TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

Belgium’s ‘most-hated woman’ Michelle Martin released from prison

Accomplice of paedophile serial killer Marc Dutroux was released on condition she keeps her distance from the relatives of the victims.

2004 file photo of Michelle Martin.
2004 file photo of Michelle Martin.
Image: Yves Logghe/AP/PA

THE NOTORIOUS accomplice and ex-wife of paedophile serial killer Marc Dutroux won parole today midway through her 30-year jail sentence – on condition she moves into a convent.

Michelle Martin was freed from a Brussels jail by a five-man panel of judges who ruled inadmissible or unfounded appeals by victims’ families and prosecutors against a July 31 regional court decision to award early release.

She was to leave a sprawling jail complex complete with tunnel exits in southern Brussels this evening.

A media scrum was awaiting her arrival, along with a significant police presence, at the convent about an hour’s drive away in Malonne, southern Belgium.

Dutroux and Martin are considered in Belgium in the way the 1960s Moors murderers, Ian Brady and Myra Hindley, are remembered in England. Dutroux and Martin were both arrested in 1996, and have been in custody ever since.

Dutroux was finally jailed for life in 2004 for the kidnap and rape between 1995 and 1996 of six young and teenage girls, and the murder of four of his victims.

Martin too was sentenced in 2004 for helping him hold the girls captive and for complicity in the deaths of two of them found starved to death in a locked cellar.

Former schoolteacher Martin, who married Dutroux in 1983 and had three children by him before their divorce in 2003, had already served time in the early years of their marriage for previous kidnappings.

Martin is still Belgium’s “most-hated woman,” said her lawyer Thierry Moreau, but “she wants to succeed in her resettlement… and wishes to repay her debt to society.”

Her fifth bid for parole succeeded on the condition that she “keeps her distance” from relatives of victims.

She will not become a nun, but will work in the convent. She will be allowed to move outside it, but cannot set foot in those areas where she lived with Dutroux.

She will have to appear if called by judicial authorities, or face the threat of a return to prison, and must continue with therapy undertaken behind bars, and likewise avoid all media contact. She is additionally still to pay compensation awarded to their victims.

Protests

The initial decision by a regional court to free her had provoked anger among victims’ families, prompted demonstrations around the convent and triggered a debate in Belgium about imposing full-term jail sentencing for crimes judged the most serious.

A previous attempt to place Martin in a French convent also fell foul of French authorities’ fears over public order.

Following the court ruling, Jean-Denis Lejeune, whose daughter Julie was one of the girls Dutroux and Martin killed, insisted that “the fight goes on.”

Lejeune wants to ensure full-term sentencing for crimes considered the most serious, notably those against children, and in an open letter to Martin urged her to tell the complete “truth” about the circumstances surrounding his daughter’s death.

The families of Dutroux’s victims fear that one day it may be Dutroux himself, currently 55, who walks free.

“He is convinced [that will happen] and believes that he too deserves a chance to be reintegrated into society,” Dutroux’s lawyer Ronny Baudewijn said on Tuesday.

A sister at the convent, home to about a dozen elderly nuns, said at the time of the initial court decision that Martin was “a human being capable of the worst and the best,” and that the convent was betting on her showing her best side.

- (c) AFP, 2012

Read next:

Comments (48 Comments)

  • I think it is outrageous that this woman is released. What about the rights of the victims ? Make’s me feel sick even looking at her!!!!

    Reply
  • That’s just wrong. She should rot in jail.

    Reply
  • Why should she have freedom? She doesn’t deserve it, she deserves to be left in a small cell on her own…. Those poor children hadn’t a chance in life… Life which was so cruelty stolen from them by that sick woman and her twisted husband

    Reply
  • It’s hard to comprehend how evil this couple were. They should never be released.

    Reply
  • Evil bitch deserves a slow painful death. Why show mercy to the merciless? Poor innocent defenceless little children abused for her sick pleasure and then left to die a most disgusting, lingering death. A death preceded by unbelievable fear and pain. The red thumbs need to examine their own conscience and then imagine if one of these girls was your niece, sister or daughter. We put dogs to sleep simply for biting yet we allow sick, twisted and perverse people who assault, abuse, torture and murder to enjoy a peaceful life in a convent. What strange creatures we are.

    Reply
  • Cara 28/08/12 #

    It is a sick, sick world when someone like this is ever let out of prison. This woman let 2 children starve to death. She let Dutroux keep two of the girls in her home, and knew exactly what was happening to them. Life should mean life in some cases.

    Reply
  • @Mick, yes I do. And a part of me hates myself for thinkin it but she is so evil and I put myself in the shoes of those poor girls and then I think that nothin a civilised society could do to this woman would come even close to what she put those poor girls thru. Not to mention the terrible effects on their families, the families who will suffer unknown pain, a pain and emptiness that they done nothing to deserve. It is perhaps a failing in my character, but I have no sympathies whatsoever for this miserable excuse of a human being.

    Reply
  • Unfortunately for these elderly nuns, they do not appear to be up to date with modern psychological knowledge, regarding certain types of offenders. It has been scientifically proven, and is widely accepted in more and more countries, that a percentage of human beings cannot be rehabilitated, and are not capable of the good that the nuns believe every human is capable of. I am specifically referring to psychopaths. All attempts at doing so have failed. In some cases, it has even made them more dangerous as they learn how better to hide their true nature. Of course, I don’t blame the nuns for their lack of knowledge, but whatever Belgian psychologists are involved in the case must be aware. I would love to know if she has been evaluated using Dr. Robert Hare’s test ,to establish whether or not she is a psychopath. If she is a psychopath and hasn’t been tested, then that’s negligent in the extreme, and she will run rings around the poor nuns, using manipulation, lies and all the other nasty ” skills ” the psychopath hones throughout their lives. Either way, I think it’s a travesty of justice for the victims and their families.

    Reply
  • I can’t these two ever being rehabilitated. They really are pure evil, just like those other serial killers you hear about.
    I pity those poor nuns. They have no idea what they’re letting themselves in for.
    I’d the prison sentence and psychiatric care plus a good lawyer helped Martin to manipulate the system to her advantage. Don’t think releasing her was a good idea at all.

    Reply
  • I agree that she should be released – but only after she has been starved to death; it makes economic sense and it is in accordance with the Old Testament.

    Reply
  • I cannot comprehend the sheer evil of this pair. I have considered the possibility that she may have been living in fear of this man but she let two innocent little children locked in a cellar starve slowly to death when he was in custody…..she could have saved them. It never ceases to amaze and disgust me that when the authorities manage to actually catch these kinds of criminals and manage to get convictions that they then let them go free again. Anyone capable of these kind of acts pose a threat to society and should be kept locked up for ever. I would go demented if it had been my children that this happened to and I had to watch the perpetrators go free.

    Reply
  • Typical – the church taking in another pedophile! And yet they want to lecture everyone else on morality.

    Reply
  • What about the fact that she has been taken in by a convent? Just the kind of PR that the catholic church needs!

    Reply
  • ah I see Belgium has much the same values on life as our very own archaic laws in this kip we know as Ireland.

    Reply
    • Be bloody grateful you live here fella/missy! despite its many faults it is still one of the best places on this planet to live with a fantastic standard of life compared to the majority of this planet!

      Reply
  • Will police protection be provided to the convent? Surely she’s in grave danger of a reprisal killing now and this is just going to cause more trouble for the Belgian judiciary than its worth. Apparently a large part of the reason Myra Hindley was never released was due to committed death threats from one of the victim’s mothers.

    Reply
  • Releasing a convicted paedophile into the care of an organisation guilty of running the biggest paedophile network in the modern world. Well, well, well… she’ll be well looked after there then.

    Reply
  • Put her into a cellar and starve her…see how she likes it….may she rot!

    Reply
  • I wonder will the nuns be able to sleep with her in the convent? My nerves would be shot for fear of her

    Reply
  • I am shure if it was the goverments or judges daughter they would never let her out! Justice in this world just sucks!!! Hope someone will go to that convent and give her what she deserves!!!

    Reply
  • There is no justice. It’s all about law and legalities. Justice rarely comes into any court proceedings. These are not crimes committed for financial gain or to improve standard of living. These sick people gain something much more disturbing from abusing and killing innocent children. They should for every ones sake be removed from any temptation and locked away forever. How is their rehabilitation measured for release? There are no children in prison so they have not proved beyond reasonable doubt that they will no longer harm them!!! Their basic human rights are met with shelter food etc. Much more than they deserve. Let their sick minds rot away with boredom in jail.

    Reply
  • Stacey 29/08/12 #

    Anyone who willingly harms a child for pleasure does not deserve to live.
    If we had extreme punishments for peadophiles, I’m betting we would see a lot less children abused.

    I’m against the death penalty, it’s wrong, as someone said in an earlier comment, “It leaves no room for error” However, if you make the decision to harm an innocent child then you deserve no mercy, you do not deserve to live, in this instance, I firmly believe your life should be forfeit.

    Reply
  • Public stoneing… Be the right job for her.

    Reply
  • I think the whole perverse situation has arisen as a result of an ongoing foolish acceptance of revealed religion and a belief that the creator has no hand in allowing evil to flourish but is the only one to be summoned to undo the vile evil in the world and if we beg him,her or it all evil that occurred in its failed design can be somehow undone. These poor deluded nuns are themselves victims of a perversion of society and are dumbly delighted to have a little project to make them feel better about themselves. The nuns can only offer some perverse comfort to this maniac through their ignorant and confused misunderstanding of the lies they and their parents, who sold them into this slavery, have been fed. This woman should at the very least in a mental hospital and at best in a prison. If society spent as much time and effort protecting and rehabilitating the victims families we might be starting along some path towards an intelligent future for mankind. God help us all!!!!!!

    Reply
  • While I have no understanding of the cruelty and savagery this woman obviously is capable of I resent the fact that people are condoning the death sentence. It was abolished for a reason firstly because it allows no room for error, if an innocent man is killed there is no remedy. Secondly because death is not always justice but often an easy way out. In this case not one person has taken into account the duress this woman may have been under not to act. While what this woman has done is wrong in every respect who are we to say she shouldn’t have the chance to prove she is repentant?

    Reply
  • In no way taking from the gravity of the crimes and the unfathomable impact on the families – it is good for civilised society to see an example of an approach which is open to the possibility of developing the good in a person through rehabilitation as opposed to a narrow vision of imprisonment being the only solution.

    Reply
  • sickening an individual like her could be released by any judicial system back into society. wasn’t there a rumour, she was to be released to a convent?

    Reply
  • I’m glad more reasonable, qualified and less bloodthirsty people than you 2 above have made the informed decision to release her.

    Reply
  • Ah Sure She Is Right At Home With The Evil Nun’s!

    Reply
  • I taught this sort of thing only happened in Ireland !
    Nuts!

    Reply

Add New Comment