the pre ‘Roe v Wade’ days of the early sixties, he refused for many years to vote to ban or criminalise abortion.

    Reply
  • They are all big on lowering corpo tax, bad news for us.

    Reply
  • Oh Inn 03/01/12 #

    If Ron Paul were to become president it would be great news for people in almost every country but USA.
    He would reduce USA millitary aggression, great news!
    Unfortunately he would also be a disaster for ordinary americans econimically. The rich would get a hell of a lot richer and everyone else woul dget a hell of a lot poorer. USA would go from being the most unequal developed nation in the world to being the most unequal nation in the world. In a country with such a love affair with violence and guns, who knows where that could lead.

    Reply

Add New Comment