TheJournal.ie uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Click here to find out more »
Dublin: 6 °C Friday 24 May, 2013

French-led troops surround fabled Timbuktu

The move by French troops follows the seizure of the city’s airport.

French soldiers patrol in armored vehicles, in the outskirts of Sevare, Mali.
French soldiers patrol in armored vehicles, in the outskirts of Sevare, Mali.
Image: Thibault Camus/AP

FRENCH-LED TROOPS surrounded Mali’s fabled desert city of Timbuktu today after seizing its airport in a lightning advance against Islamists who have been driven from key northern strongholds.

French paratroopers swooped in to block any fleeing Islamists while ground troops coming from the south seized the airport in the ancient city which has been one of the bastions of the extremists who have controlled the north for 10 months. “We control the airport at Timbuktu,” a senior officer with the Malian army told AFP. “We did not encounter any resistance.”

French army spokesman Colonel Thierry Burkhard told AFP the troops, backed up by helicopters, had seized control of the so-called Niger Loop – the area alongside the curve of the Niger River flowing between Timbuktu and Gao – in less than 48 hours.

A fabled caravan town on the edge of the Sahara desert, Timbuktu was for centuries a key centre of Islamic learning and has become a byword for exotic remoteness in the Western imagination. The once cosmopolitan town became a dusty outpost for the extremists who forced women to wear veils, whipped and stoned those who violated their version of strict Islamic law, and destroyed ancient Muslim shrines they considered “idolatrous”.

A source in a reconnaissance team which first reached Timbuktu on Sunday said Malian and French troops had not yet entered the city, which had suffered destruction as the Islamists fled. “We are in town but we are not many. But the Islamists caused damages before leaving. They burned houses, and manuscripts. They beat people who were showing their joy.”

French troops welcomed

Residents fleeing Timbuktu were jubilant in the face of the French advance and denounced the regime the Islamists had imposed on them. “They beat us up when we smoked or listened to music,” said Amadou Alassane Mega, a young student. “They will have to pay for what they did to us.”

The advance into Timbuktu known as “the City of 333 Saints”, which lies 1,000 kilometres (600 miles) north of Mali’s capital Bamako, comes a day after French and Malian soldiers seized another Islamist bastion, the eastern town of Gao. The French defence ministry said a French armoured battalion, Malian troops and soldiers from Niger and Chad were in control of Gao after fighting Saturday in which “several terrorist groups were destroyed or chased to the north”.

French warplanes had carried out some 20 air strikes Saturday and yesterday in the Gao and Timbuktu regions, the ministry statement added.

Gao is the biggest of six towns seized by French and Malian troops since they launched their offensive on January 11 to wrest the vast desert north from the Islamists.

The largest town yet to be recaptured is Kidal further north near the Algerian border which was the first to be seized by an alliance of Tuareg rebels and Islamic extremists last year. Kidal is the home of renowned former Tuareg rebel Iyad Ag Ghaly, the leader of armed Islamist group Ansar Dine (Defenders of the Faith).

Mali’s lengthy crisis was kickstarted by a Tuareg rebellion for independence in January last year which overwhelmed the weak Malian army and prompted a coup in Bamako in March. Amid the political vacuum the Tuareg desert nomads and Islamists seized the north in a matter of days. But the extremists had no interest in the Tuareg desire for independence and quickly sidelined their erstwhile allies to install sharia law.

The occupation of an area twice the size of France sparked fears abroad that northern Mali could become a new haven for terror groups, threatening the West as well as neighbouring African countries. However plans to intervene remained mired in hesitation.

Seizure of Bamako

In early January the Islamists broke through into the government-held south, raising fears that the Islamists could seize the capital Bamako and prompting intervention by former colonial power France. At an African Union summit in Addis Ababa where leaders discussed increasing troop numbers for an African intervention force in Mali, outgoing chairman and Benin President Thomas Boni Yayi criticised the AU’s slow response.

France’s action, he said, was something “we should have done a long time ago to defend a member country”. Defence chiefs from West African regional grouping ECOWAS agreed Saturday to boost their troop pledges for Mali to 5,700. Chad, which is not a member of the 15-nation bloc, has promised an extra 2,000 soldiers.

France said yesterday it had now deployed 2,900 troops and that 2,700 African soldiers were on the ground in Mali and Niger, but French Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault appealed for more aid for the Mali effort.

In the central Mali town of Konna meanwhile, where France opened its offensive 17 days ago, local people showed journalists the graves of civilians killed in the air strikes. While Konna’s deputy mayor Demba Samouka insisted there was no precise death toll available, he said that at most four civilians had died in the air raids, blaming other civilian deaths on Islamist fighters.

- © AFP 2013.

Related: Mali conflict: Islamists offer hostage talks amid French offensive>

Read next:

Comments (22 Comments)

  • Let’s hope these Islamist bullies are routed for good.

    Reply
  • Viva LA France!

    Reply
  • I’m confused as to why the term ‘Islamists’ is used so many times in the article and only at one point ‘Islamists extremists’.

    Can we get a definition of Islamist from the author?

    It seems the term is too broad in the context that it is being used without being described.

    Reply
  • For once the French aren’t in retreat.

    Reply
    • At Dunkirk the Brits retreated and had to get rescued by fishermen…no mention of that eh.Took America,Britain AND Russia to stop Germany,all this French bashing is British tabloid nonsense.

      Reply
    • That’s a ridiculous response. The French capitulated and left britain alone. Anyone who minimises the British effort in the war hasn’t read their history. The British navy and airforce held off the German advance single handedly until the Germans invaded Russia. Had Britain been defeated there would have been a single eastern front and America would have faced a German Europe. Even if you can’t stand the British you can’t ignore their resolution and defiance which, they maintained solely for the preservation of freedom not imperialist ambition. Second World War is a stain on France’s history.

      Reply
    • Riobard, anyone who knows history knows about Dunkirk. I learnt about it in school. You must have been asleep.

      Reply
    • Joes comment was in relation to a specific incident not the entire war and my comment was the same.If you want an indepth critical analysis go read a book!

      Reply
    • A bit ironic. If you had read a book in the first place then this conversation never would happened.

      Reply
    • Riobaird, anyone who has learnt about WW2 knows about Dunkirk. It’s mentioned all the time in books, movies etc

      Reply
    • Pat, I see your writing idiotic comment out of your a***, some history and perspective would be welcome.
      When Germany invaded France they faced two armies that were quickly beaten (one of them was British btw). No other armies would have stand against Germany at that time. The Allies were badly organised and badly commanded (and were faced by very organised and efficient German troops), which doesn’t diminish the valour of the soldiers that lost there live during that battle and they don’t deserve your spit. The remaining of the French army hold seven division in the siege of Lille, just long enough to let the British escape across the channel. THAT channel did more to protect them from a German invasion than anything else.
      With more than half a million dead including more than 200,000 soldiers, if stain there is, it’s a huge blood stain that France paid, (like so many others nations in Europe).

      Reply
    • @Robert Mangan. What has Dunkirk got to do with Mali? You have a peculiar mindset. Anyway, It must be nice for you each morning as you wake and breathe in the Australian air…as you watch the flag fluttering in the breeze…with the Union Jack in the top corner. Knowing that Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, Queen of Australia and Her other Realms and Territories, Head of the Commonwealth is your Head of State. Irony much?

      Reply
    • My spit? I had no intention of in any point in my argument of disrespecting the lives of the soldiers that fought. I was arguing against undermining the role Britain played in the Second World War and how close the world came to Being under nazi hegemony.

      The French do have a stain on their history in this war and through no fault of their men at arms. If memory serves there was an agreement between Great Britain and the French government that neither country would surrender without the other. Even a Anglo franco union was proposed. Churchill was promised that France would never surrender only to do so promptly once things turned ugly. French had the second/third biggest navy in the world and her colonial empire and could have fought in exile like so many other European nations. Instead she surrendered and organised a Vichy government effectively forcing GB to sink her fleet whilst it lay in docks. The stain on French history is not the action of its soldiers but of its government in surrendering.

      I agree that Britain’s island isolation was its greatest strategic advantage but to me Germany circumventing the Maginot line was the biggest fundamental co@k up in military history.

      I sound like I’m preaching and that was not my intention but Britain’s role in the Second World War should never be marginalised and that comment infuriated me.

      Reply
    • Has Dunkirk moved to Mali?

      Reply
    • Throughout history the French have actually won the most wars.

      Reply
    • That’s true, and Liverpool are historically the most successful team in England. Historically being the key word there.

      Reply
  • Great to see comedy is alive and well on this site.

    Reply
  • bigmac 28/01/13 #

    Have a friend who was a merc in south america in the 70s and all the shit that is going on in africa is still the same, the old colonial powers are trying to secure the resources (be it gold or oil) so use any excuse to send the army in, then once it leaves the mercs stay on to ensure the agreements are kept, so take a second look at whats happening now in africa, middle east and south america

    Reply
  • ‘Mali the Musical’.
    coming to web site near you!!!

    Reply

Add New Comment