TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 11 °C Tuesday 21 May, 2013

More than a quarter of births in Ireland are to women aged 35 and over

The major ESRI report on births found also found that one third of all births were to single mothers.

Image: paprarutzi via Flickr/Creative Commons

MORE THAN A quarter of all births in Ireland are to women aged 35 years and over, new figures reveal.

A major ESRI report on pregnancy and births also found that 26 per cent of women giving birth in 2010 delivered by Caesarean section, compared to 21 per cent in 2001.

The study also found that almost one third of all births were to single mothers.

Among the other findings in the report were:

  • The average birth weight for babies in 2010 was 7.6lbs, almost exactly the same as in 2001.
  • Almost half of all babies were being exclusively breastfed by the time they left the maternity hospital. This is an increase from 2001 when around 39 per cent of babies were breastfed.
  • The average age of women giving birth was 31.5 years old, an increase from 2001 when it was 30.3 years old.
  • The number of teenagers giving birth has dropped. Just 3 per cent of women giving birth were aged 19 years or under, compared to more than 5 per cent of the same age group in 2001.
  • Almost 28 per cent of women who gave birth were aged 35 or older, compared to 22 per cent for that age group in 2001.
  • Almost 33 per cent of births were to single mothers, who had an average age of 28 years old.
  • Just under one quarter of births were to mothers born outside of Ireland.

There were 177 homebirths in Ireland in 2010, which was a significant drop on 2001 when there were 245.

The report looked at 75,600 births in 2010, compared to 2001 when there were just over 58,000 births in the country. The number of children being born in Ireland is at the highest level since 1891.

The Perinatal Statistics Report collated information from 20 maternity hospitals and 18 independent midwives across the country.

Young men around twice as likely to emigrate as women – report >

Read next:

Comments (36 Comments)

  • From page 25 of the report:
    “Close to two-thirds of births were to married women, and under one-third to single women.”

    So by “single women”, it looks like the report is actually referring to unmarried women. There may well be a devoted father on the scene.

    Link to report:
    http://www.esri.ie/UserFiles/publications/SUSTAT41.pdf

    Reply
  • I’d love kids. I’m 30. But the government, greed and corruption have ruined any chance i had of providing a financially stable environment for my kids, so i’ll have to hold off. I’ve no money, no savings, a crap job, no possibility of getting a mortgage – what do i do? She’s 32 and by the time things pick up in this corrupt KIP the biological clock will have run out!

    Reply
    • i don’t know i sometimes wonder how come skangers can afford kids….i suppose they have council houses and such….how do i get one of those?

      Reply
    • siobeli 26/06/12 #

      Understand where you are coming from. Myself and my other half both work in crappy jobs, huge mortgage and in our 30s…but we have taken the plunge and I’m pregnant, been putting it off for years. I don’t think you will ever have enough money to have kids. What annoys me is that we have both be working full time and paying tax etfolate over 10 years, where I work no maternity benefit so I’ll be on state benefit of 230 a week, no help with the mortgage. I work with single mums who are financially better off than me during my mat leave as they can get rent allowance and a medical card. To top it it off, when I’m back to work I have to pay 1000 a month in childcare- cant get a place in a community crèche, which are subsidised by the government with a full time place costing 200 a month as I’m over the wage limit!! But if we didnt work we would be eligible for all this!!!nIt’s grossly unfair that if you if you choose to not work you are rewarded!! And those who work and pay tax are penalised

      Reply
    • siobeli, are you REALLY, realistically now, attracted to the idea of trading places with the people you are talking about?

      Or do you think your resentment and begrudgery should be sufficient reason for government to change its policies.

      I find this whole “they’ve got it so handy” attitude directed at the poor such an extraordinary position to take.

      The truth is, we’re all in this together, and if we lose sight of that, they’ve got us all by the short and curlies.

      Reply
    • single mums do get alot more than working mums. I know single mums, some that have never worked and they have a great social life, the child never wants for anything and they pay very little rent in the places they live. I personally don’t have any kids but I can see why some mothers get frustrated with single mothers.

      Reply
    • siobeli 26/06/12 #

      @auntie dote….this is not aimed at the poor…that is aimed at the government and their policies that makes it harder for people with children to work, the reality of the situation is that many people are financially better off not working due to the lack of incentives. There is No support from the government for working mothers, whether they are single or married. There is a lot of stress balancing a full time job, rearing a family, paying childcare and the associated emotional stress. n

      Reply
  • I am interested to see which TDs deliberately misuse the “single mother” statistic to emphasize the drain on the economy.

    Reply
  • I think the stat regarding single mothers is misleading. It refers to mothers who are unmarried but they may well be in stable relationships. A fairly high proportion of women in their thirties are separated but given their age waiting four/five years to divorce and remarry is not an option but they are in relationships.
    And Single parent Social welfare payments are not automatic according to marital status.

    Reply
  • There’s nothing wrong against pushing out a sprog when you’re 30+ and i’m not being sarcastic when i say that.

    Reply
    • Of course, nothing wrong with it when you don’t consider dozen of different risks and sicknesses possible to the child due to woman’s age.

      Reply
    • Fizi, there are risks for every age category and regarding te ones that you are talking about those risks don’t really come into force until you are in your 40s and with modern medicine aren’t as big an issue as they once were.

      In today’s age we are more than advances enough to wait to have children. People are living to older ages and the medical improvements can help a lot for those who are on the older side. I really don’t see the problem personally. I plan on waiting til I’m in my 30s myself.

      Reply
    • Yes, the risks are slightly elevated but it’s like fertility – the risks go up after 35, they don’t skyrocket! The risks do get noticeably higher in your 40s but even then you are still more likely to have a normal healthy pregnancy/baby than not.

      From our anecdata department, I had a normal pregnancy (apart from a complication that wasn’t age-related) and healthy child at 37 and all signs are on it all happening normally again with this one despite my decrepit age.

      Signed, A Geriatric Mother Who Has Yet To Be Mistaken For A Grandmother At Preschool

      Reply
  • I think we have become a bit too obsessed with the money element and the standards we want for our children. As bad as things supposedly are economically we are still way better off than any generation before us – this seems to get forgotten too easily.

    Reply
  • And a quarter of kids are to foreign mothers. Best country in the world to emigrate to if you want to start a family in my opinion.

    Reply
  • Cut the support for single mothers.

    Reply
  • A lot of people who have children into their 40s, will never get to see their grandchildren.

    Reply
    • I think that’s a bit of an exaggeration Franners. People are living to older ages these days so even if their own children follow them and have their own children in their 40s chances are that the parent could still see their grandchildren just fine

      Reply
    • Well, yes, but that also applies to a lot of people who had their children earlier, should they happen to contract a fatal disease/be hit by a bus/etc.

      My paternal grandparents had both my father and his brother in their 40s and managed to see all their 7 grandchildren, FWIW.

      Reply
  • Unfortunately age of women who give their first birth shifts more and more in whole Europe, but Ireland seems to have one of the oldest women across EU to have a child. And then in the school or playground you need to be careful as its easy to commit a blunder when you refer to a mother as a grannie. Happened to me once or twice.

    Reply
  • M O Sé 26/06/12 #

    The population replacement program is going well.

    People are living in total ignorance, TFR, ie total fertility has been below replacement since the early nineties even with the so-called-new-irish contribution of 20-25% of births for the past 5 years.

    What this will will result in is you will be in work till you drop as they wont be many to pay the pension. People are happier with buying a plasma TV and having 2 holidays a year then changing nappies.

    The European economies will implode soon if nothing is done, some countries like Italy have a TFR of only 1.2 meaning they are totally screwed. In that case just over one taxpayer will be required to support 4 grandparents and their own children(if they have any) Germany and Russia are other countries with a similarly bleak future demographically.

    Politicans and senior civil servants here are safe with their pensions on the croke ark.

    That is all that matters after all..

    Reply

Add New Comment