TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 7 °C Tuesday 18 June, 2013

Report on cutting child benefit being ‘considered’ by Burton

Fianna Fáil wants Social Protection Minister Joan Burton to honour a pre-election promise and say that child benefit will not be cut in the forthcoming budget.

Image: Niall Carson/PA Wire/Press Association Images

THE DEPARTMENT OF Social Protection has said that a report which proposes a two-tier child benefit system where the basic rate per child would be €100 is being studied by the Minister for Social Protection.

The recommendation in a report, which was was obtained by RTÉ’s The Week in Politics, suggests that a two-tier system would see the basic rate cut from €140 each for the first two children to around €100 per child with top-up payments for low income families.

It is part of a report by the Advisory Group on Tax and Social Welfare on child and family income supports which the Department said today was being considered by Joan Burton.

The move would reportedly save €200 million annually but Fianna Fáil’s social protection spokesperson Willie O’Dea has called on Social Protection Minister Joan Burton to reject the idea ahead of December’s Budget.

He cited a pre-election promise by Labour to fight any Fine Gael cuts to child benefit, saying that he finds it “incredible” that a Labour minister would consider any such proposal.

O’Dea said: “A family with four children could see their payments cut by €160 a month, which could plunge already struggling families into more severe poverty.

“I don’t see the sense in this at all and again this Government seems intent on targeting the most vulnerable in society.

The Department said that it would not yet be publishing the report but will do so in due course.

A statement said: “The report of the Group’s examination of this issue is currently being considered by the Minister.  It is intended to publish this report in due course. The report is therefore not yet in the public domain.”

Poll: Should child benefit be cut?

Read: ‘Fantasy budget’ survey shows Irish adults want child benefit means tested

Read next:

Comments (84 Comments)

  • The majority of us are struggling and no one wants to see any benefits that we receive cut but I can’t afford any more tax rises. So where there is fraud and abuse it must be stopped and soon

    Reply
  • its the system that needs sorting and one wage minus tax is whats suffocating workers we have bills and kids and all that while welfare payments can include dole fis medical card back to school rent relieif so some may be clainmin 3…4 or more its unfair that tax payers dont get the help of health cards school bus travel and its not surprising that we are complaining that our tax is being wasted while we see our wages go less every month and others can claim help from money we have worked for., its not the new people on sw that need greif its the ones thats are claimiming for years and expect to be left alone and take no cuts ,

    Reply
  • How much longer are we as a Country and Society going to sit back and let this happen, I mean all of it. As long as we sit by and complain via social media or texting your local radio station , nothing will change. The government couldn’t care less and without a proper show of protest or solidarity we will continue to be cut and we will be left with nothing.

    Reply
  • maybe if they stopped buying ‘single’ mothers 1000 euro top of the range buggies they’d save a few quid! my buggy was 80 quid and did the job just fine.

    Reply
  • I hope her and her snivelling Labour rats are decimated in the next election, a couple of weeks ago she was suggesting asking the elites if they would be so good as to hand back their childrens allowences, but when it comes to the ordinary people in this country she couldnt give a toss. The Labour Party have sold their souls!!!

    Reply
    • @Damien, You are correct about that in my opinion. They outlined their Principles very clearly in the run up to the election and they bandied about ‘treason’ accusations and told us all a load of lies.
      I accuse them now of treachery, treachery against the memory of their founder and against the people who voted for them on the basis of their promises.
      They are stroking their way to big fat pensions and dont give a toss for their voters or indeed their hundreds of councillors who will be turfed out at the local election, martyrs for the fat cats at the top.

      Reply
    • every single promise has been broken..the grass roots need to get rid of the ones at the top..they have completely sold their souls and are even more right wing than there fascist partners in government

      Reply
  • think ill move to Germany

    Reply
  • Oh for God’s sake of course I chose to have my kids, is this your sole contribution to the debate?? Is it the only point you are able to make or do you have anything more relevant to say?? Anything substansial to back up your argument?? I Do not expect the state to pay for my kids, like I said both my husband and I have good jobs the state provides child benifit in recognition of the high costs of raising a child and children and growth can only benifit a country. The whole point Im making is that families are already struggling, both working families and those on welfare, who have come to depend on child benifit to cover costs of clothing, schools etc for their children. Come back to me when you have a relevant or articulate point to make.

    Reply
  • They take more money off people who need it most it’s just more homes being repossessed more children going without more families trying to cope in a hopeless situation.

    Reply
  • O’ good – more cuts that will eventually end up in the hands of bondholders!

    Reply
    • To be fair the bondholders should be burned, we never should have bailed out the banks. But social welfare cuts are required too , getting us out of this debt is not going to happen by paying child benefit to everyone who miraculously popped out a kid.

      Reply
  • what a lovely caring society we live in today ,people with jobs and the recession not effecting them taking the higher moral ground lovely people lets hope lets hope they dont hit the brick wall a lot of people have hit through no fault of their own .

    Reply
  • Cut the politicians wages by fifty percent and we’d save a tonne of money.

    Reply
  • This is a government of cowards. Not men and women of god moral fibre and courage, cowards one and all. Yet again they are too weak to tackle the real problems, yet again they come to hit the squeezed middle with more taxes. The bondholders are ok, FG will pay them. The unemployed who have never paid any taxes are ok, Labor will look after them. The public sector can hang on to their archaic allowances because Enda and co are afraid of the unions.

    The poor PAYE mugs?
    - universal social charge (income tax increase by another name)
    - household charge
    - property tax
    - reduced child benefit
    - increased prsi
    - increased retirement age

    These despicable cowards are barely any better than the crooks that went before them

    Reply
  • Stephen and all the other guys who are rushing to abolish child benifit, go and ask your own mother how she would have managed bringing you and any siblings up without it – ask her how she she would have clothed ye, got uniforms, books, special occasions or the odd treats for ye without it. Child benifit is paid for every child in the country not just those whose parents are on welfare – both my husband and I work full time in good jobs but like the rest of the country are feeling the pinch of paycuts, tax hikes, rise in cost of living and the burden of a celtic tiger era mortgage. We have three young children let me tell you I would be lost without child benifit, every penny of it is spent on clothing them, nappies for the youngest, cost of back to school, and over the next few months getting bits for them for christmas. You’ll understand when you have children of your own and realise the costs involved. Ask your own Mum she’ll tell you.

    Reply
  • Crawl back under your rock stephen.

    Reply
  • There are ways to reduce the cost of child benefit but punishing every family with children is certainly not the way to do it. Firstly, it should absolutely be means tested, it should be treated like any other benefit in that sense. And also, I think it is absolutely ridiculous that people can claim child benefit for children who don’t even live in the country, half of them probably don’t even exist. It is very easy to obtain fraudulent birth certificates and even passports in some of these countries. But even if they do exist, why should the tax payers in this country buy child benefit for children in another? I have always thought that was crazy.

    Reply
  • Nothing is going to happen re this Report until AFTER the Referendum on Nov 10th.

    Reply
  • Yes I did choose to have my children but no I am not whiging, Im just making a point that its not only people on welfare who recieve child benifit and that cutting it would impact most families with children who are already feeling the pinch.

    Reply
    • It is up to u to support ure kids, not the tax payer / state. The allowance should be scrapped altogether, u chose to have ure kids, then u will have to shoulder the burden, if u don’t want the added expense then don’t have the kids. Harsh I know but it’s a reality.

      Reply
    • Smiley 01/10/12 #

      @Alan. Especially in today’s economic climate. Times are tough for most of us. Not the current government’s fault. Realistically, Ireland can’t afford all the welfare benefits so drastic measures need to be taken. We pay PRSI to fund potential unemployment, health et al. Not children. Parents haven’t made enough contributions before children are born to fund 18 years’ worth of payments.

      Reply
    • @ Chris ure right I will and have made arrangement for my old age, I don’t have kids and won’t because I just can’t afford to, I know my comment was harsh I know that, but it is a very cold truth that most people without kids feel but are not willing to say. I pay my tax I make provisions for my future. I won’t be be expecting Antibes kids to pay or me if I’m not willing to pay for them.

      Reply
    • @ Chris ure right I will and have made arrangement for my old age, I don’t have kids and won’t because I just can’t afford to, I know my comment was harsh I know that, but it is a very cold truth that most people without kids feel but are not willing to say. I pay my tax I make provisions for my future. I won’t be be expecting Anyones kids to pay or me if I’m not willing to pay for them.

      Reply
  • @Alan Kenny. Remember that when YOU’RE drawing YOUR pension and OUR children’s taxes are paying for it. It’s YOUR choice to grow old…

    Reply
  • And how exactly do FF propose to balance the books, seeing as they want all benefits kept?

    Reply
    • Ignore completely everything FF have to say…a blind man with a stick can see that they’d do exactly the same thing if they were still at the trough. This Twiddly O’Dea doing what all FF are doing…licking our collective arse in the hope that we’ll forget 15 years of them.

      Reply
    • Old Twiddle O’Dea got 90k in severance after he lost his Ministry last time, FF said that all that money would be Given back to the tax payer as he still had his seat but Twiddle o’Dea told the tax payer were to shove it. A promise from Willie is as bout as worthless as a signed affidavit from him.

      Reply
  • Yeah but Chris when he’s sitting in a state nursing home in his state provoded nappy, sipping state provoded stewed apple through a state provided straw it will be our working childrens taxes paying for him then.

    Reply
  • @Christopher Gardiner ….. For I start I do blame “the unemployed” as you put it who through no fault of their in this bad economic time…,however now that you brought it up,there has been people on the unemployment line for years even though there has been plenty of jobs,screwing the system over! So forgive me if Im finding it hard to stand back and say nothing now!
    I still see some of these people enjoying holidays away, iphones, cars etc..if your unemployed and needing state benifit you should not be living it up! It is these people on benifits that need to be questioned!!!!

    Reply
  • Aren’t Labour supposed to be social? Looking at all this, what’s actually the difference between FG, FF and Labour? Can’t see it to be honest

    Reply
  • G 02/10/12 #

    The usual con is being put in place. There will be a universal payment lower than the current one with top ups for the so called vulnerable. In other words, the rich won’t be really effected as they will still get a payment they don’t really need. Those living off the state and not contributing any taxes will be topped up to the existing level (possibly get an increase) then the middle bracket, the workers struggling to make ends meat who really need the payment will be hit with the cut and no top up.
    Same old story – Spongers and rich get away scot free and middle income workers pay the bills, it is disgusting!

    Reply
  • My aunt didn’t want child benefit payments a few years ago as she did’nt need them. She was told that they would continue to pay them as they are not means tested. No expensive report needed just make them means tested problem solved

    Reply
  • The whole concept of child benefit bewilders me. While its nice to get the payment, I wouldn’t depend on it to raise my child, if I couldn’t afford a child, I wouldn’t have one. A child should be a privilege

    Reply
    • There’s plenty of us who could afford them before the recession hit or have you been under a rock for the last 5 years

      Reply
    • Your right and my comment was crass, I should have been specific, I just hate the culture in certain communities where people will have a child purely for the benefits involved like the single mothers allowance, housing etc… These try to justify raising a child as a career, well we’d all like to spend every minute with our children but don’t have the luxury. Like a car bumper sticker I saw “the governments not your babies daddy”

      Reply
  • For those of us that are lucky to be employment , we will feel the pinch in a big way . For those that are not as lucky it will send them over the edge and into poverty . Again the government is looking at the vulnerable in society and is scare mongering once again and it will probably result in the children’s allowance being taxed.
    Families rely on this allowance to survive lets not forget that.

    Reply
  • It ought to be mean’s tested according not just to family income but age of child also ( communion , cocirmation and so on ) Love to see the computers deal with that ( if ever they get to talk to each other)

    Reply
  • But Chris all of Alan’s taxes are being used to pay for other people’s children.

    Reply
  • @ Chirs Neville, I actually do have experience of being part of a group of family members who helped provide for an elderly relatives nursing homes costs, there was no mention of the state providing anything there if what your saying is the case then why are some elderly left to struggle on there own?? Anyway thats for another topic . . .

    Reply
  • @Alan Kenny: I agree with you.Only people who can really afford to have kids should have them.

    Reply
  • Heres a report – cut all social welfare

    Problem solved.

    Reply
    • I bet Fine Gael love your report especially the cost of it!

      On a serious note this government is attacking the wrong people. Like Fianna F?il they are trying to solve the crisis from a bottom up approach ( the low lying fruit). However, what is required is a top down approach and no political party has the backbone to do that. They will have no choice eventually but at least they’ll be able to tell their friends that they put 90%+ of the population into poverty before touching the top 5%.

      Reply
    • Mjhint 01/10/12 #

      Stephen while I would share the view of welfare cuts Im curious about the people that are getting welfare & maybe paying off debt & feeding children & maybe just paying interest off their morgages now. If they take another ?50 off these people what would your advice be to these families that are down ?50 a week. What would you say that may comfort them & help them through more financial distress?

      Reply
    • Stop paying out Unmarried girls mite stop them having so many kids

      Reply
    • Mjhint – well id be in favour of overhauling the welfare system alltogether , consolidate all the payments together and have it all put on a laser card system where the payments automatically go on each week . This cuts overheads in the staffing of offices immediatly. You would not be able to take out any cash on this laser card, or buy cigarettes, alcohol, hholidays, sky tv or save money in a bank. You could only spend the money on food, clothing , schoolbooks, and the essentials. If you went over your allowance you would keep receipts and prove why you needed the extra money and the appropriate amount of welfare could be allocated at a lower cost .

      This stops the abuse of the down the pub welfare culture, people ising welfare money for drugs or saving or holidays, and appropriates it where its truly needed, versus a one size fits all model. The first year it would probably cost the guts of a billion to set up, but the savings made by cutting out scroungers would be far greater.

      Reply
    • Mjhint 01/10/12 #

      Stephen a totalitarian system so? You are correct that welfare is abused. However last week I visited a man on disability. He had no tv just a laptop internet connection & a phone. He doesnt drink or take drugs. He has a car he cant drive cos its too expensive. He gets rent allowance but has to top up by nearly as much & he cant declare that because he will loose his allowance. He has mental health problems & eats fast food cos it costs a fiver for his dinner. He has nothing & maybe his health will be his next loss. He worked most of his life & circumstance has him here. Now Stephen advice please cos I really cant help him. I dont know what to say to him!

      Reply
    • Under the system ive proposed above he would be able to prove he needs more money and he would get it. Everyones seeing what ive said as a cutback for all , in reality families that are truly struggling would receive more , but the abusers would all receive less , cutting out social welfare abuse helps everyone , it gives more to those truly in need and lowers my tax burden . Cash is the enemy here , its untraceable, with the analytic information from a laser card system , a computer could accuratly calculate the needs of families and we would also save money on surveys and expensive reports done by consultants and ministers. Its a win win scenario unless you use the dole to get pissed or buy drugs / holidays / laze around watching tv all day.

      Reply
    • Mjhint 01/10/12 #

      I asked you 2 questions Stephen & still no answer. I already agreed with you on the charge of welfare abuse. The problem I face with you is the attitude that all welfare claims are being abused. The system you proposed can still be abused. Actually even more than cash. Just like you I have friends working that are at a stage where work does not pay. In my view this will get worse. So now the most vunerable in society are next & all thats going to happen is we are all going to be poor & some will die from this. Stephen if want things to change get the groups that caused this to pay for it. They have the resources. You will in the future see that you yourself will be affected by poverty in some way. Then you will see the truth. We have very rich people in this country & very poor. The trend is the group in the middle are joining the poor. Both your idea & the governments are doomed to failure. You want fix this? Get people back to work not make them poorer.

      Reply
    • Stephen, that’s ridiculous. A system such as the one you suggest would cost a fortune to run. You want to make it automatic with no one administering it. But this would be an extremely complicated system. Who would examine the purchases and review the receipts that you say should be submitted? You haven’t really thought this through, have you?

      Reply
    • Yeah Stephen, let everyone who is out of work just starve and live on the streets! Well thought out comment that! As long as live is rosy in the garden for you that’s all that matters yeah? If unemployment benefit was cut there would be a crime wave like nothing ever seen before and I mean violent crime. The country would turn into America during the great depression. So lets not hear from all you hard liners with your statements about taking away in some cases the very life blood of the majority of people on the dole who actually really want to work but can’t find any! I hope you never lose your job pal!

      Reply
    • @gerri – thats what Id do with the civil servants currently doing nothing so as not to add them to the live register.

      The system would only be expensive to run for the first year or 2 , after that the true financial needs of most family catagories would have been calculated and the vast majority would not have to submit receipts for going over their spending limit.

      To anyone giving me a thumbs down – well if you believe anyone on the dole thats living out of mine and your pocket s should be entitled to go on holidays, gamble , buy smokes / drink / drugs or save our tax money away then i truly feel sorry for how misguided you are about the reality of Irelands welfare culture

      Reply
    • You have just shown, why people like you shouldn’t have a vote and be gagged till you have experienced life a little! All your money, that keeps the welfare spongers going. it is spent in the economy, keeping jobs going! so everyone on the dole should, be thankful to you for all the money you give them. Grow a little tash, get a doberman and a swaztika for yourself!

      Reply
    • I’m guessing Stephen that your experience of life or actually working is incredible small. Certainly not in a productive field of employment anyway.

      Reply
    • You got all that from, where pat? I own my home at 40, worked most of my life and wondering why i am explaining myself to You. Whats your life experience, maybe its none of my business and since I asked? Tell us what you achieved Pat, what you think should happen and are you a FG blueshirt supporter?

      Reply
    • At least Stephen has the courage to say what he believes in, What about you pat? Why are you so shy about who you are, hiding your identity and attacking others. Are you another college kid, or Stephen himself?

      Reply
    • @stephen murphy , i think his comment was meant for me although on thejournal you can never be sure.

      Also pat im not a college kid living at home , left home at 18 earning my own funds and Ive been running a business since 2004 , So I think I might have a rough idea of how things work.

      Reply
    • Totally agree!

      Reply
  • I was on the dole never been on a holiday in the sun but I did get to see united match in 2008:) I smoke but don’t drink as I take medication that reacts badly with drink!!!!! I pay my rent! My bank loan and all I have left is 40 euro to clothe myself as someone said before Stephen crawl back under your rock and don’t be so silly to tar us all with the same brush!!!!!

    Reply
    • I work, I can barely pay my bank loan and haven’t been on holidays in a few years. Worst part about it is, I wish I had €40 at the end of it.
      I’m the person paying the taxes for your social welfare and it seems I might be worse off than you. I agree with the cut to child benefit but I also believe it must be universal cut so that middle and working class Ireland don’t get screwed, while people who never even worked in the boom get the same as they always got.

      Reply
  • @Stacey o hora your comment is both ignorant and offensive.

    Reply
  • @ Chris ure right I have my my provisions for old age, I work my ass off and get nothing in return, my comment was honest, harsh yes. But the cold truth. When u make a decision u have to think about the what ifs, with kids there is a lot of them. And no I don’t have kids and I won’t, can’t afford it

    Reply
    • Nothing in return? What a man! You must have a teleporter, use your torch all the time, have your own well that by the luck of God has clean water, have your own security, have never been sick or choose to have your own doctor educated at your expense. The list goes on. Get a life! We may not receive cash transfers but generally the wealthier you are the more you benefit from your taxes.

      Reply
    • You probably don’t need a torch if the teleporter has lights, as you wouldn’t be walking anywhere.

      Reply

Add New Comment