TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 17 °C Wednesday 19 June, 2013

Ohio executes man for drug-fueled bookstore murder

Frederick Treesh died by lethal injection today, prison officials said.

Deanne Danno, sister-in-law of 1994 Michigan shooting victim Ghassan
Deanne Danno, sister-in-law of 1994 Michigan shooting victim Ghassan "Gus" Danno, talks about her relief that a man implicated in her brother-in-law's death was executed
Image: Andrew Welsh-Huggins/AP/Press Association Images

THE STATE OF Ohio executed a man who killed a security guard while robbing a bookstore amid a drug-fueled crime spree, officials said today.

Frederick Treesh, who was stealing money to buy more cocaine at the time of the 1994 murder, is the fourth inmate executed so far this year in the United States.

Remorse

His death by lethal injection was declared at 10.37am (3.37pm GMT), a spokesman for the state’s prison department told AFP.

He expressed remorse in his last words, telling observers that he wished a photo of his execution could be used to convince others to stay away from drugs.

This is where drugs lead you. This is true life.
I am here for Henry Dupree. I’d like to apologize to the family for what I’ve done. I’m sorry.

Treesh also thanked prison staff and his execution team, saying “they treated me well.”

Treesh, 48, had exhausted his appeals after 18 years on death row and was denied relief by Republican Governor John Kasich, who had previously commuted the sentences of four other death row inmates and expressed reservations about the death penalty.

Treesh was condemned to die for the murder of a 58-year-old security guard and the attempted murder of a 42-year-old salesman in the armed robbery at a bookstore in Eastlake, Ohio. He was arrested after a lengthy high speed chase.

The crime capped a three-week spree of violence and sexual assault in five other states (Michigan, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota and Wisconsin) committed with an accomplice as they sought money to buy more drugs, court documents showed.

Living proof

Treesh had previously expressed remorse while in prison and said the murder was not premeditated.

“I am living proof of what drugs can do to you. If it saves one kid, then maybe my dying is not in vain, this is the only positive thing I can do to try and help right a wrong,” he told the local paper.

Treesh is the 50th person executed in Ohio and the 1,324th in the United States since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, according to the Death Penalty Information Center. There are currently more than 3,000 people on death row in the United States.

- © AFP, 2013

  • Share on Facebook
  • Email this article
  •  

Read next:

Comments (76 Comments)

  • I don’t agree with the death penalty. And eye for an eye leaves everyone blind. I favour a system of harsh reality, where sentences are lengthy and would deter anyone from committing the crime. Prison should be hell, it should be a place where you never want to back. What does unease me, is that the Americans (As pointed out above) are the self appointed guardians of the world. Their record of upholding the law and human rights isn’t exactly number 1!

    Reply
    • Let me ask you this. If he had gotten life without possibility of parole. What then has he got to lose while in prison. He could kill as many people as he wished while serving that sentence (including Prison Officers) with the knowledge that he was not going to anymore time. Do you keep him in Solitary for the rest of his life?

      Reply
    • But there are plenty of people in prison for life without parole that don’t kill all the prison officers.
      I’m against the death penalty. But not on moral issues. I think life in jail would be much tougher sentence than a quick injection. I mean he is gonna die in jail anyway. No point in making it easy for him.

      Reply
    • Surely, the ‘eye for an eye’ proposition would leave the apprehended perpetrators of Crime monocular, as their victims, rather than completely blind?

      Of course, I suppose, metaphorically speaking, were one to visit a fest of eye gouging upon a hapless victim, rendering him or her profoundly blind, one might find oneself facing the supremely unpleasant prospect of bilateral enucleation, courtesy of the State.

      So, given the choice, say: ’8 years for an Eye’ or your eye? -Personally, I’d see you in Mountjoy, no pun intended!

      Reply
    • I regulary talk to American Officers. And they will tell you that someone doing life without possibility is 10 times more likely to commit a serious assault/murder than someone serving a fixed sentence. In our own Prisons we have stabbings, slashings and other assaults including sexual assaults on a daily basis. Its just that they are so common that media don’t bother to report them. And these are carried out by prisoners with fixed sentences!!

      Reply
  • I don’t agree with killing people.

    Reply
  • Majority of Ireland s national hero s were executed by a justice system that viewed them as morally corrupt and evil. Behan got it right in the quare fella.
    Not too long ago the flog em and hang em brigade executed thousands including children for crimes such as stealing bread . No doubt they sounded like the pro execution lobby above in their justifications. It neither lessened or eliminated the crimes. China has turned execution into an industry even recycling human organs and skin, so where do you want to draw this broad line ????

    Reply
  • An eye for an eye leaves everybody blind. The state of Ohio murdered this man. Regardless of what he did we should never take another life.
    He was out of his mind when he did what he did. The state wasn’t.
    We haven’t walked in this mans shoes.
    I’m not saying don’t punish.
    I’m saying don’t murder him.
    Well it is murder when it’s premeditated by the state.
    I know it won’t fit in with the ‘hang em high’ view but I think that view is the view of less evolved minds.

    Reply
  • I also dont agree with the death penalty. Too final in the case of mistakes being made, which they are all the time. All for chain gangs and harsher prisons with longer sentences though. That said every prisoner should have a toilet, slopping out is barbaric.

    Reply
  • how can someone argue that people who kill children do not deserve the death penalty? in Ireland you get 3 meals a day and sky tv, is that fair?

    Reply
  • mister 06/03/13 #

    It amazes me how America, the self-appointed (by politicians) moral guardian of the world continues with this practice of executing people. Yes I know that those (not always safely) convicted are typically the most evil dregs of humanity who should never enter society again. Personally I would have a very harsh approach as to the conditions of their detention for life. However, I just don’t believe that caging somebody for a decade or two with the ultimate aim of going through this primitive choreography that allows the state to ‘legally’ take a life is a correct or morally acceptable form of justice in the modern world. There are just so many things wrong about this. Any state or country that allows itself to continue such behaviour in the twenty-first century, no matter how humane and well-organised the procedure may be, is truly living in the past and cannot call itself either mature or properly developed.

    Reply
  • That fact that they still execute people proves that’s its not a deterrent. It’s right wing religious fuelled vengeance, nothing more!

    Reply
  • I can never really make up my mind on this one…???

    Reply
  • ONE WORD: MURDERERS!

    Reply
  • I’d like to see them suffer as well, but they don’t, they get short cushy punishments

    Reply
  • We could do with the death penalty here.

    Reply
  • I was reading about this recently and as many as 4% of those executed in the U.S are later acquitted. A disgusting practice.

    Reply
  • we need the death penal in Ireland. Money wasted on keeping people in prison who have no respect for life.

    Reply
  • Would all you that agree with the death penalty be willing to ” pull the trigger “? No you wouldn’t. You’d want someone else to do it for you.

    Reply
  • Killing someone will not erase your pain or memory of what happened. Anyone who says it does are in denial. We need to respond with discipline that has its root in love and reform. Nobody is ever beyond reformation. Because repaying evil with evil will only perpetuate the evil.

    Reply
    • You have obviously never been around some of the creatures I have to work with on a daily basis. You have no idea what true evil is until you have worked in a prison and seen it first hand. Some of these animals are not capable of reforming. Its like saying you can train a rabid dog. Not possible.

      Reply
    • John Lonergan was Governor of Mountjoy for many years and he absolutely would not share your view.
      Just because you work in the prisons doesn’t mean you have an evolved view on humanity. Perhaps your face is too close to the canvas to see the picture.

      Reply
    • I have heard John speak when I was on retreat once in Dublin. He is a very good speaker and I love his approach.

      Reply
    • @Stephen McElligott -I absolutely disagree with your statement that “nobody is ever beyond reformation”. That is not inconsistent with my belief in Christianity either. Some who commit heinous crimes fail to demonstrate remorse or repent for their crimes. Having considered all of the differing views, for me it would be as simple as this: If a criminal had committed a cold, calculated crime and refused to beg the mercy of the State -I’d hang ‘em high and I would step-up were I asked by the citizenry to do so.

      Yes, I would make it as easy as a demonstration of genuine remorse to avoid the noose. The State must be capable of balancing the scales of justice and extend mercy. Let God have his vengeance.

      The State has both the obligation & right to defend itself and all within it. Notwithstanding the above, the State should afford itself the recourse to the ultimate sanction, where necessary.

      No, executions should never be spectator sports nor used as opportunities for organ harvesting or profit of any kind, howsoever arising.

      Finally, I would see the role of Executor fall to Citizens as the role of Juror does now. Not something you can put your hand up to do nor necessarily avoid if your Country lawfully asks it of you.

      Reply
    • You obviously “enjoy” your job mick, and by being capable of taking a human life you are no better than those people you call animals.

      Reply
    • John Lonergon was an arsehole. We voted several times No Confidence in him. He was probably the worst Governor the the prison service ever had. I wouldn’t go go sticking him up as a Paragon of the Prison Service. Even his own fellow Governors detested him.

      Reply
    • Yes Martin I do like my job. And what’s more I am very good at it.

      Reply
  • Capital punishment is wrong…..because no matter how many righteous kills you can claim in the name of justice none of them can excuse the killing of just one innocent person and to err is human and our justice system is run by humans .

    Reply
  • Shouldn’t that read ‘ the state of Ohio killed a man who killed a security guard..?

    Reply
    • Regardless of what the headline states it’s a great result.. He killed an innocent guy out earning a living.. Another piece of dirt off the streets and no longer a strain on the system !!

      Reply
    • Deckav 07/03/13 #

      The death penalty is so so wrong. If we are so appalled at someone murdering someone else – what makes it right for the state to murder a prisoner.
      It will not bring the victim back to life. Let them spend their life in jail but – sending someone to their death is barbaric, archaic and inhumane.

      Reply
  • forget the death penalty or comfy prisons, why not set up a few gulags out in the west of Ireland. 50 years hard labour for any serious crimes. Ya don’t work ya don’t get fed. Simples.

    Reply
    • Great Idea Mark. But one problem. The bleeding heart brigade. Within a year your Gulag would have all the creature comforts. The would be screaming to the ECHR, the ICHR, Amnesty and anyone else that would listen. And the bottleless politicians would fold under pressure from the above organisations.

      Reply
    • Why not in Dublin? It sure is a hell out there. The West is the most beautiful place to be ;-)

      Reply
  • SA needs to also reinstate the death penalty..

    Reply
    • Maybe a bit if apartheid while you are at it? The country needs to progress, not go back to the dark ages.

      Reply
    • Seriously Sean? Fk apartheid.. I just got a email from my mother this morning to say that the home that she was staying in was attacked by two men, who were waiting and hiding in the bushes.. If my mother had been harmed or murdered, I would be happier enough to pull the lever and hang the bastards..

      Reply
    • By the way Sean, just so that you know that there are a lot of Black and White South Africans who want the death penalty re-instated. we are all tired of living in a country filled with corruption and murderers on a daily basis. You don’t live in SA.. Read about SA farm murders, read about how a young family were attacked 3 days ago , their 4 month baby girl was peppered sprayed and their 3 year old daughter had a gun held to her head whilst the rest of the savages robbed the family.. Or did you hear about a family whose husband and father of 42 years if age wad shot in the head at point blank range in front of his 11 Year old son.. Or how about another story? I can go on forever.. The list is endless… It just never ends and we are getting do sick and tired of having our family and friends live in this kind of environment!!!

      Reply
    • Debi. The do- gooders on her don’t want to hear any of that. The don’t want to admit that they got it wrong and SA is heading down the same road as Zimbabwe.

      Reply
    • Thx Mick.. It sure is a messed up world out there. I read your comments above and agree with what you say. It’s amazing how many people have an opinion about something regarding violence and yet have had no experience of witnessing it or having to deal with it first hand.

      Reply
  • Good for you man but I’d rather see them suffer for rest of their lives.

    Reply
  • its a pity the nanny eu court of human rights frowns on executions. why do we waste valuable resources on locking up dangerous individuals. public executions are what we need and charge admission. take the organs from these individuals and give them to people who need it

    Reply
    • Profiteering on executions, that couldn’t possibly lead to a miscarriage of justice.
      I am for one am glad that the Court of Human Rights keeps our law inline with those of the nations that have the highest standard of living on earth rather then nations like Iran (public executions) and China (executions for organ harvesting, often to order).

      Reply
    • @David Jordan another bleeding heart so called liberal. i do like your faith in humanity but i do think its a bit naive, the fact is that there are people out there who will hurt you if you allow them,

      Reply
    • @ Vincent Sweeney if someone is found guilty they are guilty. these people are not being locked up for stealing candy from a baby. they (the dangerous offenders) do not deserve your compassion and will use it against you

      Reply
    • Better a bleeding heart liberal then a jackbooted fascist who wishes to aline our laws with those of Iran and China and sell tickets to public executions like they do in Saudi Arabia.
      Frankly what turns be off any support for the death penalty is the bloodthirstiness of many of its supporters. Many of them seem to think themselves capable of killing with out hesitation or remorse.
      Supporters of execution promise us a massive decrease in violent crime, a decrease yet to materialize in those states that still practice capital punishment.

      Reply
    • That’s right Seamus, and as we are at it we could get nice black uniforms for everyone with a pretty ss symbol on the lapel and have mass rally’s before the public executions.

      Reply
    • @David Jordan a fascist!! there is a difference between being a fascist and protecting society from dangerous elements. would it suit your agenda to not punish anyone for anything ever. perhaps we can let all the rapists and murderers go free because it is a breech of their human rights to be incarcerated. or maybe the state can lay on prostitutes for prisoner because sex is a human right. tell me at what stage would you draw the line

      Reply
  • NO TO THE DEATH PENALTY.

    Reply
  • It took them 19 years from the crime to punishment and then they say ‘death sentence doesn’t work’. Of course it doesn’t work if the threat of punishment is not imminent.

    Reply
  • Hey Stevie, Eliminating vermin does not perpetuate evil

    Reply
  • This has turned out an argument for or against . But what about the people he killed parents without their children wives with husband s children without fathers , raped !
    If you cannot stay yourself taking drugs or drink then don’t take them that simple . Remorse of course there is remorse only ones with no remorse would be the criminal insane ,he had years to mull over what he had done like a child sitting on a naughty step , but he did not give his victims that did he ? The victims have a life sentence on them .
    I think we could make better use of these people rather then kill them but the human rights etc etc , it is easier and cheaper to kill them .

    Reply
  • Do they have Internet access in Arbour Hill ???

    Reply
  • Byran, It wouldn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out what type of person would put a red mark on that.

    Reply

Add New Comment