TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 19 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Explainer: Is there a common thread to all mass shootings?

Many have searched for answers to why atrocities such as the recent mass shooting at a cinema theatre in the US happen. But there are many myths and misconceptions about such incidents.

Candles cover the sidewalk at a memorial across from the theatre in Aurora, Colorado where 12 people were killed last month.
Candles cover the sidewalk at a memorial across from the theatre in Aurora, Colorado where 12 people were killed last month.
Image: Alex Brandon/AP/Press Association Images

THE RECENT DEVASTATING shooting at a screening of the new Batman film in Colorado has brought the issue of mass shootings and the reasons behind what drives someone to carry out such atrocities into focus.

In the hours and days that followed the events of 20 July there were thousands of words written and hours of airtime given to trying to explain just what drove the alleged shooter, James Holmes, to carry out the actions which left 12 dead, dozens injured and a community as confused and angered as it was traumatised.

Many looked for a moment or an event in his past that may have been some sort of motive for doing what he is alleged to have done. There is rarely a simple answer to the question or questions about why people commit mass shootings, there is rarely any answers at all but that doesn’t stop people attempting to find them.

This can lead to the creation of many myths surrounding mass shootings and many attempts to find a theme or thread that is common to each one.

In a recent Washington Post piece Jeff Kass, a former reporter for the Rocky Mountain News and the author of Columbine: A True Crime Story, wrote about five such myths about mass shootings and attempted to debunk them. They were:

  1. The idea that shooters are insane
  2. That cutting down on illegal gun sales would help reduce incidents of mass shootings
  3. A loved one should have seen it coming
  4. Communities come together after mass shootings
  5. It can happen anywhere

The article is worth a read on its own but before you do that consider what Kass told TheJournal.ie in an interview this week when asked to explain his first point: ”There is a differences between what’s insane under the law or what may be classed as crazy or mentally ill by a psychologist.

“Dylan Klebold (one of the Columbine shooters) was depressed, that’s what most psychologists say. Which is problematic but that’s what they generally agree on. If he had survived and gone to trial he could not have claimed an insanity defence.”

But what about his accomplice in one of the most notorious and devastating high school shootings in US history in which Klebold and Eric Harris killed 13 and injured 24 in 1999 before taking their own lives?

Harris kept a much-publicised journal in the year leading up to the shooting which outlined much of what he was planning to do with Klebold. This diary “was hate-hate-hate all the way through”, wrote Dave Cullen, the author of Columbine, in the New York Times recently.

He added: “Of the tiny fraction of people who commit mass murder, most are not psychopaths like Eric Harris or deeply mentally ill like Seung-Hui Cho at Virginia Tech. Far more often, they are suicidal and deeply depressed.”

As Kass mentioned, Klebold was depressed, we know also that Seung- Hui Cho was found mentally ill in 2005, less than two years before he carried out the deadliest shooting by a single gunman in US history when killed 32 people and wounded 17 at Virginia Tech in 2007. While there are indications in the case of Holmes that he had been seeing a psychiatrist and that authorities at the University of Colorado had been notified about his behaviour a month before the shootings and just before he dropped out.

So if it is the case that more often than not mass shooters or alleged mass shooters are depressed. Then what can be done to stop such heinous crimes happening or at least reduce the number of times they happen?

Mental health

Psychologist Dr Paul Wong, who is based in Toronto and recently organised a conference on the meaning behind mass shootings, identified mental health as a key issue and a problem that needs to be addressed: “Here in Canada and everywhere mental health services focus on treatment rather than prevention.

“So the issue is to identify and help these people. We often focus on an event happening and then try to fix it when something happens, but if there is help to identify people in trouble and help them in early stages it is less likely there will be incidents like these,” he told TheJournal.ie.

“In the Virgina Tech case, he had mental health problems but they did not focus on them effectively. If they had better systems to detect emotional problems, we might be able to prevent many of the tragedies that occur.”

But there are no immediately and easily identifiable signs that tell us the characteristics most likely to be found in someone who commits or is likely to commit a mass shooting. The idea that loved ones can spot in their nearest and dearest some sort of telltale signs is, to some, fanciful.

Kass says: “I don’t think you can have a checklist and go down the checklist and talk to somebody and say: ‘Well he did this, this and this he or she is definitely  going to commit a mass shooting’. We’re dealing with people, human psychology, it’s not hard and fast statistics like we would wish.”

So if we’re talking about human psychology what then does the psychologist, Dr Wong, think?

He takes it back to whole issue of the meaning of life itself: “That was part of our recent conference, trying to define what is the meaning of life but that takes quite a bit of time!” he admits.

But for Dr Wong exploring the meaning of life is about examining whether people should be pursuing success or happiness in life.

Vengeance and youth

If we take the case of Holmes and his personal pursuit of success: He had recently dropped out of medical school, a failure to some and perhaps to himself. Did this lack of success in anyway impact of on what he is alleged to have done?

In other cases did the pursuit of happiness and failure to achieve it have any bearing on other mass shooters’ decisions? How, for example, was Harris and Klebold’s respective pursuits of happiness affected by situations where they found themselves ostracised or bullied?

Kass, whose expertise is on the Columbine shooting in particular, points out: “Some people claim now that the Columbine shooters were not bullied but there are plenty of accounts that say they were bullied. It may not have been the primary factor but it appears to have happened.”

If there is failure in the pursuit of success or happiness then perhaps there is something to be said for the idea of revenge.

“I think generally speaking there is the motive of vengeance. If there is one motive from everything I’ve read and studied, what I feel is the most common or the most common I’ve seen is vengeance – to get revenge,” Kass sums-up.

So if revenge is a common thread in mass shootings are there any others? It probably won’t have escaped your notice that most perpetrators of mass shootings are males, many of them young men or even boys. Does this mean anything?

Dr Wong says: “Adolescents do not have maturity or wisdom to handle personal failure. My personal research is that aggression is a very primitive response, aggression is the most primitive way to cope.”

Gun culture

Finally, if we move away from the characteristics of a shooter or would-be shooter. Is there anything else to consider?

Kass’ Washington Post piece refers to the myth of cracking down on illegal sales means cracking down on a cause of mass shootings. Not true.

Weapons, particularly dangerous ones, are legally bought and sold in the United States. The bigger argument, the one raised by the centrist mayor of New York Michael Bloomberg, is that there should be a debate about gun laws and gun possession in the US.

Bloomberg told a local radio station recently: ”You know soothing words are nice but maybe it’s time that the two people who want to be President of the United States stand up and tell us what they’re going to do about it.

“Because this is obviously a problem across the country and everybody always says: ‘Isn’t it tragic’ and we look for was this guy trying to recreate Batman… there are so many murders with guns every day, it’s just got to stop.

“No matter where you stand on the second amendment, no matter where you stand on guns we have a right to hear from both of them (Obama and Romney) conceretly, specifically what are they going to do about guns?”

To date, neither have responded to Mayor Bloomberg’s request.

Read: Ashley Moser, injured mother of 6-year-old Colorado victim, suffers miscarriage

Read: Graphic shows every piece of equipment carried by the Colorado shooter

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (42 Comments)

  • No mention of the American culture of working every hour god sends. This means parents spend very little time with their kids. They are raised by strangers and shipped of to camps during holidays etc. the majority of these shooters are white middle class from hard working families.

    Reply
  • Harassment and isolation play a role in many shootings. Columbine was a classic case of kids bullied striking back. It is the American way.

    Reply
  • So Holmes’s alleged schizophrenia had nothing to do with it? It’s all about drugs and nothing to do with any other environmental factors, psychological factors, personality factors or stressor’s. There is no one particular factor that causes actions like this but a complex combination that come together that cause an individual or individuals to carry out rampages like this.

    If as you assert drugs were the cause of Holmes’s rampage and assuming that he wasn’t the only person taking them, then why haven’t there been a massive outbreak of mass killings throughout the US?

    Reply
  • Miriam 04/08/12 #

    I think the medication for their depression can sometimes have adverse effects on the minds of theses young men . I read that Harris had come off his meds which he himself admitted made him more aggressive .
    Medication is handed out too easily in America to solve emotional problems .

    Reply
    • That comment makes no sense to me – you’re saying that a guy who was prescribed medication went off the meds and then killed 13 people – but while he was on them he was more aggressive?

      Rather than blame the medication, I think maybe Eric Harris could have been more pro-active about communicating with his doctor about how the medication affected him. Sometimes medication is not suitable and can be changed but coming off medication is a step to take very carefully and always under advice of the doctor.

      Reply
    • Miriam 04/08/12 #

      I meant that the effects of coming off the meds having been on them for sometime . He was apparently on medication for some time and used to come off them without telling anybody . He talked about it in his journals .
      I’m not saying it was the medication that made him do it but it may have have been a contributing factor . That’s all I’m saying .

      Reply
    • Miriam 04/08/12 #

      Oh just to mention there is evidence out there that suggests that some anti psychotic drugs can have adverse effects if you come off them . You need to be weaned off them gradually .

      Reply
  • Simple- the more guns you have freely available in a society will have killings with guns

    Reply
    • Very true, but I think the article also hints that even with tight gun control there will still be some kinds of incidents.

      The silence from US politicians is embarrassing; anyone with an ounce of sense can see that the gun trade in America is making money from death, not protection.

      http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/research/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/index.html

      Reply
    • I agree entirely with Barry – the ancient and outdated ‘freedom to bear arms’, in the USA, is used as the justification of the arms manufacturers to allow retail and online sale of virtually any kind of weapon ( of mass destruction ).

      I witnessed it myself in the Shopping Malls of America , where buying over the counter is as natural as buying a mobile phone.

      Until the laws are changed in every State , unfortunately the huge numbers of murders and shootings will prosper!

      It’s all about the magic Dollar – where the manufacturers are concerned and their highly organised gun lobby!

      Reply
  • America needs to examine its relationship with guns. The second amendment is completely out of date and unnecessary in the modern world where there are more civilised ways of holding a government to account. The free availability of weapons designed to kill humans is at odds to what America purports to represent.

    Reply
    • “More civilised ways of holding a government to account”. And that’s working very well now, isn’t it?

      Reply
    • What do you suggest? Armed uprisings ?

      Reply
    • No, what I’m suggesting to you is that executive power in the US is gradually exerting its influence over every element of the lives of ordinary people the, in the name of “national security”. Governments might be toppled in elections, but policies rarely change (look at the two candidates with the best chance of winning the next election). The US government has also learned the lessons of 1963, and students in the US are more passive than ever before. Occupy Wall Street was easily eclipsed by the Tea Party, a protest essentially in favour of big business. This passivity is brought about by high education costs, which forces students to be on their best behaviour, so as to not waste their investment. Debt keeps people nice and compliant.

      Sure, this isn’t enough to merit an armed and blopdy uprising (unless you think along communist lines), but the only way of drastically changing US Government policies is by extra-parliamentary agitation of SOME kind.

      Reply
    • No, what I’m suggesting to you is that executive power in the US is gradually exerting its influence over every element of the lives of ordinary people the, in the name of “national security”. Governments might be toppled in elections, but policies rarely change (look at the two candidates with the best chance of winning the next election). The US government has also learned the lessons of 1963, and students in the US are more passive than ever before. Occupy Wall Street was easily eclipsed by the Tea Party, a protest essentially in favour of big business. This passivity is brought about by high education costs, which forces students to be on their best behaviour, so as to not waste their investment. Debt keeps people nice and compliant.

      Sure, this isn’t enough to merit an armed and bloody uprising (unless you think along communist lines), but the only way of drastically changing US Government policies is by extra-parliamentary agitation of SOME kind.

      Reply
  • American society was built on violence and is maintained with violence. We shouldn’t be surprised when it’s citizens act in a violent manner.

    Reply
  • The legal availability of guns is not the issue, lots of countries have high levels of gun ownership yet tis sort of tragedy never happens.

    Bottom line is that if someone decides to kill on a large scale, they should manage it one way or another, be it obtaining illegal firearms or some other method.

    Thejournal.ie really needs to quit with its clearly ultra pro-feminist, left leaning agenda.

    For the record, I appreciate that this’ll get loads of red thumbs, I find it ironic that a core of these will be from Shinners that actively supported a terrorist organisation that dealt in death and illegal firearms running for decades!

    Reply
  • The Columbine Shooter and Virginia Tech shooter mentioned in the piece above were both taking SSRI medication.

    As was the shooter at Fort Hood. That Chinese guy that massacred a load of kids in a school in China, Shane Clancy from Bray who murdered his ex’s new fella before killing himself, Raoul Moat, and so many others..

    We await Dr Fentons testimony to see if the Aurora shooter was too..

    The listed side effects for many psychiatric drugs include:
    “may increase the risk of violence and / or suicide”
    If you will visit http://www.ssristories.com you will see the ever increasing list of events linked with these drugs.

    Bear in mind that schools and universities in the US have staff psychiatrists. Anti depressant medication is not supposed to be prescribed to adolescents (see the package inserts if you do not believe me) but they are prescribed to children as young as 4 in the US (and animals too, Reconcile is the brand name for doggie Prozac).

    There is a common cause.. The fact that these drugs can have adverse side effects in some people, and should be prescribed with far more caution and supervision than they are at present.

    Reply
  • paul 04/08/12 #

    yes Hugh there is. experts repeatedly ask that news organizations not report on them but you can’t help yourselves can you.

    Reply
  • Just look at the number of US films in particular that use guns and other weapons. Many of these films are simply gunfire and mayhem interspersed with bits of dialogue. The glorification of killing using tools made specifically to kill a fellow human being, must have an effect of desensitising the general population and for a number of people who are mentally unstable it seems that using a gun to wreak vengeance is the only way out – just like their heroes on the big screen.

    Reply
  • The real reasons: http://goo.gl/O2RBt
    Prescription Drugs. But Big Pharma will tell you otherwise.

    Reply
  • Take a look at US foreign policy and the atrocious violence it uses to establish the nations self interest, take a look at the violent computer games the country churns out. The US has normalised violence in order to destroy all those little brown men who live on their rightful oil deposits in the middle east

    Reply
    • The violence in films and games is an old hobby-horse, at least w’ve dropped “popular music” from the unholy trinity. It’s a fallacy to say violent computer games are produced only in the US, the games may have a US shine to them, but the games themselves are produced and developed worldwide; GTA in Scotland ( I think ) Crysis in Germany, Deus Ex in Canada, etc. the link between violence in entertainment is only anecdotal.

      Reply
    • How much does the US spend on their military every year hundreds of billions who are they protecting themselves from? The US government is obsessed with weapons and violence .One or two incidents wont make them change anything regarding gun laws they endorse the use of guns and violence.

      Reply
    • I just love the violent imagery in games / movies argument.. Isn’t that what the age ratings are designed for?
      If kids are getting 18 rated games it’s either because staff in shops aren’t doing their jobs right or because parents aren’t supervising what games their kids play / movies they watch..

      Having said that, most people with some grasp on reality are able to differentiate between games / movies and reality fairly early on.. If they can’t then why didn’t anyone explain it to them?

      Reply
  • Lex Long 05/08/12 #

    The fact of the matter is that Harris had a rifle with a drum magazine, a shotgun, 2 pistols with 6000 rounds all legally bought. Surely some database somewhere should have flagged this and he should have been checked on.

    Someone brought up Dunblaine. In the aftermath the British government clamped right down on guns and such a massacre has never been repeated.

    Reply
  • If somebody wishes to use a gun in a criminal act, then they’ll find one. About all you can do is to restrict the sale of the most dangerous, and unneccesary firearms (who needs an assault rifle for hunting?). While maintaining legal access for legitimate gun owners (for hunting, sports shooting, or “self defence”).

    There should also be stricter screening and registration/licensing for those who wish to lawfully posess firearms. Rather than a free for all like kids in a candy store.

    You’ll never stop gun crime from occurring. But you can minimize it’s impact in such cases, and hopefully cut down on the frequency of such incidents.

    Reply
  • The common thread is they are all mentally disturbed! End of.

    Reply
  • Guns don’t kill people, people kill people. Bad guys are always going to have firearms whether they are bought legally or illegally, why shouldn’t innocent citizen be allowed posses them for protection?

    Reply
    • Didn’t realise the NRA were so active on the journal. While I agree that people kill people it wouldn’t be as easy without access to automatic weapons.

      Reply
    • Faceless he didn’t use automatic weapons , he used semi-automatic weapons which are also available in Ireland through gun dealers. He used an AR-15, a Glock 40 and a pump action shot gun none of which are classed as automatic weapons.

      Reply
  • American kids are wrapped in cotton wool. They live in a bubble world and cant handle when something goes wrong in life. Unfortunately sometimes they go bananas and take it out on innocents.

    Its too late to change the gun laws but give them back their kinder eggs and stop coddling them.

    Maybe they’ll handle the “hardships” of their yuppie lives if they grow up with some more reality checks. Everyone has problems. Killing lots of people because life didnt turn out rosy is cowardly. The common theme is cowardice in my opinion.

    Reply
  • its quite simple

    Reply

Add New Comment