TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 13 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

80% think counselling and psychotherapy should be regulated

The research also revealed that almost two thirds of people believe it is more acceptable to talk about their problems than it was in the past.

Image: Counsellor via Shutterstock

FOUR OUT OF five people in Ireland think that counsellors and psychotherapists should be regulated by the government.

The research carried out by Behaviour and Attitudes for the Irish Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy also revealed that almost 60 per cent of Irish people believe it is more acceptable to talk about their problems than it was in the past.

The study was carried to better understand the value that Irish people attach to counselling or psychotherapy services. “This is a very positive shift and means people are more likely to talk to a counsellor or psychotherapist about their problems, which further emphasises the need for regulation in this area,” says Naoise Kelly, National Director at IACP.

Kelly added that it’s important that the right, qualified people are doing the job:

Currently, there is nothing to prevent someone doing a three-week course and hanging a sign outside their door. An individual is not qualified to deal with sensitive and potentially complex issues after such a course. If you are going to work with a counsellor or psychotherapist, ensure they are appropriately qualified.

Over 200 IACP members will attend the Association’s 32nd AGM tomorrow in Portlaoise.

Read: Cutbacks reduce one-to-one guidance counselling by 50% – study >

More: Suicide helplines experiencing more calls from worried family members >

Read next:

Comments (17 Comments)

  • I totally agree. I qualified in a related area in which I had to complete a four year degree to get a license. Unregulated this is dangerous. Succesive governments have promised to regulate these areas for years but so far usual lies.

    Reply
  • Regulation in psychotherapy and counselling will only be a good thing.
    Get rid of the Con-jobs

    Reply
  • Youve no idea the pain me and my wife went through because of the state of regulation around this in Ireland. A place called Tabor, I`m not afraid to mention the name because if they want to complain let them and I will happily take them to court. They advertised a degree in Psychoterapy at their “Cabin” in Mullingar which turned out to be a large shed.. It basically was a scam and their so called training consisted of my wife being sucked in a demi-cult where every penny possible was squeezed out of us and the course owner Janette would intimidate and even fail students regardless of their academic performance if they didnt pay for the additional services required to qualify for the degree to the extent Janette even told my wife she had the power to visit people in their dreams and she would visit my wife to let her know why she should take on extra courses that Janette would take payment for.
    The most worrying thing is that people who do cough up all the cash to Tabor go on to treat patients with real issues and traumas and the graduates of Tabor treat these people with no real ability or knowledge on how to treat.
    In the end it cost us €40k over 3 years and alot of heartache before I managed to get my wife out of the grip of Janette and Tabor. Its a disgrace that these scam artists can get away with this in 2013.

    Reply
  • Of course they should be regulated. I heard of a chancer who was counselling an old guy for some trauma and got the ‘patient’ to sign over his house and everything to him and then fled the country.

    Reply
    • Statutory registration, that is regulation, is on the way for clinicians such as psychologists but for some unfathomable reason, counsellors & psychotherapists are not part of this process. So yes, the public remains in unprotected. My advice…check your therapist’s credentials, particularly whether he/she is a member of a reputable professional body.

      Reply
  • A much needed policy.

    Reply
  • Totally agree- wasn’t there a case a few years ago in Rathgar where a ‘therapist’ was conning unwell people out of thousands? Disgusting.

    Reply
  • No-brainer.

    Anyone who presents themselves as a medicinal advisor needs to be accredited by a reputable organisation.

    Doctors spend an enormous amount of time, money and effort to be able to practice.

    Therapists, counsellers and ( worst of the worst ) Alternative medicine practitioners can set up shop with a Mickey Mouse certificate gained from a weekend-long course, or bought over the Internet, or without any qualification at all.

    It makes a mockery of medical standards, and means there’s absolutely no established standard of service.

    As it is, anyone seeking medicinal help from anyone who is not a registered medicinal doctor should ask for clear details of the service-providers credentials. If the service-provider gets huffy or defensive, drop them.

    Buyer beware. Nothing worse than self-proclaimed experts with a thimbleful of knowledge and a sackful of ego.

    Reply
    • 22/03/13 #

      Much needed,these people charge 60-70 euro an hour,and talk to some of the most vulnerable people in our society,though they spoke(Mary Harney) about regulating the sun bed industry here and the alcohol industry and yeah we are still waiting

      Reply
  • Regulation is greatly needed at home. Whats more perplexing is the lack of psychotherapy and counselling jobs, matched by the tiny ammount of clinical and counselling psychology places in colleges. Its bordering on impossible to get onto these courses to which twelve places are allocated in a small few universities, you literallybcould tick all the boxes required and not get it in over ten years applying. Who loses out? People with the mental health problems. Have started looking at alternative postgrads because no job means no mortgage being paid.

    Reply
  • Totally agree.

    Here is a transcript of a letter sent to IACP a few years ago.

    ===

    As a user at the *sharp end* of mental health services your organisation does not provide any insight into how mental health professionals – or their representative association – ensure good standards of practice for prospective patients.

    My own experience is that quality is NOT a guarantee.

    Over 15 years I have been referred to four different therapists with varied results. Two of the people I was recommended to see were next to useless.

    Their approaches were so “holistic” and fuzzy as to be totally ineffective. Of course, it may be that I was referred to the wrong type of carer. But if that is so, why did two different GPs fail to make correct suggestions? Is that reflective of experience in general?

    Another member of my family has had similar complaints.

    He has also attended several therapists and his view is that unless you fit a desired “type” (e.g. “the downtrodden woman”, “the repressed homosexual”) some counsellors are simply not interested.

    Their lack of empathy shows itself in a mistrust of the symptoms you describe. Unless you can somehow
    manufacture a break-down in front of them, they may not believe you.

    What I am saying is that our experience at the sharp end of mental health care delivery is NOT wholly positive. Some carers are out of their depth and patients are being referred to them that they cannot possibly help.

    But, of course these unlucky patients may have to spill their guts for 6 weeks (at up to 80 euro a go) before they learn that – “Sorry, I don’t think this is going anywhere”.

    Demand for mental health services is increasing whilst the supply of quality professionals remains low. This
    implies that industry revenue is growing, i.e. it is getting richer.

    The industry should use this extra income to offer a free assessment service to people seeking a mental health intervention. I believe marriage counselling services do the same (www.mrcs.ie) by giving couples a free assessment before they recommend a counsellor.

    Such a measure would encourage uptake of services, remove the onus from GPs to make (often ill-informed) referrals, and most importantly ensure patients receive the right type of care.

    Reply
  • Helplink 22/03/13 #

    We at Helplink, http://www.helplink.ie, completely agree that the area of counselling and psychotherapy needs to be regulated. In fact it is surprising that it wasn’t 100% of people thinking that the area of counselling should be regulated by the government.

    If you new your GP looking after your physical health was not regulated then simply you wouldn’t go to him/her, in fact it would be dangerous to do so! The same premise should operate with your counsellor, you need to be confident that you are seeing someone who is qualified and regulated properly before they help you to take care of your mental health.

    It is shocking the amount of people out there that are messing with people’s minds who are not qualified and frankly these snake oil sales people should be ashamed of themselves and dare I say it brought before the courts.

    Helplink’s low cost national counselling service only employs professional accredited or pre-accredited, insured AND also Garda vetted counsellors.

    Reply
  • Regulation what a joke! Currently a social worker and registration is €295 but has been reduced to a once off fee of €100 if we vote yes to accept Croke Park 2! Yes, the registration that is meant to protect the public from Social Work bad practice is negotiable! I am skeptical of Government regulation if this is the approach the Government takes!

    Reply
  • Alangb 22/03/13 #

    I remember back in the 70′s watching TV shows where we were introduced here in Ireland to the latest American fads ‘Head shrinks’ otherwise know as Psychotherapists, there was a lot of pressure back then in the 70′s and early 80′s for people who had issues to go visit these guys (It was a burgeoning business back then in Ireland).

    The buzz words if you didn’t go to one of these therapists was ‘your old fashioned’ ‘it’s not cool’ or in the case of Men ‘Ah jasus your’e afraid of talkin about your feelins’ that is of course until we discovered our friends, what ever happened to talking to them, nothing of course except that it takes money away from the ‘ex spurt’ P.S. I have the bestest friends eva!!!!

    Reply
  • Does that mean that 80% of the existing councillors would be struck off? Some of the doctors were struck off as they are dreadful at their jobs eg Neary. We as a nation prescribe the most anti depressants in Europe so it seems to me that the qualified people who are regulated ie doctors and mental health professionals could be struck off. They cut guidance councillors time and that is more important as the younger the person is the better chance of helping with emotional and mental illness.

    Reply
    • Just because someone has a driving license, it doesn’t mean they are a good driver. But It doesn’t follow that there’s no need or reason of driving licenses.

      An incompetent doctor shouldn’t be allowed to practice. And there’s a structure for this. A doctor can be struck off. A therapist or counsellor cannot be struck off, as there’s nothing they can be struck off from. So there’s no way to stop them causing harm via their incompetence.

      Every person who receives a service from a professional has the right to expect an demand competent service. But without structures in place, there’s no way to ensure that level of competency.

      Reply

Add New Comment