TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 5 °C Saturday 25 May, 2013

Constitutional Convention aims to begin discussions next month

132 members of the public have been identified to participate – 66 of whom will be direct substitutes for the others.

Dublin Castle - seen here during the Global Irish Economic Forum - is set to house the first meeting of the Constitutional Convention next month.
Dublin Castle - seen here during the Global Irish Economic Forum - is set to house the first meeting of the Constitutional Convention next month.
Image: Niall Carson/PA Archive

THE LONG-AWAITED Constitutional Convention is set to begin next month, after 132 members of the public were identified to participate in the unprecedented public attempt at overhauling Ireland’s constitution.

A polling company has identified 66 members of the public who together make up a representative sample of the Irish public, with a further 66 people identified as direct substitutes for the original nominees in case they become unavailable.

The 66 members, who were notified of their selection and have agreed to participate, will be formally appointed to the Convention by its chair – who is due to be named shortly – at a ceremonial first sitting at Dublin Castle.

The convention’s final sittings may not all be held in Dublin, however, with dozen of hotels from across the country responding to a tender asking interested parties to register their interested in hosting the events and putting up the participants.

Irrespective of this, all events are to be webcast at www.constitution.ie – a website previously used by an all-party Oireachtas group reporting on potential changes, and which is to be re-purposed for the convention.

TheJournal.ie understands that strenuous efforts have been made to ensure that the demographic make-up of the group reflects that of the country at large: a fixed number of members will be drawn from each age group, which will in turn carry a representative sample of the sexes and of residents from the various regions of Ireland.

One-to-one ‘shadow’

It is intended that each member will have a one-to-one ‘shadow’ who will fill in for them whenever they may be unavailable, so that this demographic balance is maintained throughout the convention’s sittings.

The chairman, and the remaining 33 members to be drawn from political parties on both sides of the border, will make up the full 100-strong membership. It will likely be up to the chair to decide on the venue for each meeting, and to draw up a proposed timetable for each.

It is intended that the convention will sit for eight weekends over the next year, to discuss matters including reducing the voting age to 17, allowing same-sex marriage, reforming the Dáil electoral system and giving Irish citizens abroad the right to vote in presidential elections.

The convention will also consider whether to amend the clause referring to the role of women in the home, and how to encourage female participation in politics and public life.

Under the terms of a Dáil agreement from July, the convention will report on its findings on lowering the voting age, and reducing the Presidential term of office, within two months of its first sitting – meaning that if the intended timetable reaches fruition, a report could be issued before Christmas.

The remainder of the topics – as well as any other amendments of its choosing, if the convention has enough time to cover them – are to be agreed and reported on within a year of its first sitting.

Read next:

Comments (17 Comments)

  • To hell with the convention. why can’t we crowd source our constitution like they did in Iceland.

    Reply
  • Get God and religion out of the constitution make it for real people not imaginary friends and goblins.

    Reply
  • how can you demographic balanced with 66 people?

    Reply
  • how much will that cost?

    Reply
  • Money, money, money!
    Has anybody looked at the constitution lately? It should be in a museum, it’s so old!
    The fact that it doesn’t even establish children as an entity but as a property is full proof that it needs this. Nor does it deal with other basic rights – LGBT marriage, full and free abortion. Every time Europe makes a decision it has to go to a referendum, with people voting in it that know next in line to nothing about what it is they are voting for or against but they’re voting no because they have a right to vote?! The constitution is in need of a makeover – it would be irresponsible to not allow that.

    Reply
    • The US constitution is a hell of a lot older than ours – and coincidentally is also a hell of a lot less prescriptive. Why do we feel the need to explicitly provide for absolutely every little thing in the constitution. Children and LGBT are people, same as anyone else. They are not special and ask for nothing more than to be treated as equal citizens of our Republic – no more and no less. Their rights, just like any other group’s, can and should be fully enforced through legislation or the courts. A constitution is supposed to be there as a guiding document from which all legal rights are derived – rights which are enumerated in legislation or, failing that, legal precedent.

      Reply
    • Micheal 21/09/12 #

      Absolutely, I quite agree actually. A constitution should be plain, and simple, to the point. The Irish constitution doesn’t do that – you only need to look as far as the definition of marriage to see that it actually over-complicates things!
      Constitutions should set a base, from which all else can be interpreted, or ruled upon.

      Reply
  • The usual keyboard brigade having the daily moan here I see. Lads, it’s the constitution – it’s the single most important legal document in the State. It is also our document – not any government, court or persons – it belongs to the people, and was written to define and protect us.

    The one we currently have was largely written in the 1930’s when Ireland was a young State, and does not adaquetly reflect who we now are, and our requirements. Surely, it’s time for a revision?

    Reply
    • They did a better job organising the original in the 30s compared to this half arsed nonsense , they say a camel is a horse designed by a committee , expect a few humps to be added by the asses from this malarky

      Reply
  • Aaaarrgggghhh the fcukin tokenism in this country has reached new highs (lows). This fecking waste of money and space talking shop will achieve absolutely nothing. And without wishing to annoy the Shinners among us, what the fcuk are we doing inviting people from a foreign country to participate? We fecking did away with Articles 2 and 3 so we don’t even maintain the fiction of a claim on the ‘six counties’ in the fecking constitution any more – and yet we want their ‘input’ on OUR constitution.

    Meanwhile people are emigrating in droves, families are being ripped apart by unemployment, debt is driving people to despair.

    Beggars belief this country, it really fecking does.

    Reply
    • Yup. Unless they propose some mechanism by which the electorate can force a binding vote on a policy issue, they won’t have addressed our fundamental systemic political problem in Ireland; and even if they do propose it, what politician would take on the role of a turkey voting for christmas?

      Hopeless process. Literally.

      Reply
  • This whole thing is a load of rubbish and a waste of taxpayers money! What’s wrong with the constitution in its present form?

    Reply
  • The only one thing wrong with our constitution. Is the way the Government ignores it when it suits them.

    Reply
  • are there aany outisde comapnies involved in this apart from the polling companies?

    Reply

Add New Comment