TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 8 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

End in sight for Fukushima fears – as engineers ponder burying stricken plant

Engineers relay new power lines to the stricken nuclear plant – as operators admit they may simply bury it under concrete.

An aerial photograph of the Fukushima I plant, taken while engineers attempted to drop water on it from helicopters.
An aerial photograph of the Fukushima I plant, taken while engineers attempted to drop water on it from helicopters.
Image: AP

ENGINEERS AT THE Fukushima I nuclear power plant in northern Japan have extended a new emergency power cable to the front of the complex – hoping to create a medium-term solution to the plant’s ongoing cooling problems.

Staff at the plant have been battling to maintain cooling systems at the plant since the 9.0-magnitude earthquake a week ago – and the resulting tsunami – knocked out both the primary and backup cooling systems at each of the plant’s six nuclear reactors.

Each core reactor has faced the possibility of overheating as a result – with some of the active nuclear cores already having gone into partial meltdown.

Overnight, however, engineers finished laying a new industrial electricity supply to the plant – a move which could allow the primary cooling systems to be restored, allying any major fears of further meltdowns.

Operations to restore power through the new facilities were underway at the time of publication, government spokesman Yukio Edano confirmed.

If the operation proves unsuccessful – or even if it is – a spokesman for plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) has acknowledged that it could pursue the so-called “Chernobyl solution” to stop any further radioactive emissions from the facility.

That solution would involve effectively burying the plant with sand and concrete to seal it off from the outside world – a tactic which, as the name suggests, was used at the Chernobyl power plant in the Ukraine after its explosion in 1986.

The UN’s nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said that the main concern in the meantime was at the ponds of ‘spent’ nuclear fuel at reactors 4, 5 and 6, explaining that the water temperature in such storage pools is usually around 25°C or lower.

When the temperature in the pools at reactors 5 and 6 were monitored yesterday, by comparison, both recorded Celsius temperatures of above 62°C.

“If fuel is no longer covered by water or temperatures reach a boiling point, fuel can become exposed and create a risk of radioactive release,” an IAEA statement explained.

“The concern about the spent fuel pools at Fukushima Daiichi [number 1 plant] is that sources of power to cool the pools have been compromised.”

It was those fears that had seen Japanese authorities yesterday fly helicopters over the plant in attempts to douse the reactors with seawater.

The official level of concern about reactors 1, 2 and 3 – as measured on the International Nuclear Event Scale – has now been raised from level 4 to level 5, the equivalent of the partial meltdown at Three Mile Island in the 1970.

A spokesman for General Electric also confirmed that staff from the company were joining TEPCO, in attempts to avoid a full-scale meltdown.

GE designs nuclear reactors, and was involved in the architecture of all six of the reactors at Fukushima I, Reuters reports.

Japan this morning observed a moment’s silence to mark the exact time one week ago when the major earthquake struck, which triggered a series of massive aftershocks in the region. The US Geological Survey has recorded 547 individual aftershocks to that quake.

Read next:

Comments (15 Comments)

  • I could be wrong but isn’t this the same strategy that was used for chernobyl? The eventually realised the uranium wasn’t cooling down but melting the concrete and sinking into the water table. If I remember correctly they had to mine beneath in shifts to reinforce the ground beneath the reactor. Will the same not happen to these reactors?

    Reply
  • “Because the other real story, which is a much happier – yes happier – one, is how the Japanese nuclear plants have performed magnificently in the past few days despite being hit by a disaster vastly greater than they were designed to withstand.What has happened in Japan should in fact be seen as a massive endorsement of nuclear power. But of course, people being what they are, it will not be.[Michael Hanlon,Daily Mail ] “

    Reply
    • You are correct Jude in one way. The amount of abuse this facility has endured without a complete meltdown has been awesome and is a testament to the engineering and safety features of a modern Nuclear facility. Other non-nuclear facilities wouldn’t have fared so well, for sure. However, if things do go wrong and the safety measures to contain the reactor don’t work correctly, the potential for damage to human life and the environment is almost beyond comprehension. If there is a complete meltdown, huge areas of land will become uninhabitable for many, many generations, people who aren’t evacuated safely will die either an immediate brutal death or a long drawn out one due to cancers associated with radiation and radiation poisoning. For many years after that, children will be born with debilitating mental and physical defects that is a death sentence on it’s own. I cannot think of another single technology that is so devastating when it malfunctions.

      For these reasons Jude, i’m sure you will appreciate my hesitance at having a nuclear plant anywhere near me for the sake of a cheap electric bill.

      Reply
    • Couldn’t agree more-japan have gone above and beyond in maintaining a situation that many, including ourselves, I have little doubt, would find overwhelming. They deserve a great dealof respect for their work since the disaster.
      Shane

      Reply
    • We need Thorium reactors which do not have the dangers of uranium fueled units.

      Reply
  • Dallas Airport discovered radiation on a flight yesterday screening.Turns out that it was medical equipment, not nuclear energy

    Reply
  • I don’t see how they can do that….

    Reply
  • Well, I just came across this bit of propaganda. “Mission Accomplished!” Five months out now and this disaster is no where near over, or even under control as engineers have realized that burying the plant is not an effective long term solution.

    Reply
  • The earthquake that hit Japan was 5 times more powerful than the worst earthquake the nuclear power plant was built for. (The Richter scale works logarithmically; the difference between the 8.9 quake and an 8.2 quake the plants were built for is not 8.9-8.2= 0.7. It is 5-fold.) So, the first hooray for Japanese engineering… everything held up.

    Reply
  • Geiger counter readings from Hino in Tokyo current and from 2010

    http://park30.wakwak.com/~weather/geiger_index.html

    Reply

Add New Comment